communication-strategies

Scale Matters In Marketing: Communication Strategies For Unconventional Business People

An effective communication strategy starts with a clear brand identity by defining clear boundaries and compromises your brand will not take in the marketplace. Based on that, understanding whether context, formats, and scale are in line with your business message to prevent a loss of identity.

What business communication is about?

One of the key tenets of content syndication is you take a piece of content, break it down in small parts and spread it around several platforms when you do that you amplify your message. This kind of thinking isn’t only limiting but dangerous for whoever is trying to build a successful marketing strategy.

Primarily an effective communication strategy should start by clear brand identity and look at the following:

  • Context: What kind of behaviors this type of communication and platform incentivizes?
  • Format: What format is available on that platform?
  • And scale: How fast a message can spread on the platform given the context and format?

In this article, I want to highlight some of the thoughts I had hanging in my mind about communication for business.

Let me tell you why.

Clear brand identity? It’s about what you’re not about

Usually, a clear brand identity starts by identifying the core values. And that is fine. But in reality, strong brand identity starts by setting clear boundaries around what you’re not about.

Therefore, make sure to define the compromise your brand is not willing to take in the marketplace and make sure you comprise that in your message and you treasure it as the most valued asset.

For instance, “FourWeekMBA is not about quick business education for the sake of it, it’s about the minimum dose of business education that leads to action, rather than paralysis.”

So from a negative statement, a positive outcome is born.

Preserving your brand identity is the key to an effective communication strategy to prevent your message to get lost.

The message is the context

A message has meaning based on the context it sits. Communication between two people, it’s not the same as a group chat, where more complex social dynamics kick in.

Therefore, when communicating it’s critical to understand the context the message is getting delivered. Because the same message delivered through different context changes the meaning.

The same words spoken within different contexts are not the same message!

If you are at a company retreat and you’re giving a motivational talk to your employees, that might be well received and understood in that context (remember you might be sharing the same company’s culture).

The same speech recorded and shared across social media can be a disastrous endeavor.

Not only the communication will change from one to a few (the boss and its employees) to many (people sharing it on social media) but the message will get out of the context it was thought for, thus changing its whole meaning.

When that happens, things can get messy. That is why it might be better to avoid any sort of communication there, rather than wanting to be “innovative” yet risking a complete disaster.

The format is the message

Another element to take into account is the format. An article can be summarized in a post. But while an article can conceive several ideas a post will communicate a single, clear idea.

That is why taking the same message to spread it across different platforms won’t work. In some cases, a message can be adapted to several formats, but that is not always the case.

For instance, an article can be adjusted and summarized in a LinkedIn post. However, a LinkedIn post to work has to have certain features that make it aligned with the platform dynamics.

For instance, on LinkedIn, a short story might work better to conceive the idea of the article. In short, if you have a short story within the article you want to start from there to amplify the article.

Therefore, the question becomes whether using a format that a platform makes available (on Twitter, for instance, tweets and tweetstorms work well, on Instagram stories go viral, and on TikTok duets spread quickly) is in line with your communication style.

If so, you can adjust the message to fit the format without using its essence. But keep in mind that if the message scales, the more it does the more it might change its original meaning.

Are you ready to take that risk?

A tweetstorm is not a blog post

According to some, the first tweetstorm appeared maybe when venture capitalist Marc Andresseen broke the boundaries of Twitter’s 140 characters a new format on a new platform was born.

While a tweetstorm might seem just like a short-form article, it’s a completely different form of communication and that’s due to the scaling of the message.

When a tweetstorm gets released, the fact that its length is that of a short-form article might trick you to believe it has the same property. Yet they are not the same thing.

A tweetstorm is a one to many, only at the moment, it gets shared. Yet at the moment that spreads that same tweetstorm will become a many to many communication, and the message which once you controlled and it was yours will be adjusted to the scale it reaches.

Thus, if you have expressed an idea which is prone to be understood by a small group of people, are you sure that the tweetstorm is the best place to start? In short, to keep the same property of the message probably a newsletter would do the job way better?

Network effects and scaling

When a message scales it changes its core properties. That implies also a change of meaning on the other side. That is why it’s important to understand how prone is a message to scale, given the context, format, and platform where it gets delivered.

A blog post has a different scaling propensity than a twitter post or a TikTok video. A newsletter, for instance, is usually a one to one communication and remains so up to a certain extent (unless you launch the same message to hundreds of thousands people).

Why does it all matter?

Context, format, and scale influence your communication and based on the message you want to deliver it’s important to know what you’re doing to prevent disasters.

Because while we all want to communicate on the web, and most of us do at amateurish level, it’s also important if you’re building a business, to understand the hidden risk of communication done wrong.

Key takeaways

When communicating you are explaining to people what is your identity, why you exist, what your business is about and this all helps to build your business’ personality, what marketers call a brand.

A brand is valuable as it enables a business to scale beyond the person who created it. In short, people can relate also to an abstract entity, called brand, as soon as they can perceive this abstract entity has human-like features.

This demands your communication flow to be in line with what you want to conceive. The era of digital platforms seems to demand brand to be there just for the presence’s sake (everyone is there so I must be too).

That makes small brands, but also larger ones to fall into the trap of losing their message just because they adapt, without too much thinking at the format the platform offers.

We saw in this article, how context (what kind of behaviors the platform incentivizes?), format (what format is available on that platform?) and scale (how fast a message can spread on the platform?) can change the meaning of your message altogether.

This brings a loss in translation which can translate in loss of brand equity. Therefore, before committing for all the platforms out there ask yourself:

  • Is this platform in line with my brand identity?
  • Is there a format available on the platform which will enable us to preserve the meaning of the message?
  • How prone is the message to scale? And if it does would it lose its original meaning?

Read Next: Lasswell Communication Model, Linear Model Of Communication.

Connected Communication Models

Aristotle’s Model of Communication

aristotle-model-of-communication
The Aristotle model of communication is a linear model with a focus on public speaking. The Aristotle model of communication was developed by Greek philosopher and orator Aristotle, who proposed the linear model to demonstrate the importance of the speaker and their audience during communication. 

Communication Cycle

linear-model-of-communication
The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.

Berlo’s SMCR Model

berlos-smcr-model
Berlo’s SMCR model was created by American communication theorist David Berlo in 1960, who expanded the Shannon-Weaver model of communication into clear and distinct parts. Berlo’s SMCR model is a one-way or linear communication framework based on the Shannon-Weaver communication model.

Helical Model of Communication

helical-model-of-communication
The helical model of communication is a framework inspired by the three-dimensional spring-like curve of a helix. It argues communication is cyclical, continuous, non-repetitive, accumulative, and influenced by time and experience.

Lasswell Communication Model

lasswell-communication-model
The Lasswell communication model is a linear framework for explaining the communication process through segmentation. Lasswell proposed media propaganda performs three social functions: surveillance, correlation, and transmission. Lasswell believed the media could impact what viewers believed about the information presented.

Modus Tollens

modus-tollens
Modus tollens is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference used to make conclusions of arguments and sets of arguments.  Modus tollens argues that if P is true then Q is also true. However, P is false. Therefore Q is also false. Modus tollens as an inference rule dates back to late antiquity where it was taught as part of Aristotelian logic. The first person to describe the rule in detail was Theophrastus, successor to Aristotle in the Peripatetic school.

Five Cannons of Rhetoric

five-canons-of-rhetoric
The five canons of rhetoric were first organized by Roman philosopher Cicero in his treatise De Inventione in around 84 BC. Some 150 years later, Roman rhetorician Quintilian explored each of the five canons in more depth as part of his 12-volume textbook entitled Institutio Oratoria. The work helped the five canons become a major component of rhetorical education well into the medieval period. The five canons of rhetoric comprise a system for understanding powerful and effective communication.

Communication Strategy

communication-strategy-framework
A communication strategy framework clarifies how businesses should communicate with their employees, investors, customers, and suppliers. Some of the key elements of an effective communication strategy move around purpose, background, objectives, target audience, messaging, and approach.

Noise if Communication

noise-in-communication
Noise is any factor that interferes with or impedes effective communication between a sender and receiver. When noise disrupts the communication process or prevents the transmission of information, it is said to be communication noise.

7 Cs of Communication

7-cs-of-communication
The 7Cs of communication is a set of guiding principles on effective communication skills in business, moving around seven principles for effective business communication: clear, concise, concrete, correct, complete, coherent, and courteous.

Transactional Model of Communication

transactional-model-of-communication
The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.

Other business resources:

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA