
AI competition is no longer about models alone. It is about full-stack control: hardware, infrastructure, platforms, models, services, and applications. The companies that own more layers compound advantages faster and escape the constraints that slow everyone else down.
The complete strategic framework behind this analysis is presented in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
This article distills the map into an accessible, comparative overview.
1. Hardware Layer — The Foundation of AI Economics
Google / Alphabet: Complete
Google controls its silicon with TPUs, edge devices, and vertical integration from chip design to deployment.
This gives Google a structural cost advantage explored in detail in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
OpenAI: Limited
OpenAI relies entirely on NVIDIA hardware. No custom silicon means no hardware–software optimization loop.
Microsoft: Moderate
Microsoft has emerging silicon initiatives and owns devices like Surface and Xbox, but still depends on partners.
Meta: Emerging
Meta invests in research chips and edge devices (VR/AR), but silicon control is still early.
Amazon: Selective
Inferentia and Trainium represent AWS’s push into custom AI hardware.
Anthropic: None
No hardware. Fully dependent on cloud vendors.
Apple: Integrated
Apple’s chip strategy is deeply vertical, optimized for privacy and on-device AI.
NVIDIA: Dominant
NVIDIA owns the global GPU market, CUDA ecosystem, and GPU software stack.
This dominance is discussed within the broader stack analysis in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
2. Infrastructure Layer — The Compute Backbone
Google: Complete
Massive cloud footprint, global data centers, and Kubernetes across the stack.
OpenAI: Partial
Microsoft Azure partnership provides infrastructure but limits autonomy.
Microsoft: Complete
Global cloud presence combined with enterprise security and integration.
Meta: Strong
Large-scale infrastructure optimized for social platforms and AI research.
Amazon: Dominant
AWS remains the global cloud leader, with unmatched enterprise reliability.
Anthropic: Dependent
Fully tied to AWS/GCP infrastructure agreements.
Apple: Limited
Focused on private cloud and edge-first design.
NVIDIA: Indirect
Partners provide infrastructure; NVIDIA supplies the hardware.
3. Platforms Layer — ML Frameworks, Dev Tools, APIs
Google: Complete
TensorFlow, JAX, Keras API, and Colab give Google one of the strongest platform layers.
Platform leverage is a key vector analyzed in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
OpenAI: Strong
GPT APIs, developer tools, Playground, and fine-tuning.
Microsoft: Strong
Azure AI, Cognitive Services, ML Studio, and Bot Framework.
Meta: Open
PyTorch and open-source frameworks dominate research.
Amazon: Growing
SageMaker and Bedrock are expanding rapidly.
Anthropic: Focused
Claude API, simple tools, research focus.
Apple: Ecosystem
Core ML, Create ML, and MLX.
NVIDIA: Foundational
CUDA, cuDNN, TensorRT, Triton — the software backbone of GPU computing.
4. Models Layer — Foundation and Specialized Models
Google: Complete
Gemini, PaLM 2, Imagen, and DeepMind research.
OpenAI: Leading
GPT-4o, DALL·E 3, Sora, Whisper.
Microsoft: Partnership
Top-tier access to OpenAI models plus internal research.
Meta: Competitive
Llama 3.1 and FAIR research.
Amazon: Emerging
Nova models, partner models, and Titan.
Anthropic: Excellent
Claude 3.5, Sonnet/Opus, and Constitutional AI research.
Apple: Private
On-device foundational models.
NVIDIA: Selective
NeMo models but primarily an enabler for others.
A detailed comparison of model moats appears in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
5. Services Layer — AI Services and Enterprise Products
Google: Complete
Gemini API, Vertex AI, enterprise solutions.
OpenAI: Growing
ChatGPT Plus, GPT Store, enterprise models.
Microsoft: Complete
Azure AI, Power Platform, Copilot integrations.
Meta: Limited
Research APIs, internal tools.
Amazon: Comprehensive
AWS AI/ML services, inference APIs, enterprise marketplace.
Anthropic: Simple
Claude API, teams, and focus on safety.
Apple: Internal
Private APIs, on-device intelligence.
NVIDIA: Enabler
AI enterprise services and partner offerings.
6. Applications Layer — User Interfaces and End-User Apps
Google: Complete
Search, Gemini apps, Workspace AI, NotebookLM.
OpenAI: Focused
ChatGPT, GPT apps, GPT Plus.
Microsoft: Integrated
Copilot across Office, Teams, Windows.
Meta: Social
Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp.
Amazon: Fragmented
Alexa, shopping, internal enterprise tools.
Anthropic: Minimal
Claude web, API, third-party integrations.
Apple: Integrated
Siri, Photos, ecosystem apps.
NVIDIA: Indirect
Partner applications and gaming integrations.
The application layer’s distribution dynamics are explored in The Business Engineer: https://businessengineer.ai/
Conclusion — Vertical Integration Is the Real Battleground
The companies competing in AI are not fighting over models alone. They are fighting over entire stacks. The ones that own more layers gain powerful self-reinforcing loops:
- lower costs
- faster iteration
- richer data
- deeper integration
- stronger distribution
- tighter moats
This is why Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and NVIDIA look so different across the map. Their strengths and weaknesses emerge from the layers they control and the dependencies they cannot escape.
To explore the full strategic logic behind vertical integration and AI moats, see The Business Engineer:
https://businessengineer.ai/









