JPMorgan raised its price target for SpaceX to $500 from $240 on 21 October 2026, according to Rallies and posts on X by Walter Bloomberg, a wire-headline account, and Shay Boloor, an investor who posts market news. Wells Fargo raised its target to $274 from $214, Rallies reported. The moves came the day after SpaceX reported third-quarter results and Elon Musk said SpaceX and Tesla had formed special committees to discuss a merger. SpaceX shares rose 10.4% before the market opened on Wednesday, CNBC reported.
A special committee is a small group of independent directors that negotiates a deal when the company’s own leader sits on both sides. Musk runs both companies, and he said on the call, according to Axios, “Because I’m a conflicted party, I can’t actually be in the discussions.” No deal has been announced.
Business Pill · SYNERGIES
A short Business Engineer explainer on how merger synergies work, from cost savings a buyer controls to revenue gains it hopes for. It teaches the general idea only and says nothing about SpaceX or Tesla.
The key insight: As we read it, the day after SpaceX’s results the question shifted from whether Musk wants a SpaceX–Tesla merger to how the banks would price one: JPMorgan lifted its target to $500 from $240 and Wells Fargo to $274 from $214, and a JPMorgan note, as Walter Bloomberg reported it, sketched a SpaceX-led all-stock deal at a 30–35% premium to Tesla.
Walter Bloomberg posted this list of SpaceX price targets after the results, at 10:42 UTC on 21 October:
Morgan Stanley: $300, Overweight.
Wells Fargo: $274, up from $214. Rallies reported the same change at 10:30 UTC.
Citi: $240, up from $200.
UBS: $230, up from $210.
Mizuho: $205, up from $200.
In a separate post, the account said Citi had added SpaceX to its 90-day upside catalyst watch list. Rallies also reported JPMorgan’s new $500 target, up from $240, at 10:56 UTC. Apart from JPMorgan’s and Wells Fargo’s, these targets come from Walter Bloomberg’s posts; we did not read the banks’ notes.
SpaceX price targets after its third-quarter results, 21 October 2026. JPMorgan’s ($500, from $240) and Wells Fargo’s ($274, from $214) were reported by Rallies; the others are as listed by the wire-headline account Walter Bloomberg on X. Bars start at zero.
What Was Posted on X
JPMorgan just gave a $500 price target for $SPCX saying it’s “pulling forward more than another year in our model” as its 2027โ2028 estimates more than double.
The firm now expects SpaceX to reach 10 GW of AI compute by the end of 2027 supporting a ~$400B ARR.
Shay Boloor, an investor who posts market news, reports JPMorgan’s new $500 SpaceX target and quotes the bank as saying it is pulling forward more than another year in its model, with 10 GW of AI compute expected by the end of 2027. We did not read JPMorgan’s note itself.
$SPCX – WALL STREET RAISES SPACEX TARGETS AFTER EARNINGS
Analysts are turning more bullish on SpaceX, with several banks lifting their price targets:
๐ธ Morgan Stanley: $300 โ Overweight ๐ธ Wells Fargo: $274, up from $214 ๐ธ Citi: $240, up from $200 ๐ธ UBS: $230, up from $210 ๐ธ Mizuho: $205, up from $200
Walter Bloomberg, a wire-headline account, lists the post-results targets from Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, Citi, UBS and Mizuho. Wells Fargo’s change also appears in a Rallies item; the other figures come from this post.
Muskโs SpaceX ambitions may be โdangerousโ for Europe, warns EU lawmaker https://ft.trib.al/U2kXG58
The Financial Times’ post links its story on an EU lawmaker’s warning about Musk’s SpaceX ambitions. The article is paywalled; the headline does not name the lawmaker.
JPMorgan on a Merger
Walter Bloomberg wrote at 10:57 UTC that JPMorgan “sees strong strategic logic” for a SpaceX–Tesla merger, pointing to shared AI infrastructure, engineering talent and chip development. According to the post, the bank sees a possible SpaceX-led all-stock deal at a 30–35% premium to Tesla, and “no deal has been announced.”
Rallies reported at 10:56 UTC that JPMorgan raised its SpaceX target to $500 from $240. A Walter Bloomberg post at 11:06 UTC said the bank kept an Overweight rating and now forecasts $254 billion in 2027 revenue and 10 GW of computing capacity by year-end. Shay Boloor quoted the bank as saying it is “pulling forward more than another year in our model” as its 2027–2028 estimates more than double, and wrote that JPMorgan expects SpaceX to reach 10 GW of AI compute by the end of 2027, supporting about $400 billion of annual recurring revenue. We did not read JPMorgan’s note.
How the Shares Moved
SpaceX shares rose 10.4% before the market opened on Wednesday, and Tesla shares were up 2.1%, CNBC reported. Reuters reported earlier that SpaceX shares rose 8% in extended trading after Musk’s remarks.
“I do think there’s a lot of merit to combining the companies as we are pretty much in the superintelligence singularity, and there’s a lot to be gained from cooperating,” Musk said on the call, according to CNBC. Tesla is due to report its own third-quarter results after the close on Wednesday, CNBC added.
Truist Securities analysts said in a Tuesday note that commentary on the call supported “continued pricing power and shorter payback periods” for AI cloud providers, CNBC reported. “Despite market concerns relating to financing for AI cloud providers this past week, we believe SpaceX’s third-quarter 2026 represents the first data point during the earnings season to support the bull case for AI cloud providers,” they wrote, according to CNBC.
The Pushback
Separately, the Financial Times ran a story headlined “Musk’s SpaceX ambitions may be ‘dangerous’ for Europe, warns EU lawmaker.” The article is behind a paywall, and the headline does not name the lawmaker. A separate FT analysis was headlined “Rockets, robots and risk: Musk’s $3.6tn gamble to merge Tesla and SpaceX.” Techmeme’s summary of that article says the combination would create a $3.6 trillion company but faces hurdles such as shareholder votes and regulatory probes.
Reuters reported that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said decisions on Ukraine’s access to Starlink “were up to SpaceX and Elon Musk, not the White House,” comments Reuters said suggested Musk may have restricted Kyiv’s access to the service.
Update, 21 October: Lawmakers Call for a Musk Probe; Trump Denies Ordering the Slowdown
The Wall Street Journal said on X on 21 October that “Bipartisan lawmakers are calling for an investigation into Elon Musk after The Wall Street Journal reported that the SpaceX chief restricted Ukraine’s access to the company’s satellite-based Starlink network.” The WSJ article is paywalled and we have not read it, so we do not name the lawmakers it cites.
The same day, CNBC reported that President Donald Trump “insisted that he had nothing to do with a slowdown of SpaceX’s Starlink in Ukraine, and does not know if Elon Musk was responsible.” Earlier, before the Journal’s report, Rep. Mike Turner said on CBS’s Face the Nation that “There needs to be a congressional investigation,” and Sen. Kevin Cramer said “Certainly Congress itself could and should investigate,” according to IANS as published by Gulf News on 19 October.
Connecting the Coverage
Our results piece reported on 20 October that SpaceX’s third-quarter revenue rose 161% to $14.6 billion, with net income of $4.4 billion against a net loss a year earlier. Our merger piece reported the same night that Musk said a combination “would be a good idea” while the special committees decide.
Our call-questions piece reported that “When will SpaceX merge with Tesla?” was the second-most upvoted investor question before the call, Reuters said. Our GPU piece covered Musk’s pace of Nvidia systems from the call, and our forecast piece reported SpaceX’s guidance of $33 billion to $37 billion in first-quarter 2027 revenue. What is new today is the market’s reply: higher targets and a bank note on how a deal could be structured.
The Structural Read
As we read it, the higher targets rest on the AI business more than on rockets: CNBC reported that SpaceX’s Super Intelligence segment is now its largest unit, with revenue up ninefold to $7.56 billion, and JPMorgan’s reported forecast of 10 GW of computing capacity points the same way.
As we read it, the deal question is about governance as much as price: Musk said he is a conflicted party and cannot be in the discussions, so the special committees of independent directors, not Musk, would set any terms, and none have been published.
As we read it, the reaction reached beyond SpaceX: Truist said the call supported the case for AI cloud providers, CNBC reported that Nebius, CoreWeave, Iren and Applied Digital rose more than 3% before the open, and, separately, the FT headline and Rubio’s remarks kept SpaceX’s politics in the news the same day.
Elon Musk on SpaceX’s third-quarter earnings call, as reported by CNBC, 21 October 2026
“I do think there’s a lot of merit to combining the companies as we are pretty much in the superintelligence singularity, and there’s a lot to be gained from cooperating”
Three Implications
FOR SPACEX AND TESLA SHAREHOLDERS No deal has been announced and no terms have been published; JPMorgan’s reported 30–35% premium is one bank’s structure, as Walter Bloomberg relayed it, not an offer.
FOR AI CLOUD PROVIDERS Truist said SpaceX’s quarter was the first data point of the earnings season to support the bull case for AI cloud providers, CNBC reported, and Nebius and CoreWeave shares rose before the open.
FOR TESLA’S OWN RESULTSTesla reports its third-quarter results after the close on Wednesday, CNBC said; on SpaceX’s call, Musk said the committees have not reached agreement on the terms of any transaction, The Verge reported.
The framework argues that “the AI economy is not a list of companies racing each other. It is a layered industrial stack”, and that the binding constraint “sits at a different layer than it did six months ago.”
As we read it, a combined SpaceX and Tesla would sit across several of those layers at once, from computing capacity to vehicles and robots, which is the “shared AI infrastructure” logic Walter Bloomberg attributed to JPMorgan. The framework was published in May 2026 and does not discuss SpaceX or Tesla.
What Is Not Established
No merger has been announced, and neither company has published terms. Apart from JPMorgan’s and Wells Fargo’s, the price targets here come from Walter Bloomberg’s posts, not from the banks’ notes, which we did not read. The two posts on JPMorgan’s note give different revenue measures ($254 billion of 2027 revenue in one, about $400 billion of annual recurring revenue in the other), and without the note we cannot reconcile them. The FT articles are paywalled, so we report only their headlines, and Reuters’ article on Rubio could not be read, so we rely on Reuters’ own summary. Morgan Stanley’s $300 is listed without a prior figure.
Business Engineer Framework
The Nine Layers of AI
A Business Engineer field guide to the AI stack, from energy and chips to applications, and where the binding constraint sits.
The day after SpaceX’s results, JPMorgan more than doubled its target to $500 from $240, Wells Fargo lifted its to $274 from $214, Walter Bloomberg posted higher targets from Citi, UBS and Mizuho, and a JPMorgan note sketched an all-stock SpaceX-led deal, according to the account. As we read it, the debate has moved from whether Musk wants a merger to how the banks would price one, while the FT and Rubio’s remarks point to the politics around SpaceX.
95,000+ executives read Business Engineer for the AI strategy frameworks cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.
A note on sourcing. This piece is built on two Rallies items, posts on X by the wire-headline account Walter Bloomberg and by Shay Boloor, a CNBC article read in full, and posts by Reuters and the Financial Times on X, all of 21 October 2026. We did not read the banks’ research notes; the price targets and JPMorgan’s views are as Rallies, Walter Bloomberg and Shay Boloor reported them.
The FT articles are paywalled, so only their headlines are used. We did not contact SpaceX, Tesla or the banks. Nothing here is legal, financial or investment advice.
Gennaro Cuofano is a CRO and tech executive who has worked in AI since late 2015, starting with bringing NLP, natural-language generation, voice and chatbot products to the marketing industry. His background is in law and finance: he holds a Master's degree in Law and an International MBA with an emphasis on corporate finance (LUISS Business School and the University of San Diego, 2012), and worked as a financial analyst at a real-estate investment firm in San Diego and as an assistant controller. His work focuses on business model strategy, business engineering and, more broadly, structural analysis: how companies make money, read from their own filings. He created FourWeekMBA and leads research there and at The Business Engineer, his newsletter on AI and business strategy, with over 95,000 subscribers and more than 1,000 published analyses. His writing has also appeared on Entrepreneur (for example, How to Digitize a Family Business in Europe) and HackerNoon. Find him on LinkedIn and Substack. See how we source.
Scroll to Top
Discover more from FourWeekMBA
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
