DeepSeek’s models accounted for 56.4% of the tokens processed by the 10 most-used models on OpenRouter in the week to November 7, up from 52.0% a week earlier, by our arithmetic from the OpenRouter rankings page as our dataset watcher captured it.
The two snapshots were taken at 20:46 UTC on October 31 and 20:12 UTC on November 7. Each shows OpenRouter’s weekly table of the top 10 models, with the tokens each processed.
Business Pill · Tokens Explained
An evergreen Business Engineer explainer on tokens, the unit AI models read, write and bill in. It teaches the general idea only and does not discuss OpenRouter or any company named here.
The key insight: By our arithmetic from OpenRouter’s weekly rankings, DeepSeek’s models made up 56.4% of the tokens processed by OpenRouter’s 10 most-used models in the week to November 7, up from 52.0% a week earlier.
Update, 8 Nov, 19:24 UTC: Kimi K3.1 Pro enters the top 10. In our collection of OpenRouter’s public rankings page, captured at 19:24 UTC on 8 November, the table OpenRouter labels “Top models today” shows Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3.1 Pro at No. 7 with 824B tokens, a change of +56% as shown in OpenRouter’s own change column. Kimi K3.1 Pro was not in that table’s top 10 in our previous capture, at 20:12 UTC on 7 November. In the 8 November capture it sits one place above Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5 (No. 8, 767B tokens, −27%).
By our arithmetic from the same capture, models from Chinese labs (DeepSeek, Tencent, Z.ai, StepFun, Moonshot AI and MiniMax) hold 7 of the 10 places and 15.78T of the 18.10T tokens listed, or 87.1%. OpenAI and Anthropic models account for 8.9%, and one model listed as stealth, Crouton Alpha, for 3.9%. This is one table on one router, captured on a Sunday, not a measure of the whole AI market. For the model itself, see our 4 November piece on Kimi K3.1 Pro’s open weights, its 57.4 score on the TCSExam benchmark and what Chinese labs said this week about keeping weights open.
What the Rankings Show
In the November 7 table, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ranks first with 56.2T tokens, up 23% on OpenRouter’s own comparison, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ranks second with 17.2T, up 13%. GLM 5.3 Flash from Z.ai is third with 14.1T, down 13%.
OpenAI’s GPT-6 Luna is fourth with 7.22T tokens, down 34%. Tencent’s Hy4 enters at fifth with 7.05T, marked new. Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic is seventh with 6.59T, down 10%. StepFun’s Step 5 Preview, MiniMax M3.1 Flash, Tencent’s Hy4 preview and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Luna fill the rest of the list.
In the October 31 table, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 was first with 45.5T tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash second with 16.1T and GPT-6 Luna fourth with 10.9T. Claude Opus 5.5 was sixth with 7.31T.

Our Numbers
We added up the tokens of the 10 models in each table: 124.2T in the week to October 31 and 130.0T in the week to November 7. All shares below are our arithmetic on those totals.
DeepSeek’s three listed models made up 52.0% of the October 31 total; its two listed models made up 56.4% of the November 7 total, a gain of 4.4 points. Z.ai fell from 16.7% to 10.8%, partly because its GLM 5.3 model, ninth on October 31 with 4.62T, is not in the November 7 table.
OpenAI and Anthropic together went from 14.7% to 13.7%. OpenAI held near 8.7% because GPT-5.6 Luna joined the list while GPT-6 Luna fell; Anthropic moved from 5.9% to 5.1%. Tencent, StepFun and MiniMax together rose from 16.6% to 19.0%.
By the same arithmetic, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 alone processed 56.2T tokens, about 4.1 times GPT-6 Luna and Claude Opus 5.5 combined.
Where This Fits
Our earlier pieces covered open models’ share of OpenRouter tokens and agents’ share of its October volume. The weekly tables add a second reading on the same platform, week on week, by model maker. We also covered Kimi K3.1’s release and a test of routing hard cases to a frontier model.
The Structural Read
As we read the tables, the gain came from volume: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 went from 45.5T to 56.2T tokens while GPT-6 Luna went from 10.9T to 7.22T.
As we read them, OpenAI and Anthropic together slipped from 14.7% to 13.7% of the top 10, and Tencent, StepFun and MiniMax together rose from 16.6% to 19.0%.
As we read the scope, these are one platform’s top-10 tables in rolling weeks; a model entering or leaving the list moves the shares.
Tokenomics: The Economics of AI, The Business Engineer
“It is simultaneously the unit of cognition the model produces, the unit of compute the data center serves, the unit of price the lab charges, and the unit of value the enterprise extracts.”
Three Implications
FOR DEEPSEEK OpenRouter’s November 7 table lists its two V4.1 Flash models first and second, with 56.2T and 17.2T tokens.
FOR OPENAI AND ANTHROPIC OpenRouter’s table shows GPT-6 Luna down 34% and Claude Opus 5.5 down 10% on its own weekly comparison.
FOR READERS OF THESE TABLES The shares cover OpenRouter’s top 10 only and exclude direct API traffic to any lab.
The Business Engineer Lens
This story maps onto the Business Engineer framework Tokenomics: The Economics of AI.
The analysis says of the token: “It is simultaneously the unit of cognition the model produces, the unit of compute the data center serves, the unit of price the lab charges, and the unit of value the enterprise extracts.”
As we read it, OpenRouter’s weekly table counts the first of those units, tokens processed, by model maker. The analysis does not discuss OpenRouter or these rankings.
What Is Not Established
These are OpenRouter’s tables, not the whole market: direct API traffic to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google or DeepSeek is not included. The shares cover only the top 10 models in each week, so a model leaving or entering the list moves the figures. The tables are rolling seven-day windows captured at a moment. We make no claim about revenue.
The Bottom Line
On OpenRouter’s weekly table, DeepSeek’s models rose to 56.4% of the top-10 models’ tokens in the week to November 7, from 52.0% a week before, by our arithmetic. GPT-6 Luna’s volume fell 34% and Claude Opus 5.5’s fell 10% on OpenRouter’s own figures. The data covers one platform and its top 10 only.
95,000+ executives read Business Engineer for the AI strategy frameworks cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.
A note on sourcing. Model names, ranks, token counts and percentage changes are from OpenRouter’s rankings page, weekly top-10 tables captured by our dataset watcher on October 31 and November 7, 2026. Totals and shares are our arithmetic. This piece is not investment advice.
Sources: OpenRouter rankings, weekly top-10 table (captured 31 Oct and 7 Nov 2026)









