FOURWEEKMBA EXPLAINER · FROM THE NEWSROOM · UPDATED 12 NOVEMBER 2026
The CEO is an officer; the board appoints officers
A company has two layers. The shareholders own it and elect the board of directors. The board hires the officers who run it day to day, starting with the chief executive. Delaware law, which governs Nvidia, says a corporation’s business is “managed by or under the direction of a board of directors” (Section 141(a)).
So the chief executive answers to the board. Delaware leaves the details of officers to each company: officers serve “for such terms as are prescribed by the bylaws or determined by the board of directors”, until a successor is chosen “or until such officer’s earlier resignation or removal” (Section 142(b)). The bylaws are where the removal rule lives. For the wider picture, see our guides to the board of directors and corporate governance.
Five questions that decide how it works
1. Who votes? Removing someone from the CEO job is a board decision. Shareholders do not vote on the office itself; they act through the directors they elect.
2. How many directors? The bylaws set the bar. Some say a majority of directors present at a meeting with a quorum; others, like Nvidia’s, require a majority of all directors in office.
3. Is “cause” needed? For the office, bylaws commonly allow removal “with or without cause”, as Nvidia’s do. Cause tends to matter more for pay and, at some companies, for removing a director.
4. What does it cost? Severance depends on the CEO’s employment agreement, any severance plan and the terms of stock awards. Some contracts pay more if the exit is “without cause”. If there is no agreement, there is no contractual severance to trigger.
5. Does a founder’s stake protect the job? Not directly. Shares vote on board seats, not on the CEO’s office. A founder with a large stake, or with a class of shares carrying extra votes, can influence who sits on the board, and so who sits in the room when the board votes.
Worked example: the steps under Nvidia’s bylaws
Nvidia’s bylaws, amended and restated as of 12 March 2024, are filed with the SEC. Every quote below is from them, Nvidia’s 2026 proxy statement or its 8-K filings, as read by our newsroom (explainer) and checked against the bylaws on EDGAR on 12 November 2026.
Sources: NVIDIA Bylaws (12 March 2024) Sections 21-32; 2026 proxy statement; 8-K of 8 May 2026; SEC Form 8-K instructions. 6 of 11 is our arithmetic. Section 32 also lets a board committee, or a superior officer, remove an officer where the board has given it that power.
Office vs seat: who decides what
| Decision | Who votes | Bar at Nvidia | Cause needed? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remove the CEO from office | Board of directors | Majority of directors in office (6 of 11), or unanimous written consent | No (“with or without cause”) |
| Remove a director, with cause | Stockholders | Majority of voting power (over 12.2B shares) | Yes |
| Remove a director, without cause | Stockholders | 66 2/3% of voting power (about 16.2B shares) | No |
| Replace any director | Stockholders, at the annual meeting | Every seat is elected each year | No |
| Delaware default for directors, if bylaws are silent | Stockholders | Majority of shares entitled to vote (Section 141(k)) | No (“with or without cause”) |
Share counts are our arithmetic on the 24,312,141,810 shares in the 2026 proxy. Sources: NVIDIA Bylaws; Delaware General Corporation Law Section 141(k).
Does the CEO’s stake change anything at Nvidia?
The 2026 proxy lists the chief executive’s beneficial ownership at 870,604,104 shares, 3.58% of the total, at 23 March 2026, and Nvidia has no share class with extra votes (our report). That stake counts in any shareholder vote on board seats. It is far short of the two-thirds needed to remove a director without cause, or of a majority. In the board’s vote on the office, he is one of 11 directors; he is the only director who is also a company officer. For the full shareholder list, see who owns Nvidia.
Shareholders backed the whole board in June. At the 24 June 2026 annual meeting all ten nominees were elected, with support ranging from 99.0% for the chief executive to 86.7% for Lead Director Stephen C. Neal, by our newsroom’s arithmetic from the 8-K (our report). Four outside directors with venture careers held 99.2% of the outside directors’ 74.7 million shares in March (our report).
Who is on the bench
A board that removes a chief executive has to fill the office. Nvidia’s 10-K of 25 February 2026 named five executive officers. One seat has changed since: Ajay K. Puri, “a 21-year executive at NVIDIA”, gave notice to retire from worldwide field operations, and Nicholas Parker, a 26-year Microsoft executive, took the role in August 2026, with new-hire equity at a target value of $35 million in stock units and $5 million in performance units. The 10-K has flagged the risk of weak succession planning in each of its nine filings from 2018 to 2026 (our report).
Where things stand (12 November 2026)
On 8 November Nvidia’s board said “A committee of independent directors, assisted by outside independent counsel, will oversee the investigation”. On 10 November the independent directors said they had retained former acting U.S. Attorney Joon H. Kim and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz. On 11 November The Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter, that the board is preparing to oust the chief executive (our report). Nvidia had filed no 8-K since 3 September 2026 when we checked EDGAR at 06:11 UTC on 12 November. This page explains the rules; it makes no prediction about what the board will do.
FAQ
Can shareholders fire a CEO?
Not directly. The board appoints and removes officers. Shareholders act by electing or removing directors. At Nvidia every director stands for election each year.
How many votes does Nvidia’s board need to remove its CEO?
A majority of the directors in office, 6 of 11 since 13 July 2026, or the unanimous written consent of all directors, under Section 32 of its bylaws. No cause is needed.
Would a removed CEO stay on the board?
Removal from office does not by itself end the board seat. Under Section 21 of Nvidia’s bylaws only stockholders can remove a director: a majority of the voting power with cause, or 66 2/3% without cause. A director can also resign, and every seat is on the ballot at each annual meeting.
Does Nvidia’s CEO have a severance agreement?
No. The 2026 proxy says Nvidia has no employment, severance or change-in-control agreements with its executive officers, who are at-will employees. Equity awards follow the company’s plans and award agreements.
Who chairs Nvidia’s board?
Nobody: the proxy says it has “an independent Lead Director, rather than a chairperson”. Stephen C. Neal is Lead Director. Its governance policies give that director the duty to preside when the CEO is not present.
How fast must a CEO change be disclosed?
Within four business days, on SEC Form 8-K, Item 5.02(b), for a principal executive officer who retires, resigns or is terminated.
Related
- How Boards Remove a CEO: 6 of 11 Votes Under Nvidia’s Bylaws
- Nvidia’s Outside Directors: 4 Venture Investors Hold 99%
- Nvidia’s Executive Bench: 74 Years at Nvidia, One $40M Hire
- Nvidia Flagged Succession Risk in 9 Straight 10-K Filings
- Nvidia CEO Holds 3.58% of Shares, With No Super-Voting Class
- Nvidia Sheds $306B Late on Report Board May Oust Huang
Evergreen: Board of directors · Who owns Nvidia · Corporate governance.
Sources
- NVIDIA Bylaws, amended and restated 12 March 2024 (SEC exhibit)
- NVIDIA 2026 proxy statement · 10-K, 25 Feb 2026
- 8-K, 8 May 2026 · 8-K, 30 Jun 2026 · 8-K, 2 Jul 2026
- NVIDIA Corporate Governance Policies (3 Mar 2025)
- NVIDIA board statement, 8 Nov 2026 · independent directors’ statement, 10 Nov 2026
- Delaware General Corporation Law, Sections 141-142 · SEC Form 8-K
How this page stays current
Built from the FourWeekMBA newsroom’s reading of Nvidia’s filings, with the bylaw quotes re-checked on EDGAR. When Nvidia files a new proxy, changes its bylaws or reports an officer or director change on Form 8-K, this page is updated with the new count and date. This is an explainer of rules, not legal advice.









