Meta Sheds About $124B in a Day as 13 Brokers Lift Targets

Shares of Meta Platforms closed down about 7% on 22 October 2026, at $648.85 against $697.52 the day before (Nasdaq and Yahoo Finance data), as investors weighed its fast-growing AI agent business against the cost of funding its AI expansion. By our arithmetic, that took about $124 billion off Meta’s market value. Before the open, Reuters had reported a fall of about 3% that, if it held, was set to erase about $50 billion.

Analysts moved the other way. At least 13 brokerages raised their price targets on the stock after the results, according to LSEG data cited by Reuters. Of the ten target changes listed by Stocktwits, seven were raised and three were lowered, on our count.

Business Pill · CAPEX AND DEPRECIATION

A short Business Engineer explainer on capex and depreciation: why chip lifetimes drive AI profits. It teaches the general idea only and says nothing about Meta or any analyst in this piece.

The key insight: As we read it, the sell side and the share price read the same quarter in opposite directions: Meta closed down about 7%, about $124 billion of market value by our arithmetic, while at least 13 brokerages raised their targets, according to LSEG data cited by Reuters.

Update (22 Oct): After the open, the fall was larger than the premarket move Reuters reported. NDTV Profit reported that Meta “erased $100 billion in value, dropping 5.4%, the most it has dropped intrady since July 30.” FirstSquawk posted that the shares slid 6% at the open, and Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) that they hit their lowest in over a month.

At the open, Reuters reported the S&P 500 down 0.81% and the Nasdaq Composite down 1.48%, as earnings from Tesla and Meta “did little to dispel doubts about AI outlook.”

By our arithmetic, a 5.4% fall from Meta’s 21 October close of $697.52 (Yahoo Finance data), across the about 2,556 million Class A and Class B shares outstanding on 16 October (Meta’s 10-Q), comes to about $96 billion of market value, close to NDTV Profit’s $100 billion and about twice Reuters’ premarket estimate of about $50 billion. That figure was intraday.

At the close: Meta finished at $648.85, down $48.67 or about 7.0% from $697.52 (Nasdaq and Yahoo Finance data). By our arithmetic, across the same about 2,556 million shares, that is about $124 billion of market value, more than twice Reuters’ premarket estimate. CNBC reported the stock “sinks nearly 7% as AI spend pushes free cash flow negative,” and Yahoo Finance reported it was set for its worst day in nearly three months.

What Was Reported

Reuters wrote that the downbeat reaction came even though Meta reported stronger-than-expected quarterly revenue, forecast fourth-quarter sales above Wall Street estimates and highlighted rapid adoption of Muse, its new AI agent app. Before the drop, the stock had gained more than 5% this year, according to Reuters.

The cost side is large. Reuters noted Meta expects annual capital expenditure of $135 billion to $145 billion, and reported a free cash flow deficit of $2.12 billion in the third quarter, against positive free cash flow a year earlier. Capital expenditure is money spent on long-lived assets such as data centres and servers.

Reuters also pointed to two other weights. A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay a $25 billion penalty in a data-privacy case linked to Cambridge Analytica, and Meta said it plans to appeal. Meta also announced a new class of non-voting Class C shares, which Reuters said gives it more flexibility for acquisitions and employee pay while keeping Mark Zuckerberg’s voting control.

A separate Reuters markets report said the non-voting stock plan “revived concern over its mounting capital commitments.” It added that shares in Tesla, which also reported and cut its spending forecast, dropped nearly 4% in the premarket.

New 12-month price targets for Meta from ten firms after its third-quarter results, as compiled by Stocktwits
New 12-month price targets for Meta from ten firms after its third-quarter results, as compiled by Stocktwits on 22 October 2026; red bars are targets that were lowered. The 7% fall is Meta’s 22 October close against the prior close (Nasdaq and Yahoo Finance data); the about $124 billion is our arithmetic from that close and the share count on Meta’s 10-Q cover.

What Was Posted on X

FirstSquawk posted at 13:32 UTC that Meta shares dropped 5.4%, the most intraday since 30 July. It is the intraday figure our Update uses to size the regular-session move against Reuters’ premarket estimate of about $50 billion.

The Table: Ten Price Targets After the Results

A price target is the share price an analyst expects in about a year. The table lists the changes Stocktwits compiled on 22 October. Pivotal Research and Cantor Fitzgerald also raised their targets, according to Dow Jones headlines.

FirmRatingNew targetPrevious targetDirection
Wells FargoOverweight$995$1,000Lowered
JPMorganOverweight$940$920Raised
CitiBuy$905$895Raised
UBSBuy$892$884Raised
BarclaysOverweight$880$780Raised
TD CowenBuy$850$865Lowered
SusquehannaPositive$850$650Raised
Piper SandlerOverweight$850$875Lowered
BofABuy$845$810Raised
DA DavidsonBuy$800$700Raised
Source: Stocktwits, 22 October 2026. Direction column is our reading of the old and new targets.

The average across 57 analysts rose from $816.98 to $825.58, FactSet data on TradingView shows, about 18% above the 21 October close. That data counts 62 Buy ratings, 6 Holds and 1 Sell among 69 covering analysts.

What Analysts Said

Deutsche Bank analyst Benjamin Black said Meta’s AI investments were producing stronger advertising performance and engagement, Reuters reported, as investors increasingly view computing infrastructure as a revenue-generating asset rather than a cost burden.

Barclays called Muse a “game changer” for Meta’s investment narrative, and Citi said Meta was entering an “AI product super-cycle”, according to Stocktwits. JPMorgan said Meta’s fourth-quarter revenue guidance was $1 billion above its expectations at the high end.

The concerns were about funding. TD Cowen expects Meta to issue equity or debt to finance its AI infrastructure over the coming years, Stocktwits reported. Wells Fargo flagged uncertainty around capital raising and Meta’s 2027 spending, and Piper Sandler raised its 2027 expense and capital expenditure forecasts.

In a Dow Jones Market Talk, Quilter Cheviot’s Ben Barringer wrote that Meta’s capital-expenditure plans failed to soothe investors worried the AI boom is slowing. He added that some investors might have expected another big increase.

The Structural Read

As we read it, the analysts are pricing the revenue and the market is pricing the bill. Reuters wrote that investors weighed the fast-growing AI agent business against “the mounting costs of funding its ambitious AI expansion.”

As we read it, the funding question is now explicit. Reuters reported a third-quarter free cash flow deficit of $2.12 billion, and TD Cowen expects Meta to issue equity or debt to finance its AI infrastructure, according to Stocktwits.

As we read it, the three lowered targets carry the same message as the raised ones: Wells Fargo, TD Cowen and Piper Sandler still rate the stock Overweight or Buy, according to Stocktwits.

Reuters markets report, 22 October 2026

“The first of the so-called AI hyperscalers to publish quarterly results, reported third-quarter revenue late on Wednesday that beat expectations.”

Three Implications

FOR SHAREHOLDERS Reuters said the new non-voting stock plan revived concern over Meta’s mounting capital commitments, a funding question that sits next to the capex figures.

FOR ANALYSTS Wells Fargo flagged uncertainty around capital raising and Meta’s 2027 spending, and Piper Sandler raised its 2027 expense and capex forecasts, Stocktwits reported.

FOR THE OTHER HYPERSCALERS As we read it, Meta reported first among the AI hyperscalers, according to Reuters, so its reception is the first market read on AI spending this earnings season.

The Business Engineer Lens

This story maps onto the Business Engineer framework The AI Capex Map.

The framework sets out to map the financing of AI: “How the money flows, where it cracks, what it buys, who can absorb it, and what happens when revenue can’t catch up.”

As we read it, Meta’s reception tests the “who can absorb it” question: capex above operating cash in the quarter, and a new share class to fund what comes next. The framework was published in May 2026 and does not discuss these results.

What Is Not Established

Reuters’ $50 billion was an estimate made before regular trading opened; the close was larger. The $124 billion is our arithmetic from the closing price and the share count on Meta’s 10-Q cover, and data providers may use a different share count for market value. The Reuters story cites at least 13 raised targets but does not list them, and the Stocktwits table covers ten firms only. Meta had not commented on the share move in the sources we read.

Connecting the Coverage

We broke down the results in our Q3 explainer, where capital expenditure of $34.91 billion topped the $32.79 billion of cash from operations. Our piece on the nonvoting stock covers the new Class C shares, and our piece on Meta’s commitments covers the $454.52 billion it has locked in. Muse passing 10 million users is in our Muse piece.

Business Engineer Framework

The AI Capex Map

A Business Engineer framework on how the AI capex cycle is financed, where it cracks and who can absorb it.

Read the Map of AI →

The Bottom Line

As we read it, the market and the analysts split on the same numbers. Meta shares closed down about 7%, about $124 billion of value by our arithmetic, while at least 13 brokerages lifted their targets.

95,000+ executives read Business Engineer for the AI strategy frameworks cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.

A note on sourcing. This piece is based on Reuters’ 22 October 2026 report on Meta’s share move and its markets report the same day, both read in full through Reuters’ feed on TradingView; Stocktwits’ compilation of analyst price targets, read in full; Dow Jones headlines and a Market Talk note on TradingView; FactSet consensus data on TradingView; and our own earlier pieces. The 22 October closing price is from Nasdaq and Yahoo Finance data; the 7.0% and the $124 billion are our arithmetic; Reuters’ $50 billion was a premarket estimate. The seven-and-three split is our count. Nothing here is investment advice.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA