Resource leveling is a project management technique used to adjust the allocation of resources over time to prevent peaks and valleys in resource utilization. It aims to optimize resource utilization while maintaining project schedules and objectives. By smoothing out resource usage, resource leveling helps to prevent overallocation or underutilization of resources, minimizes project delays, and improves overall project efficiency. This technique is particularly useful in projects where resources are limited or where resource availability fluctuates over time.
Optimize Resource Utilization: Resource leveling ensures that resources are allocated efficiently and effectively to minimize idle time and maximize productivity.
Maintain Project Schedules: Resource leveling helps to ensure that project schedules are realistic and achievable by balancing resource demand with resource availability.
Prevent Overallocation: Resource leveling prevents overallocation of resources by spreading resource demands evenly across the project timeline, reducing the risk of burnout and delays.
Improve Project Efficiency: Resource leveling improves project efficiency by minimizing disruptions and delays caused by resource shortages or conflicts.
Principal Concepts
Resource Allocation: Resource leveling involves adjusting the allocation of resources, such as personnel, equipment, and materials, to ensure that they are utilized optimally throughout the project lifecycle.
Resource Demand and Availability: Resource leveling takes into account both the demand for resources, which is driven by project activities and schedules, and the availability of resources, which may be limited or fluctuate over time.
Project Constraints: Resource leveling considers project constraints, such as deadlines, budget limitations, and resource dependencies, when adjusting resource allocations to ensure that project objectives are met.
Theoretical Foundations of Resource Leveling
Resource leveling draws on principles from various theoretical perspectives, including:
Project Management: Resource leveling is a fundamental concept in project management theory, where it is used to optimize resource allocation and scheduling to achieve project objectives.
Operations Research: Resource leveling applies concepts from operations research, such as linear programming and optimization techniques, to balance resource demand and availability and minimize project duration.
Components of Resource Leveling
Resource leveling typically involves the following components:
Resource Identification: Identify the types and quantities of resources required for each project activity, including personnel, equipment, and materials.
Resource Demand Assessment: Assess the resource demand for each project activity based on activity duration, resource requirements, and dependencies.
Resource Availability Analysis: Analyze the availability of resources over time, taking into account factors such as resource constraints, holidays, and other project commitments.
Resource Allocation Adjustment: Adjust resource allocations to smooth out resource demand over time, avoiding peaks and valleys in resource utilization.
Applications of Resource Leveling
Resource leveling has diverse applications across contexts, including:
Construction: In construction projects, resource leveling is used to balance the allocation of labor, equipment, and materials to avoid bottlenecks and delays and ensure that project milestones are met on time.
Software Development: In software development projects, resource leveling helps to optimize the allocation of development teams, tools, and infrastructure to ensure that project tasks are completed efficiently and according to schedule.
Industries Influenced by Resource Leveling
Resource leveling has influenced a wide range of industries and sectors, including:
Manufacturing: In manufacturing operations, resource leveling is employed to balance production schedules, workforce assignments, and equipment usage to meet production targets and customer demand.
Healthcare: In healthcare settings, resource leveling is used to optimize staff schedules, patient appointments, and facility utilization to ensure that healthcare services are delivered efficiently and effectively.
Advantages of Resource Leveling
Optimized Resource Utilization: Resource leveling optimizes resource utilization by balancing resource demand and availability, reducing idle time and maximizing productivity.
Improved Project Efficiency: Resource leveling improves project efficiency by minimizing delays and disruptions caused by resource shortages or conflicts, enabling projects to stay on schedule and within budget.
Enhanced Team Morale: Resource leveling promotes a balanced workload and prevents overwork or burnout among team members, leading to higher job satisfaction and morale.
Challenges and Considerations in Implementing Resource Leveling
Despite its benefits, resource leveling presents challenges:
Complexity: Resource leveling can be complex and time-consuming, especially in large-scale projects with numerous dependencies and constraints, requiring careful planning and coordination.
Trade-offs: Resource leveling often involves trade-offs between project duration, resource costs, and project objectives, requiring project managers to balance competing priorities and constraints.
Integration with Broader Project Management Practices
To maximize the benefits of resource leveling, it should be integrated with broader project management practices:
Project Planning: Resource leveling is integrated into project planning processes to develop realistic schedules, allocate resources effectively, and identify potential resource conflicts or bottlenecks.
Risk Management: Resource leveling is incorporated into risk management processes to identify and mitigate risks related to resource availability, dependencies, and project delays.
Future Directions in Resource Leveling
As resource leveling continues to evolve, future trends may include:
Automation: Leveraging automation tools and algorithms to streamline resource leveling processes and optimize resource allocations in real time.
Dynamic Resource Management: Implementing dynamic resource management strategies that allow for flexible resource allocation and adjustment in response to changing project conditions and priorities.
Conclusion
Resource leveling is a valuable project management technique that optimizes resource utilization, maintains project schedules, and improves overall project efficiency. By balancing resource demand and availability and smoothing out resource utilization over time, resource leveling helps to prevent overallocation or underutilization of resources and minimize project delays and disruptions. While challenges may arise in implementing resource leveling, its benefits in enhancing project performance and team productivity make it a valuable tool for project managers seeking to achieve project objectives on time and within budget.
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure.
Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue.
Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
