theory-e-and-theory-o

Theory E and Theory O

Theory E and Theory O are strategic change management theories that offer different approaches to achieving organizational excellence. Developed by Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis in their book “Operations Strategy,” these theories provide valuable insights into the strategies organizations can employ to drive change and enhance their performance.

  • Theory E (Economic): Theory E emphasizes economic value creation and focuses on achieving change through rational and quantitative measures. It is often associated with cost reduction, efficiency improvement, and financial performance.
  • Theory O (Organizational): Theory O, on the other hand, emphasizes the human and organizational aspects of change. It prioritizes cultural transformation, employee engagement, and the development of a learning organization.

Let’s explore these theories in more detail and understand their core concepts.

Core Concepts of Theory E and Theory O

Theory E (Economic)

1. Economic Value:

  • Theory E is driven by the pursuit of economic value. It emphasizes the importance of financial metrics and aims to enhance shareholder value through initiatives such as cost reduction and revenue growth.

2. Rational Decision-Making:

  • Rational decision-making plays a central role in Theory E. It involves analyzing data, conducting cost-benefit analyses, and making decisions based on quantitative assessments.

3. Efficiency and Productivity:

  • Efficiency and productivity improvement are key objectives of Theory E. Organizations focus on streamlining processes, reducing waste, and optimizing resource utilization.

4. Short-Term Results:

  • Theory E often prioritizes short-term financial results. Organizations may implement changes with a view to delivering immediate returns to shareholders.

Theory O (Organizational)

1. Organizational Culture:

  • Theory O places a strong emphasis on organizational culture. It recognizes that culture plays a significant role in shaping employee behavior and the organization’s ability to adapt to change.

2. Human Capital:

  • Human capital is a central concept in Theory O. It highlights the importance of investing in employee development, talent management, and creating a skilled and motivated workforce.

3. Learning Organization:

  • Theory O encourages the development of a learning organization, where employees continuously acquire knowledge and skills, and the organization fosters a culture of innovation and adaptability.

4. Long-Term Sustainability:

  • Theory O is oriented toward long-term sustainability. It acknowledges that some changes may take time to yield results but can lead to lasting benefits for the organization.

Significance of Theory E and Theory O

Both Theory E and Theory O hold significance for organizations facing the challenges of change management:

Theory E Significance

1. Financial Performance:

  • Theory E is instrumental in improving financial performance and delivering short-term results, which is essential for organizations seeking to satisfy shareholders and investors.

2. Efficiency and Cost Reduction:

  • It provides a structured approach to achieving efficiency and cost reduction objectives, helping organizations operate more competitively.

3. Quantitative Decision-Making:

  • Theory E fosters a culture of data-driven decision-making, which can lead to more informed and effective choices.

Theory O Significance

1. Organizational Resilience:

  • Theory O contributes to organizational resilience by focusing on culture and employee engagement. A strong culture can help organizations weather challenges and adapt to new circumstances.

2. Sustainability and Innovation:

  • It promotes long-term sustainability and innovation by encouraging organizations to invest in their people and create a culture of continuous improvement.

3. Adaptive Capacity:

  • Theory O enhances an organization’s adaptive capacity, enabling it to respond more effectively to changing market conditions and customer needs.

Practical Applications of Theory E and Theory O

The practical applications of Theory E and Theory O depend on an organization’s specific goals and circumstances:

For Organizations:

  1. Strategic Planning:
  • Organizations can apply Theory E principles in strategic planning to set clear financial objectives and identify initiatives that improve economic value.
  1. Operational Efficiency:
  • To enhance efficiency and productivity, organizations can use Theory E to streamline processes, reduce waste, and optimize resource allocation.
  1. Cost Reduction Initiatives:
  • Theory E is suitable for cost reduction initiatives, such as lean management and Six Sigma, aimed at eliminating inefficiencies.
  1. Short-Term Projects:
  • When organizations need immediate financial results, Theory E is the preferred approach for short-term projects and quick wins.
  1. Cultural Transformation:
  • To foster a culture of innovation, employee engagement, and learning, organizations can adopt Theory O principles and invest in talent development.
  1. Change Management:
  • For change management efforts that focus on cultural transformation and long-term sustainability, Theory O can guide strategy and implementation.
  1. Employee Engagement:
  • Theory O is relevant for initiatives aimed at improving employee engagement, satisfaction, and retention.

For Researchers and Academics:

  1. Empirical Studies:
  • Researchers can conduct empirical studies to evaluate the effectiveness of Theory E and Theory O in various organizational contexts.
  1. Change Management Frameworks:
  • Academics can develop change management frameworks based on Theory E and Theory O principles to guide organizations through transformation processes.

For Policymakers:

  1. Regulatory Design:
  • Policymakers can design regulations and incentives that encourage organizations to consider both economic and organizational aspects when implementing change.

For Individuals:

  1. Career Development:
  • Individuals can assess an organization’s change management approach when making career decisions, aligning their values and goals with Theory E or Theory O orientations.

Challenges and Considerations

Implementing Theory E and Theory O comes with challenges and considerations:

  1. Balancing Short-Term and Long-Term Goals:
  • Organizations must strike a balance between short-term financial results (Theory E) and long-term sustainability and cultural transformation (Theory O).
  1. Change Resistance:
  • Employees may resist change initiatives that disrupt established processes or challenge the existing culture.
  1. Resource Allocation:
  • Allocating resources between economic value-driven initiatives and organizational development efforts can be a complex decision.
  1. Contextual Adaptation:
  • The suitability of Theory E or Theory O may depend on the organization’s industry, size, and competitive landscape.
  1. Leadership and Communication:
  • Effective leadership and communication are critical for successful change management, regardless of the chosen theory.

Future Directions in Theory E and Theory O

As organizations continue to evolve, Theory E and Theory O are likely to adapt and evolve as well. Future directions may include:

  1. Integrated Approaches:
  • Developing integrated change management approaches that combine elements of both Theory E and Theory O to address the dual goals of financial performance and organizational development.
  1. Digital Transformation:
  • Exploring how Theory E and Theory O can guide organizations through digital transformation initiatives and the challenges they pose.
  1. Measuring Culture and Engagement:
  • Developing quantitative metrics and tools to measure cultural transformation and employee engagement in Theory O contexts.
  1. Global Perspective:
  • Assessing the applicability of Theory E and Theory O in different cultural and global contexts.
  1. Sustainability and Social Responsibility:
  • Expanding Theory O to incorporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility as integral components of organizational change.

Conclusion

Theory E and Theory O offer valuable perspectives on organizational change, addressing the dual objectives of economic value creation and cultural transformation. These theories recognize the importance of both financial performance and the human side of organizations. To effectively navigate the complexities of change, organizations must carefully consider their goals, context, and the balance between Theory E and Theory O principles. By doing so, they can drive meaningful and sustainable change that positions them for success in an ever-evolving business landscape.

Key Highlights:

  • Introduction to Theory E and Theory O: These strategic change management theories, developed by Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis, offer different approaches to achieving organizational excellence.
  • Theory E (Economic):
    • Driven by economic value creation.
    • Emphasizes rational decision-making, efficiency, and short-term results.
  • Theory O (Organizational):
    • Focuses on organizational culture, human capital, and long-term sustainability.
    • Prioritizes cultural transformation and the development of a learning organization.
  • Core Concepts:
    • Theory E: Economic value, rational decision-making, efficiency, short-term results.
    • Theory O: Organizational culture, human capital, learning organization, long-term sustainability.
  • Significance:
    • Theory E: Improves financial performance, efficiency, and cost reduction.
    • Theory O: Enhances organizational resilience, sustainability, and adaptive capacity.
  • Practical Applications:
    • For Organizations: Strategic planning, operational efficiency, cost reduction, cultural transformation, change management.
    • For Researchers and Academics: Empirical studies, change management frameworks.
    • For Policymakers: Regulatory design.
    • For Individuals: Career development.
  • Challenges and Considerations:
    • Balancing short-term and long-term goals, change resistance, resource allocation, contextual adaptation, leadership, and communication.
  • Future Directions:
    • Integrated approaches, digital transformation, measuring culture and engagement, global perspective, sustainability, and social responsibility.
  • Conclusion: Theory E and Theory O offer valuable perspectives on organizational change, addressing economic value creation and cultural transformation. Organizations must carefully consider their goals and context to drive meaningful and sustainable change.

Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model– A comprehensive method for implementing successful change in organizations. It includes creating urgency, forming powerful coalitions, and creating short-term wins among other steps.– Useful for managing complex change initiatives in organizations needing structured change management.
Lewin’s Change Management Model– A foundational model that describes change as a three-stage process: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. This model emphasizes the need to prepare, execute, and solidify change.– Applicable in settings where change needs to be thoroughly implemented and made permanent.
McKinsey 7-S Framework– Focuses on seven internal elements of an organization that need to align for successful change: strategy, structure, systems, shared values, skills, style, and staff.– Best used for diagnostic analysis and alignment during major transformation efforts.
ADKAR Model (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement)– A goal-oriented change management model that guides individual and organizational change through specific, achievable outcomes.– Ideal for managing personal and professional change at an individual or team level.
Balanced Scorecard– Integrates strategic management and performance measurement, linking performance to financial outcomes and operational goals, thus bridging the gap between strategy and execution.– Employed for strategic management and measurement in organizations focusing on both short-term and long-term goals.
Organizational Health Index (OHI)– A tool developed by McKinsey to assess an organization’s overall health by measuring alignment, execution, and renewal, which can predict long-term performance.– Useful for assessing the effectiveness of organizational change and ongoing improvements.
Transformational Leadership Model– Focuses on leadership that creates valuable and positive change in followers with the end goal of developing followers into leaders.– Applied in scenarios where change requires strong leadership to inspire and motivate teams towards broader organizational transformation.
Six Sigma– A set of techniques and tools for process improvement, aimed at improving the quality of output by identifying and removing causes of defects and minimizing variability in processes.– Best for organizations that need to enhance processes and increase efficiency, particularly in manufacturing and operations.
Blue Ocean Strategy– Encourages companies to exit overcrowded competitive markets (“red oceans”) and create new market spaces (“blue oceans”) where competition is irrelevant, thus driving growth and innovation.– Ideal for organizations looking to implement strategic changes that differentiate them from competitors.
Organizational Culture Model– Examines the beliefs, attitudes, and values that shape an organization’s internal environment. This model is crucial for understanding how to cultivate a culture that supports change and innovation.– Effective in guiding cultural transformation efforts that align with both Theory E (economic value) and Theory O (organizational capability).

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA