Agenda-Setting Theory

Agenda-Setting Theory, developed by Gerbner and Gross, posits that media set the agenda by highlighting specific issues, influencing what the public perceives as important. It distinguishes between the media agenda and public agenda. While media can shape public opinion and political campaigns seek media coverage, critics argue about selective exposure and limited effects.

Defining Agenda-Setting Theory

Agenda-Setting Theory posits that the media have the power to not only tell people what to think but also what to think about. In other words, media organizations, through their coverage choices and editorial decisions, can influence which issues, topics, and events gain prominence in the public’s consciousness. The theory suggests that the media’s ability to set the agenda of public discourse plays a pivotal role in shaping public opinion and policy priorities.

Key to this theory is the concept of agenda building. Agenda building involves the media’s selection and highlighting of certain issues while downplaying or ignoring others. Through repeated coverage, the media can elevate particular issues to the forefront of public attention, thereby making them more salient in the minds of the audience.

Key Concepts of Agenda-Setting Theory

To understand Agenda-Setting Theory more comprehensively, let’s explore its key concepts:

1. Agenda-Setting Function:

The core premise of the theory is that the media have an agenda-setting function, meaning they influence which topics and issues are considered important by the public. This function is based on the idea that people rely on the media to learn about the world, and the media’s choices in reporting shape their perceptions of reality.

2. First-Level Agenda Setting:

First-level agenda setting refers to the media’s ability to influence the importance attributed to specific issues. When the media consistently cover a particular topic, people are more likely to perceive it as significant. This can lead to heightened public awareness and concern about the issue.

3. Second-Level Agenda Setting:

Second-level agenda setting extends the theory to include how the media influence the attributes and aspects of issues that the public considers important. It’s not just about what issues are covered but also how those issues are framed and presented. For example, the media can frame an economic crisis as a result of government mismanagement or as a consequence of global market forces, influencing public perceptions and potential policy responses.

4. Agenda Cutting:

Agenda cutting occurs when the media decide to discontinue coverage of an issue or shift their attention to other topics. This can result in issues losing their prominence in public discourse, even if they were previously considered important.

5. Gatekeeping:

Gatekeeping refers to the role of media professionals, such as editors and journalists, in deciding which stories make it into the news and how they are presented. These gatekeepers play a crucial role in shaping the media agenda.

Practical Applications of Agenda-Setting Theory

Agenda-Setting Theory has significant practical applications in various domains, including journalism, public relations, politics, and advocacy. Here are some ways in which the theory is applied in real-world scenarios:

1. Newsroom Decision-Making:

In newsrooms, editors and journalists use Agenda-Setting Theory to determine which stories to cover prominently and which to prioritize. Understanding what issues are likely to resonate with the audience helps shape news coverage.

2. Political Communication:

Political candidates and parties utilize Agenda-Setting Theory to craft their messaging and campaign strategies. They seek to frame issues in ways that align with their priorities and values, recognizing that media coverage can influence voters’ perceptions.

3. Public Relations:

Organizations and businesses employ Agenda-Setting Theory to manage their public image and reputation. They work to ensure that their key messages and initiatives receive media attention and are framed positively.

4. Advocacy and Activism:

Advocacy groups and activists use the theory to identify which issues to prioritize in their campaigns. By understanding how media coverage can elevate certain topics, they can strategically engage with the media to advance their causes.

Relevance in Today’s Media Landscape

In today’s digital age, the media landscape has evolved significantly with the advent of the internet, social media, and user-generated content. While these developments have expanded the sources of information and diversified the voices in the media landscape, Agenda-Setting Theory remains highly relevant. Here’s why:

1. Digital Media Gatekeeping:

Although anyone can publish content online, algorithms and news aggregators on digital platforms still function as gatekeepers, determining which stories and topics gain visibility. Understanding digital gatekeeping is essential for those seeking to influence public discourse.

2. Virality and Trending Topics:

Social media platforms have the power to amplify certain issues and make them go viral, effectively setting their agenda. The speed at which topics can gain prominence online highlights the continued influence of the media in shaping public discussions.

3. Polarization and Fragmentation:

In an era of media polarization, different news outlets and social media echo chambers may set different agendas for their respective audiences. This fragmentation underscores the need to consider multiple media sources and perspectives when analyzing agenda-setting processes.

4. Fact-Checking and Misinformation:

Agenda-Setting Theory is relevant in the context of fact-checking and countering misinformation. Understanding how false or misleading information can gain prominence in the media agenda is crucial for promoting accuracy and transparency.


Agenda-Setting Theory remains a fundamental framework for understanding the media’s role in shaping public perception and policy priorities. It emphasizes that the media’s choices in reporting and framing issues can have a profound impact on what people consider important and how they perceive the world around them. In an age of information abundance and digital communication, the theory’s core principles continue to apply, albeit in new and evolving ways. Recognizing the agenda-setting power of the media is essential for media professionals, policymakers, advocates, and individuals seeking to navigate the complex and dynamic landscape of public discourse. By understanding how issues are brought to the forefront of public attention, we gain insights into the dynamics of influence and the forces that shape our collective understanding of the world.

Key Highlights

  • Agenda-Setting Theory: Developed by Gerbner and Gross, this mass communication theory focuses on how media outlets influence public perceptions by setting the agenda for what issues are considered important.
  • Characteristics: Agenda-Setting Theory highlights the role of media in shaping public agendas, emphasizing the distinction between the media agenda and the public agenda.
  • Agenda-Setting Function: Media organizations set agendas by choosing which topics to cover prominently, prompting public attention to those issues.
  • Media Influence: The theory suggests that media can influence public opinion and policy by framing issues prominently in their coverage.
  • Political Campaigns: Political candidates and campaigns actively seek media coverage to shape the political agenda and sway voter perceptions.
  • Criticisms: Critics point out limitations, including selective exposure by audiences and the theory’s potential to overstate the media’s influence.
  • Applications: Agenda-Setting Theory has practical applications in media strategy, with organizations and individuals using media to set agendas and influence public perception on various issues. It also underscores the importance of news framing by media outlets in shaping public discourse and policy discussions.

Connected Communication Models

Aristotle’s Model of Communication

The Aristotle model of communication is a linear model with a focus on public speaking. The Aristotle model of communication was developed by Greek philosopher and orator Aristotle, who proposed the linear model to demonstrate the importance of the speaker and their audience during communication

Communication Cycle

The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.

Berlo’s SMCR Model

Berlo’s SMCR model was created by American communication theorist David Berlo in 1960, who expanded the Shannon-Weaver model of communication into clear and distinct parts. Berlo’s SMCR model is a one-way or linear communication framework based on the Shannon-Weaver communication model.

Helical Model of Communication

The helical model of communication is a framework inspired by the three-dimensional spring-like curve of a helix. It argues communication is cyclical, continuous, non-repetitive, accumulative, and influenced by time and experience.

Lasswell Communication Model

The Lasswell communication model is a linear framework for explaining the communication process through segmentation. Lasswell proposed media propaganda performs three social functions: surveillance, correlation, and transmission. Lasswell believed the media could impact what viewers believed about the information presented.

Modus Tollens

Modus tollens is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference used to make conclusions of arguments and sets of arguments.  Modus tollens argues that if P is true then Q is also true. However, P is false. Therefore Q is also false. Modus tollens as an inference rule dates back to late antiquity where it was taught as part of Aristotelian logic. The first person to describe the rule in detail was Theophrastus, successor to Aristotle in the Peripatetic school.

Five Cannons of Rhetoric

The five canons of rhetoric were first organized by Roman philosopher Cicero in his treatise De Inventione in around 84 BC. Some 150 years later, Roman rhetorician Quintilian explored each of the five canons in more depth as part of his 12-volume textbook entitled Institutio Oratoria. The work helped the five canons become a major component of rhetorical education well into the medieval period. The five canons of rhetoric comprise a system for understanding powerful and effective communication.

Communication Strategy

A communication strategy framework clarifies how businesses should communicate with their employees, investors, customers, and suppliers. Some of the key elements of an effective communication strategy move around purpose, background, objectives, target audience, messaging, and approach.

Noise if Communication

Noise is any factor that interferes with or impedes effective communication between a sender and receiver. When noise disrupts the communication process or prevents the transmission of information, it is said to be communication noise.

7 Cs of Communication

The 7Cs of communication is a set of guiding principles on effective communication skills in business, moving around seven principles for effective business communication: clear, concise, concrete, correct, complete, coherent, and courteous.

Transactional Model of Communication

The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.

Horizontal Communication

Horizontal communication, often referred to as lateral communication, is communication that occurs between people at the same organizational level. In this context, communication describes any information that is transmitted between individuals, teams, departments, divisions, or units.

Communication Apprehension

Communication apprehension is a measure of the degree of anxiety someone feels in response to real (or anticipated) communication with another person or people.

Closed-Loop Communication

Closed-loop communication is a simple but effective technique used to avoid misunderstandings during the communication process. Here, the person receiving information repeats it back to the sender to ensure they have understood the message correctly. 

Grapevine In Communication

Grapevine communication describes informal, unstructured, workplace dialogue between employees and superiors. It was first described in the early 1800s after someone observed that the appearance of telegraph wires strung between transmission poles resembled a grapevine.

ASE Model

The ASE model posits that human behavior can be predicted if one studies the intention behind the behavior. It was created by health communication expert Hein de Vries in 1988. The ASE model believes intention and behavior are determined by cognitive variables such as attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. The model also believes that intention predicts behavior such that one’s attitude toward a behavior is influenced by the consequences of that behavior. Three cognitive variables are the primary determinants of whether the intention to perform a new behavior was sustained: attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. Various external variables also influence these factors.

Integrated Marketing Communication

Integrated marketing communication (IMC) is an approach used by businesses to coordinate and brand their communication strategies. Integrated marketing communication takes separate marketing functions and combines them into one, interconnected approach with a core brand message that is consistent across various channels. These encompass owned, earned, and paid media. Integrated marketing communication has been used to great effect by companies such as Snapchat, Snickers, and Domino’s.

Social Penetration Theory

Social penetration theory was developed by fellow psychologists Dalmas Taylor and Irwin Altman in their 1973 article Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Social penetration theory (SPT) posits that as a relationship develops, shallow and non-intimate communication evolves and becomes deeper and more intimate.

Hypodermic Needle

The hypodermic needle theory was first proposed by communication theorist Harold Lasswell in his 1927 book Propaganda Technique in the World War. The hypodermic needle theory is a communication model suggesting media messages are inserted into the brains of passive audiences.

7-38-55 Rule

The 7-38-55 rule was created by University of California psychology professor Albert Mehrabian and mentioned in his book Silent Messages.  The 7-38-55 rule describes the multi-faceted way in which people communicate emotions, claiming that 7% of communication occurred via spoken word, 38% through tone of voice, and the remaining 55% through body language.

Active Listening

Active listening is the process of listening attentively while someone speaks and displaying understanding through verbal and non-verbal techniques. Active listening is a fundamental part of good communication, fostering a positive connection and building trust between individuals.

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top