thomas-kilmann-conflict-mode

Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument

Business / By /

The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, often referred to as the TKI, is a psychological assessment tool developed by Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann in the early 1970s. The TKI is designed to measure an individual’s or team’s preferred approach to handling conflicts in various situations. It is based on the premise that people have different conflict-handling styles, and understanding these styles can lead to more effective conflict resolution.

Key Concepts of the TKI

The TKI is rooted in two fundamental dimensions of conflict-handling behavior:

  1. Assertiveness: This dimension reflects the extent to which an individual tries to satisfy their own concerns, needs, or goals when confronted with a conflict. High assertiveness involves a focus on personal objectives, while low assertiveness prioritizes the concerns of others.
  2. Cooperativeness: Cooperativeness relates to the degree to which an individual attempts to satisfy the concerns, needs, or goals of others during a conflict. High cooperativeness entails a focus on addressing others’ interests, while low cooperativeness centers on self-interest.

The combination of assertiveness and cooperativeness results in five distinct conflict-handling styles or modes, which the TKI assesses:

  1. Competing (High Assertiveness, Low Cooperativeness): Individuals adopting this style are assertive in pursuing their own goals and interests, often at the expense of others. They tend to use their authority and power to win conflicts.
  2. Collaborating (High Assertiveness, High Cooperativeness): Collaborators seek to address the concerns and interests of all parties involved. They are willing to invest time and effort to find mutually beneficial solutions.
  3. Compromising (Moderate Assertiveness, Moderate Cooperativeness): Compromisers aim to strike a middle ground by making concessions and finding solutions that partially satisfy everyone’s needs. They seek to avoid extremes.
  4. Avoiding (Low Assertiveness, Low Cooperativeness): Avoiders tend to withdraw from conflicts or sidestep them altogether. They may delay addressing the issue or hope it resolves itself.
  5. Accommodating (Low Assertiveness, High Cooperativeness): Individuals who accommodate are willing to yield to the concerns and interests of others, often at their own expense. They prioritize maintaining harmony and relationships.

Practical Applications of the TKI

The TKI has found widespread use in various personal, professional, and organizational contexts:

1. Personal Development:

  • Self-Awareness: Individuals can gain insight into their natural conflict-handling tendencies and identify areas for personal growth and improvement.
  • Conflict Resolution Skills: Armed with knowledge of their preferred styles, individuals can develop a more versatile and adaptive approach to conflict resolution.
  • Effective Communication: Understanding the TKI can enhance communication skills by helping individuals tailor their messages to suit the preferences of others.

2. Team Building:

  • Team Dynamics: Teams can use the TKI to understand their collective conflict-handling styles and make adjustments to work more cohesively.
  • Conflict Resolution Workshops: Team workshops based on the TKI can improve conflict resolution skills, leading to better collaboration and productivity.

3. Leadership and Management:

  • Leadership Styles: Leaders can use the TKI to assess their leadership styles in conflict situations and adapt their approaches to lead more effectively.
  • Conflict Management: Managers can apply the TKI to address conflicts within their teams, fostering a healthier work environment.

4. Organizational Development:

  • Conflict Resolution Programs: Organizations can implement conflict resolution programs based on the TKI to enhance workplace relations and reduce the negative impact of conflicts.
  • Conflict Transformation: The TKI can contribute to a culture of conflict transformation, where conflicts become opportunities for growth and innovation.

Benefits of Using the TKI

The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument offers several advantages:

  1. Enhanced Self-Awareness: Individuals gain insights into their natural conflict-handling styles and tendencies, enabling them to make more informed choices in conflict situations.
  2. Improved Conflict Resolution: By understanding the five conflict-handling modes, individuals and teams can choose the most appropriate approach for a given situation, leading to more effective conflict resolution.
  3. Better Communication: The TKI encourages individuals to adapt their communication styles to match the preferences of others, improving the quality of interactions.
  4. Conflict Prevention: With an understanding of different styles, individuals can proactively address potential conflicts before they escalate.
  5. Enhanced Relationships: Teams and organizations that use the TKI often experience improved relationships and a more positive work environment.

Challenges and Criticisms

While the TKI is a valuable tool, it is not without challenges and criticisms:

  1. Situational Factors: Critics argue that conflict-handling styles can vary based on situational factors, and people may not always adhere to a single style.
  2. Overreliance: Some individuals may become overly reliant on the TKI, rigidly applying a particular style without considering the unique circumstances of each conflict.
  3. Complexity: The TKI’s simplicity may not capture the full complexity of human conflict behaviors, which can be influenced by cultural, emotional, and cognitive factors.
  4. Limited Predictive Value: It has limited predictive value in certain situations where factors other than assertiveness and cooperativeness play a significant role.

Real-World Examples

The TKI has been applied in various fields and organizations:

  1. Corporate Settings: Many corporations use the TKI to enhance conflict resolution skills among employees and promote a more harmonious workplace.
  2. Educational Institutions: Teachers and school administrators employ the TKI to improve communication and conflict resolution among students and staff.
  3. Marriage and Family Counseling: Couples and families use the TKI to better understand their conflict-handling styles and work towards healthier relationships.
  4. Community Organizations: Nonprofit and community groups utilize the TKI to address conflicts among members and volunteers, fostering greater collaboration.

Conclusion

The Thomas–Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) is a valuable tool for understanding and managing conflicts in personal, professional, and organizational contexts. By assessing an individual’s or team’s preferred conflict-handling styles, it provides a foundation for enhanced self

-awareness, improved conflict resolution, and better communication.

While the TKI is not without its limitations and criticisms, it remains a widely used and respected resource for conflict management and resolution. Its principles can help individuals and organizations transform conflicts from sources of tension and discord into opportunities for growth, collaboration, and positive change.

Key Highlights

  • Key Concepts of the TKI:
    • Assertiveness: Extent to which one pursues own goals.
    • Cooperativeness: Degree to which one addresses others’ concerns.
  • Five Conflict-Handling Styles:
    • Competing: High assertiveness, low cooperativeness.
    • Collaborating: High assertiveness, high cooperativeness.
    • Compromising: Moderate assertiveness, moderate cooperativeness.
    • Avoiding: Low assertiveness, low cooperativeness.
    • Accommodating: Low assertiveness, high cooperativeness.
  • Practical Applications:
    • Personal Development: Self-awareness, conflict resolution skills.
    • Team Building: Understanding team dynamics, conflict resolution workshops.
    • Leadership and Management: Assessing leadership styles, conflict management.
    • Organizational Development: Conflict resolution programs, conflict transformation.
  • Benefits:
    • Enhanced Self-Awareness: Insight into natural conflict-handling tendencies.
    • Improved Conflict Resolution: Selecting appropriate approach for effective resolution.
    • Better Communication: Adapting communication styles for better interactions.
    • Conflict Prevention: Proactively addressing potential conflicts.
    • Enhanced Relationships: Improved workplace relationships and environment.
  • Challenges and Criticisms:
    • Situational Factors: Styles may vary based on situations.
    • Overreliance: Risk of rigidly applying a single style.
    • Complexity: May not capture full complexity of human conflict behaviors.
    • Limited Predictive Value: Limited applicability in certain situations.
  • Real-World Examples:
    • Corporate Settings: Enhancing conflict resolution skills in workplaces.
    • Educational Institutions: Improving communication and conflict resolution among students and staff.
    • Marriage and Family Counseling: Understanding conflict-handling styles for healthier relationships.
    • Community Organizations: Addressing conflicts among members for greater collaboration.
  • Conclusion:
    • Value: Understanding and managing conflicts effectively.
    • Benefits: Enhanced self-awareness, improved conflict resolution, better communication.
    • Limitations: Challenges in applicability and predictive value.
    • Real-World Impact: Applications in various fields for fostering collaboration and positive change.

Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI)– A widely-used assessment tool that measures an individual’s preferences for handling conflict based on five primary conflict-handling styles: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. – The TKI helps individuals understand their default approach to conflict resolution and provides insights into their behavior under different conflict situations. – It is often used in personal development, team building, leadership training, and conflict resolution workshops to improve communication, collaboration, and conflict management skills.Conflict resolution training, leadership development, team building, interpersonal communication skills development
Blake and Mouton’s Managerial Grid– A leadership model that identifies five distinct leadership styles based on two behavioral dimensions: concern for people and concern for production. – The Managerial Grid categorizes leadership styles as impoverished, country club, produce or perish, team, and middle-of-the-road, depending on varying levels of emphasis on task accomplishment and employee relationships. – It helps leaders understand their leadership style and adapt their behavior to effectively manage conflicts and motivate team members.Leadership development, team management, conflict resolution, organizational development
Conflict Management Styles Assessment (CMSA)– An assessment tool that evaluates an individual’s preferred conflict management styles and tendencies across different conflict situations. – The CMSA typically assesses styles such as competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating, similar to the TKI. – It provides insights into how individuals respond to conflicts, their strengths and limitations in conflict resolution, and strategies for improving their conflict management skills. – The CMSA is often used in coaching, counseling, and conflict resolution training programs to enhance self-awareness and interpersonal effectiveness.Conflict resolution training, coaching, counseling, leadership development, team building
Cultural Intelligence (CQ)– A framework that measures an individual’s ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings and interact with people from different cultural backgrounds. – Cultural Intelligence (CQ) includes four key components: cognitive, motivational, behavioral, and metacognitive, which influence individuals’ capacity to understand, adapt to, and navigate cultural differences. – It helps individuals develop awareness, knowledge, and skills to manage conflicts arising from cultural misunderstandings and differences in values, norms, and communication styles. – CQ is essential for building inclusive workplaces, managing multicultural teams, and fostering cross-cultural collaboration and innovation.Intercultural communication, diversity and inclusion initiatives, global leadership development, cross-cultural team management, international business
Emotional Intelligence (EI)– A framework that assesses individuals’ ability to perceive, understand, manage, and regulate their own emotions and those of others. – Emotional Intelligence (EI) comprises five key components: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills, which are critical for effective interpersonal relationships and conflict resolution. – It helps individuals recognize and manage emotions in conflict situations, empathize with others’ perspectives, and navigate conflicts constructively by controlling impulses, communicating effectively, and building trust and rapport. – EI is valuable for leadership development, team dynamics, and improving communication and collaboration skills.Leadership development, conflict resolution, team building, interpersonal communication, coaching
Nonviolent Communication (NVC)– A communication and conflict resolution framework that emphasizes empathy, authenticity, and compassionate communication to resolve conflicts peacefully and build mutually satisfying relationships. – Nonviolent Communication (NVC) focuses on expressing observations, feelings, needs, and requests in a nonjudgmental and empathetic manner to foster understanding and connection with others. – It helps individuals communicate assertively, listen empathetically, and navigate conflicts by addressing underlying needs and feelings rather than focusing on blame or criticism. – NVC promotes mutual respect, empathy, and cooperation in resolving conflicts and building harmonious relationships.Conflict resolution, interpersonal communication, mediation, negotiation, relationship counseling
Transactional Analysis (TA)– A psychological framework that analyzes human behavior and communication patterns based on three ego states: parent, adult, and child. – Transactional Analysis (TA) helps individuals understand their own and others’ behavioral patterns, motives, and communication styles in interpersonal interactions and conflicts. – It provides insights into how people respond to conflicts based on their ego states and transactional dynamics, enabling them to choose more effective ways of communicating and resolving conflicts. – TA is used in counseling, coaching, and conflict resolution to improve self-awareness, communication skills, and relationship dynamics.Counseling, coaching, conflict resolution, communication skills training, interpersonal relationships
Interest-Based Negotiation (IBN)– A negotiation approach that focuses on identifying and addressing underlying interests, needs, and values of parties involved in a dispute. – Interest-Based Negotiation seeks to create value, expand the options for agreement, and build trust and collaboration between negotiators. – It encourages open communication, joint problem-solving, and creative solutions to reach mutually beneficial agreements that address the interests of all parties. – Interest-Based Negotiation contrasts with positional bargaining, which focuses on fixed positions and win-lose outcomes.Business negotiations, labor disputes, contract negotiations, commercial transactions, conflict resolution
Strategic Leadership– A leadership approach that focuses on aligning organizational goals and resources to adapt to changing environments and achieve competitive advantage. – Strategic Leadership involves vision setting, strategic planning, and execution to guide organizations toward their long-term objectives. – It emphasizes innovation, agility, and transformational change to address challenges and capitalize on opportunities in dynamic and uncertain markets. – Strategic leaders inspire and empower teams, foster collaboration, and promote a culture of continuous improvement and learning.Organizational leadership, change management, strategic planning, innovation management, business development
Empowerment Evaluation– A participatory approach to program evaluation that engages stakeholders in the evaluation process and empowers them to assess program effectiveness, make data-driven decisions, and take ownership of outcomes. – Empowerment Evaluation involves collaborative goal setting, data collection, analysis, and interpretation to facilitate learning, accountability, and continuous improvement. – It emphasizes inclusivity, transparency, and capacity building to strengthen organizations and communities’ ability to evaluate and improve their programs.Program evaluation, organizational development, community development, capacity building, social impact assessment

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

More Resources

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA