lattice-structure-organization

Lattice Structure Organization

The lattice structure organization represents a revolutionary approach to how companies organize and operate, emphasizing agility, collaboration, and adaptability. Departing from the traditional hierarchical models, the lattice structure introduces a flexible framework where employees are empowered to take ownership of their roles and contribute across various functions and projects.

Understanding the Lattice Structure Organization

The Essence of the Lattice Structure

The lattice structure organization, sometimes referred to as a networked or lattice organization, is characterized by a departure from traditional hierarchical models. Instead of rigid reporting lines and fixed roles, the lattice structure emphasizes flexibility and collaboration. Key features of the lattice structure include:

  1. Flat Hierarchy: Lattice organizations have minimal hierarchical layers, often with just a few levels of management, or even none at all.
  2. Role Fluidity: Employees are encouraged to take on various roles and responsibilities across different functions or projects, allowing for greater adaptability.
  3. Decentralized Decision-Making: Decision-making authority is distributed throughout the organization, with decisions often made by teams or individuals closest to the issues.
  4. Dynamic Teams: Teams are formed based on project needs, and team members may change from project to project.

Origins of the Lattice Structure

The lattice structure organization model has evolved in response to the changing demands of the modern business environment. It is influenced by several factors, including:

  • The need for organizations to be more agile and responsive in a rapidly changing market.
  • A desire to empower employees and tap into their diverse skills and experiences.
  • The recognition that traditional hierarchical structures can hinder innovation and collaboration.

Key Concepts in the Lattice Structure Organization

1. Flat Hierarchy:

  • The lattice structure features a flat or non-existent hierarchy, with minimal layers of management.

2. Role Fluidity:

  • Employees are encouraged to take on diverse roles and responsibilities, adapting to the needs of the organization.

3. Decentralized Decision-Making:

  • Decision-making authority is distributed, enabling faster and more informed decisions at various levels.

4. Dynamic Teams:

  • Teams are formed and dissolved as needed, with members selected based on their expertise and relevance to the project.

Advantages of the Lattice Structure Organization

Organizations that adopt the lattice structure organization often experience a range of advantages:

1. Enhanced Agility:

  • The lattice structure allows organizations to quickly adapt to changing market conditions and customer demands.

2. Improved Collaboration:

  • With employees taking on different roles and working in diverse teams, collaboration and knowledge sharing become integral to the culture.

3. Greater Employee Empowerment:

  • Employees have more ownership over their work, leading to higher job satisfaction and motivation.

4. Efficient Resource Utilization:

  • Resources, including talent, are used more efficiently as employees are deployed where their skills are most needed.

5. Enhanced Innovation:

  • A culture of role fluidity and collaboration fosters innovation and creative problem-solving.

6. Responsive Customer Service:

  • Lattice organizations can respond more quickly to customer needs due to their decentralized decision-making.

Implementation Strategies

Implementing the lattice structure organization requires careful planning and execution:

1. Define Core Values:

  • Establish clear values and principles that guide decision-making and behavior within the organization.

2. Empower Employees:

  • Provide training and support to empower employees to take on new roles and responsibilities.

3. Flatten the Hierarchy:

  • Reduce unnecessary layers of management and encourage open communication.

4. Create Cross-Functional Teams:

  • Form teams based on project needs, bringing together individuals with diverse skills.

5. Foster a Culture of Collaboration:

  • Encourage collaboration, knowledge sharing, and mutual support among employees.

6. Measure and Adjust:

  • Continuously evaluate the effectiveness of the lattice structure and make adjustments as needed.

Challenges of the Lattice Structure Organization

While the lattice structure offers numerous advantages, it is not without challenges:

1. Resistance to Change:

  • Employees and leaders accustomed to traditional hierarchical structures may resist the transition to a lattice organization.

2. Decision-Making Complexity:

  • Decentralized decision-making can be challenging to manage and coordinate effectively.

3. Role Clarity:

  • Employees may struggle to define their roles and responsibilities in a fluid environment.

4. Organizational Alignment:

  • Maintaining alignment with the organization’s mission and strategy can be more complex in a lattice structure.

Broader Impact

The lattice structure organization has broader implications for the future of work and organizational design:

1. Adaptive Organizations:

  • Lattice organizations are more adaptable and better equipped to navigate the complexities of the modern business landscape.

2. Employee-Centric Culture:

  • The model prioritizes employee empowerment, leading to a more engaged and motivated workforce.

3. Enhanced Innovation:

  • A culture of collaboration and role fluidity fosters innovation and creative problem-solving.

4. Agile Practices:

  • Lattice organizations often embrace agile methodologies, further enhancing their ability to respond to change.

Conclusion

The lattice structure organization represents a paradigm shift in how companies are structured and operate. By prioritizing agility, collaboration, and adaptability, organizations can position themselves for success in a rapidly evolving business environment. As the lattice structure gains recognition and adoption, it serves as a testament to the power of reimagining traditional organizational models and fostering a culture that values employee empowerment and innovation. Whether in tech companies or traditional enterprises, the lattice structure organization has demonstrated its ability to drive success and create a workplace where employees are encouraged to take ownership of their roles and contribute to the organization’s mission.

Key Highlights:

  • Definition: The lattice structure organization, also known as a networked or lattice organization, emphasizes flexibility and collaboration over traditional hierarchical models. It features minimal hierarchical layers, role fluidity, decentralized decision-making, and dynamic teams.
  • Origins: The lattice structure has emerged in response to the need for organizations to be more agile, innovative, and responsive in a rapidly changing market. It aims to empower employees and foster a culture of collaboration.
  • Key Concepts:
    • Flat Hierarchy
    • Role Fluidity
    • Decentralized Decision-Making
    • Dynamic Teams
  • Advantages:
    • Enhanced Agility
    • Improved Collaboration
    • Greater Employee Empowerment
    • Efficient Resource Utilization
    • Enhanced Innovation
    • Responsive Customer Service
  • Implementation Strategies:
    • Define Core Values
    • Empower Employees
    • Flatten the Hierarchy
    • Create Cross-Functional Teams
    • Foster a Culture of Collaboration
    • Measure and Adjust
  • Challenges:
    • Resistance to Change
    • Decision-Making Complexity
    • Role Clarity
    • Organizational Alignment
  • Broader Impact:
    • Adaptive Organizations
    • Employee-Centric Culture
    • Enhanced Innovation
    • Agile Practices
  • Conclusion: The lattice structure organization represents a shift towards more adaptable, collaborative, and employee-centric organizational models. By embracing this approach, organizations can position themselves for success in today’s dynamic business landscape, fostering innovation and empowering their workforce to thrive.
Related ConceptsDescriptionImplications
Lattice Structure OrganizationA Lattice Structure Organization is characterized by a flexible, non-hierarchical organizational design where employees have the opportunity to move laterally across different roles, projects, and functions based on their skills, interests, and organizational needs. In a lattice structure, employees have more autonomy and control over their career paths, allowing them to develop diverse skill sets, gain varied experiences, and pursue individualized career trajectories. Lattice structures promote agility, innovation, and employee engagement, enabling organizations to adapt quickly to changing market conditions and foster a culture of continuous learning and development.Lattice Structure Organizations offer several benefits, including flexibility, employee empowerment, and talent development. By providing employees with the opportunity to move laterally across different roles and functions, lattice structures enable organizations to prioritize flexibility, innovation, and talent retention effectively. Lattice structures promote autonomy, ownership, and career development among employees, fostering a culture of continuous learning and growth. However, lattice structures may also pose challenges related to coordination, communication, and performance management. To maximize the benefits of lattice structures, organizations need to establish clear career pathways, communication channels, and performance evaluation mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different roles and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Agile OrganizationAn Agile Organization is characterized by a dynamic, responsive organizational design that emphasizes flexibility, collaboration, and customer-centricity. Agile organizations focus on delivering value quickly and responsively by organizing work into cross-functional teams, adopting iterative and incremental approaches to project management, and promoting continuous feedback and adaptation. Agile organizations enable employees to self-organize, make decisions autonomously, and collaborate closely with customers and stakeholders, fostering innovation, agility, and resilience in a rapidly changing environment.Agile Organizations share similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in their focus on flexibility and employee empowerment. By organizing work into cross-functional teams and enabling employees to make autonomous decisions, agile organizations prioritize flexibility, innovation, and collaboration effectively. Both models promote autonomy, ownership, and continuous learning among employees, fostering a culture of agility and adaptability. However, agile organizations may also require effective team dynamics, communication, and stakeholder engagement to ensure alignment and effectiveness in the organization. To maximize the benefits of agile organizations, organizations need to establish clear goals, roles, and feedback mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Boundaryless OrganizationA Boundaryless Organization is characterized by a fluid, interconnected organizational structure that transcends traditional boundaries, such as hierarchy, function, and geography. Boundaryless organizations promote collaboration, innovation, and knowledge sharing by breaking down silos, fostering cross-functional and cross-cultural teamwork, and leveraging external partnerships and networks. Boundaryless organizations enable employees to collaborate seamlessly, access diverse perspectives and expertise, and respond quickly to changes in the external environment, fostering a culture of openness, inclusivity, and continuous improvement.Boundaryless Organizations share similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in their focus on collaboration and flexibility. By breaking down silos and fostering cross-functional teamwork, boundaryless organizations prioritize collaboration, innovation, and knowledge sharing effectively. Both models promote autonomy, ownership, and continuous learning among employees, fostering a culture of openness and inclusivity. However, boundaryless organizations may also require effective communication, trust-building, and relationship management to ensure alignment and effectiveness across boundaries. To maximize the benefits of boundaryless organizations, organizations need to establish clear communication channels, collaboration platforms, and partnership networks, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Network OrganizationA Network Organization is characterized by a decentralized, interconnected organizational design that relies on external partnerships, alliances, and networks to achieve strategic objectives. Network organizations leverage external resources, expertise, and capabilities by collaborating with suppliers, customers, competitors, and other stakeholders in a networked ecosystem. Network organizations enable organizations to access diverse perspectives, share risks and rewards, and innovate collaboratively, fostering agility, resilience, and competitiveness in a complex and interconnected world.Network Organizations share similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in their focus on collaboration and partnership. By leveraging external partnerships and networks, network organizations prioritize flexibility, innovation, and agility effectively. Both models promote autonomy, ownership, and continuous learning among employees, fostering a culture of collaboration and adaptability. However, network organizations may also require effective governance, trust-building, and relationship management to ensure alignment and effectiveness across the network. To maximize the benefits of network organizations, organizations need to establish clear partnership goals, communication channels, and governance mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different network participants and stakeholders to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Teal OrganizationA Teal Organization is characterized by a holistic, self-managed organizational design that fosters wholeness, evolutionary purpose, and decentralized decision-making. Teal organizations empower employees to self-organize, make decisions autonomously, and pursue shared goals based on trust, purpose, and shared values. In teal organizations, hierarchies are replaced by self-managing teams or circles that operate with high levels of autonomy and accountability, fostering a culture of empowerment, innovation, and adaptability.Teal Organizations share similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in their focus on empowerment and autonomy. By empowering employees to self-organize and pursue shared goals, teal organizations enable organizations to prioritize flexibility, innovation, and adaptability effectively. Both models promote autonomy, ownership, and continuous learning among employees, fostering a culture of trust and empowerment. However, teal organizations may also require effective leadership support, cultural transformation, and continuous learning to ensure alignment and effectiveness in the organization. To maximize the benefits of teal organizations, organizations need to establish clear purpose, values, and governance mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Flat Organizational StructureA Flat Organizational Structure has few or no levels of middle management between frontline employees and senior leadership, promoting direct communication, empowerment, and decision-making throughout the organization. Flat structures minimize bureaucracy, hierarchy, and red tape, enabling organizations to respond quickly to changes in the external environment and foster innovation and employee engagement. Flat structures promote transparency, accountability, and agility, enabling organizations to adapt and thrive in a fast-paced and competitive market.Flat Organizational Structures share similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in their focus on empowerment and agility. By minimizing bureaucracy and hierarchy, flat structures enable organizations to prioritize flexibility, transparency, and innovation effectively. Both models promote direct communication, empowerment, and accountability within teams, fostering a culture of trust and collaboration. However, flat structures may also require effective communication, decision-making, and conflict resolution mechanisms to ensure alignment and effectiveness in the organization. To maximize the benefits of flat structures, organizations need to establish clear roles, communication channels, and decision-making processes, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Distributed LeadershipDistributed Leadership is a leadership model that distributes authority, decision-making, and influence across multiple individuals or teams within an organization. Instead of relying solely on top-down leadership, distributed leadership empowers employees at all levels to lead and make decisions based on their expertise, knowledge, and experience. Distributed leadership fosters collaboration, innovation, and adaptability, enabling organizations to leverage the collective intelligence and creativity of their employees to drive organizational performance and success.Distributed Leadership shares similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in its focus on empowerment and collaboration. By distributing authority and decision-making, distributed leadership enables organizations to prioritize flexibility, innovation, and collaboration effectively. Both models promote collaboration, accountability, and ownership within teams, fostering a culture of leadership and initiative. However, distributed leadership may also require effective communication, role clarity, and support from traditional leadership to ensure alignment and effectiveness in the organization. To maximize the benefits of distributed leadership, organizations need to establish clear leadership roles, communication channels, and decision-making processes, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Agile MethodologyAgile Methodology is an iterative approach to software development and project management that emphasizes collaboration, flexibility, and customer feedback. Agile teams work in short iterations or sprints to deliver incremental value to customers, continuously adapting to changing requirements and priorities. Agile methodologies promote transparency, adaptability, and customer-centricity, enabling organizations to deliver high-quality products or services quickly and responsively.Agile Methodology shares similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in their focus on collaboration and adaptability. By working in short iterations and adapting to changing requirements, agile teams enable organizations to prioritize flexibility, responsiveness, and innovation effectively. Both models promote collaboration, transparency, and customer-centricity within teams, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and adaptation. However, agile methodologies may also require effective team dynamics, communication, and stakeholder engagement to ensure alignment and effectiveness in the organization. To maximize the benefits of agile methodologies, organizations need to establish clear project goals, iterative processes, and feedback mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.
Lean ManagementLean Management is a management philosophy and set of principles derived from the Toyota Production System (TPS), focused on maximizing customer value while minimizing waste, inefficiencies, and unnecessary work. Lean principles, such as continuous improvement, waste reduction, and respect for people, enable organizations to streamline processes, improve productivity, and enhance customer satisfaction effectively. Lean management fosters a culture of continuous improvement, learning, and innovation, enabling organizations to thrive in a competitive and dynamic environment.Lean Management shares similarities with Lattice Structure Organizations in its focus on empowerment and continuous improvement. By prioritizing customer value and waste reduction, lean management enables organizations to prioritize flexibility, efficiency, and innovation effectively. Both models promote continuous improvement, respect for people, and problem-solving within teams, fostering a culture of excellence and adaptation. However, lean management may also require effective leadership support, employee engagement, and process standardization to ensure alignment and effectiveness in the organization. To maximize the benefits of lean management, organizations need to establish clear improvement goals, processes, and performance metrics, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different teams and functions to deliver value to customers and stakeholders.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA