critical-success-factors

Critical Success Factors In A Nutshell

Critical success factors (CSFs) are elements that must be met for an organization to achieve its goals. A critical success factors analysis might help businesses identify the opportunities based on the goals and missions of the business both short and long term.

Understanding critical success factors

Critical success factors have a few non-negotiable characteristics.

They must:

  • Be synonymous with a high-level goal.
  • Directly be linked to the business strategy.
  • Be integral to organizational success.
  • Benefit the individual, department, or organization as a whole.

In terms of a precise definition, critical success factors are generally action phrases describing the desired result and the action itself. 

For example, a company might seek to be service-oriented when working with its customers. Another may opt to work toward a higher quality order fulfillment experience through process improvements.

Regardless of the particular CSF or industry concerned, it must be stressed that the preferred course of action is aligned with organizational goals and mission.

Determining critical success factors

Establishing a suite of critical success factors can be performed in five steps:

  1. Assemble a team from the top level of the organization. Seniority is important to guide proper strategy and ensures there is buy-in from those with the power to make decisions. Some businesses may choose to bring in consultants to facilitate the process.
  2. Incorporate employee feedback to create a list of around 10 to 15 critical success factors. Be sure to incorporate a broad swathe of employees, backgrounds, skills, departments, and expertise.
  3. Use multiple frameworks to understand the key elements of each goal. A business may choose to use an OAS (Objective, Advantage, Scope) statement to help them describe its strategy and strategy execution. A SWOT analysis can also be performed to optimize performance, maximize potential, manage competition, and minimize risk. Then, combine a strategic plan with a change agenda to outline what needs to change for goals to be met.
  4. Determine which factors are key to achieving long-term plans. Using key insights from the frameworks in step 3, determine the most salient critical success factors. These factors and their associated goals should then be grouped by category. As a general rule, the categories of finance, customer, process, and people are a good place to start.
  5. Strategic plan implementation – it is important to take action on a strategic plan to see the real benefits. Some organizations opt to use a balanced scorecard (BSC) which helps them understand if they are acting in such a way that their objectives will be met. What’s more, the balanced scorecard lists smaller action tasks that keep the team motivated to follow through on the strategic plan.

Different types of critical success factors

According to American organizational theorist and MIT lecturer John F. Rockart, there are five broad CSF types:

  1. Temporal factors – or factors critical to the success of managing short-term or temporary situations. A somewhat temporal factor was the introduction of COVID-19 hygiene protocols in many brick-and-mortar businesses.
  2. Management-position factors – these factors are identified by managers who have a unique perspective on continuous improvement, company culture, and employee engagement. Factors are specific to the individual role or expertise of each manager. For example, an operations manager may gauge success through production efficiency and cost control.
  3. Industry-related factors – or factors an organization must satisfy to remain industry competitive. For an airline company, a CSF may be an average delay time of no more than ten minutes.
  4. Peer-related factors – which factors relate to the relative position of a business with respect to its competitors? An industry leader will be more focused on maintaining a competitive advantage. On the other hand, a smaller player may consider success to be an increase in market share driven by higher brand loyalty.
  5. Environmental factors – describing any factor happening external to the organization over which it has no control. Examples include public or economic policy, competitor behavior, and technological innovation. Critical environmental success factors should always seek to mitigate, anticipate, and stay ahead of the curve wherever practicable. 

Key takeaways:

  • Critical success factors are objectives that must be satisfied for an organization to meet goals, objectives, or missions.
  • Critical success factors are created by assembling a team of senior managers and incorporating employee feedback. Frameworks such as the SWOT analysis and OAS statement then help the organization determine which CSFs are the most important for success.
  • Critical success factors are grouped into five general types: temporal, management-position, industry-related, peer-related, and environmental.

Connected Decision-Making Frameworks

Cynefin Framework

cynefin-framework
The Cynefin Framework gives context to decision making and problem-solving by providing context and guiding an appropriate response. The five domains of the Cynefin Framework comprise obvious, complicated, complex, chaotic domains and disorder if a domain has not been determined at all.

SWOT Analysis

swot-analysis
A SWOT Analysis is a framework used for evaluating the business’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. It can aid in identifying the problematic areas of your business so that you can maximize your opportunities. It will also alert you to the challenges your organization might face in the future.

Personal SWOT Analysis

personal-swot-analysis
The SWOT analysis is commonly used as a strategic planning tool in business. However, it is also well suited for personal use in addressing a specific goal or problem. A personal SWOT analysis helps individuals identify their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

Pareto Analysis

pareto-principle-pareto-analysis
The Pareto Analysis is a statistical analysis used in business decision making that identifies a certain number of input factors that have the greatest impact on income. It is based on the similarly named Pareto Principle, which states that 80% of the effect of something can be attributed to just 20% of the drivers.

Failure Mode And Effects Analysis

failure-mode-and-effects-analysis
A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to identifying design failures in a product or process. Developed in the 1950s, the failure mode and effects analysis is one the earliest methodologies of its kind. It enables organizations to anticipate a range of potential failures during the design stage.

Blindspot Analysis

blindspot-analysis
A Blindspot Analysis is a means of unearthing incorrect or outdated assumptions that can harm decision making in an organization. The term “blindspot analysis” was first coined by American economist Michael Porter. Porter argued that in business, outdated ideas or strategies had the potential to stifle modern ideas and prevent them from succeeding. Furthermore, decisions a business thought were made with care caused projects to fail because major factors had not been duly considered.

Comparable Company Analysis

comparable-company-analysis
A comparable company analysis is a process that enables the identification of similar organizations to be used as a comparison to understand the business and financial performance of the target company. To find comparables you can look at two key profiles: the business and financial profile. From the comparable company analysis it is possible to understand the competitive landscape of the target organization.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

cost-benefit-analysis
A cost-benefit analysis is a process a business can use to analyze decisions according to the costs associated with making that decision. For a cost analysis to be effective it’s important to articulate the project in the simplest terms possible, identify the costs, determine the benefits of project implementation, assess the alternatives.

Agile Business Analysis

agile-business-analysis
Agile Business Analysis (AgileBA) is certification in the form of guidance and training for business analysts seeking to work in agile environments. To support this shift, AgileBA also helps the business analyst relate Agile projects to a wider organizational mission or strategy. To ensure that analysts have the necessary skills and expertise, AgileBA certification was developed.

SOAR Analysis

soar-analysis
A SOAR analysis is a technique that helps businesses at a strategic planning level to: Focus on what they are doing right. Determine which skills could be enhanced. Understand the desires and motivations of their stakeholders.

STEEPLE Analysis

steeple-analysis
The STEEPLE analysis is a variation of the STEEP analysis. Where the step analysis comprises socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental/ecological, and political factors as the base of the analysis. The STEEPLE analysis adds other two factors such as Legal and Ethical.

Pestel Analysis

pestel-analysis
The PESTEL analysis is a framework that can help marketers assess whether macro-economic factors are affecting an organization. This is a critical step that helps organizations identify potential threats and weaknesses that can be used in other frameworks such as SWOT or to gain a broader and better understanding of the overall marketing environment.

DESTEP Analysis

destep-analysis
A DESTEP analysis is a framework used by businesses to understand their external environment and the issues which may impact them. The DESTEP analysis is an extension of the popular PEST analysis created by Harvard Business School professor Francis J. Aguilar. The DESTEP analysis groups external factors into six categories: demographic, economic, socio-cultural, technological, ecological, and political.

Paired Comparison Analysis

paired-comparison-analysis
A paired comparison analysis is used to rate or rank options where evaluation criteria are subjective by nature. The analysis is particularly useful when there is a lack of clear priorities or objective data to base decisions on. A paired comparison analysis evaluates a range of options by comparing them against each other.

Related Strategy Concepts: Go-To-Market StrategyMarketing StrategyBusiness ModelsTech Business ModelsJobs-To-Be DoneDesign ThinkingLean Startup CanvasValue ChainValue Proposition CanvasBalanced ScorecardBusiness Model CanvasSWOT AnalysisGrowth HackingBundlingUnbundlingBootstrappingVenture CapitalPorter’s Five ForcesPorter’s Generic StrategiesPorter’s Five ForcesPESTEL AnalysisSWOTPorter’s Diamond ModelAnsoffTechnology Adoption CurveTOWSSOARBalanced

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA