The Cultural Onion Model is a conceptual framework that provides insights into the multi-layered nature of organizational culture. It suggests that like an onion, culture consists of multiple layers, each with its unique characteristics and influence on an organization’s identity and behavior.
The Cultural Onion Model, also known as the Cultural Web, was first introduced by Gerry Johnson and Kevan Scholes in their book “Exploring Corporate Strategy” in 1999. It visualizes organizational culture as a multi-layered construct, with each layer representing different aspects of culture. The model provides a framework for analyzing and understanding the complexity of culture within an organization.
The Layers of the Cultural Onion Model
The Cultural Onion Model consists of several layers, with each layer representing a distinct aspect of organizational culture:
1. Symbols:
Symbols are the visible and tangible representations of an organization’s culture. They include the company’s logo, office layout, dress code, and even artifacts like awards and trophies. Symbols serve as powerful communicators of an organization’s values and beliefs.
2. Rituals and Routines:
Rituals and routines encompass the regular and repetitive actions, behaviors, and interactions that define how work is done in an organization. This layer includes daily practices, meeting structures, and established procedures that shape employee behavior and expectations.
3. Stories and Myths:
Stories and myths are the narratives that circulate within an organization. These stories may be based on real events or myths that have been created to reinforce specific values or behaviors. They help employees make sense of their organization’s history and purpose.
4. Control Systems:
Control systems refer to the mechanisms used to manage and monitor performance and behavior within the organization. This layer includes policies, rules, and processes that guide employees and ensure alignment with the organization’s culture.
5. Power Structures:
Power structures represent the distribution of authority and decision-making within the organization. This layer examines who holds power, how decisions are made, and the extent of hierarchical control or decentralized autonomy.
6. Organizational Structures:
Organizational structures encompass the formal arrangement of roles, departments, and reporting lines within the organization. These structures influence communication, collaboration, and the flow of information.
7. Symbols:
Symbols are the visible and tangible representations of an organization’s culture. They include the company’s logo, office layout, dress code, and even artifacts like awards and trophies. Symbols serve as powerful communicators of an organization’s values and beliefs.
Significance of the Cultural Onion Model
Understanding the Cultural Onion Model is essential because it provides several key insights into organizational culture:
1. Complexity of Culture:
The model underscores the complexity of organizational culture by highlighting the numerous interrelated elements that shape it. It demonstrates that culture goes beyond surface-level symbols and rituals.
2. Alignment and Consistency:
By examining the various layers, organizations can assess the alignment and consistency of their culture. Inconsistencies between layers can lead to confusion and challenges in maintaining a cohesive culture.
3. Change and Transformation:
The model helps organizations identify specific areas for cultural change or transformation. Leaders can target particular layers to initiate and guide cultural shifts.
4. Communication and Storytelling:
Recognizing the importance of stories and symbols in shaping culture highlights the role of effective communication and storytelling in reinforcing desired values and behaviors.
5. Impact on Behavior:
Each layer of the Cultural Onion Model has a direct influence on employee behavior and decision-making. Understanding these influences allows organizations to manage culture more effectively.
Strategies for Managing and Transforming Organizational Culture
Effectively managing and transforming organizational culture requires a strategic approach. Here are strategies based on the insights provided by the Cultural Onion Model:
1. Assessment and Diagnosis:
Begin by conducting a thorough assessment of your organization’s culture, examining each layer of the Cultural Onion Model. Identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.
2. Leadership Alignment:
Ensure that senior leadership is aligned with the desired culture and serves as role models for the organization. Leaders should embody the values and behaviors they wish to promote.
3. Communication and Storytelling:
Use storytelling and effective communication to reinforce the organization’s values and beliefs. Share stories that exemplify the culture you want to cultivate.
4. Symbolic Changes:
Make symbolic changes that reflect the desired culture. This can include redesigning office spaces, updating the company’s visual identity, or introducing new traditions and rituals.
5. Empowerment and Autonomy:
Empower employees to actively participate in shaping the culture. Encourage their input in decision-making processes and involve them in defining the organization’s values.
6. **Feedback and Measurement
**:
Establish mechanisms for collecting feedback on the cultural changes and measuring their impact. Use surveys, focus groups, and key performance indicators (KPIs) to assess progress.
7. Training and Development:
Provide training and development programs that align with the desired culture. These programs can help employees acquire the skills and mindset needed to embody the culture.
Challenges and Considerations
While the Cultural Onion Model offers valuable insights, organizations should be aware of potential challenges and considerations when managing culture:
1. Resistance to Change:
Cultural change often faces resistance from employees who are comfortable with the existing culture. Leaders must address this resistance and provide a compelling vision for the new culture.
2. Time and Patience:
Cultural transformation is a long-term endeavor and may not yield immediate results. Organizations must be patient and persistent in their efforts.
3. Balancing Tradition and Innovation:
Organizations must strike a balance between preserving aspects of their culture that are valuable and evolving to meet changing needs and expectations.
4. Cultural Inertia:
Cultural inertia can hinder change efforts, as deeply ingrained cultural norms and behaviors may be resistant to modification.
5. Ethical Considerations:
Cultural changes should align with ethical principles and values. Organizations must ensure that cultural shifts do not compromise ethical standards.
Future Trends in Organizational Culture
The future of organizational culture is influenced by emerging trends and evolving workplace dynamics:
1. Hybrid Work Environments:
As remote and hybrid work models become more prevalent, organizations will need to adapt their cultures to accommodate diverse work arrangements.
2. Diversity and Inclusion:
Organizations will prioritize creating inclusive cultures that embrace diversity and foster a sense of belonging for all employees.
3. Agility and Adaptability:
Agile cultures that can quickly respond to change and uncertainty will be crucial in an increasingly dynamic business environment.
4. Digital Transformation:
The integration of digital technologies into work processes will influence cultural norms and expectations, including the acceptance of virtual collaboration.
5. Well-being and Mental Health:
Cultures that prioritize employee well-being and mental health support will attract and retain top talent.
6. Purpose-Driven Cultures:
Organizations will focus on defining and communicating their purpose to create cultures that inspire and engage employees.
Conclusion
The Cultural Onion Model provides a valuable framework for understanding the multi-faceted nature of organizational culture. By examining the various layers of culture, organizations can gain deeper insights into their values, behaviors, and traditions. Effectively managing and transforming culture requires a strategic approach that aligns leadership, communication, and empowerment efforts with the desired cultural outcomes. As the workplace continues to evolve, organizations that prioritize and invest in their cultures will be better equipped to adapt to change, attract top talent, and thrive in an ever-changing business landscape.
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure.
Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue.
Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
