Product cannibalization is a situation where a company’s new product directly competes with and diminishes the sales and market share of its existing products. Essentially, it involves a company competing with itself by introducing a new offering that appeals to the same customer base as its existing products. While this may appear detrimental at first glance, product cannibalization can be a strategic choice made to maintain or expand a company’s overall market presence.
Several factors can lead to product cannibalization:
Innovation: The introduction of innovative products or services can make existing offerings less attractive, prompting customers to switch to the new, superior option.
Market Evolution: Changes in customer preferences, market dynamics, or technological advancements may require companies to adapt and offer new solutions to remain competitive.
Competitive Pressure: The presence of strong competitors in the market can force a company to innovate and release new products to maintain or expand its market share.
Diversification: Companies often seek to diversify their product or service portfolios to reduce risks and capture a broader range of customers.
Impact of Product Cannibalization
Product cannibalization can have various consequences for a business:
Advantages:
Innovation: Cannibalization encourages companies to innovate and introduce new products or services, ensuring they stay relevant in a rapidly changing market.
Market Leadership: Embracing cannibalization can reinforce a company’s market leadership position by demonstrating its commitment to innovation and progress.
Sustained Growth: The introduction of new products or services allows a company to continue growing and adapting to changing market conditions.
Disadvantages:
Short-Term Revenue Loss: Cannibalization can result in a temporary decline in sales and revenue as customers switch to the new offerings.
Brand Confusion: Customers may become confused or frustrated when a company offers similar products with slight variations, potentially affecting brand loyalty.
Resource Allocation: Companies need to allocate resources for the development, marketing, and distribution of new products, which can be costly.
Channel Conflict: Cannibalization may create conflicts within distribution channels, as retailers or distributors may struggle to allocate resources and shelf space to competing products.
Strategies for Managing Product Cannibalization
To effectively manage and leverage product cannibalization, businesses can implement several strategies:
Customer Segmentation: Identify distinct customer segments for existing and new products. Ensure that the new offerings cater to different customer needs or preferences.
Clear Communication: Transparently communicate the benefits of new products to existing customers. Explain how the innovations address their needs or offer superior value.
Gradual Transition: Implement cannibalization gradually rather than abruptly discontinuing existing products. This allows customers to adjust to the changes.
Pricing Strategies: Employ pricing strategies that encourage customers to switch to new products gradually. This can include offering discounts or bundling options.
Cross-Promotion: Promote new products to existing customers through cross-selling and bundling, creating synergy between the old and new offerings.
Innovation Pipeline: Establish a consistent innovation pipeline to continually introduce new products and stay ahead of market changes.
Monitoring and Adjustment: Monitor the performance of new products and be prepared to adjust marketing, pricing, and distribution strategies based on customer feedback and market dynamics.
Real-World Examples of Product Cannibalization
Apple Inc.: Apple has strategically employed product cannibalization several times. When it introduced the iPhone, it cannibalized its own iPod sales, recognizing that the iPhone’s capabilities made standalone music players less relevant. Similarly, the introduction of the iPad disrupted its laptop sales, but it opened up a new market segment for Apple.
Toyota: Toyota introduced its hybrid vehicles, like the Prius, which cannibalized its own sales of traditional gasoline-powered cars. The company recognized the shift in consumer preferences toward more fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles, and it embraced this change through innovation.
Netflix: Netflix, originally a DVD rental service, transitioned to a streaming platform, cannibalizing its own DVD rental business. This move allowed Netflix to stay ahead in the evolving entertainment industry and cater to changing viewer habits.
Conclusion
Product cannibalization is a complex phenomenon in business where a company’s new product competes with and reduces the sales and market share of its existing products. While it may initially lead to short-term revenue loss and brand confusion, when managed effectively, it can drive innovation, sustain growth, and maintain market leadership. By understanding its causes, impact, advantages, disadvantages, and effective management strategies, businesses can make informed decisions regarding product cannibalization. In a competitive business landscape, embracing well-managed cannibalization can contribute to long-term success and adaptability.
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growthstrategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growthstrategy can be derived from whether the market is new or existing, and whether the product is new or existing.
The business model canvas is a framework proposed by Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur in Busines Model Generation enabling the design of business models through nine building blocks comprising: key partners, key activities, value propositions, customer relationships, customer segments, critical resources, channels, cost structure, and revenue streams.
The lean startup canvas is an adaptation by Ash Maurya of the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder, which adds a layer that focuses on problems, solutions, key metrics, unfair advantage based, and a unique value proposition. Thus, starting from mastering the problem rather than the solution.
The Blitzscaling business model canvas is a model based on the concept of Blitzscaling, which is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty, and that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of uncertainty.
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is valueinnovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is valueinnovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.
A gap analysis helps an organization assess its alignment with strategic objectives to determine whether the current execution is in line with the company’s mission and long-term vision. Gap analyses then help reach a target performance by assisting organizations to use their resources better. A good gap analysis is a powerful tool to improve execution.
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.
The McKinsey Horizon Model helps a business focus on innovation and growth. The model is a strategy framework divided into three broad categories, otherwise known as horizons. Thus, the framework is sometimes referred to as McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth.
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces.
According to Michael Porter, a competitive advantage, in a given industry could be pursued in two key ways: low cost (cost leadership), or differentiation. A third generic strategy is focus. According to Porter a failure to do so would end up stuck in the middle scenario, where the company will not retain a long-term competitive advantage.
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business‘s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.
Businesses use scenario planning to make assumptions on future events and how their respective business environments may change in response to those future events. Therefore, scenario planning identifies specific uncertainties – or different realities and how they might affect future business operations. Scenario planning attempts at better strategic decision making by avoiding two pitfalls: underprediction, and overprediction.
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
