reciprocal-concessions

Reciprocal Concessions

Reciprocal concessions refer to the idea that when one party makes a concession or offers a compromise in a negotiation, the other party is more likely to reciprocate by making concessions of their own. In essence, it is the principle of “you scratch my back, and I’ll scratch yours.” This psychological phenomenon is rooted in the human tendency to reciprocate kindness or favors, creating a sense of obligation to give in return.

Reciprocal concessions can take various forms in negotiations, such as:

  • Making a smaller request initially and then following it with a larger request: This is known as the door-in-the-face technique.
  • Offering a compromise or concession on one issue to gain leverage on another issue: This is often referred to as trading concessions.
  • Acknowledging and validating the other party’s perspective before presenting one’s own demands: This can create a sense of reciprocity in the negotiation process.

Mechanisms Behind Reciprocal Concessions

The effectiveness of reciprocal concessions in negotiations is attributed to several psychological mechanisms:

1. Norm of Reciprocity:

  • The norm of reciprocity is a social and psychological principle that drives individuals to return favors, kindness, or concessions when they have received them. When someone makes a concession in a negotiation, the other party often feels a moral or social obligation to reciprocate in kind.

2. Consistency and Commitment:

  • People tend to strive for consistency in their behavior and commitments. When someone initially rejects a request or proposal but then makes a concession, they may perceive their subsequent concession as a commitment to reaching an agreement, making them more likely to follow through with additional concessions.

3. Perceived Fairness:

  • Reciprocal concessions can create a perception of fairness in negotiations. When both parties make concessions, it can lead to a balanced and equitable outcome, reinforcing the idea that the agreement is fair to both sides.

Real-World Examples of Reciprocal Concessions

Reciprocal concessions are commonly observed in various real-world scenarios, both in formal negotiations and everyday interactions:

1. Sales and Marketing:

  • Salespeople often start with a high asking price and then make a series of concessions, such as offering discounts or additional products, to encourage customers to make a purchase.

2. Political Negotiations:

  • In political negotiations, parties may begin with extreme demands but gradually make concessions to reach compromises and resolve conflicts.

3. Parent-Child Interactions:

  • Parents may use reciprocal concessions to influence their children’s behavior. For example, a parent may initially request that a child finishes all their homework, and then, after resistance, they may agree to let the child take a short break before completing the rest of the tasks.

4. Labor Negotiations:

  • Labor unions and management often engage in negotiations where both sides make concessions to reach agreements on issues like wages, working conditions, and benefits.

5. Diplomacy and International Relations:

  • Countries engaged in diplomatic negotiations may employ reciprocal concessions to build trust and facilitate diplomatic agreements.

Strategies for Effective Reciprocal Concessions

To utilize reciprocal concessions effectively in negotiations, consider the following strategies:

1. Begin with a Substantial Request (Door-in-the-Face Technique):

  • Start by making a larger request or presenting a proposal that you expect the other party to reject. Then follow up with a more reasonable request or concession. The contrast between the initial request and the subsequent one can increase the likelihood of acceptance.

2. Build Rapport and Trust:

  • Establishing a positive relationship and rapport with the other party can enhance the impact of reciprocal concessions. People are more likely to reciprocate when they trust and respect the person making the concessions.

3. Be Mindful of Timing:

  • Timing is crucial in negotiations. Make concessions strategically, and consider when it is most advantageous to do so. Offering concessions too early may leave you with less leverage, while offering them too late can hinder progress.

4. Highlight Shared Interests:

  • Emphasize the common interests and goals you share with the other party. This can create a sense of collaboration and make it more likely for them to reciprocate concessions.

5. Trade Concessions:

  • Consider trading concessions on different issues within the negotiation. Offering something of value to the other party in exchange for a concession you desire can be an effective way to reach mutually beneficial agreements.

6. Maintain Flexibility:

  • Be open to adjusting your concessions based on the other party’s responses and evolving circumstances during the negotiation. Flexibility can help build goodwill and facilitate progress.

Ethical Considerations in Reciprocal Concessions

While reciprocal concessions can be a valuable negotiation tool, it’s important to use this technique ethically and responsibly. Here are some ethical considerations:

1. Honesty and Transparency:

  • Maintain honesty and transparency in your negotiations. Avoid using manipulative tactics that may harm the other party’s trust or perception of fairness.

2. Respect for Boundaries:

  • Be mindful of the other party’s boundaries and avoid pressuring or coercing them into making concessions against their will.

3. Mutually Beneficial Outcomes:

  • Strive for agreements that are mutually beneficial and fair to both parties. Avoid seeking concessions solely for your benefit at the expense of the other party.

4. Long-Term Relationships:

  • Consider the long-term implications of your negotiations on the relationship between the parties involved. Building and maintaining positive relationships can be more valuable than immediate gains.

Conclusion

Reciprocal concessions, driven by the norm of reciprocity, play a fundamental role in negotiation strategies and interpersonal dynamics. Understanding the power of reciprocal concessions and employing them strategically can lead to more successful negotiations and agreements. However, it is essential to use this technique ethically and with a focus on achieving mutually beneficial outcomes. When used effectively and responsibly, reciprocal concessions can contribute to productive negotiations, conflict resolution, and positive relationships.

Key Points:

  • Definition: Reciprocal concessions in negotiations involve making concessions or compromises with the expectation that the other party will reciprocate, driven by the norm of reciprocity.
  • Forms: Examples include starting with a larger request and then making a smaller one (door-in-the-face technique), offering compromises to gain leverage on other issues, and acknowledging the other party’s perspective before presenting demands.
  • Mechanisms: The effectiveness of reciprocal concessions stems from psychological mechanisms such as the norm of reciprocity, consistency and commitment, and perceived fairness.
  • Real-World Examples: Reciprocal concessions are observed in sales and marketing, political negotiations, parent-child interactions, labor negotiations, and diplomacy.
  • Strategies: Effective strategies for reciprocal concessions include beginning with a substantial request, building rapport and trust, being mindful of timing, highlighting shared interests, trading concessions, and maintaining flexibility.
  • Ethical Considerations: Ethical considerations include honesty and transparency, respect for boundaries, seeking mutually beneficial outcomes, and considering the long-term relationship between parties.
  • Conclusion: Reciprocal concessions are a fundamental aspect of negotiation strategies and interpersonal dynamics, driven by the norm of reciprocity. When used ethically and strategically, they can lead to successful negotiations, conflict resolution, and positive relationships.

Read Next: Communication Cycle, Encoding, Communication Models, Organizational Structure.

Read Next: Lasswell Communication Model, Linear Model Of Communication.

Connected Communication Models

Aristotle’s Model of Communication

aristotle-model-of-communication
The Aristotle model of communication is a linear model with a focus on public speaking. The Aristotle model of communication was developed by Greek philosopher and orator Aristotle, who proposed the linear model to demonstrate the importance of the speaker and their audience during communication

Communication Cycle

linear-model-of-communication
The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.

Berlo’s SMCR Model

berlos-smcr-model
Berlo’s SMCR model was created by American communication theorist David Berlo in 1960, who expanded the Shannon-Weaver model of communication into clear and distinct parts. Berlo’s SMCR model is a one-way or linear communication framework based on the Shannon-Weaver communication model.

Helical Model of Communication

helical-model-of-communication
The helical model of communication is a framework inspired by the three-dimensional spring-like curve of a helix. It argues communication is cyclical, continuous, non-repetitive, accumulative, and influenced by time and experience.

Lasswell Communication Model

lasswell-communication-model
The Lasswell communication model is a linear framework for explaining the communication process through segmentation. Lasswell proposed media propaganda performs three social functions: surveillance, correlation, and transmission. Lasswell believed the media could impact what viewers believed about the information presented.

Modus Tollens

modus-tollens
Modus tollens is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference used to make conclusions of arguments and sets of arguments.  Modus tollens argues that if P is true then Q is also true. However, P is false. Therefore Q is also false. Modus tollens as an inference rule dates back to late antiquity where it was taught as part of Aristotelian logic. The first person to describe the rule in detail was Theophrastus, successor to Aristotle in the Peripatetic school.

Five Cannons of Rhetoric

five-canons-of-rhetoric
The five canons of rhetoric were first organized by Roman philosopher Cicero in his treatise De Inventione in around 84 BC. Some 150 years later, Roman rhetorician Quintilian explored each of the five canons in more depth as part of his 12-volume textbook entitled Institutio Oratoria. The work helped the five canons become a major component of rhetorical education well into the medieval period. The five canons of rhetoric comprise a system for understanding powerful and effective communication.

Communication Strategy

communication-strategy-framework
A communication strategy framework clarifies how businesses should communicate with their employees, investors, customers, and suppliers. Some of the key elements of an effective communication strategy move around purpose, background, objectives, target audience, messaging, and approach.

Noise if Communication

noise-in-communication
Noise is any factor that interferes with or impedes effective communication between a sender and receiver. When noise disrupts the communication process or prevents the transmission of information, it is said to be communication noise.

7 Cs of Communication

7-cs-of-communication
The 7Cs of communication is a set of guiding principles on effective communication skills in business, moving around seven principles for effective business communication: clear, concise, concrete, correct, complete, coherent, and courteous.

Transactional Model of Communication

transactional-model-of-communication
The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.

Horizontal Communication

horizontal-communication
Horizontal communication, often referred to as lateral communication, is communication that occurs between people at the same organizational level. In this context, communication describes any information that is transmitted between individuals, teams, departments, divisions, or units.

Communication Apprehension

communication-apprehension
Communication apprehension is a measure of the degree of anxiety someone feels in response to real (or anticipated) communication with another person or people.

Closed-Loop Communication

closed-loop-communication
Closed-loop communication is a simple but effective technique used to avoid misunderstandings during the communication process. Here, the person receiving information repeats it back to the sender to ensure they have understood the message correctly. 

Grapevine In Communication

grapevine-in-communication
Grapevine communication describes informal, unstructured, workplace dialogue between employees and superiors. It was first described in the early 1800s after someone observed that the appearance of telegraph wires strung between transmission poles resembled a grapevine.

ASE Model

ase-model
The ASE model posits that human behavior can be predicted if one studies the intention behind the behavior. It was created by health communication expert Hein de Vries in 1988. The ASE model believes intention and behavior are determined by cognitive variables such as attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. The model also believes that intention predicts behavior such that one’s attitude toward a behavior is influenced by the consequences of that behavior. Three cognitive variables are the primary determinants of whether the intention to perform a new behavior was sustained: attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. Various external variables also influence these factors.

Integrated Marketing Communication

integrated-marketing-communication
Integrated marketing communication (IMC) is an approach used by businesses to coordinate and brand their communication strategies. Integrated marketing communication takes separate marketing functions and combines them into one, interconnected approach with a core brand message that is consistent across various channels. These encompass owned, earned, and paid media. Integrated marketing communication has been used to great effect by companies such as Snapchat, Snickers, and Domino’s.

Social Penetration Theory

social-penetration-theory
Social penetration theory was developed by fellow psychologists Dalmas Taylor and Irwin Altman in their 1973 article Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Social penetration theory (SPT) posits that as a relationship develops, shallow and non-intimate communication evolves and becomes deeper and more intimate.

Hypodermic Needle

hypodermic-needle-theory
The hypodermic needle theory was first proposed by communication theorist Harold Lasswell in his 1927 book Propaganda Technique in the World War. The hypodermic needle theory is a communication model suggesting media messages are inserted into the brains of passive audiences.

7-38-55 Rule

7-38-55-rule
The 7-38-55 rule was created by University of California psychology professor Albert Mehrabian and mentioned in his book Silent Messages.  The 7-38-55 rule describes the multi-faceted way in which people communicate emotions, claiming that 7% of communication occurred via spoken word, 38% through tone of voice, and the remaining 55% through body language.

Active Listening

active-listening
Active listening is the process of listening attentively while someone speaks and displaying understanding through verbal and non-verbal techniques. Active listening is a fundamental part of good communication, fostering a positive connection and building trust between individuals.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA