Prioritization plays a crucial role in every business. In an ideal world, businesses have enough time and resources to complete every task within a project satisfactorily. The MoSCoW method is a task prioritization framework. It is most effective in situations where many tasks must be prioritized into an actionable to-do list. The framework is based on four main categories that give it the name: Must have (M), Should have (S), Could have (C), and Won’t have (W).
|Concept Overview||The MoSCoW Method is a prioritization technique used in project management, product development, and requirements gathering. It helps stakeholders categorize project or product requirements into four priority levels: Must-haves, Should-haves, Could-haves, and Won’t-haves, enabling clear focus on essential elements.|
|Key Elements||Key elements of the MoSCoW Method include:|
1. Must-Haves (M): Critical requirements that are non-negotiable and must be included for project success.
2. Should-Haves (S): Important but not critical requirements that enhance the project’s value.
3. Could-Haves (C): Desirable but optional requirements that may be implemented if resources allow.
4. Won’t-Haves (W): Requirements explicitly excluded from the project scope.
|Must-Haves (M)||Must-Have requirements are fundamental to the project’s success and must be delivered for the project to be considered complete. These requirements are typically essential for achieving project objectives and meeting stakeholder expectations. Failing to deliver Must-Have requirements can lead to project failure or dissatisfaction among stakeholders.|
|Should-Haves (S)||Should-Have requirements are important but not critical for the project’s core functionality. These requirements enhance the project’s value and may improve user experience or functionality. While they are not indispensable, they contribute significantly to stakeholder satisfaction and project success. Prioritizing Should-Have requirements ensures they receive appropriate attention during development.|
|Could-Haves (C)||Could-Have requirements are desirable but optional. They represent features or enhancements that would be nice to include if resources, time, or budget permits. These requirements provide flexibility for project teams to explore additional features or improvements that can enhance the project’s appeal or utility. While valuable, Could-Have requirements are not prioritized as high as Must-Have or Should-Have requirements.|
|Won’t-Haves (W)||Won’t-Have requirements are explicitly excluded from the project scope. These are features or elements that stakeholders have agreed should not be part of the current project. Identifying and documenting Won’t-Have requirements helps manage stakeholder expectations and avoids scope creep by clarifying what is not included in the project.|
|Benefits||– Clear prioritization: The MoSCoW Method provides a straightforward way to prioritize requirements and focus on critical elements.- Alignment with objectives: It ensures that project teams work on the most essential features that align with project goals.- Scope control: Identifying Won’t-Have requirements helps manage scope and prevents unnecessary additions.- Efficient resource allocation: Resources are allocated based on priority, optimizing project efforts.- Stakeholder communication: It facilitates transparent communication about what to expect from the project.|
|Drawbacks||– Subjectivity: Determining the priority of requirements can be subjective and influenced by stakeholder perspectives.- Rigidity: The method may not accommodate changes in priority as the project progresses, requiring periodic reassessment.- Complexity: Managing a large number of requirements with this method can become complex and time-consuming.- Conflicting interests: Stakeholders may have differing views on priority, leading to disputes or challenges in reaching consensus.|
|Use Cases||1. Software development: Project managers use the MoSCoW Method to prioritize software features based on criticality and user needs.2. Product development: Product teams employ the method to decide which product features to include in each release.3. Agile project management: Agile teams integrate the MoSCoW Method into their iterative processes to prioritize work for each sprint or iteration.4. Requirements gathering: Business analysts use the method to categorize and prioritize business requirements from stakeholders.|
|Examples||1. A software development project classifies user requirements as Must-Have (e.g., login functionality), Should-Have (e.g., user profile customization), Could-Have (e.g., advanced search filters), and Won’t-Have (e.g., integration with legacy systems).|
2. An e-commerce platform prioritizes product features for an upcoming release, with Must-Have features including online shopping and Should-Have features like wishlist functionality.
3. An agile development team identifies Must-Have user stories for an upcoming sprint and categorizes others as Should-Have or Could-Have for future sprints.
Understanding the MoSCoW method
Since unforeseen setbacks are inevitable, task prioritization ensures that the most relevant and important tasks are completed first. Projects lacking in task prioritization quickly become disorganized and chaotic.
Instead of a systematic process, resources are typically assigned to tasks by those that simply have the most influence in the room. Invariably, this comes at the expense of the success of the project and of the organization itself.
The method is based on an acronym from the first letter of four prioritization categories.
In the next section, we will look at each category in more detail.
The four prioritization categories of the MoSCoW method
All requirements are important to MoSCoW method principles, but they need to be categorized according to priority to deliver maximum benefit to the business.
Here are the four categories in descending order of priority:
- Must have (M) – or requirements that must be satisfied for the project or solution to be a success. These requirements play a vital role in meeting deadlines and satisfying legal or safety standards. If the result of a requirement not being met is project cancellation, then it occupies this category.
- Should have (S) – or important (but not vital) requirements such as a lack of efficiency or unfavorable stakeholder expectations. These so-called “secondary requirements” usually have a workaround and do not significantly impact the project being delivered. In any case, they should only be rectified once “must-have” requirements have been satisfied.
- Could have (C) – this includes requirements that would be nice to incorporate on the proviso that they do not affect anything else. However, leaving them out of the project scope must result in little impact when compared with a “should have” requirement. This category sometimes includes low-cost refinements that are carried out provided there is sufficient time to do so.
- Won’t have (W) – these requirements are either beyond the scope of the project or add little value. They may be feasible for a future project update and should be stored away for later reference. For example, a new rideshare company may shelve plans for a premium car option until usability issues with its app have been resolved.
Advantages and disadvantages of the MoSCoW method
- Ease of use. The method is easy to learn and implement because it is based on basic principles of task prioritization.
- Accuracy. Accurate task prioritization is reliant on group consensus lead by an impartial moderator. It does not rely on biased prioritization where big personalities can influence others.
- Versatility. The MoSCoW method can be used for any project and any sized company.
- Lack of category sorting. While the method provides clear guidance on categorization, it does not suggest how requirements within the categories should be sorted.
- Bias. Despite the team-based approach, bias can still occur when most requirements are mistakenly placed in the “must-have” category. Some businesses find it helpful to stipulate that no more than 60% of all project requirements can be classified as high priority.
MoSCoW method examples
Below we have listed a few general examples of the MoSCoW method in action.
Developing a project management app
- Must have – task assignment, file attachment, workflow monitoring, and integration with Google Calendar.
- Should have – Kanban view, Notion integration, mobile app version, in-app messaging, and time tracking functionality.
- Could have – collaborative whiteboard (in-app), Chrome support (add-on), integration with Slack, and a feature that visualizes key project advancement indicators.
- Won’t have – video conferencing.
Designing a block of apartments for a new city development
- Must have – cement, bricks, windows, proper ventilation, fire hoses for each floor, pile foundations, and a stairwell for emergencies.
- Should have – a compact, modular kitchen, doors made from composite material, soundproofed walls, two elevators, at least two bedrooms per apartment, and ducted, reverse cycle heating and cooling.
- Could have – load-bearing balconies (with a balustrade), internal staircases for penthouse apartments, outdoor entertainment areas, and an intercom system.
- Won’t have – traditional gardens, water features, and a separate laundry room for a washing machine and dryer.
Product development for a men’s wallet
- Must have – two slots for banknotes, ten compartments for credit and debit cards, durable construction material, and high-quality sewing.
- Should have – leather as the primary composition, a transverse horizontal compartment, a transparent credit card sleeve, and a small company logo on the outside face.
- Could have – an attractive, timeless color or pattern on the inside of the banknote slots, an additional transparent sleeve for treasured photos, and a small, zippered coin pouch.
- Won’t have – cream or beige colored leather that stains or wears easily, external metal accents that can catch on the material inside the wearer’s pocket.
Purchasing a new vehicle
- Must have – at least seven seats, 4WD, a 5-star safety rating, a hybrid engine, front and rear passenger airbags, adaptive cruise control, tow bar, and Apple CarPlay.
- Should have – reverse parking sensors, electronic brakeforce distribution (EBD), blind spot mirror warnings, an electric driver’s seat with customizable settings, and Bluetooth.
- Could have – lane departure warning system, heated seats, limited slip differential, sunroof, leather upholstery, center airbags, remote parking, intersection-scanning autonomous emergency braking (AEB), and live blind spot video feed.
- Won’t have – a small, four-cylinder engine, screens that are not touch-sensitive, haptic controls that replace buttons, spoiler, and voice recognition.
Building a website for a law firm that wants to enable clients to track their court cases
- Must have – robust coding free from any bugs, maximum uptime, a simple client registration system, a safe and robust personal directory that cannot be accessed by malicious actors, and discoverability on the first page of Google search results for the company name keyword.
- Should have – a modern, intuitive, and responsive design and navigation, email notifications, a site with pages that load quickly, nofollow links to external sites or organizations, a high contrast color scheme, and a prominent “Contact Us” page.
- Could have – a blog section with information on industry news and trends, custom menus with submenus, and an introductory video on the homepage.
- Won’t have – too much text, no whitespace, and pages with no mobile optimization.
Implementing Agile Methodology for Software Development
- Must Have – Daily stand-up meetings, user stories, sprint planning, and continuous integration.
- Should Have – Retrospective meetings, automated testing, backlog grooming, and a product owner role.
- Could Have – Pair programming, test-driven development (TDD), cross-functional teams, and burndown charts.
- Won’t Have – Waterfall project management, lengthy documentation, and a rigid change control process.
Launching a New Mobile App for a Fitness Company
- Must Have – User registration, workout tracking, video tutorials, and a progress dashboard.
- Should Have – Social sharing features, in-app purchases, integration with wearable fitness trackers, and a nutrition tracking tool.
- Could Have – Personalized workout plans, live streaming fitness classes, gamification elements, and integration with health databases.
- Won’t Have – Virtual reality fitness experiences, biometric scanning, and a feature for booking physical fitness classes.
Redesigning an E-commerce Website for a Fashion Retailer
- Must Have – User-friendly navigation, product listings, a shopping cart, and secure checkout.
- Should Have – Filter and sort options, responsive design, customer reviews, and product recommendations.
- Could Have – Virtual try-on feature, saved wishlists, chat support, and integration with social media for sharing fashion finds.
- Won’t Have – Virtual reality shopping, blockchain-based supply chain tracking, and a complete overhaul of the existing branding.
Upgrading Customer Support for a Telecommunications Company
- Must Have – 24/7 hotline, ticketing system, knowledge base, and service level agreements (SLAs).
- Should Have – Live chat support, email support, remote troubleshooting, and a customer portal for issue tracking.
- Could Have – AI-powered chatbots, predictive maintenance alerts, and a mobile app for customer self-service.
- Won’t Have – In-person customer support centers, handwritten correspondence, and fax support.
Developing a New Video Game
- Must Have – Engaging gameplay, high-quality graphics, sound effects, and a clear user interface.
- Should Have – Multiple levels, character customization, leaderboards, and multiplayer mode.
- Could Have – Downloadable content (DLC), virtual reality support, and an engaging storyline.
- Won’t Have – Integration with real-world banking, non-gaming related social networking, and excessive microtransactions.
Expanding Data Analytics Capabilities for a Financial Institution
- Must Have – Data warehousing, data cleaning, reporting tools, and regulatory compliance.
- Should Have – Predictive analytics, data visualization, and role-based access control.
- Could Have – Machine learning algorithms, real-time data processing, and data governance policies.
- Won’t Have – Data storage on personal computers, unencrypted data transmission, and manual data entry.
Enhancing Cybersecurity for a Global Tech Company
- Must Have – Firewall protection, intrusion detection, antivirus software, and employee cybersecurity training.
- Should Have – Regular security audits, two-factor authentication, and secure remote access.
- Could Have – Employee monitoring software, threat intelligence feeds, and a bug bounty program.
- Won’t Have – Open access to sensitive data, default passwords, and publicly shared passwords.
Revamping Supply Chain Management for a Manufacturing Company
- Must Have – Inventory management, demand forecasting, supplier relationship management, and order processing.
- Should Have – Automated replenishment, real-time tracking, and electronic data interchange (EDI).
- Could Have – Advanced analytics, blockchain-based supply chain, and just-in-time inventory.
- Won’t Have – Manual tracking in spreadsheets, paper-based documentation, and decentralized procurement.
- The MoSCoW method is a requirement prioritization framework. It may be used to classify tasks, objectives, or change processes.
- The MoSCoW method utilizes four requirement categories according to the degree that each requirement impacts the overall project.
- The MoSCoW method is a versatile, accurate, and relatively simple process to learn. However, it can be prone to bias and it does not suggest how requirements within categories should be prioritized.
MoSCoW Method and its Application: Key Takeaways
- MoSCoW Method Overview: The MoSCoW method is a task prioritization framework used to categorize requirements, tasks, or change processes based on their importance and impact on a project’s success. It uses four main categories: Must have (M), Should have (S), Could have (C), and Won’t have (W).
- Importance of Prioritization: Prioritization is essential for effective project management, ensuring that the most critical tasks are addressed first. Without proper prioritization, projects can become disorganized and chaotic.
- Categories of the MoSCoW Method:
- Must have (M): These are requirements that must be satisfied for the project’s success. They are crucial for meeting deadlines, legal standards, or safety requirements. Failure to meet these requirements could lead to project cancellation.
- Should have (S): These requirements are important but not vital. They may impact efficiency or stakeholder expectations. Secondary requirements should be addressed after must-have requirements are satisfied.
- Could have (C): These are desirable requirements that could be incorporated if they do not negatively affect other aspects. They may include refinements or features that enhance the project.
- Won’t have (W): These requirements are beyond the project’s scope or add minimal value. They may be considered for future updates or projects.
- Advantages of the MoSCoW Method:
- Ease of Use: The method is easy to learn and implement.
- Accuracy: Prioritization is based on group consensus, reducing bias.
- Versatility: The method can be applied to various projects and company sizes.
- Disadvantages of the MoSCoW Method:
- Lack of Sorting: The method does not provide guidance on sorting requirements within categories.
- Bias: Bias can still occur, with too many requirements classified as must-have. Some businesses set limits on high-priority requirements.
- Examples of the MoSCoW Method:
- Project Management App: Must have – task assignment, Should have – Kanban view, Could have – collaborative whiteboard, Won’t have – video conferencing.
- Apartment Design: Must have – proper ventilation, Should have – soundproofed walls, Could have – load-bearing balconies, Won’t have – traditional gardens.
- Men’s Wallet: Must have – banknote slots, Should have – leather composition, Could have – attractive color pattern, Won’t have – easily stained leather.
- Vehicle Purchase: Must have – 4WD, safety rating, hybrid engine, Should have – reverse parking sensors, Could have – lane departure warning, Won’t have – small engine.
Related Agile Business Frameworks
Read More: Business Models
- Business Models
- Business Strategy
- Business Development
- Distribution Channels
- Marketing Strategy
- Platform Business Models
- Network Effects
Main Case Studies: