The Map of AI: Vertical Integration Analysis — How the Major Players Compete Across the Stack

AI competition is no longer about models alone. It is about full-stack control: hardware, infrastructure, platforms, models, services, and applications. The companies that own more layers compound advantages faster and escape the constraints that slow everyone else down.

The complete strategic framework behind this analysis is presented in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/

This article distills the map into an accessible, comparative overview.


1. Hardware Layer — The Foundation of AI Economics

Google / Alphabet: Complete

Google controls its silicon with TPUs, edge devices, and vertical integration from chip design to deployment.
This gives Google a structural cost advantage explored in detail in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/

OpenAI: Limited

OpenAI relies entirely on NVIDIA hardware. No custom silicon means no hardware–software optimization loop.

Microsoft: Moderate

Microsoft has emerging silicon initiatives and owns devices like Surface and Xbox, but still depends on partners.

Meta: Emerging

Meta invests in research chips and edge devices (VR/AR), but silicon control is still early.

Amazon: Selective

Inferentia and Trainium represent AWS’s push into custom AI hardware.

Anthropic: None

No hardware. Fully dependent on cloud vendors.

Apple: Integrated

Apple’s chip strategy is deeply vertical, optimized for privacy and on-device AI.

NVIDIA: Dominant

NVIDIA owns the global GPU market, CUDA ecosystem, and GPU software stack.
This dominance is discussed within the broader stack analysis in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/


2. Infrastructure Layer — The Compute Backbone

Google: Complete

Massive cloud footprint, global data centers, and Kubernetes across the stack.

OpenAI: Partial

Microsoft Azure partnership provides infrastructure but limits autonomy.

Microsoft: Complete

Global cloud presence combined with enterprise security and integration.

Meta: Strong

Large-scale infrastructure optimized for social platforms and AI research.

Amazon: Dominant

AWS remains the global cloud leader, with unmatched enterprise reliability.

Anthropic: Dependent

Fully tied to AWS/GCP infrastructure agreements.

Apple: Limited

Focused on private cloud and edge-first design.

NVIDIA: Indirect

Partners provide infrastructure; NVIDIA supplies the hardware.


3. Platforms Layer — ML Frameworks, Dev Tools, APIs

Google: Complete

TensorFlow, JAX, Keras API, and Colab give Google one of the strongest platform layers.
Platform leverage is a key vector analyzed in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/

OpenAI: Strong

GPT APIs, developer tools, Playground, and fine-tuning.

Microsoft: Strong

Azure AI, Cognitive Services, ML Studio, and Bot Framework.

Meta: Open

PyTorch and open-source frameworks dominate research.

Amazon: Growing

SageMaker and Bedrock are expanding rapidly.

Anthropic: Focused

Claude API, simple tools, research focus.

Apple: Ecosystem

Core ML, Create ML, and MLX.

NVIDIA: Foundational

CUDA, cuDNN, TensorRT, Triton — the software backbone of GPU computing.


4. Models Layer — Foundation and Specialized Models

Google: Complete

Gemini, PaLM 2, Imagen, and DeepMind research.

OpenAI: Leading

GPT-4o, DALL·E 3, Sora, Whisper.

Microsoft: Partnership

Top-tier access to OpenAI models plus internal research.

Meta: Competitive

Llama 3.1 and FAIR research.

Amazon: Emerging

Nova models, partner models, and Titan.

Anthropic: Excellent

Claude 3.5, Sonnet/Opus, and Constitutional AI research.

Apple: Private

On-device foundational models.

NVIDIA: Selective

NeMo models but primarily an enabler for others.

A detailed comparison of model moats appears in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/


5. Services Layer — AI Services and Enterprise Products

Google: Complete

Gemini API, Vertex AI, enterprise solutions.

OpenAI: Growing

ChatGPT Plus, GPT Store, enterprise models.

Microsoft: Complete

Azure AI, Power Platform, Copilot integrations.

Meta: Limited

Research APIs, internal tools.

Amazon: Comprehensive

AWS AI/ML services, inference APIs, enterprise marketplace.

Anthropic: Simple

Claude API, teams, and focus on safety.

Apple: Internal

Private APIs, on-device intelligence.

NVIDIA: Enabler

AI enterprise services and partner offerings.


6. Applications Layer — User Interfaces and End-User Apps

Google: Complete

Search, Gemini apps, Workspace AI, NotebookLM.

OpenAI: Focused

ChatGPT, GPT apps, GPT Plus.

Microsoft: Integrated

Copilot across Office, Teams, Windows.

Meta: Social

Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp.

Amazon: Fragmented

Alexa, shopping, internal enterprise tools.

Anthropic: Minimal

Claude web, API, third-party integrations.

Apple: Integrated

Siri, Photos, ecosystem apps.

NVIDIA: Indirect

Partner applications and gaming integrations.

The application layer’s distribution dynamics are explored in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/


Conclusion — Vertical Integration Is the Real Battleground

The companies competing in AI are not fighting over models alone. They are fighting over entire stacks. The ones that own more layers gain powerful self-reinforcing loops:

  • lower costs
  • faster iteration
  • richer data
  • deeper integration
  • stronger distribution
  • tighter moats

This is why Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and NVIDIA look so different across the map. Their strengths and weaknesses emerge from the layers they control and the dependencies they cannot escape.

To explore the full strategic logic behind vertical integration and AI moats, see The Business Engineer:
https://businessengineer.ai/

businessengineernewsletter
Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA