burgaining-power-of-suppliers

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

The bargaining power of suppliers is one of the fundamental factors in Michael Porter’s Five Forces Framework, which is used to analyze industry competitiveness. It assesses the ability of suppliers to influence prices, terms, and conditions in the supply chain. A strong bargaining position allows suppliers to demand higher prices, better payment terms, or other favorable conditions from their customers.

Supplier power is not uniform across all industries or markets and can vary significantly based on several factors, including the concentration of suppliers, the uniqueness of their products or services, the availability of substitute suppliers, and the importance of the supplied goods or services to the buyer’s business. Recognizing these determinants is crucial for businesses to make informed sourcing decisions and remain competitive.

Determinants of the Bargaining Power of Suppliers

Several key determinants contribute to the strength of supplier power in a market. These determinants, though not exhaustive, provide valuable insights into the dynamics of supplier-buyer relationships:

  1. Supplier Concentration: The concentration of suppliers in an industry can impact their bargaining power. In markets with only a few dominant suppliers, they can exert greater control over prices and terms, as buyers have limited alternatives.
  2. Uniqueness of Inputs: Suppliers offering unique or highly specialized products or services may have stronger bargaining power, as buyers may find it challenging to switch to alternative suppliers without sacrificing quality or functionality.
  3. Switching Costs: The costs and efforts required for buyers to switch from one supplier to another affect supplier power. High switching costs make buyers less likely to switch, giving suppliers more leverage.
  4. Availability of Substitute Inputs: The availability of substitute inputs or materials can influence supplier power. When suitable substitutes are scarce, suppliers can demand higher prices and better terms.
  5. Importance of Supplier’s Input: The significance of a supplier’s input to a buyer’s business can impact supplier power. If a supplier provides a critical component or service, the buyer may have limited options and be more dependent on the supplier.
  6. Brand Reputation: Suppliers with strong brand reputations or a history of reliability may have an advantage in negotiations, as buyers may be more inclined to maintain relationships with trusted suppliers.
  7. Regulatory Environment: Government regulations, trade restrictions, and quality standards can affect supplier power. Compliance with specific regulations or standards can be costly, creating barriers to entry for potential suppliers.
  8. Price Volatility: The degree of price volatility in input materials can influence supplier power. Suppliers of stable or predictable-priced inputs may have more negotiating power.
  9. Supplier Alliances: Suppliers may form alliances or collaborations to enhance their bargaining power. Collective action can help them negotiate better terms with their customers.
  10. Competitive Dynamics: The level of competition among suppliers in an industry can influence supplier power. In highly competitive supplier markets, buyers may have more options and therefore greater bargaining power.

Strategies to Address the Bargaining Power of Suppliers

To mitigate the bargaining power of suppliers and maintain a competitive advantage, businesses can employ various strategies:

  1. Diversification of Suppliers: Reduce dependency on a single supplier by diversifying your supplier base. This can create competition among suppliers and provide alternatives in case of disruptions.
  2. Vertical Integration: Consider vertically integrating by acquiring or investing in suppliers. This can provide greater control over the supply chain and reduce vulnerability to supplier power.
  3. Long-Term Contracts: Establish long-term contracts or agreements with suppliers to secure stable pricing and supply. Long-term partnerships can foster trust and collaboration.
  4. Supplier Development: Invest in the development of key suppliers to enhance their capabilities, quality, and efficiency. This can improve the overall value chain.
  5. Cost Leadership: Strive for cost leadership by optimizing processes and supply chain efficiencies. Reducing costs can mitigate the impact of supplier price increases.
  6. Supplier Relationship Management (SRM): Implement SRM programs to build strong and collaborative relationships with suppliers. Effective communication and collaboration can lead to mutually beneficial outcomes.
  7. Leverage Group Purchasing: Collaborate with other buyers or industry peers to leverage collective purchasing power and negotiate better terms with suppliers.
  8. Seek Alternative Inputs: Continuously explore alternative sources of supply and input materials to reduce reliance on a single supplier.
  9. Inventory Management: Maintain strategic inventory levels to buffer against supply disruptions and price fluctuations. Just-in-time inventory systems may need to be balanced with risk mitigation.

Real-World Examples of the Bargaining Power of Suppliers

To illustrate the concept of the bargaining power of suppliers, consider the following real-world examples:

  1. Technology Manufacturing: Companies in the technology manufacturing industry often rely on a limited number of suppliers for critical components, such as semiconductors. When these suppliers face disruptions, it can impact the production and pricing of technology products.
  2. Automotive Industry: Automakers depend on suppliers for various components, including engines, transmissions, and electronics. Suppliers with unique technologies or proprietary parts can wield significant bargaining power.
  3. Fast Food Chains: Fast food chains source ingredients, such as beef and potatoes, from suppliers. When there are disruptions or shortages in the supply of these ingredients, it can affect menu offerings and pricing.
  4. Airlines: Airlines rely on suppliers for aircraft, engines, and maintenance services. The high switching costs and specialized nature of these suppliers can give them substantial bargaining power.

Conclusion

The bargaining power of suppliers is a fundamental aspect of market dynamics and business strategy. Recognizing the determinants of supplier power and implementing effective strategies to address it is essential for businesses seeking to maintain competitiveness and profitability. By diversifying suppliers, building strong supplier relationships, and exploring alternative sourcing options, companies can mitigate the potential challenges posed by varying levels of supplier power. Successful management of supplier relationships and supply chain dynamics can contribute to business resilience and long-term success in dynamic and competitive markets.

Key Highlights:

  • Definition of Supplier Power: Supplier power refers to the ability of suppliers to influence price levels, payment terms, and other conditions in a market. A strong bargaining position allows suppliers to demand higher prices and favorable conditions from their customers.
  • Determinants of Supplier Power: Key determinants include supplier concentration, uniqueness of inputs, switching costs, availability of substitute inputs, importance of the supplier’s input, brand reputation, regulatory environment, price volatility, supplier alliances, and competitive dynamics.
  • Strategies to Address Supplier Power: Businesses can mitigate supplier power through diversification of suppliers, vertical integration, long-term contracts, supplier development, cost leadership, supplier relationship management (SRM), leveraging group purchasing, seeking alternative inputs, and effective inventory management.
  • Real-World Examples: Examples from industries like technology manufacturing, automotive, fast food chains, and airlines illustrate how supplier power can affect businesses’ operations, pricing, and supply chain resilience.
  • Conclusion: Recognizing and addressing supplier power is crucial for businesses to maintain competitiveness and profitability. By implementing effective strategies to manage supplier relationships and mitigate supply chain risks, companies can navigate challenges and achieve long-term success in dynamic markets.

Alternative Frameworks

FrameworkDescriptionKey Features
Porter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Five Forces is a framework for analyzing the competitive intensity and attractiveness of an industry. It examines five key factors: 1) Threat of new entrants, 2) Bargaining power of buyers, 3) Bargaining power of suppliers, 4) Threat of substitute products or services, and 5) Intensity of competitive rivalry.– Provides a structured framework for analyzing the competitive dynamics of an industry. – Identifies key factors influencing industry profitability and attractiveness. – Helps organizations develop strategies to navigate competitive forces and sustain competitive advantage.
SWOT AnalysisSWOT Analysis is a strategic planning tool that assesses an organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. It helps identify strategic factors affecting the organization’s performance and competitive position, enabling the formulation of strategies that leverage strengths, mitigate weaknesses, capitalize on opportunities, and address threats.– Assesses internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats. – Provides a comprehensive overview of the organization’s strategic position and environment. – Facilitates strategy formulation by identifying factors that impact organizational performance and competitiveness.
PESTLE AnalysisPESTLE Analysis is a strategic tool for analyzing the external macro-environmental factors affecting an organization. It examines six key dimensions: Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. PESTLE analysis helps organizations understand the broader contextual factors influencing their operations and strategies, enabling proactive response and adaptation to changes in the external environment.– Analyzes macro-environmental factors impacting organizations across political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental dimensions. – Provides insights into external factors that may affect organizational performance and competitiveness. – Guides strategic decision-making and risk management by anticipating changes in the external environment.
Value Chain AnalysisValue Chain Analysis is a strategic framework for assessing an organization’s internal activities and processes to identify sources of competitive advantage. It involves analyzing primary and support activities along the value chain to determine areas where value can be added or costs reduced, thereby enhancing overall organizational performance and competitiveness.– Examines an organization’s internal activities to identify sources of competitive advantage. – Distinguishes between primary activities directly involved in creating value and support activities that facilitate primary functions. – Helps organizations optimize their value chain activities to improve efficiency, quality, and customer value proposition.
Blue Ocean StrategyBlue Ocean Strategy is a strategic approach that focuses on creating new market spaces or “blue oceans” by innovating and offering unique value propositions that differentiate organizations from competitors. It encourages organizations to move away from competing in overcrowded “red ocean” markets characterized by intense competition and instead seek uncontested market spaces ripe for growth and innovation.– Emphasizes creating new market spaces with uncontested market demand and minimal competition. – Encourages organizations to innovate and differentiate their offerings to create unique value propositions. – Shifts focus from competing in existing markets to creating new market spaces through innovation and value creation.
Balanced ScorecardThe Balanced Scorecard is a strategic performance management framework that translates an organization’s vision and strategy into a set of balanced objectives and performance measures across four perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Business Processes, and Learning and Growth. It aligns organizational activities and initiatives with strategic objectives to drive performance and achieve long-term success.– Translates organizational strategy into balanced objectives and performance measures across key perspectives. – Aligns performance management and measurement with strategic goals and priorities. – Facilitates communication and alignment of organizational activities with strategic objectives.
Scenario PlanningScenario Planning is a strategic foresight technique that involves creating and analyzing multiple plausible future scenarios to anticipate uncertainties and prepare organizations for different possible outcomes. It enables organizations to identify potential risks, opportunities, and strategic challenges, allowing for proactive decision-making and strategic adaptation in an uncertain and rapidly changing environment.– Anticipates uncertainties and prepares organizations for future challenges and opportunities. – Generates multiple plausible scenarios to explore alternative future outcomes. – Helps organizations identify strategic risks and opportunities and develop contingency plans.
Competitive AdvantageCompetitive Advantage is a strategic concept that refers to the unique strengths, capabilities, or assets that enable an organization to outperform competitors and achieve superior performance in the marketplace. It can stem from various sources such as cost leadership, differentiation, innovation, customer focus, or operational excellence, providing organizations with sustainable competitive edge and profitability.– Identifies unique strengths or advantages that enable organizations to outperform competitors. – Can be derived from cost leadership, differentiation, innovation, customer focus, or operational excellence. – Provides organizations with sustainable competitive edge and profitability.

Other frameworks by Michael Porter

Porter’s Five Forces

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces

Porter’s Generic Strategies

porters-generic-strategies
In his book, “Competitive Advantage,” in 1985, Porter conceptualized the concept of competitive advantage, by looking at two key aspects. Industry attractiveness, and the company’s strategic positioning. The latter, according to Porter, can be achieved either via cost leadership, differentiation, or focus.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

Porter’s Four Corners Analysis 

four-corners-analysis
Developed by American academic Michael Porter, the Four Corners Analysis helps a business understand its particular competitive landscape. The analysis is a form of competitive intelligence where a business determines its future strategy by assessing its competitors’ strategy, looking at four elements: drivers, current strategy, management assumptions, and capabilities.

Six Forces Models

six-forces-models
The Six Forces Model is a variation of Porter’s Five Forces. The sixth force, according to this model, is the complementary products. In short, the six forces model is an adaptation especially used in the tech business world to assess the change of the context, based on new market entrants and whether those can play out initially as complementary products and in the long-term substitutes.

Read Next: Porter’s Five ForcesPESTEL Analysis, SWOT, Porter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced ScorecardOKRAgile MethodologyValue PropositionVTDF Framework.

Connected Strategy Frameworks

ADKAR Model

adkar-model
The ADKAR model is a management tool designed to assist employees and businesses in transitioning through organizational change. To maximize the chances of employees embracing change, the ADKAR model was developed by author and engineer Jeff Hiatt in 2003. The model seeks to guide people through the change process and importantly, ensure that people do not revert to habitual ways of operating after some time has passed.

Ansoff Matrix

ansoff-matrix
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growth strategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growth strategy can be derived from whether the market is new or existing, and whether the product is new or existing.

Business Model Canvas

business-model-canvas
The business model canvas is a framework proposed by Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur in Busines Model Generation enabling the design of business models through nine building blocks comprising: key partners, key activities, value propositions, customer relationships, customer segments, critical resources, channels, cost structure, and revenue streams.

Lean Startup Canvas

lean-startup-canvas
The lean startup canvas is an adaptation by Ash Maurya of the business model canvas by Alexander Osterwalder, which adds a layer that focuses on problems, solutions, key metrics, unfair advantage based, and a unique value proposition. Thus, starting from mastering the problem rather than the solution.

Blitzscaling Canvas

blitzscaling-business-model-innovation-canvas
The Blitzscaling business model canvas is a model based on the concept of Blitzscaling, which is a particular process of massive growth under uncertainty, and that prioritizes speed over efficiency and focuses on market domination to create a first-scaler advantage in a scenario of uncertainty.

Blue Ocean Strategy

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

Business Analysis Framework

business-analysis
Business analysis is a research discipline that helps driving change within an organization by identifying the key elements and processes that drive value. Business analysis can also be used in Identifying new business opportunities or how to take advantage of existing business opportunities to grow your business in the marketplace.

BCG Matrix

bcg-matrix
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.

Balanced Scorecard

balanced-scorecard
First proposed by accounting academic Robert Kaplan, the balanced scorecard is a management system that allows an organization to focus on big-picture strategic goals. The four perspectives of the balanced scorecard include financial, customer, business process, and organizational capacity. From there, according to the balanced scorecard, it’s possible to have a holistic view of the business.

Blue Ocean Strategy 

blue-ocean-strategy
A blue ocean is a strategy where the boundaries of existing markets are redefined, and new uncontested markets are created. At its core, there is value innovation, for which uncontested markets are created, where competition is made irrelevant. And the cost-value trade-off is broken. Thus, companies following a blue ocean strategy offer much more value at a lower cost for the end customers.

GAP Analysis

gap-analysis
A gap analysis helps an organization assess its alignment with strategic objectives to determine whether the current execution is in line with the company’s mission and long-term vision. Gap analyses then help reach a target performance by assisting organizations to use their resources better. A good gap analysis is a powerful tool to improve execution.

GE McKinsey Model

ge-mckinsey-matrix
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.

McKinsey 7-S Model

mckinsey-7-s-model
The McKinsey 7-S Model was developed in the late 1970s by Robert Waterman and Thomas Peters, who were consultants at McKinsey & Company. Waterman and Peters created seven key internal elements that inform a business of how well positioned it is to achieve its goals, based on three hard elements and four soft elements.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

McKinsey Horizon Model

mckinsey-horizon-model
The McKinsey Horizon Model helps a business focus on innovation and growth. The model is a strategy framework divided into three broad categories, otherwise known as horizons. Thus, the framework is sometimes referred to as McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth.

Porter’s Five Forces

porter-five-forces
Porter’s Five Forces is a model that helps organizations to gain a better understanding of their industries and competition. Published for the first time by Professor Michael Porter in his book “Competitive Strategy” in the 1980s. The model breaks down industries and markets by analyzing them through five forces.

Porter’s Generic Strategies

competitive-advantage
According to Michael Porter, a competitive advantage, in a given industry could be pursued in two key ways: low cost (cost leadership), or differentiation. A third generic strategy is focus. According to Porter a failure to do so would end up stuck in the middle scenario, where the company will not retain a long-term competitive advantage.

Porter’s Value Chain Model

porters-value-chain-model
In his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, Porter explains that a value chain is a collection of processes that a company performs to create value for its consumers. As a result, he asserts that value chain analysis is directly linked to competitive advantage. Porter’s Value Chain Model is a strategic management tool developed by Harvard Business School professor Michael Porter. The tool analyses a company’s value chain – defined as the combination of processes that the company uses to make money.

Porter’s Diamond Model

porters-diamond-model
Porter’s Diamond Model is a diamond-shaped framework that explains why specific industries in a nation become internationally competitive while those in other nations do not. The model was first published in Michael Porter’s 1990 book The Competitive Advantage of Nations. This framework looks at the firm strategy, structure/rivalry, factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business‘s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

PESTEL Analysis

pestel-analysis

Scenario Planning

scenario-planning
Businesses use scenario planning to make assumptions on future events and how their respective business environments may change in response to those future events. Therefore, scenario planning identifies specific uncertainties – or different realities and how they might affect future business operations. Scenario planning attempts at better strategic decision making by avoiding two pitfalls: underprediction, and overprediction.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA