threat-of-new-entrants

Threat of New Entrants

The threat of new entrants is a fundamental element of competitive strategy. It assesses the ease or difficulty with which new businesses can enter a particular industry and compete with established players. A high threat of new entrants suggests that it is relatively easy for new companies to penetrate the market, while a low threat indicates significant barriers that deter potential entrants.

The level of threat of new entrants is influenced by various factors, including market conditions, regulatory environment, economies of scale, and brand loyalty. By analyzing these factors, businesses can better anticipate competitive challenges and formulate strategies to protect their market position.

Determinants of the Threat of New Entrants

Several key determinants contribute to the threat of new entrants in an industry. These determinants vary across different sectors and markets but generally include the following:

  1. Economies of Scale: Industries characterized by economies of scale often have higher barriers to entry. Existing firms can produce goods or services at lower average costs due to their size and production efficiency. New entrants may struggle to achieve similar cost advantages.
  2. Capital Requirements: The amount of capital needed to start and operate a business in a particular industry can be a significant barrier to entry. Capital-intensive industries, such as manufacturing or telecommunications, may deter potential entrants.
  3. Technological Advancements: Rapid technological changes can either facilitate or hinder new entrants. In some cases, emerging technologies make it easier for startups to enter markets and disrupt established players. Conversely, industries with complex or proprietary technologies may have higher barriers.
  4. Access to Distribution Channels: Established firms often have well-established distribution networks and relationships with distributors, retailers, or customers. New entrants may struggle to secure access to these channels, limiting their market reach.
  5. Regulatory Environment: Regulatory requirements, licenses, permits, and compliance costs can significantly impact the threat of new entrants. Industries subject to strict government regulations may discourage potential startups.
  6. Brand Loyalty: Strong brand loyalty can be a formidable barrier to entry. Customers who are loyal to existing brands may be resistant to trying new products or services from unfamiliar entrants.
  7. Switching Costs: High switching costs for customers can create a barrier to entry. If customers would incur significant expenses or inconveniences when switching from one provider to another, new entrants may struggle to attract customers.
  8. Network Effects: Industries with network effects, where the value of a product or service increases with the number of users, can be challenging for new entrants. Established firms benefit from existing user bases, making it difficult for newcomers to compete.
  9. Government Policy: Government policies, trade barriers, and protectionist measures can either encourage or hinder new entrants. Favorable policies may facilitate entry, while restrictions can act as barriers.

Strategies to Address the Threat of New Entrants

To mitigate the threat of new entrants, established businesses can employ various strategies:

  1. Economies of Scale: Capitalize on existing economies of scale by continuously improving operational efficiency and cost management. This can make it more challenging for new entrants to achieve cost parity.
  2. Brand Loyalty: Invest in branding, marketing, and customer loyalty programs to strengthen brand recognition and customer retention. Building strong customer relationships can make it difficult for new entrants to lure away existing customers.
  3. Product Differentiation: Develop unique products or services that provide added value to customers. Creating a differentiated offering can help retain customer loyalty and reduce the appeal of new entrants.
  4. Exclusive Contracts: Establish exclusive contracts or agreements with suppliers, distributors, or key partners. These arrangements can limit the access of new entrants to critical resources.
  5. Network Effects: Leverage existing network effects to reinforce customer loyalty. Expanding the user base or ecosystem can create a self-reinforcing cycle that deters new entrants.
  6. Patents and Intellectual Property: Protect intellectual property through patents, trademarks, or copyrights. Intellectual property rights can provide legal barriers to entry.
  7. Cost Leadership: Focus on achieving and maintaining cost leadership within the industry. Being the low-cost provider can make it difficult for new entrants to compete on price.
  8. Strategic Alliances: Form strategic alliances or partnerships with other firms in the industry to share resources and create barriers to entry.

Real-World Examples of the Threat of New Entrants

To illustrate the concept of the threat of new entrants, consider the following real-world examples:

  1. Automobile Manufacturing: The automobile industry has high barriers to entry due to the enormous capital requirements for research, development, and manufacturing. Established companies benefit from economies of scale, brand loyalty, and extensive distribution networks. New entrants, such as Tesla, faced significant challenges and required substantial investment to compete.
  2. Social Media: Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have high network effects. As more users join these platforms, their value increases. This makes it difficult for new social media startups to compete because they lack an established user base.
  3. Telecommunications: The telecommunications industry is heavily regulated, and obtaining licenses and spectrum rights is costly and complex. Established telecom companies have significant infrastructure investments and long-term contracts with customers, creating high barriers to entry.
  4. Pharmaceuticals: The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by extensive research and development costs, strict regulatory requirements, and patent protection. New pharmaceutical companies often face a lengthy and costly journey to bring new drugs to market.

Conclusion

The threat of new entrants is a fundamental aspect of competitive dynamics within an industry. Businesses must assess and address this threat to maintain their market positions and profitability. Understanding the determinants of the threat of new entrants and implementing effective strategies can help established firms protect their competitive advantage. Conversely, entrepreneurs and new entrants should consider these factors when evaluating the feasibility of entering a particular market and devise strategies to overcome barriers to entry. By navigating this competitive force effectively, businesses can adapt to changing market conditions and enhance their long-term sustainability.

Key Highlights:

  • Significance of Threat of New Entrants: Recognizing the level of threat posed by potential new entrants is crucial for businesses to anticipate competitive challenges and protect their market positions effectively.
  • Determinants of Threat: Various factors contribute to the threat of new entrants, including economies of scale, capital requirements, technological advancements, access to distribution channels, regulatory environment, brand loyalty, switching costs, network effects, and government policy.
  • Strategies to Mitigate Threat: Established businesses can implement strategies such as leveraging economies of scale, building brand loyalty, differentiating products or services, securing exclusive contracts, leveraging network effects, protecting intellectual property, focusing on cost leadership, forming strategic alliances, and more to mitigate the threat of new entrants.
  • Real-World Examples: Examples from industries like automobile manufacturing, social media, telecommunications, and pharmaceuticals highlight how high barriers to entry, network effects, regulatory complexities, and significant capital requirements deter new entrants and favor established players.
  • Conclusion: Understanding the determinants of the threat of new entrants and implementing effective strategies to address it are essential for businesses to maintain their competitive advantage and long-term sustainability in dynamic markets. Both established firms and potential new entrants should carefully evaluate market conditions and devise strategies accordingly to navigate this competitive force.

Alternative Frameworks

FrameworkDescriptionKey Features
Porter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Five Forces is a framework for analyzing the competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry. It examines five key factors: 1) Threat of new entrants, 2) Bargaining power of buyers, 3) Bargaining power of suppliers, 4) Threat of substitute products or services, and 5) Intensity of competitive rivalry.– Provides a structured framework for analyzing the competitive dynamics of an industry. – Identifies key factors influencing industry profitability and attractiveness. – Helps organizations develop strategies to navigate competitive forces and sustain competitive advantage.
SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis is a strategic planning tool that assesses an organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. It helps identify strategic factors affecting the organization’s performance and competitive position, enabling the formulation of strategies that leverage strengths, mitigate weaknesses, capitalize on opportunities, and address threats.– Assesses internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. – Provides a comprehensive overview of the organization’s strategic position and environment. – Facilitates strategy formulation by identifying factors that impact organizational performance and competitiveness.
PESTLE AnalysisPESTLE Analysis is a strategic tool for analyzing the external macro-environmental factors affecting an organization. It examines six key dimensions: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. PESTLE analysis helps organizations understand the broader contextual factors influencing their operations and strategies, enabling proactive response and adaptation to changes in the external environment.– Analyzes macro-environmental factors impacting organizations across political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental dimensions. – Provides insights into external factors that may affect organizational performance and competitiveness. – Guides strategic decision-making and risk management by anticipating changes in the external environment.
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain Analysis is a strategic framework for assessing an organization’s internal activities and processes to identify sources of competitive advantage. It involves analyzing primary and support activities along the value chain to determine areas where value can be added or costs reduced, thereby enhancing overall organizational performance and competitiveness.– Examines an organization’s internal activities to identify sources of competitive advantage. – Distinguishes between primary activities directly involved in creating value and support activities that facilitate primary functions. – Helps organizations optimize their value chain activities to improve efficiency, quality, and customer value proposition.
Blue Ocean StrategyBlue Ocean Strategy is a strategic approach that focuses on creating new market spaces or “blue oceans” by innovating and offering unique value propositions that differentiate organizations from competitors. It encourages organizations to move away from competing in overcrowded “red ocean” markets characterized by intense competition and instead seek uncontested market spaces ripe for growth and innovation.– Emphasizes creating new market spaces with uncontested market demand and minimal competition. – Encourages organizations to innovate and differentiate their offerings to create unique value propositions. – Shifts focus from competing in existing markets to creating new market spaces through innovation and value creation.
Balanced ScorecardThe Balanced Scorecard is a strategic performance management framework that translates an organization’s vision and strategy into a set of balanced objectives and performance measures across four perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Business Processes, and Learning and Growth. It aligns organizational activities and initiatives with strategic objectives to drive performance and achieve long-term success.– Translates organizational strategy into balanced objectives and performance measures across key perspectives. – Aligns performance management and measurement with strategic goals and priorities. – Facilitates communication and alignment of organizational activities with strategic objectives.
Scenario PlanningScenario Planning is a strategic foresight technique that involves creating and analyzing multiple plausible future scenarios to anticipate uncertainties and prepare organizations for different possible outcomes. It enables organizations to identify potential risks, opportunities, and strategic challenges, allowing for proactive decision-making and strategic adaptation in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment.– Anticipates uncertainties and prepares organizations for future challenges and opportunities. – Generates multiple plausible scenarios to explore alternative future outcomes. – Helps organizations identify strategic risks and opportunities and develop contingency plans.
Competitive AdvantageCompetitive Advantage is a strategic concept that refers to the unique strengths, capabilities, or assets that enable an organization to outperform competitors and achieve superior performance in the marketplace. It can stem from various sources such as cost leadership, differentiation, innovation, customer focus, or operational excellence, providing organizations with sustainable competitive edge and profitability.– Identifies unique strengths or advantages that enable organizations to outperform competitors. – Can be derived from cost leadership, differentiation, innovation, customer focus, or operational excellence. – Provides organizations with sustainable competitive edge and profitability.

Other frameworks by Michael Porter

Porter’s Five Forces

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces

Porter’s Generic Strategies

porters-generic-strategies
In his book, “Competitive Advantage,” in 1985, Porter conceptualized the concept of competitive advantage, by looking at two key aspects. Industry attractiveness, and the company’s strategic positioning. The latter, according to Porter, can be achieved either via cost leadership, differentiation, or focus.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

Porter’s Four Corners Analysis 

four-corners-analysis
Developed by American academic Michael Porter, the Four Corners Analysis helps a business understand its particular competitive landscape. The analysis is a form of competitive intelligence where a business determines its future strategy by assessing its competitors’ strategy, looking at four elements: drivers, current strategy, management assumptions, and capabilities.

Six Forces Models

six-forces-models
The Six Forces Model is a variation of Porter’s Five Forces. The sixth force, according to this model, is the complementary products. In short, the six forces model is an adaptation especially used in the tech business world to assess the change of the context, based on new market entrants and whether those can play out initially as complementary products and in the long-term substitutes.

Read Next: Porter’s Five ForcesPESTEL Analysis, SWOT, Porter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF Framework.

Connected Strategy Frameworks

ADKAR Model

adkar-model
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.

Ansoff Matrix

ansoff-matrix
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growth strategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growth strategy can be derived from whether the market is new or existing, and whether the product is new or existing.

Business Model Canvas

business-model-canvas
The business model canvas is a framework proposed by Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur in Busines Model Generation enabling the design of business models through nine building blocks comprising: key partners, key activities, value propositions, customer relationships, customer segments, critical resources, channels, cost structure, and revenue streams.

Lean Startup Canvas

lean-startup-canvas
The lean startup canvas is an adaptation by Ash Maurya of the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder, which adds a layer that focuses on problems, solutions, key metrics, unfair advantage based, and a unique value proposition. Thus, starting from mastering the problem rather than the solution.

Blitzscaling Canvas

blitzscaling-business-model-innovation-canvas
The Blitzscaling business model canvas is a model based on the concept of Blitzscaling, which is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty, and that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of uncertainty.

Blue Ocean Strategy

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

Business Analysis Framework

business-analysis
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

BCG Matrix

bcg-matrix
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.

Balanced Scorecard

balanced-scorecard
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.

Blue Ocean Strategy 

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

GAP Analysis

gap-analysis
A gap analysis helps an organization assess its alignment with strategic objectives to determine whether the current execution is in line with the company’s mission and long-term vision. Gap analyses then help reach a target performance by assisting organizations to use their resources better. A good gap analysis is a powerful tool to improve execution.

GE McKinsey Model

ge-mckinsey-matrix
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.

McKinsey 7-S Model

mckinsey-7-s-model
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

McKinsey Horizon Model

mckinsey-horizon-model
The McKinsey Horizon Model helps a business focus on innovation and growth. The model is a strategy framework divided into three broad categories, otherwise known as horizons. Thus, the framework is sometimes referred to as McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth.

Porter’s Five Forces

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces.

Porter’s Generic Strategies

competitive-advantage
According to Michael Porter, a competitive advantage, in a given industry could be pursued in two key ways: low cost (cost leadership), or differentiation. A third generic strategy is focus. According to Porter a failure to do so would end up stuck in the middle scenario, where the company will not retain a long-term competitive advantage.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business‘s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

pestel-analysis

Scenario Planning

scenario-planning
Businesses use scenario planning to make assumptions on future events and how their respective business environments may change in response to those future events. Therefore, scenario planning identifies specific uncertainties – or different realities and how they might affect future business operations. Scenario planning attempts at better strategic decision making by avoiding two pitfalls: underprediction, and overprediction.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA