Collective Bargaining

Business / By /

Collective bargaining is a process of negotiation between employers and employees, usually represented by labor unions, to establish terms and conditions of employment. It involves discussions, compromises, and agreements on a wide range of issues, including wages, benefits, hours of work, job security, and workplace safety. Collective bargaining plays a crucial role in shaping labor relations, promoting worker rights, and ensuring fair and equitable treatment of employees in the workplace.

Purpose and Scope

The purpose of collective bargaining is to provide workers with a collective voice in decisions that affect their working conditions, wages, and benefits. The scope of collective bargaining varies depending on the industry, sector, and specific concerns of the workers and employers involved. It can encompass negotiations over economic issues, such as wages and benefits, as well as non-economic issues, such as workplace safety, training, and grievance procedures.

Principal Concepts

  • Labor Unions: Labor unions represent workers in collective bargaining negotiations, advocating for their interests, concerns, and demands to employers. Unions provide a collective voice for workers and help ensure that their rights are protected and respected in the workplace.
  • Negotiation: Collective bargaining involves a process of negotiation, where representatives from labor and management discuss and exchange proposals, counteroffers, and concessions to reach mutually acceptable agreements on employment terms and conditions.
  • Collective Agreement: The outcome of collective bargaining is a collective agreement, a legally binding contract between labor and management that outlines the terms and conditions of employment for workers covered by the agreement.

Theoretical Foundations of Collective Bargaining

Collective bargaining draws on principles from various theoretical perspectives, including:

  • Industrial Relations Theory: Collective bargaining is grounded in industrial relations theory, which examines the relationships between employers, employees, and labor organizations and seeks to understand the dynamics of workplace conflict and cooperation.
  • Power and Conflict: Collective bargaining reflects power dynamics and conflicts of interest between labor and management, with each side seeking to advance its own interests while recognizing the need for compromise and cooperation to reach agreements.

Methods and Techniques for Collective Bargaining

Collective bargaining employs a variety of methods and techniques:

  • Negotiation: Negotiation is the core method used in collective bargaining, involving direct discussions and exchanges of proposals, counteroffers, and concessions between labor and management representatives.
  • Mediation and Arbitration: In cases of impasse or disagreement, collective bargaining may involve third-party intervention, such as mediation or arbitration, to help resolve disputes and facilitate agreement between the parties.
  • Strike and Lockout: As a last resort, collective bargaining may involve the use of economic pressure tactics, such as strikes by workers or lockouts by employers, to exert leverage and influence over negotiations.

Applications of Collective Bargaining

Collective bargaining has diverse applications across industries, sectors, and countries:

  • Private Sector: Collective bargaining is widely practiced in the private sector, where unions negotiate with employers in industries such as manufacturing, construction, transportation, and services to establish terms and conditions of employment.
  • Public Sector: Collective bargaining also occurs in the public sector, where unions represent government employees, including teachers, firefighters, police officers, and civil servants, in negotiations with government agencies and employers.

Industries Influenced by Collective Bargaining

Collective bargaining has influenced a wide range of industries and sectors, including:

  • Manufacturing: Collective bargaining has played a critical role in shaping labor relations and working conditions in manufacturing industries, where unions represent workers in negotiations with employers to secure fair wages, benefits, and workplace protections.
  • Healthcare: Collective bargaining is prevalent in the healthcare sector, where unions represent nurses, doctors, and other healthcare professionals in negotiations with hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems to address issues such as staffing levels, workload, and patient care standards.

Advantages of Collective Bargaining

  • Worker Representation: Collective bargaining gives workers a collective voice and representation in negotiations with employers, ensuring that their interests, concerns, and priorities are taken into account in decisions affecting their employment.
  • Fair Wages and Benefits: Collective bargaining helps ensure that workers receive fair wages, benefits, and working conditions that reflect their contributions to the organization and provide for their needs and well-being.
  • Labor Peace: Collective bargaining promotes labor peace and stability by providing a structured process for resolving disputes, grievances, and conflicts between labor and management, reducing the likelihood of strikes, lockouts, and other disruptions.

Challenges and Considerations in Collective Bargaining

Despite its benefits, collective bargaining presents challenges:

  • Power Imbalance: Collective bargaining can be challenging when there is a significant power imbalance between labor and management, making it difficult for workers to achieve their desired outcomes and protections in negotiations.
  • Legal and Regulatory Constraints: Collective bargaining is subject to legal and regulatory constraints, including labor laws, court decisions, and government policies, which can limit the scope and effectiveness of bargaining and influence the outcomes of negotiations.

Integration with Broader Labor Relations Strategies

To maximize the benefits of collective bargaining, it should be integrated with broader labor relations strategies:

  • Union Organizing: Union organizing efforts play a critical role in expanding collective bargaining rights and coverage to more workers and industries, strengthening worker representation and bargaining power.
  • Legislative Advocacy: Legislative advocacy and policy reform efforts can help strengthen labor laws, protect worker rights, and create a more conducive environment for collective bargaining and labor organizing.

Future Directions in Collective Bargaining

As collective bargaining continues to evolve, future trends may include:

  • Digital Transformation: Leveraging digital technologies, data analytics, and online platforms to enhance the efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of collective bargaining processes, including virtual negotiations, electronic voting, and online dispute resolution.
  • Globalization and Supply Chains: Addressing the challenges of globalization and supply chain dynamics in collective bargaining, including coordinating bargaining strategies across borders, industries, and multinational corporations to protect worker rights and standards.

Conclusion

Collective bargaining is a cornerstone of labor relations and industrial democracy, providing workers with a collective voice and representation in negotiations with employers. By enabling workers to negotiate wages, benefits, and working conditions through organized labor unions, collective bargaining promotes fairness, equity, and dignity in the workplace. As collective bargaining continues to adapt to changing economic, technological, and social realities, it remains a vital tool for advancing worker rights, promoting social justice, and building more inclusive and equitable societies.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

More Resources

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA