How Big Tech Finances AI Data Centres Off Balance Sheet

FOURWEEKMBA EXPLAINER ยท FROM THE NEWSROOM ยท UPDATED 1 NOVEMBER 2026

Google and Meta stand behind up to $133B of their data-centre partners' risk: Alphabet $91.9B, Meta $41.5B, Microsoft, Amazon and Oracle none found in their latest 10-Qs
Free to share with a link to this page. Alphabet and Meta figures from their 10-Q filings for the quarter to 30 September 2026; the $133.4 billion total is our arithmetic.

The short version: the biggest AI builders increasingly put new data centres inside a separate company. Partners and bond buyers fund most of the build, the tech company signs a lease to rent the campus, and it promises to cover part of any loss if the campus is worth less when it walks away. The debt sits on the separate company’s books, not the tech company’s. The promise does not disappear: it shows up as a lease commitment or a guarantee in the notes to the accounts.

Two companies disclose that kind of promise at scale. Alphabet lists $91.9 billion of data-centre backstops and power-equipment guarantees and Meta $41.5 billion of residual value guarantees, both at 30 September 2026 (our analysis of the 10-Qs). Meta’s maximum exposure to its two data-centre ventures reached $68.40 billion, up 49% in nine months (Meta 10-Q).

How the structure works

Take Meta’s Hyperion campus in Richland Parish, Louisiana, the template the others copy. Every number below is from Meta’s filings, its 21 October 2025 release or IFR’s account of the bond.

Hyperion structure, simplified. Sources: Meta 10-K FY2025 and 10-Q Q3 2026 (Note 5), Meta release of 21 Oct 2025, IFR.

Why it stays off the balance sheet. Each venture is a variable interest entity. Under US accounting rules the company with the “power” to direct what most affects its economics must consolidate it. Meta says remarketing the campus (finding new tenants, selling buildings) is that activity, and that it does not control it: “As we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact each Venture’s economic performance, we are not the primary beneficiary for either Venture and, therefore, do not consolidate.” It adds that “RVG payments are not probable, and therefore no liability has been recorded to date” (10-Q Q3 2026).

The same idea, other shapes. Alphabet does not form ventures; it backstops the leases and energy bills its data-centre partners owe, for up to 15 years, keeping “the right to assume the underlying leases” if a partner defaults. Nvidia and AMD give credit support behind campuses that a customer will rent. Neoclouds such as CoreWeave mostly borrow on their own balance sheets, and SpaceX has agreed a finance lease of GPUs from an Apollo-managed lessor, which stays on its books.

The deals

Thirteen arrangements from our newsroom’s sourced coverage. Amounts are what each source states; they are not comparable with each other (a guarantee cap, a development cost and a loan are different things).

CompanyPartner / lenderAmountStructureMWDateSource
Meta: Louisiana Venture (Hyperion)Funds managed by Blue Owl (80%); Beignet Investor bonds, Pimco anchor, Morgan Stanley sole underwriter~$27B development cost; $27.3B bonds at 6.581% to 2049Off balance sheet: unconsolidated venture, Meta 20%, leaseback from 2029, residual value guarantee ~$28B2.3 GW load for Entergy’s plants; Meta says “scaling toward 5 gigawatts”Oct 2025Meta, IFR, WWNO, Meta Engineering
Meta: Texas VenturePartner not named in the 10-Q~$14B development cost; $1.04B cash back to MetaOff balance sheet: same template, Meta 20%, lease from 2028, guarantee—Jul 2026Meta 10-Q
Meta: third contribution“a third party”, not named$1.89B of data-centre assetsPlan to contribute assets to co-develop data centres—Jul 2026Meta 10-Q
Alphabet: data-centre backstopsThird-party data-centre providers$75.7B ($48.0B executed + $27.7B to put in place)Off balance sheet: credit backstops on lease payments and energy costs, up to 15 years—30 Sep 2026Alphabet 10-Q
Alphabet: power-equipment guaranteesCounterparties buying long-lead power equipment$16.2BGuarantees (maximum potential future payments)—30 Sep 2026Alphabet 10-Q
Alphabet + Blackstone: Crux AIFunds managed by Blackstone (equity); Alphabet backstop obligation (related party)$5B initial equity; $10.0B of Alphabet’s backstops to put in placeTPU cloud venture backed by an Alphabet backstop500 MW planned online in 2027Sep 2026Crux AI release, Alphabet 10-Q
Google + Anthropic: Hubbard, TexasBank group led by Morgan Stanley$15B loanGoogle guarantees four Anthropic leases and power payments if Anthropic defaults (Reuters, citing WSJ); banks later delayed a bond sale (Bloomberg)—Jul 2026Reuters, Bloomberg
Nvidia: SB Energy, OhioAffiliates of SB Energy, “on behalf of a customer” (OpenAI, per The Information)Guarantees capped at $105BCredit support on a land, power and shell buildout—Aug 2026Nvidia 10-Q
AMD: Fermi America, Project MatadorFermi AmericaNot stated in Fermi’s releaseCredit support agreement backing a lease222 MW (phase one)Oct 2026Fermi release
Oracle / OpenAI: Abilene, TexasCrusoe, Blue Owl and Primary Digital Infrastructure; JPMorgan loan$5B cash + $10B loanChain of leases (OpenAI from Oracle, Oracle from Crusoe); loan “taken out by a shell company” sponsored by the three, per the report—Reported 16 Oct 2026AFR / Open Markets report
SpaceX: GPU finance leaseEntity managed by Apollo Global Management~$40B aggregate principal paymentsOn balance sheet: master finance lease of GPU pods, schedules of about 5 years, from H1 2027—24 Oct 2026SpaceX 8-K
CoreWeaveBond and loan markets$31.4B recourse + $3.7B non-recourse debt (our arithmetic)On balance sheet: the neocloud borrows directly—30 Jun 2026CoreWeave 10-Q
Blue Owl’s Stack: MelbourneLenders (loan sought)A$8.6B ($6B)Five-year loan for a data-centre project—Oct 2026Bloomberg

“—” in the MW column means no megawatt figure in the sources listed for that row; it is not a claim that none exists. Scroll the table sideways on a phone.

Meta's maximum exposure to its data-centre ventures rose from $46.0B at 31 Dec 2025 to $68.4B at 30 Sep 2026, mostly residual value guarantees ($28.1B to $41.5B) and lease commitments ($12.3B to $18.5B)
Most of the rise is the new Texas venture’s guarantee and lease, layered onto Louisiana’s. Meta 10-K FY2025 and 10-Q Q3 2026, Note 5.

Why it matters

  • The debt moves off the debt line, not off the hook. S&P rated the Beignet bonds A+, one notch below Meta, because the deal passes “substantial credit risk to Meta during both construction and operation phases”, as IFR reports it. In an IFR opinion piece, Prasad Gollakota, a former UBS capital-solutions co-head, argues the debt is economically Meta’s, because the guarantee gives Meta an incentive to keep renewing four-year leases.
  • It is not cheaper money. The Beignet bonds pay 6.581%; Meta’s own May 2026 notes carry stated coupons of 4.55% to 6.45% (10-Q). Lenders price these deals off the tenant: GPU-backed loans run about 6% with Microsoft or Meta as renter and about 9% without (our report).
  • Disclosure gives a ceiling, not a probability. Meta pays only if it decides to “terminate or not renew a lease” and “certain other conditions” are met; the filings value neither campus, so outsiders cannot price the expected loss. As we read it, the loss path is: AI demand or Meta’s plans change, Meta exits at a four-year break, and a single-tenant, gigawatt-scale campus cannot be re-let at its guaranteed value.
  • Layers add fragility. “Such multilayered structures are precarious,” says a 16 October report by Americans for Financial Reform Education Fund and the Open Markets Institute, describing the Abilene chain, because if one party cannot pay or build, the others face losses unless someone takes on its obligations.
  • Credit markets are watching. S&P turned Meta’s outlook negative on 30 October as capex topped operating cash (our report), and the WSJ reported the cost of insuring Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Oracle debt at its highest since 2021 (our report). Reuters reported that CoreWeave’s default-insurance cost of around 1,000 basis points implies a nearly 63% chance of default within five years (Reuters).
  • Private credit is the funding pool. The World Bank expects US$800 billion of AI capex in 2025-2028 to be financed by private credit, and puts AI-related lending at 34% of private credit activity in 2025 (World Bank).
  • Local costs outlast the lease. Entergy Louisiana’s three gas plants for Hyperion were approved 4-1 by the state regulator; Meta covers 100% of plant costs under a 15-year deal (WWNO), shorter than the 16-year guarantee and the bond running to 2049.

FAQ

What does “off balance sheet” mean for a data centre?

The campus and the debt that paid for it sit in a separate company the tech firm does not consolidate. The tech firm reports only its stake, its lease commitments and any guarantees, in the notes. Meta’s venture debt, for example, was issued by Beignet Investor, a Blue Owl vehicle, not by Meta.

What is a residual value guarantee?

A promise from the tenant to cover the gap if the property is worth less than an agreed threshold when the tenant leaves. Meta’s guarantees cap at $41.49 billion across its two ventures at 30 September 2026; it has recorded no liability because it judges payment “not probable”.

Is this legal?

Yes. It follows US GAAP consolidation rules, which turn on who has “power” over a venture’s key decisions. Meta discloses the judgment and the maximum exposure in its filings. Critics such as IFR’s columnist argue the economics are still Meta’s.

How big is it across Big Tech?

Alphabet and Meta disclose up to $133.4 billion of contingent support for data-centre and power partners (our arithmetic). Leases signed but not yet started are larger: Meta lists $355.73 billion, and our tracker puts Big Tech’s off-book commitments at $3.94 trillion (our report).

Do Microsoft, Amazon and Oracle do the same?

Our newsroom’s full-text search of their latest 10-Qs found no comparable guarantee. They carry the commitment as large leases not yet started instead: $364.6 billion at Microsoft, $164.9 billion at Amazon and $288 billion at Oracle (our report).

What would make the guarantees pay out?

For Meta, a decision not to renew a lease plus “certain other conditions” the filing does not spell out, with the campus worth less than the threshold. For Alphabet, “specified default scenarios by underlying parties”, in which case it can take over the leases or sublease them.

From the newsroom

The spending these structures fund: The AI capex race and the AI capex tracker.

How this page stays current

Built from the FourWeekMBA newsroom’s sourced facts and its research on the Meta and Blue Owl structure. When Alphabet, Meta, Nvidia or the others file new quarterly numbers, or a new deal is reported, our newsroom covers it and this page is updated with the new figure and date. Figures marked “our arithmetic” are our own sums or ratios from the cited filings.

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA