Puma Organizational Structure

  • Puma utilizes a U-form organizational structure. Otherwise known as a functional structure, this allows the company to effectively structure its business operations around the world.
  • Some of Puma’s functional groups include Finance, Sourcing, Supervisory Board, and Office of the CEO. There are also over 100 subsidiaries that perform various tasks at the local level, such as administration, distribution, marketing, and product development.
  • Puma’s organizational structure consists of three product-based divisions: footwear, apparel, and accessories. There are also three geographic divisions: Americas, Asia-Pacific, and Europe, Middle East, and Africa.


Puma is a German multinational that specializes in the manufacture and design of footwear, apparel, and related accessories. The company, which was founded in 1948 by Rudolf Dassler, is the world’s third-largest sportswear manufacturer behind Nike and Adidas.

Puma utilizes a U-form organizational structure. Otherwise known as a functional structure, this allows the company to effectively structure its business operations around the world and maintain a competitive advantage in a dynamic industry.

Let’s take a look at the U-form approach in more detail below with some additional commentary on secondary aspects of Puma’s organizational structure

U-form or unitary organizational structure

Puma’s U-form organizational structure consists of a hierarchy with company headquarters overseeing various business components along functional lines. This hierarchy is a predominant feature of Puma’s structure, with decisions passed from headquarters down to the most junior of employees.

Each business component (or functional group) consists of employees and/or business processes that are grouped according to commonalities in material utilization, human resource expertise, or operational activities.

In terms of corporate governance, Puma has a dual management and supervisory structure. There is a four-member Management Board comprised of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Sourcing Officer, Chief Commercial Officer, and Chief Financial Officer. There is also a six-member Supervisory Board with management consultants and employee representatives, among others.

Otherwise, the main functional groups in Puma include:

  1. Office of the CEO.
  2. Finance, and
  3. Sourcing.

The company also directly or indirectly controls over 100 subsidiaries that perform tasks at the local level. These tasks are related to product development, distribution, sourcing, marketing, and administration.

Puma’s U-form structure gives corporate headquarters full control over business operations and strategic decision-making. It also promotes employee specialization and economies of scale for global operations. 

But the structure is not without its drawbacks. In some cases, senior management at Puma may be less responsive in the face of complex problems that are specific to a particular group.

Product-based divisions

Supporting Puma’s functional groups are product-based divisions. These divisions help the company maintain its position as an innovative producer of sports-related goods.

There are also three product-based divisions:

  1. Footwear – the most lucrative source of revenue for the company with sales of €3.163 billion in 2021.
  2. Apparel, and
  3. Accessories.

Geographic divisions

For the purposes of internal reporting, Puma’s business activities are divided into three broad geographic divisions:

  1. Americas.
  2. Asia-Pacific, and
  3. EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa).

Read Also: U vs M-form Organizational Structure, Nike Business Model.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

Airbnb Organizational Structure

Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

eBay Organizational Structure

eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

IBM Organizational Structure

IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

Sony Organizational Structure

Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Facebook Organizational Structure

Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Google Organizational Structure

Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

Tesla Organizational Structure

Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

Walmart Organizational Structure

Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Read Next: Organizational Structure

Read Also: Business Model

Main Resources

Scroll to Top