structuration-theory

Structuration Theory

Structuration Theory, developed by Anthony Giddens, explores the interplay of social structure and individual agency. It introduces the duality of structure, emphasizing their interdependence. Key concepts include structure (social rules) and agency (individual capacity). Norms, rules, and resources constitute its components. The theory enhances understanding but may be challenging due to complexity. It has implications for social change and finds application in organizational studies.

Understanding Structuration Theory:

What is Structuration Theory?

Structuration Theory, developed by Anthony Giddens in the late 1970s, is a sociological framework that seeks to understand the interplay between structure and agency in shaping human behavior within social systems. It focuses on how individuals both reproduce and transform social structures through their actions, creating a dynamic feedback loop between the two.

Key Concepts of Structuration Theory:

  1. Structure: Refers to the enduring patterns and rules that govern social systems, including institutions, norms, and power relations.
  2. Agency: Represents individual actions and decisions that influence and are influenced by social structures.
  3. Duality of Structure: This central concept emphasizes that structure and agency are not separate but intertwined elements, shaping and being shaped by one another.

Why Structuration Theory Matters:

Understanding the significance of Structuration Theory is essential for grasping the complexity of social systems, including organizations, communities, and societies. It sheds light on how human behavior both maintains and transforms the structures that define our lives.

The Impact of Structuration Theory:

  • Social Change: Structuration Theory helps explain how societal change occurs through the actions of individuals and groups.
  • Organizational Behavior: It provides insights into the dynamics of organizations and how they adapt to changing circumstances.

Benefits of Structuration Theory:

  • Improved Decision-Making: By recognizing the dual influence of structure and agency, individuals can make more informed choices.
  • Effective Change Management: Organizations can use Structuration Theory to understand and manage change processes.

Challenges in Applying Structuration Theory:

  • Complexity: Analyzing the interplay between structure and agency can be challenging due to the multifaceted nature of social systems.
  • Interpretation: The interpretation of structures and agency can vary, leading to different conclusions.

Characteristics:

  • Duality of Structure: The central characteristic of Structuration Theory is the notion of the duality of structure. This means that social structures (such as rules and norms) are not external constraints but are produced and reproduced through the actions of individuals. At the same time, individuals’ actions are shaped by these social structures. It highlights the inseparable relationship between structure and agency.

Key Concepts:

  • Structure: In Structuration Theory, structure refers to the rules, norms, and resources that guide and constrain human behavior within a social context. Structures are not fixed but are constantly being shaped and reshaped by human actions. They provide the framework within which individuals make choices and act.
  • Agency: Agency represents the capacity of individuals to act independently and make choices. It’s the ability of individuals to exercise their own will and make decisions. In the context of Structuration Theory, agency is not seen as separate from structure but as intertwined with it. Individuals’ agency is both enabled and constrained by social structures.

Components:

  • Norms: Norms are shared social expectations and standards of behavior within a society or a social group. They define what is considered appropriate or acceptable behavior. In Structuration Theory, norms are a key component of social structure and influence how individuals behave.
  • Rules: Rules are explicit guidelines or regulations that govern social practices. They provide a more formalized framework for behavior within a given context. Rules can be written or unwritten and play a crucial role in shaping human actions.
  • Resources: Resources in the context of Structuration Theory refer to the means available to individuals that enable them to act within a social structure. Resources can be tangible (e.g., financial resources) or intangible (e.g., knowledge or social connections). They influence an individual’s ability to exercise agency.

Benefits:

  • Understanding Behavior: One of the primary benefits of Structuration Theory is that it offers a framework for understanding how social structures and individual agency interact to shape human behavior. It provides insights into why people act the way they do within social contexts.

Challenges:

  • Complexity: Structuration Theory can be complex and abstract, making it challenging to apply in practical situations. Its emphasis on the interplay between structure and agency requires a nuanced understanding of social phenomena.

Implications:

  • Social Change: The theory has significant implications for understanding social change. It suggests that changes in social structures occur as a result of shifts in individual and collective actions. This insight is valuable for studying how societies evolve over time.

Applications:

  • Organizational Studies: Structuration Theory is applied in fields like organizational studies to analyze how organizations function and how they are influenced by both their internal structures and the agency of employees. It helps explain how organizations adapt to changing circumstances.

Case Studies

1. Social Media Usage:

  • Structure: Social media platforms have specific rules and norms regarding content sharing and engagement.
  • Agency: Users have the agency to create and share content within these platforms.
  • Example: Users follow platform rules (structure) while expressing their opinions and sharing content (agency) on social media.

2. Workplace Behavior:

  • Structure: Organizations have established norms, rules, and hierarchies governing employee behavior.
  • Agency: Employees have the agency to make decisions and perform tasks within the organizational structure.
  • Example: Employees adhere to company policies (structure) while exercising their creativity and problem-solving skills (agency) at work.

3. Political Activism:

  • Structure: Political movements often have established ideologies and strategies.
  • Agency: Activists have the agency to choose how they participate in the movement and contribute to its goals.
  • Example: Activists may follow a movement’s principles (structure) while creatively organizing protests or using social media (agency) to promote their cause.

4. Family Dynamics:

  • Structure: Families have established roles and norms for members.
  • Agency: Family members have the agency to make decisions and interact within the family structure.
  • Example: Children follow family rules (structure) while expressing their individuality and making choices (agency) within the family.

5. Educational Institutions:

  • Structure: Schools have established curricula, rules, and grading systems.
  • Agency: Students have the agency to choose their courses, study methods, and extracurricular activities.
  • Example: Students navigate the educational system (structure) while making choices (agency) about their academic paths.

6. Environmental Conservation:

  • Structure: Environmental organizations have established guidelines and missions.
  • Agency: Members have the agency to decide how they contribute to conservation efforts.
  • Example: Members align with the organization’s goals (structure) while using their unique skills and ideas (agency) to support conservation initiatives.

7. Online Communities:

  • Structure: Online forums and communities have rules for participation and content sharing.
  • Agency: Members have the agency to engage in discussions and contribute to the community.
  • Example: Users follow community guidelines (structure) while expressing their opinions and sharing information (agency) within online communities.

Key Highlights

  • Duality of Structure: Structuration Theory, developed by Anthony Giddens, centers around the concept of the duality of structure. It posits that social structures and individual agency are not separate but are interdependent and mutually constitutive.
  • Structure: Social structures encompass rules, norms, and resources that shape human behavior within a social context. These structures provide the framework within which individuals make choices and act.
  • Agency: Agency refers to the capacity of individuals to act independently, make choices, and exercise their own will. In Structuration Theory, agency is not seen as separate from structure but as intertwined with it.
  • Components: The theory identifies key components, including norms (shared social expectations), rules (explicit guidelines), and resources (means available to individuals), which constitute the elements of social structures.
  • Understanding Behavior: One of the primary benefits of Structuration Theory is its capacity to enhance our understanding of how social structures and individual agency interact to shape human behavior. It offers a framework for studying why people act as they do within social contexts.
  • Complexity: Structuration Theory can be conceptually complex, requiring a nuanced understanding of the interplay between structure and agency. This complexity can pose challenges in its practical application.
  • Implications for Social Change: The theory has significant implications for understanding social change. It suggests that changes in social structures occur as a result of shifts in individual and collective actions, offering insights into how societies evolve over time.
  • Applications: Structuration Theory finds applications in various fields, including organizational studies, sociology, political science, and communication. It helps researchers and practitioners analyze how structures and agency influence behavior and outcomes in these contexts.

Read Next: Communication Cycle, Encoding, Communication Models, Organizational Structure.

Read Next: Lasswell Communication Model, Linear Model Of Communication.

Connected Communication Models

Aristotle’s Model of Communication

aristotle-model-of-communication
The Aristotle model of communication is a linear model with a focus on public speaking. The Aristotle model of communication was developed by Greek philosopher and orator Aristotle, who proposed the linear model to demonstrate the importance of the speaker and their audience during communication

Communication Cycle

linear-model-of-communication
The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.

Berlo’s SMCR Model

berlos-smcr-model
Berlo’s SMCR model was created by American communication theorist David Berlo in 1960, who expanded the Shannon-Weaver model of communication into clear and distinct parts. Berlo’s SMCR model is a one-way or linear communication framework based on the Shannon-Weaver communication model.

Helical Model of Communication

helical-model-of-communication
The helical model of communication is a framework inspired by the three-dimensional spring-like curve of a helix. It argues communication is cyclical, continuous, non-repetitive, accumulative, and influenced by time and experience.

Lasswell Communication Model

lasswell-communication-model
The Lasswell communication model is a linear framework for explaining the communication process through segmentation. Lasswell proposed media propaganda performs three social functions: surveillance, correlation, and transmission. Lasswell believed the media could impact what viewers believed about the information presented.

Modus Tollens

modus-tollens
Modus tollens is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference used to make conclusions of arguments and sets of arguments.  Modus tollens argues that if P is true then Q is also true. However, P is false. Therefore Q is also false. Modus tollens as an inference rule dates back to late antiquity where it was taught as part of Aristotelian logic. The first person to describe the rule in detail was Theophrastus, successor to Aristotle in the Peripatetic school.

Five Cannons of Rhetoric

five-canons-of-rhetoric
The five canons of rhetoric were first organized by Roman philosopher Cicero in his treatise De Inventione in around 84 BC. Some 150 years later, Roman rhetorician Quintilian explored each of the five canons in more depth as part of his 12-volume textbook entitled Institutio Oratoria. The work helped the five canons become a major component of rhetorical education well into the medieval period. The five canons of rhetoric comprise a system for understanding powerful and effective communication.

Communication Strategy

communication-strategy-framework
A communication strategy framework clarifies how businesses should communicate with their employees, investors, customers, and suppliers. Some of the key elements of an effective communication strategy move around purpose, background, objectives, target audience, messaging, and approach.

Noise if Communication

noise-in-communication
Noise is any factor that interferes with or impedes effective communication between a sender and receiver. When noise disrupts the communication process or prevents the transmission of information, it is said to be communication noise.

7 Cs of Communication

7-cs-of-communication
The 7Cs of communication is a set of guiding principles on effective communication skills in business, moving around seven principles for effective business communication: clear, concise, concrete, correct, complete, coherent, and courteous.

Transactional Model of Communication

transactional-model-of-communication
The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.

Horizontal Communication

horizontal-communication
Horizontal communication, often referred to as lateral communication, is communication that occurs between people at the same organizational level. In this context, communication describes any information that is transmitted between individuals, teams, departments, divisions, or units.

Communication Apprehension

communication-apprehension
Communication apprehension is a measure of the degree of anxiety someone feels in response to real (or anticipated) communication with another person or people.

Closed-Loop Communication

closed-loop-communication
Closed-loop communication is a simple but effective technique used to avoid misunderstandings during the communication process. Here, the person receiving information repeats it back to the sender to ensure they have understood the message correctly. 

Grapevine In Communication

grapevine-in-communication
Grapevine communication describes informal, unstructured, workplace dialogue between employees and superiors. It was first described in the early 1800s after someone observed that the appearance of telegraph wires strung between transmission poles resembled a grapevine.

ASE Model

ase-model
The ASE model posits that human behavior can be predicted if one studies the intention behind the behavior. It was created by health communication expert Hein de Vries in 1988. The ASE model believes intention and behavior are determined by cognitive variables such as attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. The model also believes that intention predicts behavior such that one’s attitude toward a behavior is influenced by the consequences of that behavior. Three cognitive variables are the primary determinants of whether the intention to perform a new behavior was sustained: attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. Various external variables also influence these factors.

Integrated Marketing Communication

integrated-marketing-communication
Integrated marketing communication (IMC) is an approach used by businesses to coordinate and brand their communication strategies. Integrated marketing communication takes separate marketing functions and combines them into one, interconnected approach with a core brand message that is consistent across various channels. These encompass owned, earned, and paid media. Integrated marketing communication has been used to great effect by companies such as Snapchat, Snickers, and Domino’s.

Social Penetration Theory

social-penetration-theory
Social penetration theory was developed by fellow psychologists Dalmas Taylor and Irwin Altman in their 1973 article Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Social penetration theory (SPT) posits that as a relationship develops, shallow and non-intimate communication evolves and becomes deeper and more intimate.

Hypodermic Needle

hypodermic-needle-theory
The hypodermic needle theory was first proposed by communication theorist Harold Lasswell in his 1927 book Propaganda Technique in the World War. The hypodermic needle theory is a communication model suggesting media messages are inserted into the brains of passive audiences.

7-38-55 Rule

7-38-55-rule
The 7-38-55 rule was created by University of California psychology professor Albert Mehrabian and mentioned in his book Silent Messages.  The 7-38-55 rule describes the multi-faceted way in which people communicate emotions, claiming that 7% of communication occurred via spoken word, 38% through tone of voice, and the remaining 55% through body language.

Active Listening

active-listening
Active listening is the process of listening attentively while someone speaks and displaying understanding through verbal and non-verbal techniques. Active listening is a fundamental part of good communication, fostering a positive connection and building trust between individuals.

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA