x-shaped-skills

X-shaped skills

Business / By /

X-shaped skills derive their name from the visual representation of the letter “X,” which symbolizes the intersection of expertise in one specific domain with a range of skills in diverse areas. Unlike the traditional T-shaped or I-shaped skills models, X-shaped skills emphasize a multidimensional approach to skill development, with a central pillar of deep expertise.

Core Elements of X-Shaped Skills:

  1. Depth of Expertise: X-shaped professionals possess a high level of expertise in a specific domain, often referred to as their “core” area. This expertise is typically built through education, experience, and continuous learning.
  2. Breadth of Skills: In addition to their core expertise, X-shaped experts have a wide range of skills that extend across multiple disciplines. These skills enable them to collaborate, communicate, and innovate beyond their core domain.

Significance of X-Shaped Skills in the Modern Workforce

X-shaped skills offer several advantages for both individuals and organizations in today’s dynamic job market:

1. Specialized Expertise:

X-shaped professionals are recognized experts in their core domain. They can provide specialized solutions and insights, making them valuable assets in their field.

2. Cross-Disciplinary Innovation:

The multidisciplinary nature of X-shaped skills promotes innovation. Professionals with X-shaped skills can draw from various domains to develop creative solutions to complex problems.

3. Effective Collaboration:

X-shaped experts excel in interdisciplinary collaboration. They can bridge the gap between specialists in different fields, fostering teamwork and synergy.

4. Leadership Potential:

X-shaped skills enhance leadership potential. X-shaped professionals can lead diverse teams and offer valuable insights in various organizational contexts.

5. Adaptive Career Paths:

X-shaped professionals have the flexibility to pursue diverse career paths. They can transition between different roles and industries with ease.

Developing X-Shaped Skills

Cultivating X-shaped skills requires a strategic and intentional approach to skill development and integration:

1. Identify Your Core Domain:

Choose a specific domain or area of expertise that aligns with your career aspirations and interests. This domain will serve as your “core” area of deep expertise.

2. Diversify Your Skill Set:

Identify complementary skills and disciplines that can enhance your core expertise. These skills should be chosen strategically to broaden your capabilities and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration.

3. Continuous Learning:

Invest in ongoing education and skill development. This may involve pursuing certifications, attending workshops, or enrolling in courses related to both your core domain and the supplementary skills you wish to acquire.

4. Interdisciplinary Projects:

Actively seek out projects and initiatives that require you to apply your core expertise while leveraging your supplementary skills. These experiences will help you develop a holistic approach to problem-solving.

5. Networking and Collaboration:

Build a network of professionals who excel in different domains. Engage in collaborative projects that allow you to learn from experts outside your core area.

6. Mentorship:

Seek mentorship from individuals who have successfully cultivated X-shaped skills. Their guidance can be invaluable in your skill development journey.

7. Communication Skills:

Enhance your communication skills, as effective communication is crucial when working with specialists from different domains. Focus on clarity and the ability to convey complex ideas.

The Impact of X-Shaped Skills on Career Success

X-shaped skills can have a profound impact on career success and professional growth:

1. Subject Matter Expertise:

X-shaped professionals are recognized as subject matter experts in their core domain. This expertise can open doors to leadership roles and specialized career opportunities.

2. Innovation Leadership:

The ability to draw from diverse disciplines makes X-shaped experts well-suited to lead innovation initiatives. They can drive creative solutions and oversee projects that require multidisciplinary collaboration.

3. Entrepreneurship:

X-shaped skills are beneficial for entrepreneurs who require deep expertise in a specific domain while navigating the complexities of running a business.

4. Global Perspectives:

In a globalized world, X-shaped professionals can understand and adapt to different cultures, markets, and industries, making them valuable assets in international contexts.

5. Problem-Solving Excellence:

X-shaped professionals excel in tackling complex problems that require deep expertise and a multidisciplinary approach. Their ability to integrate knowledge leads to more comprehensive solutions.

Challenges and Considerations

While X-shaped skills offer numerous benefits, they come with certain challenges and considerations:

1. Time and Commitment:

Developing deep expertise in one domain and acquiring supplementary skills demand a significant time commitment. X-shaped professionals must be dedicated to continuous learning.

2. Balance and Integration:

Balancing deep expertise with a broad skill set can be challenging. Finding ways to integrate knowledge effectively is key to success.

3. Changing Fields:

X-shaped professionals may encounter resistance when changing fields or industries, as employers may struggle to define their roles.

4. Staying Current:

Staying up-to-date in both the core domain and supplementary skills demands continuous effort. Professionals must be proactive in keeping their knowledge current.

Conclusion

In an era where versatility and expertise are highly valued, X-shaped skills offer a compelling framework for individuals seeking to excel in the modern workforce. Professionals who embrace the multidimensional approach can position themselves as subject matter experts who are equally adept at collaborating, communicating, and innovating across various disciplines. While developing X-shaped skills requires dedication, the rewards in terms of career advancement, adaptability, and the ability to make a meaningful impact are well worth the effort. The X-shaped paradigm represents a dynamic and forward-thinking approach to skill development, where individuals can thrive in an ever-evolving professional landscape.

