What happened to Fisker?

Fisker Inc., an electric vehicle (EV) startup, has faced significant financial and operational challenges in recent months, leading to a precarious situation for the company.

Financial Struggles and Stock Delisting

  • Financial Losses: Fisker reported substantial financial losses, including a $463.6 million loss in Q4 2023, with a total revenue of $200 million for the same period.
  • Stock Delisting: The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced plans to delist Fisker’s stock due to “abnormally low” price levels, which had fallen to less than 10 cents per share. This delisting triggered the need for Fisker to offer to buy back bonds due in 2026 and immediately pay off other debts due in 2025.
  • Bankruptcy Concerns: There is substantial doubt about Fisker’s ability to continue as a going concern, with the company needing to raise more funds to survive.

Operational Challenges

  • Production Issues: Fisker faced delays and quality issues with its Ocean SUV, which was produced by Magna Steyr in Austria. Magna has since announced it will no longer produce the Fisker Ocean, citing program delays and financial losses.
  • Inventory and Sales: Fisker has a significant inventory of unsold vehicles, with approximately 4,700 vehicles in stock as of mid-March 2024. The company has struggled to deliver vehicles to customers, with only about half of the 10,000 vehicles produced in 2023 being delivered.

Strategic Shifts and Dealer Model

  • Dealer Partner Model: Fisker shifted from a direct-to-consumer sales model to a dealer partner model in early 2024, signing up numerous dealer partners in the US and Europe[1][5]. This move was intended to improve sales and brand awareness but has yet to prove its effectiveness.
  • Price Cuts: In an effort to boost sales and reduce inventory, Fisker slashed the prices of its Ocean SUV models by up to 39%. Despite these price cuts, the company has only managed to deliver a limited number of vehicles.

Software and Quality Issues

  • Software Updates: Fisker has rolled out several over-the-air (OTA) software updates to address performance and quality issues with the Ocean SUV. However, these updates have not fully resolved the problems, and the vehicle continues to face criticism for software glitches and missing features.
  • Quality Complaints: The Ocean SUV has been criticized for various quality issues, including power losses, glitchy key fobs, and brake problems. High-profile reviews, such as one by Marques Brownlee, have further damaged the vehicle’s reputation.

Future Prospects and Potential Deals

  • Failed Negotiations: Fisker was in talks with a large automaker, reportedly Nissan, for a potential investment and joint development deal. However, these talks fell through, exacerbating the company’s financial woes.
  • Potential Lifelines: Despite the challenges, Fisker has secured a $3.45 million short-term loan to continue operations and is reportedly in discussions with other potential investors. However, the company’s future remains uncertain, with bankruptcy appearing increasingly likely.

The Fisker Ocean has received a series of highly critical reviews, which have significantly impacted the company’s reputation and financial stability. Here are the key points from some of the most notable negative reviews:

Consumer Reports Review

  • Incomplete Features: Consumer Reports highlighted that many of the Ocean’s features, particularly safety tech, function inconsistently. For example, the blind-spot warning and lane-keep assist systems were non-functional at times, and adaptive cruise control was not available despite being listed on the window sticker.
  • Software Issues: The review noted numerous software problems, such as inconsistent Bluetooth connectivity and a laggy touchscreen interface. The braking experience was also criticized for being overly aggressive and difficult to modulate.
  • Build Quality: The interior was described as feeling cheap, with issues like dashboard rattles and harsh suspension impacts. The upholstery was likened to a “cheap polyester suit”.
  • High Costs: The review pointed out the high destination fee of $2,438, which was deemed excessive given the overall delivery experience.

Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) Review

  • Software Glitches: Brownlee’s review emphasized severe software issues, including repeated Bluetooth pairing failures and random error messages. He also experienced problems with the key fob and the car’s inability to monitor the solar roof output.
  • Driving Experience: The review criticized the driving experience, noting that even the smoothest driving mode felt rough. Brownlee also mentioned that the car’s software update promises were not sufficient to overlook the current issues.
  • Company Response: Fisker attempted to delay Brownlee’s review until a major software update was released, which he declined. This interaction, along with a viral phone call from a Fisker employee to the dealership that provided the car, further damaged the company’s image.

MotorTrend Review

  • Persistent Software Problems: MotorTrend’s review echoed similar concerns about software reliability, such as tire-pressure monitoring issues, false error messages, and inconsistent settings.
  • Operational Failures: The car sometimes refused to shift out of park, displaying incorrect battery levels and lighting up all warning lights. These issues raised concerns about the vehicle’s reliability and the potential for being stranded.
  • Inconsistent Braking: The review also noted inconsistencies in the regenerative braking system, which affected the overall driving experience.

Edmunds Review

  • Uncertain Future: Edmunds advised against buying the Fisker Ocean due to the company’s uncertain financial future and the vehicle’s incomplete state. They highlighted the drastic price cuts as a sign of desperation to clear out old inventory.
  • Software and Feature Gaps: Despite some improvements in the latest software build, many features remained non-functional or unreliable, leading to a recommendation to avoid purchasing the vehicle.

General Sentiment

  • Mixed Reactions: While some reviewers, like Doug DeMuro, found aspects of the Ocean appealing despite its glitches, the overall sentiment has been largely negative. The recurring theme across reviews is that the Ocean has potential but is marred by significant software and quality control issues.
  • Impact on Company: These negative reviews have contributed to a sharp decline in Fisker’s stock price and raised doubts about the company’s ability to survive without substantial improvements and financial support.

The Fisker Ocean has faced severe criticism for its software issues, inconsistent feature performance, and questionable build quality. These reviews have not only tarnished the vehicle’s reputation but also exacerbated Fisker’s financial and operational challenges.

In summary, Fisker Inc. is grappling with severe financial difficulties, operational setbacks, and quality issues with its Ocean SUV. The company’s stock has been delisted, and it faces significant debt obligations. While there are ongoing efforts to secure additional funding and strategic partnerships, Fisker’s future remains highly uncertain.

Other Failure Stories

What Happened to WeWork

what-happened-to-wework
WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

What Happened to Netscape

what-happened-to-netscape
Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.

What Happened to Musical.ly

what-happened-to-musically
Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.

What Happened to Vine

what-happened-to-vine
Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

What Happened to CNN Plus

what-happened-to-cnn-plus
CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.

What Happened to Clubhouse

what-happened-to-clubhouse
Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

What Happened to Facebook

what-happened-to-facebook
Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA