rendhaneyi

Rendanheyi

Rendanheyi is a groundbreaking management model that has redefined the way organizations operate, innovate, and serve their customers. Developed by Haier Group, a global leader in home appliances and consumer electronics, Rendanheyi places individuals and customer-centricity at the core of its philosophy.

Understanding Rendanheyi

What is Rendanheyi?

Rendanheyi is a management model that was developed by Zhang Ruimin, the CEO of Haier Group, and first introduced in the early 2000s. The term “Rendanheyi” itself is a combination of two Chinese words: “ren” (人), meaning “people,” and “danheyi” (蛋壳理), which can be translated to “eggshell theory.” This theory emphasizes that individuals and small teams within an organization should have the autonomy and accountability to operate like “micro-enterprises” within the larger organization, much like eggs within an egg carton.

At its core, Rendanheyi focuses on three fundamental principles:

  1. User Value Creation: The primary purpose of an organization is to create value for its users (customers). Every action, decision, and innovation should be driven by the goal of enhancing user value.
  2. Platform-Based Organization: The organization is structured as a platform where individuals and teams have the freedom to become entrepreneurs and operate as independent “micro-enterprises” to serve users.
  3. Interconnected Ecosystem: The Rendanheyi model promotes the creation of an interconnected ecosystem where users, employees, and partners collaborate seamlessly to deliver value.

Key Principles of Rendanheyi

1. User-Centricity:

  • Rendanheyi places users at the center of the organization’s focus. Understanding user needs and delivering exceptional value to them is the driving force behind all decisions and actions.

2. Entrepreneurship and Autonomy:

  • Under Rendanheyi, individuals and small teams are empowered to operate with a high degree of autonomy. They are encouraged to take risks, make decisions, and innovate independently.

3. Accountability and Responsibility:

  • With autonomy comes accountability. Each “micro-enterprise” within the organization is responsible for its performance and outcomes. This accountability fosters a culture of ownership and responsibility.

4. Platform Thinking:

  • Rendanheyi views the organization as a platform that connects various entities, including users, employees, and partners. This platform provides the infrastructure for collaboration and value creation.

5. Ecosystem Collaboration:

  • The model promotes collaboration across the entire ecosystem. Users, employees, and external partners work together to co-create value, share knowledge, and drive innovation.

Implementation Strategies

Implementing the Rendanheyi model involves several key strategies:

1. Micro-Enterprise Transformation:

  • The organization is divided into smaller, self-contained units or micro-enterprises. These units operate with their own profit and loss responsibility, fostering a sense of ownership and entrepreneurship.

2. User Communities:

  • Creating user communities where customers can interact, share feedback, and co-create solutions is essential. These communities serve as a valuable source of insights and ideas for product development and improvement.

3. Open Innovation:

  • Embracing open innovation by collaborating with external partners, startups, and experts in various fields. This approach allows for the rapid development of new products and services.

4. Data-Driven Decision-Making:

  • Rendanheyi relies heavily on data and analytics to inform decisions and identify areas for improvement. Data-driven insights are used to enhance user experiences and drive innovation.

5. Digital Transformation:

  • Leveraging digital technologies to streamline operations, improve communication, and enhance user interactions is a fundamental aspect of the model.

6. Agile and Lean Principles:

  • Implementing agile and lean principles to respond quickly to changing market conditions and customer needs.

Transformative Impact

Haier’s Success Story:

  • Haier Group’s adoption of the Rendanheyi model has been nothing short of revolutionary. From a struggling state-owned enterprise in the 1980s, Haier has transformed into a global powerhouse in the home appliances and consumer electronics industry.

Customer-Centric Innovation:

  • Rendanheyi’s user-centric approach has driven continuous innovation at Haier. The company actively seeks user input and uses it to develop products and services that meet real needs.

Global Expansion:

  • Haier’s success with the Rendanheyi model has not been limited to China. The company has expanded its presence globally and acquired several international brands, all while maintaining its commitment to user-centricity.

Industry Influence:

  • Haier’s success with Rendanheyi has inspired other organizations, both in China and around the world, to adopt similar user-centric and platform-based approaches.

Broader Implications

User-Centric Business Models:

  • Rendanheyi has brought attention to the importance of user-centric business models in today’s competitive landscape. Many organizations are now placing a greater emphasis on understanding and meeting user needs.

Digital Transformation:

  • The model underscores the significance of digital transformation and the integration of technology into business operations. It highlights the need for organizations to be agile and responsive in a digital age.

Platform Thinking:

  • The platform-based thinking inherent in Rendanheyi has influenced discussions on how organizations can create ecosystems that foster collaboration and innovation.

Innovation Culture:

  • Rendanheyi’s emphasis on entrepreneurship and autonomy has sparked discussions on fostering innovation cultures within organizations.

Challenges and Considerations

While Rendanheyi has demonstrated remarkable success, it is not without challenges:

Organizational Culture:

  • Shifting to a Rendanheyi model requires a significant cultural shift within an organization. Employees may initially resist change or struggle with the autonomy and accountability it entails.

Complexity:

  • Managing a network of interconnected micro-enterprises can be complex, requiring robust systems and processes.

Scalability:

  • While the model has worked well for Haier and some other organizations, it may not be suitable for all types of businesses or industries.

Conclusion

Rendanheyi is a revolutionary management model that has transformed Haier Group and inspired organizations worldwide to rethink their approach to business. Its emphasis on user-centricity, entrepreneurship, and platform-based thinking has redefined the way organizations create value and drive innovation. As the business landscape continues to evolve, the principles of Rendanheyi serve as a beacon, guiding organizations toward more agile, user-focused, and collaborative futures. The model’s enduring impact on the world of business underscores its significance as a catalyst for change and innovation in the 21st century.

Key Highlights:

  • Definition: Rendanheyi is a management model developed by Haier Group, focusing on user value creation, platform-based organization, and an interconnected ecosystem.
  • Core Principles:
    • User-Centricity
    • Entrepreneurship and Autonomy
    • Accountability and Responsibility
    • Platform Thinking
    • Ecosystem Collaboration
  • Implementation Strategies:
    • Micro-Enterprise Transformation
    • User Communities
    • Open Innovation
    • Data-Driven Decision-Making
    • Digital Transformation
    • Agile and Lean Principles
  • Transformative Impact:
    • Haier’s Success Story
    • Customer-Centric Innovation
    • Global Expansion
    • Industry Influence
  • Broader Implications:
    • User-Centric Business Models
    • Digital Transformation
    • Platform Thinking
    • Innovation Culture
  • Challenges and Considerations:
    • Organizational Culture
    • Complexity
    • Scalability
  • Conclusion: Rendanheyi has revolutionized management practices, inspiring organizations worldwide to prioritize user-centricity, entrepreneurship, and platform-based thinking. Its enduring impact highlights its significance as a catalyst for change and innovation in the modern business landscape.
Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Holacracy– A decentralized organizational structure and management system that distributes authority and decision-making power across self-organizing teams or “circles.” Holacracy replaces traditional hierarchical management with a dynamic system of roles, accountabilities, and transparent governance processes. Holacratic organizations empower employees to make autonomous decisions, drive innovation, and adapt quickly to changing circumstances, fostering agility, resilience, and employee engagement. Rendanheyi aligns with holacracy principles by promoting decentralized decision-making, empowering frontline employees, and fostering organizational agility and responsiveness to customer needs and market dynamics.– Applicable in organizational agility, leadership development, and change management where flattening hierarchies, empowering employees, and fostering adaptability and innovation are strategic imperatives for driving organizational transformation and competitive advantage. Holacracy complements Rendanheyi by providing a framework for decentralized governance, distributed decision-making, and self-organization, enabling organizations to unleash the creative potential of employees, respond rapidly to market changes, and deliver superior customer value through agile and autonomous teams.
Agile Methodology– An iterative approach to project management and software development that emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and customer responsiveness. Agile methodologies, such as Scrum and Kanban, prioritize delivering incremental value to customers through iterative cycles of planning, execution, and feedback. Agile teams self-organize, collaborate cross-functionally, and adapt to changing requirements, enabling organizations to accelerate delivery, minimize risks, and optimize outcomes. Rendanheyi embraces agile principles by promoting customer-centricity, empowering frontline teams, and fostering continuous improvement and learning to deliver value to customers rapidly and effectively.– Relevant in product development, project management, and innovation processes where delivering customer value, accelerating time-to-market, and fostering collaboration and adaptability are strategic priorities for achieving business agility and competitiveness. Agile methodologies complement Rendanheyi by providing a framework for iterative development, customer collaboration, and adaptive planning, enabling organizations to respond rapidly to market feedback, optimize resource allocation, and deliver high-quality products and services that meet customer needs and expectations.
Lean Management– A systematic approach to maximizing value and minimizing waste in organizational processes and operations. Lean management principles, derived from the Toyota Production System, focus on eliminating inefficiencies, standardizing workflows, and continuously improving processes to enhance productivity and quality while reducing costs and lead times. Lean organizations empower employees to identify and solve problems, streamline workflows, and create value for customers through waste reduction and process optimization. Rendanheyi integrates lean principles by emphasizing value creation, empowering frontline workers, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement and waste elimination to deliver superior customer experiences and operational excellence.– Applicable in process optimization, quality management, and cost reduction initiatives where maximizing efficiency, improving productivity, and enhancing customer value are strategic imperatives for achieving operational excellence and competitive advantage. Lean management complements Rendanheyi by providing a framework for waste reduction, process streamlining, and employee empowerment, enabling organizations to optimize operations, drive innovation, and deliver high-quality products and services that exceed customer expectations and create sustainable value.
Design Thinking– A human-centered approach to innovation and problem-solving that emphasizes empathy, creativity, and collaboration to understand user needs, explore new possibilities, and develop innovative solutions. Design thinking involves iterative cycles of observation, ideation, prototyping, and testing to address complex challenges and uncover novel opportunities. Design thinking encourages multidisciplinary teams to adopt a user-centric mindset, experiment with ideas, and iterate based on feedback to generate meaningful and sustainable solutions. Rendanheyi embraces design thinking principles by prioritizing customer empathy, fostering cross-functional collaboration, and promoting experimentation and iteration to co-create value with customers and stakeholders iteratively.– Relevant in product design, service innovation, and customer experience optimization where understanding user needs, fostering creativity, and driving iterative development are critical for delivering innovative solutions and enhancing customer satisfaction and loyalty. Design thinking complements Rendanheyi by providing a framework for customer-centric innovation, cross-functional collaboration, and rapid experimentation, enabling organizations to uncover latent customer needs, generate breakthrough ideas, and develop solutions that resonate with users and create lasting value.
Servant Leadership– A leadership philosophy that emphasizes serving others, empowering employees, and facilitating their growth and development to achieve organizational goals and build cohesive, high-performing teams. Servant leaders prioritize the needs of their team members, coach and support them, and create a culture of trust, collaboration, and accountability. Servant leadership fosters employee engagement, autonomy, and commitment, leading to improved morale, productivity, and organizational effectiveness. Rendanheyi embodies servant leadership principles by placing frontline employees at the center of decision-making, empowering them to serve customers effectively, and creating a supportive environment that enables personal and professional growth and fulfillment.– Applicable in leadership development, team management, and organizational culture transformation where fostering employee engagement, promoting trust, and nurturing talent are strategic imperatives for driving performance and innovation. Servant leadership complements Rendanheyi by providing a model for empathetic leadership, employee empowerment, and values-based management, enabling leaders to inspire and support their teams, unleash their potential, and create a culture of excellence and service that drives organizational success and sustainability.
Continuous Improvement– A systematic approach to enhancing organizational processes, products, or services through incremental changes and innovation. Continuous improvement involves identifying opportunities for improvement, implementing changes, and evaluating outcomes to drive ongoing learning and adaptation. Continuous improvement cultures prioritize employee involvement, data-driven decision-making, and a focus on customer value to foster innovation, quality, and efficiency. Rendanheyi promotes continuous improvement by empowering frontline employees, fostering a culture of experimentation and learning, and providing tools and support for identifying and implementing process enhancements and innovations iteratively.– Relevant in quality management, process optimization, and innovation management where fostering a culture of learning, experimentation, and collaboration is essential for achieving operational excellence and driving business growth. Continuous improvement complements Rendanheyi by providing a framework for employee engagement, process optimization, and innovation, enabling organizations to adapt quickly to changing market conditions, improve customer satisfaction, and sustain long-term success through continuous learning and innovation.
Employee Empowerment– The process of granting employees autonomy, authority, and responsibility to make decisions and take action in their work roles. Employee empowerment involves delegating decision-making power, providing resources and support, and fostering a culture of trust and accountability. Empowered employees are more engaged, motivated, and innovative, leading to improved performance, customer satisfaction, and organizational success. Rendanheyi empowers frontline employees by decentralizing decision-making, providing training and development opportunities, and fostering a culture of ownership and accountability that enables employees to deliver exceptional customer experiences and drive business results proactively.– Applicable in talent management, employee engagement initiatives, and organizational development where fostering a culture of trust, autonomy, and accountability is critical for attracting, retaining, and developing top talent. Employee empowerment complements Rendanheyi by providing a foundation for decentralized decision-making, employee innovation, and organizational agility, enabling organizations to unleash the full potential of their workforce, adapt quickly to market changes, and deliver value-driven solutions that meet customer needs and expectations effectively.
Lean Startup Methodology– An approach to developing and launching new products or services that emphasizes rapid experimentation, customer feedback, and iterative learning to validate assumptions and minimize risks. Lean startup methodologies advocate for building a minimum viable product (MVP), testing hypotheses with real users, and iterating based on validated learning to optimize product-market fit and resource allocation. Lean startups prioritize agility, customer-centricity, and learning over traditional planning and execution methods, enabling them to innovate efficiently and respond quickly to market feedback. Rendanheyi embraces lean startup principles by encouraging experimentation, fostering customer collaboration, and promoting iterative development to drive innovation and deliver value to customers iteratively.– Relevant in startup incubation, product innovation, and entrepreneurial ventures where validating product-market fit, minimizing time-to-market, and maximizing resource efficiency are critical for startup success. Lean startup methodologies complement Rendanheyi by providing a framework for lean experimentation, customer validation, and iterative learning, enabling organizations to innovate rapidly, mitigate risks, and create products and services that resonate with customers and drive sustainable growth and competitiveness.
Human-Centered Design– An approach to problem-solving and innovation that prioritizes understanding user needs, preferences, and behaviors to create solutions that are intuitive, desirable, and impactful. Human-centered design involves empathizing with users, defining problem statements, ideating potential solutions, prototyping and testing iteratively, and refining designs based on user feedback. Human-centered design fosters empathy, creativity, and collaboration, leading to products and services that are more user-friendly, inclusive, and effective. Rendanheyi embraces human-centered design principles by focusing on customer empathy, engaging users in co-creation, and iterating based on user feedback to design products and services that meet real user needs and deliver exceptional experiences.– Applicable in product design, service innovation, and user experience (UX) design where understanding user needs, preferences, and behaviors is essential for creating products and services that resonate with users and drive adoption and satisfaction. Human-centered design complements Rendanheyi by providing a framework for customer-centric innovation, collaboration, and iteration, enabling organizations to design solutions that address real user pain points, deliver meaningful experiences, and drive customer loyalty and advocacy effectively.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA