the-standard-for-portfolio-management

The Standard for Portfolio Management

The Standard for Portfolio Management (SfPfM) describes a suite of portfolio management processes concerning programs, projects, and organizational strategy. The Standard for Portfolio Management is a creation of the Project Management Institute (PMI).

Understanding The Standard for Portfolio Management

In compiling a list of portfolio management processes, the PMI ensured that each approach satisfied two criteria:

  • They must be “generally recognized” in the sense that knowledge and practices apply to most portfolios most of the time. There must also be relatively widespread agreement regarding their value and usefulness.
  • They must be “good practice”, with general agreement that the combination of tools, skills, and techniques can contribute to the success of many different portfolios. Here, good practice does not mean that knowledge or methods are applied uniformly. There is still a requirement that portfolio managers identify what is most appropriate to their needs.

The Standard for Portfolio Management also details a common vocabulary that professionals can use when discussing or applying aspects of portfolio management.

The Standard for Portfolio Management definitions

Here are some of the core definitions of SfPfM:

  • Portfolio – a collection of programs and projects grouped to facilitate the completion of work in meeting strategic goals and objectives. Projects and programs do not need to be related or interdependent.
  • Portfolio management – the coordinated and continuous management of one or more portfolios using interrelated processes that support decision making. The business must consistently evaluate, prioritize, and allocate resources to ensure that portfolios meet strategic goals.
  • Aligning Process Group – a group of individuals that determine how portfolio components will be categorized, evaluated, and managed for potential inclusion in a portfolio.
  • Monitoring and Controlling Process Group – who periodically review portfolio KPIs to determine whether they are contributing to company success.

Portfolio management and organizational strategy

The PMI note that the ultimate goal of SfPfM is to link it with organizational strategy to establish a business plan that is both balanced and executable.

Businesses can develop this plan by addressing six different areas:

  • Maintaining portfolio alignment. While each portfolio should be aligned to strategic objectives, this alignment cannot occur if the business does not understand what its objectives are. Each new or pre-existing portfolio component must support the fulfillment of company strategy.
  • Allocating financial resources. Resource allocation is tied to the prioritization of portfolio components.
  • Allocating human resources. High-priority portfolio components receive funding for resource planning, recruitment, scheduling, and the training or upskilling of talent long-term.
  • Allocating material or equipment resources. Each component must be allocated information, equipment, or space. This includes capital investment to ensure that the needs of each component are met at the organizational level – including needs related to constraints.
  • Measuring portfolio component performance. Portfolio performance must only be measured in the context of whether the portfolio helped achieved a strategic goal.
  • Managing risk. Each component should be routinely evaluated for internal and external risks that might prevent strategic goals from being achieved.

Key takeaways:

  • The Standard for Portfolio Management describes a suite of best practices for portfolio management with respect to projects, programs, and organizational strategy.
  • The Standard for Portfolio Management defines vocabulary that portfolio managers can use in their professional careers. SfPfM uses a combination of well-established and process-specific terms.
  • The Standard for Portfolio Management is predominantly focused on helping businesses attain goals and objectives. This can be facilitated by considering six key areas that detail resource allocation, alignment, and risk management.

Related Business Concepts

scaled-agile-lean-development
Scaled Agile Lean Development (ScALeD) helps businesses discover a balanced approach to agile transition and scaling questions. The ScALed approach helps businesses successfully respond to change. Inspired by a combination of lean and agile values, ScALed is practitioner-based and can be completed through various agile frameworks and practices.
test-driven-development
As the name suggests, TDD is a test-driven technique for delivering high-quality software rapidly and sustainably. It is an iterative approach based on the idea that a failing test should be written before any code for a feature or function is written. Test-Driven Development (TDD) is an approach to software development that relies on very short development cycles.
feature-driven-development
Feature-Driven Development is a pragmatic software process that is client and architecture-centric. Feature-Driven Development (FDD) is an agile software development model that organizes workflow according to which features need to be developed next.
extreme-programming
eXtreme Programming was developed in the late 1990s by Ken Beck, Ron Jeffries, and Ward Cunningham. During this time, the trio was working on the Chrysler Comprehensive Compensation System (C3) to help manage the company payroll system. eXtreme Programming (XP) is a software development methodology. It is designed to improve software quality and the ability of software to adapt to changing customer needs.
dual-track-agile
Product discovery is a critical part of agile methodologies, as its aim is to ensure that products customers love are built. Product discovery involves learning through a raft of methods, including design thinking, lean start-up, and A/B testing to name a few. Dual Track Agile is an agile methodology containing two separate tracks: the “discovery” track and the “delivery” track.
timeboxing
Timeboxing is a simple yet powerful time-management technique for improving productivity. Timeboxing describes the process of proactively scheduling a block of time to spend on a task in the future. It was first described by author James Martin in a book about agile software development.
rapid-application-development
RAD was first introduced by author and consultant James Martin in 1991. Martin recognized and then took advantage of the endless malleability of software in designing development models. Rapid Application Development (RAD) is a methodology focusing on delivering rapidly through continuous feedback and frequent iterations.
mvc-framework
The MVC framework is a predictable software design pattern separated into three main components and suitable for many programming languages. The goal of the MVC framework is to help structure the code-base and separate application concerns into three components: View, Model, and Controller.
agile-methodology
Agile started as a lightweight development method compared to heavyweight software development, which is the core paradigm of the previous decades of software development. By 2001 the Manifesto for Agile Software Development was born as a set of principles that defined the new paradigm for software development as a continuous iteration. This would also influence the way of doing business.
devsecops
DevSecOps is a set of disciplines combining development, security, and operations. It is a philosophy that helps software development businesses deliver innovative products quickly without sacrificing security. This allows potential security issues to be identified during the development process – and not after the product has been released in line with the emergence of continuous software development practices.

Read Next: Business AnalysisCompetitor Analysis, Continuous InnovationAgile MethodologyLean StartupBusiness Model InnovationProject Management.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA
[class^="wpforms-"]
[class^="wpforms-"]