Grapevine communication describes informal, unstructured, workplace dialogue between employees and superiors. It was first described in the early 1800s after someone observed that the appearance of telegraph wires strung between transmission poles resembled a grapevine.
Aspect
Explanation
Grapevine in Communication
The grapevine is an informal communication network that exists within organizations. It is characterized by the spontaneous transmission of information, rumors, and gossip among employees, often outside the formal channels of communication. The grapevine plays a significant role in disseminating information, building social connections, and addressing employee needs. Understanding and managing the grapevine is important for effective organizational communication.
Characteristics
– Informal: The grapevine is informal, meaning it operates outside official communication channels. – Rapid: Information spreads quickly through the grapevine, often faster than formal channels. – Unverified: Grapevine information may be inaccurate or based on rumors. – Social: It fosters social connections among employees. – Flexible: The grapevine can adapt to changes and needs within the organization.
Types of Grapevine
The grapevine can take various forms, including the single-strand grapevine (information flows through a linear path), the cluster grapevine (information spreads among specific groups or clusters), and the probability grapevine (information is shared randomly). The type of grapevine depends on the organization’s culture and structure.
Functions
The grapevine serves several functions: 1. Information Dissemination: It spreads news and updates quickly. 2. Social Cohesion: It helps build relationships among employees. 3. Feedback Mechanism: It provides feedback on organizational changes and policies. 4. Emotional Support: Employees can share concerns and frustrations. 5. Resistance Outlet: It can be a channel for expressing dissent or dissatisfaction.
Challenges
While the grapevine can be beneficial, it also poses challenges: 1. Accuracy: Information may be unreliable or incorrect. 2. Distortions: Messages can get distorted as they pass from person to person. 3. Negative Impact: Rumors and gossip can harm morale and productivity. 4. Management Difficulty: Managing the grapevine can be challenging for organizations.
Management
Organizations can manage the grapevine by fostering transparent and open communication, addressing employees’ concerns through official channels, and providing accurate information promptly. Managers should also be aware of grapevine activity and use it as a barometer of employee sentiment. By acknowledging and addressing grapevine issues, organizations can mitigate its negative effects and harness its benefits.
Impact on Organizations
The grapevine can have both positive and negative impacts on organizations. While it can facilitate information sharing and social connections, it can also lead to misunderstandings, anxiety, and resistance to change. Effective management of the grapevine involves striking a balance between harnessing its advantages and minimizing its drawbacks.
Grapevine communication spreads rapidly within an organization and, at some point, every employee will likely be made aware of the information in question.
The spread of information was once facilitated by written notes and water cooler conversation, but today, it may also occur via social media and other digital channels.
This form of communication is inevitable in a workplace since it is driven by an individual’s innate desire to interact with others.
Employees also love to discuss events that may impact their work – especially if there is an absence or lack of information trickling down from senior management.
Types of grapevine communication
Based on how the information spreads, there are four main types of grapevine communication:
Single strand chain
Perhaps the most traditional type where one employee shares information with another who then does the same in a linear chain.
Since the message is repeated frequently, it may become distorted.
Gossip chain
Where one employee shares information with multiple co-workers simultaneously.
The individual in question may also seek out the information for the express purpose of sharing it.
Probability chain
The probability chain is similar to the gossip chain in that the information originates from a single source.
However, the spread itself is more random.
An individual may tell one or more direct co-workers, who in turn may tell a few others in a different department.
Cluster chain
Where one employee shares information with a specific cohort of employees who each repeat the process with another cohort.
This is common in hierarchical organizations where divisional managers share information with regional managers, store managers, and then line managers.
The positive effects of grapevine communication
While the grapevine is undoubtedly a source of misinformation and harmful rumors in some circumstances, it is important businesses look past the negative connotations and also consider the positive effects.
Such effects include:
Efficient dissemination
When one employee is made aware of an interesting or relevant piece of information, they will set off a chain of events that spreads the message around the organization in rapid time.
In some cases, the grapevine is a faster and more efficient form of mass communication than emails or memos.
Understanding of company culture
New employees often use the grapevine to gauge a company’s often intangible culture.
They may ask others to clarify acceptable dress standards, what the boss expects of them, or the employer’s policies concerning break times.
Team cohesiveness
When information is shared between colleagues, they tend to form closer bonds which can improve team cohesiveness and productivity.
In this way, grapevine communication can also increase job satisfaction and morale.
Emotional release
The grapevine is an important emotional outlet for some employees who need to vent about a superior, project, or some other stressful situation.
Provided the shared information does not cause a rift between those concerned, employees who release their emotions feel less isolated and can contribute to a positive work culture.
The four types of grapevine in communication include the single strand chain, gossip chain, probability chain, and cluster chain.
Grapevine communication is inevitable in a workplace since it is driven by an individual’s innate desire to interact with others. While it can be a source of rumors and misinformation, it is also a useful way to understand company culture, increase team cohesion, and provide an emotional release for stressed staff.
Grapevine in Communication Strategies
Scenario
Example
Application
Implication
Outcome
Organizational Change Communication
Rumors about Restructuring:
During a major organizational change, employees often rely on the grapevine to share rumors and speculations about layoffs, restructuring, or leadership changes. This unofficial information can lead to uncertainty and anxiety among employees.
Increased employee stress and decreased morale.
Resistance to change and potential disruptions.
Product Launch
Leaks of New Product Details:
In the lead-up to a product launch, employees may leak information about new products or features through the grapevine. This can generate excitement among employees but also compromise the confidentiality of product launches.
Eager anticipation and curiosity among employees.
Risk of competitors obtaining sensitive information.
Employee Layoffs and Downsizing
Unconfirmed Layoff Rumors:
Before official announcements, employees may use the grapevine to spread rumors about impending layoffs or downsizing. Such rumors can create fear, job insecurity, and decreased productivity within the organization.
Increased employee anxiety and job insecurity.
Negative impact on employee performance and morale.
Office Politics
Rumors about Promotions:
Grapevine communication often carries news about potential promotions, favoritism, or office politics. These rumors can fuel competition, resentment, and strained relationships among employees.
Increased office politics and competition.
Decreased trust among employees and team dynamics.
Project Delays and Challenges
Unofficial Updates on Projects:
When projects face delays or challenges, employees may use the grapevine to share unofficial updates and discuss project issues. This can lead to misinformation and reduced team morale.
Decreased trust in project leadership and planning.
Potential misalignment and decreased project efficiency.
Leadership Changes
Speculations about New Leadership:
When leadership changes are on the horizon, employees may engage in grapevine communication to speculate about potential candidates, their qualifications, and anticipated changes in leadership style.
Increased curiosity and interest in leadership transitions.
Potential misalignment with actual leadership decisions.
Mergers and Acquisitions
Rumors about M&A Deals:
During merger or acquisition talks, grapevine communication can spread rumors about potential deals, their impact on employees, and the future of the organization. These rumors can affect employee morale and job security.
Increased uncertainty and anxiety among employees.
Potential resistance to change and decreased productivity.
Competitive Intelligence
Unconfirmed Industry Insights:
Employees may use the grapevine to share industry insights, news about competitors, and market trends they have heard informally. While this can enhance knowledge sharing, it may lack accuracy and verification.
Greater awareness of industry developments.
Risk of relying on inaccurate or outdated information.
Policy Changes
Rumors about Policy Revisions:
Before official policy changes are announced, grapevine communication can disseminate rumors about impending revisions. These rumors can create anxiety and uncertainty among employees about the impact of policy changes.
Increased apprehension and confusion among employees.
Resistance to policy changes and potential compliance issues.
Workplace Relationships
Relationship Speculations:
Grapevine communication may include speculations about workplace relationships, such as romantic involvement between colleagues or conflicts among team members. Such rumors can affect team dynamics and morale.
Increased curiosity and interest in colleagues’ relationships.
Potential disruption of workplace harmony and trust.
Talent Recruitment
Rumors about New Hires:
Employees may share grapevine information about potential new hires or upcoming talent recruitment strategies. While this can generate excitement, it may also raise expectations and affect team dynamics.
Increased interest in new talent and recruitment efforts.
Potential disappointment if rumors do not align with reality.
The Aristotle model of communication is a linear model with a focus on public speaking. The Aristotle model of communication was developed by Greek philosopher and orator Aristotle, who proposed the linear model to demonstrate the importance of the speaker and their audience during communication.
The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.
Berlo’s SMCR model was created by American communication theorist David Berlo in 1960, who expanded the Shannon-Weaver model of communication into clear and distinct parts. Berlo’s SMCR model is a one-way or linear communication framework based on the Shannon-Weaver communication model.
The helical model of communication is a framework inspired by the three-dimensional spring-like curve of a helix. It argues communication is cyclical, continuous, non-repetitive, accumulative, and influenced by time and experience.
The Lasswell communication model is a linear framework for explaining the communication process through segmentation. Lasswell proposed media propaganda performs three social functions: surveillance, correlation, and transmission. Lasswell believed the media could impact what viewers believed about the information presented.
Modus tollens is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference used to make conclusions of arguments and sets of arguments. Modus tollens argues that if P is true then Q is also true. However, P is false. Therefore Q is also false. Modus tollens as an inference rule dates back to late antiquity where it was taught as part of Aristotelian logic. The first person to describe the rule in detail was Theophrastus, successor to Aristotle in the Peripatetic school.
The five canons of rhetoric were first organized by Roman philosopher Cicero in his treatise De Inventione in around 84 BC. Some 150 years later, Roman rhetorician Quintilian explored each of the five canons in more depth as part of his 12-volume textbook entitled Institutio Oratoria. The work helped the five canons become a major component of rhetorical education well into the medieval period. The five canons of rhetoric comprise a system for understanding powerful and effective communication.
A communication strategy framework clarifies how businesses should communicate with their employees, investors, customers, and suppliers. Some of the key elements of an effective communication strategy move around purpose, background, objectives, target audience, messaging, and approach.
Noise is any factor that interferes with or impedes effective communication between a sender and receiver. When noise disrupts the communication process or prevents the transmission of information, it is said to be communication noise.
The 7Cs of communication is a set of guiding principles on effective communication skills in business, moving around seven principles for effective business communication: clear, concise, concrete, correct, complete, coherent, and courteous.
The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.
Horizontal communication, often referred to as lateral communication, is communication that occurs between people at the same organizational level. In this context, communication describes any information that is transmitted between individuals, teams, departments, divisions, or units.
Communication apprehension is a measure of the degree of anxiety someone feels in response to real (or anticipated) communication with another person or people.
Closed-loop communication is a simple but effective technique used to avoid misunderstandings during the communication process. Here, the person receiving information repeats it back to the sender to ensure they have understood the message correctly.
Grapevine communication describes informal, unstructured, workplace dialogue between employees and superiors. It was first described in the early 1800s after someone observed that the appearance of telegraph wires strung between transmission poles resembled a grapevine.
The ASE model posits that human behavior can be predicted if one studies the intention behind the behavior. It was created by health communication expert Hein de Vries in 1988.
The ASE model believes intention and behavior are determined by cognitive variables such as attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. The model also believes that intention predicts behavior such that one’s attitude toward a behavior is influenced by the consequences of that behavior.
Three cognitive variables are the primary determinants of whether the intention to perform a new behavior was sustained: attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. Various external variables also influence these factors.
Integrated marketing communication (IMC) is an approach used by businesses to coordinate and brand their communication strategies. Integrated marketing communication takes separate marketing functions and combines them into one, interconnected approach with a core brand message that is consistent across various channels. These encompass owned, earned, and paid media. Integrated marketing communication has been used to great effect by companies such as Snapchat, Snickers, and Domino’s.
Social penetration theory was developed by fellow psychologists Dalmas Taylor and Irwin Altman in their 1973 article Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Social penetration theory (SPT) posits that as a relationship develops, shallow and non-intimate communication evolves and becomes deeper and more intimate.
The hypodermic needle theory was first proposed by communication theorist Harold Lasswell in his 1927 book Propaganda Technique in the World War. The hypodermic needle theory is a communication model suggesting media messages are inserted into the brains of passive audiences.
The 7-38-55 rule was created by University of California psychology professor Albert Mehrabian and mentioned in his book Silent Messages. The 7-38-55 rule describes the multi-faceted way in which people communicate emotions, claiming that 7% of communication occurred via spoken word, 38% through tone of voice, and the remaining 55% through body language.
Active listening is the process of listening attentively while someone speaks and displaying understanding through verbal and non-verbal techniques. Active listening is a fundamental part of good communication, fostering a positive connection and building trust between individuals.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