Key Highlights:

  • Definition: X-shaped skills represent expertise in a specific domain combined with a breadth of skills across diverse areas, symbolizing the intersection of deep expertise and multidisciplinary proficiency.
  • Core Elements:
    • Depth of Expertise
    • Breadth of Skills
  • Significance in the Modern Workforce:
    • Specialized Expertise
    • Cross-Disciplinary Innovation
    • Effective Collaboration
    • Leadership Potential
    • Adaptive Career Paths
  • Developing X-Shaped Skills:
    • Identify Your Core Domain
    • Diversify Your Skill Set
    • Continuous Learning
    • Interdisciplinary Projects
    • Networking and Collaboration
    • Mentorship
    • Communication Skills
  • Impact on Career Success:
    • Subject Matter Expertise
    • Innovation Leadership
    • Entrepreneurship
    • Global Perspectives
    • Problem-Solving Excellence
  • Challenges and Considerations:
    • Time and Commitment
    • Balance and Integration
    • Changing Fields
    • Staying Current
  • Conclusion: X-shaped skills offer a holistic framework for career success, enabling professionals to combine deep expertise with interdisciplinary proficiency. While developing X-shaped skills requires dedication and effort, the rewards in terms of career advancement and adaptability are significant in today’s dynamic professional landscape.
Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
T-shaped Skills– Describes a skill set characterized by depth in one specialized area (the vertical stroke of the “T”) complemented by a breadth of knowledge and skills across multiple disciplines (the horizontal stroke of the “T”). T-shaped skills emphasize the ability to collaborate across diverse domains, integrate knowledge from various fields, and communicate effectively with interdisciplinary teams. By combining depth and breadth, T-shaped skills foster innovation, creativity, and adaptability in complex problem-solving contexts.– Applicable in team-based projects, cross-functional collaboration, and innovation initiatives where leveraging diverse expertise, perspectives, and skills is essential for addressing complex challenges, driving innovation, and achieving synergy and collective impact across multidisciplinary teams and organizations.
I-shaped Skills– Represent a skill set characterized by deep expertise in one specialized area, typically denoted by the vertical stroke of the “I.” I-shaped skills emphasize mastery and depth of knowledge in a specific domain or discipline. While I-shaped skills are valuable for technical proficiency, they may lack versatility and adaptability in interdisciplinary contexts.– Relevant in specialized technical roles, domain-specific research, and expert consulting where in-depth knowledge and expertise in a particular field are critical for achieving excellence, advancing knowledge, and providing specialized solutions and insights to address complex challenges and meet specific project requirements.
Pi-shaped Skills– Builds on the T-shaped skills model by incorporating a second vertical stroke, forming the shape of the Greek letter pi (π). Pi-shaped skills represent deep expertise in two specialized areas, complemented by a breadth of knowledge and skills across multiple disciplines. Pi-shaped skills emphasize the ability to integrate insights, methodologies, and approaches from two distinct domains to tackle complex problems and generate innovative solutions. By combining depth in multiple areas, Pi-shaped skills enhance individuals’ capacity for interdisciplinary collaboration and creative synthesis.– Applicable in interdisciplinary research, cross-sector partnerships, and innovation ecosystems where addressing complex, multifaceted challenges requires expertise from multiple domains and the ability to bridge disciplinary boundaries, integrate diverse perspectives, and leverage synergies and complementarities across specialized fields to drive breakthrough innovations and advance collective goals and impact.
M-shaped Skills– Represents a skill set characterized by expertise in multiple specialized areas, denoted by the multiple vertical strokes of the letter M. M-shaped skills combine depth in several domains with the ability to navigate and connect across diverse disciplines. M-shaped skills emphasize versatility, adaptability, and the capacity to transition between different roles, projects, and contexts seamlessly. By cultivating expertise in multiple areas, M-shaped skills enable individuals to tackle complex challenges from multiple angles and contribute effectively across various domains.– Relevant in multidisciplinary research, entrepreneurship, and portfolio careers where individuals engage in diverse projects, ventures, and initiatives that require expertise across multiple domains and the ability to pivot, learn quickly, and apply insights from different fields to address evolving challenges and opportunities effectively and creatively.
Comb-shaped Skills– Extends the concept of T-shaped skills by incorporating multiple horizontal strokes, forming the shape of a comb. Comb-shaped skills emphasize deep expertise in one specialized area, complemented by a breadth of knowledge and skills across multiple domains, represented by the teeth of the comb. Comb-shaped skills highlight the ability to engage with diverse perspectives, methods, and tools while maintaining a strong foundation in a core discipline. By integrating expertise from various fields, comb-shaped skills enhance individuals’ capacity for interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative problem-solving.– Applicable in cross-disciplinary research, design education, and complex project management where navigating diverse knowledge domains, methodologies, and stakeholder perspectives is essential for addressing multifaceted challenges, fostering innovation, and achieving project success and impact through interdisciplinary collaboration, integration, and synthesis.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

More Resources

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA