conflict-model

Conflict Model 

Business / By /

The Conflict Model is a structured approach to understanding, analyzing, and resolving conflicts. It provides a framework for individuals, teams, and organizations to identify the underlying causes of conflicts, manage emotions, and work towards constructive solutions. Conflict models aim to transform conflicts from destructive forces into opportunities for growth and positive change.

Key Principles of the Conflict Model

The Conflict Model is guided by several key principles:

  1. Conflict is Normal: Recognizing that conflicts are a natural part of human interactions and often stem from differing perspectives, needs, and goals.
  2. Understanding Root Causes: Focusing on identifying the underlying causes of conflicts rather than solely addressing surface-level issues.
  3. Effective Communication: Emphasizing open, honest, and empathetic communication as a means to explore and resolve conflicts.
  4. Collaborative Problem-Solving: Encouraging parties involved in the conflict to work together in finding mutually acceptable solutions.
  5. Conflict Transformation: Viewing conflicts as opportunities for personal and interpersonal growth and transformation.

Benefits of Using the Conflict Model

The adoption of the Conflict Model offers numerous benefits:

  1. Improved Relationships: Effective conflict resolution can lead to stronger, more resilient relationships, whether in personal, professional, or community settings.
  2. Enhanced Communication Skills: Learning to navigate conflicts equips individuals with better communication and problem-solving skills.
  3. Productive Work Environment: In the workplace, resolving conflicts can create a more productive and harmonious atmosphere.
  4. Reduced Stress: Addressing conflicts reduces the emotional and psychological stress associated with unresolved disputes.
  5. Conflict Prevention: Understanding the root causes of conflicts allows for proactive measures to prevent future disputes.
  6. Personal Growth: Engaging in conflict resolution processes can lead to personal growth and increased self-awareness.

The Conflict Model in Practice

The Conflict Model typically involves several stages:

  1. Identification: Recognizing the presence of a conflict and acknowledging its significance.
  2. Analysis: Examining the conflict’s underlying causes, such as differences in values, needs, or perceptions.
  3. Emotional Management: Managing emotions related to the conflict, including anger, frustration, or sadness.
  4. Communication: Engaging in open and constructive dialogue with the parties involved, actively listening, and expressing one’s own perspective.
  5. Problem-Solving: Collaboratively seeking solutions that address the root causes and meet the needs of all parties.
  6. Resolution: Implementing agreed-upon solutions and monitoring their effectiveness.

Challenges of Using the Conflict Model

While the Conflict Model offers valuable tools for resolving conflicts, it also presents challenges:

  1. Emotional Intensity: Handling strong emotions during conflict resolution can be difficult and may require emotional intelligence and self-regulation.
  2. Resistance to Change: Some individuals or parties may resist collaborative conflict resolution processes, preferring more adversarial approaches.
  3. Complexity: Complex conflicts involving multiple parties or deeply rooted issues may require extensive time and effort to resolve.
  4. Skill Requirements: Effective conflict resolution demands a high level of skill in communication, negotiation, and mediation.

Real-World Applications of the Conflict Model

The Conflict Model has been successfully applied in various contexts:

  1. Mediation and Conflict Resolution Services: Mediators and conflict resolution professionals use the Conflict Model to facilitate negotiations and agreements between disputing parties.
  2. Workplace Conflict Resolution: Many organizations implement conflict resolution programs and training to address workplace conflicts and improve employee relations.
  3. Community Dispute Resolution: Community mediation centers employ the Conflict Model to resolve disputes among residents, neighbors, and community organizations.
  4. International Diplomacy: Diplomats and negotiators often apply conflict resolution principles to address conflicts between nations and promote peace.

Conclusion

The Conflict Model is a valuable tool for understanding, managing, and resolving conflicts in various settings. Its principles emphasize the normalcy of conflicts, effective communication, collaborative problem-solving, and conflict transformation. By adopting this model, individuals and organizations can turn conflicts into opportunities for growth, improved relationships, and positive change.

Despite the challenges associated with emotional intensity, resistance, complexity, and skill requirements, the Conflict Model remains a powerful approach to conflict resolution. As individuals and organizations recognize the benefits of constructive conflict resolution, the application of conflict models like this one is likely to continue to expand, fostering healthier, more harmonious relationships and environments.

Key Highlights

  • Key Principles of the Conflict Model:
    • Conflict is Normal: Recognizes conflicts as natural outcomes of differing perspectives, needs, and goals.
    • Understanding Root Causes: Focuses on identifying underlying causes rather than surface-level issues.
    • Effective Communication: Emphasizes open, honest, and empathetic communication to explore and resolve conflicts.
    • Collaborative Problem-Solving: Encourages parties to work together in finding mutually acceptable solutions.
    • Conflict Transformation: Views conflicts as opportunities for growth and positive change.
  • Benefits:
    • Improved Relationships: Stronger, more resilient relationships in personal, professional, or community settings.
    • Enhanced Communication Skills: Better communication and problem-solving skills.
    • Productive Work Environment: More productive and harmonious workplace atmosphere.
    • Reduced Stress: Less emotional and psychological stress associated with unresolved disputes.
    • Conflict Prevention: Proactive measures to prevent future disputes.
    • Personal Growth: Increased self-awareness and personal growth.
  • The Conflict Model in Practice:
    • Identification: Recognizing and acknowledging conflicts.
    • Analysis: Examining underlying causes.
    • Emotional Management: Handling emotions related to the conflict.
    • Communication: Constructive dialogue and active listening.
    • Problem-Solving: Seeking solutions meeting all parties’ needs.
    • Resolution: Implementing agreed-upon solutions and monitoring effectiveness.
  • Challenges:
    • Emotional Intensity: Handling strong emotions during resolution.
    • Resistance to Change: Some may resist collaborative approaches.
    • Complexity: Resolving deeply rooted or multi-party conflicts.
    • Skill Requirements: Demands high-level communication and negotiation skills.
  • Real-World Applications of the Conflict Model:
    • Mediation and Conflict Resolution Services: Facilitating negotiations between disputing parties.
    • Workplace Conflict Resolution: Programs and training to improve employee relations.
    • Community Dispute Resolution: Resolving disputes among residents and organizations.
    • International Diplomacy: Addressing conflicts between nations to promote peace.
  • Conclusion:
    • Value: Understanding, managing, and resolving conflicts.
    • Principles: Normalcy of conflicts, effective communication, collaborative problem-solving.
    • Benefits: Growth, improved relationships, and positive change.
    • Challenges: Emotional intensity, resistance, complexity, skill requirements.
    • Applications: Various settings from workplaces to international diplomacy.
Related FrameworkDescriptionWhen to Apply
Conflict Model– A framework for understanding and managing conflicts that arise within individuals, teams, organizations, or societies. – The Conflict Model views conflict as a natural and inevitable aspect of human interaction, resulting from differences in goals, values, perceptions, or interests. – It identifies various sources and types of conflict, such as interpersonal, intragroup, intergroup, or structural, and examines their underlying causes and dynamics. – The model emphasizes the importance of constructive conflict resolution strategies, communication skills, and conflict transformation processes to address conflicts effectively and promote positive outcomes.Team dynamics, organizational change, negotiation, dispute resolution, mediation
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI)– A tool used to assess individual preferences for handling conflicts based on five conflict-handling styles: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. – The TKI helps individuals understand their preferred approach to conflict resolution and how to adapt their behavior in different situations to achieve desired outcomes. – It provides insights into conflict management strategies and promotes effective communication and collaboration in resolving conflicts.Leadership development, team building, conflict resolution training, organizational development
Interest-Based Relational Approach (IBR)– A collaborative approach to conflict resolution that focuses on identifying underlying interests, needs, and values of parties involved in a conflict. – The Interest-Based Relational Approach emphasizes communication, active listening, and empathy to foster understanding and build trust between conflicting parties. – It seeks to find mutually beneficial solutions that address underlying interests and preserve or strengthen relationships. – IBR promotes win-win outcomes and encourages parties to work together to resolve conflicts constructively.Negotiation, mediation, relationship counseling, workplace conflict resolution, family therapy
The Conflict Resolution Continuum– A framework that categorizes conflict resolution strategies along a continuum from low to high assertiveness and from low to high cooperativeness. – The Conflict Resolution Continuum includes competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating as different approaches to handling conflicts. – It helps individuals and groups understand the range of options available for managing conflicts and select the most appropriate strategy based on the situation and desired outcomes. – The model encourages flexibility and adaptability in conflict resolution efforts to achieve optimal results.Conflict management training, leadership development, team building, interpersonal communication skills
Interest-Based Negotiation– A negotiation approach that focuses on identifying and addressing underlying interests, concerns, and needs of parties involved in a dispute. – Interest-Based Negotiation seeks to create value, expand the options for agreement, and build trust and collaboration between negotiators. – It encourages open communication, joint problem-solving, and creative solutions to reach mutually beneficial agreements that address the interests of all parties. – Interest-Based Negotiation contrasts with positional bargaining, which focuses on fixed positions and win-lose outcomes.Business negotiations, labor disputes, contract negotiations, commercial transactions, conflict resolution
The Conflict Iceberg Model– A metaphorical representation of conflict that compares observable behaviors and issues to the visible tip of an iceberg, while underlying causes, emotions, and values remain hidden beneath the surface. – The Conflict Iceberg Model illustrates how conflicts often arise from deeper-rooted factors such as unmet needs, unexpressed emotions, or differing values and beliefs. – It emphasizes the importance of addressing underlying issues and understanding the full context of conflicts to achieve meaningful and lasting resolution. – The model encourages empathy, active listening, and curiosity in exploring underlying causes of conflict.Conflict resolution training, mediation, relationship counseling, organizational conflict management
The Dual Concern Model– A framework that describes conflict behavior based on two fundamental dimensions: concern for self (assertiveness) and concern for others (cooperativeness). – The Dual Concern Model categorizes conflict-handling styles into five modes: competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating, based on varying levels of assertiveness and cooperativeness. – It helps individuals and groups understand their own and others’ approaches to conflict resolution and select appropriate strategies to manage conflicts effectively.Conflict management training, leadership development, team dynamics, interpersonal communication skills
The Circle of Conflict Model– A model that illustrates the interconnected nature of conflicts by identifying five core conflict dimensions: data, interests, structure, values, and relationships. – The Circle of Conflict Model shows how conflicts often escalate or persist when underlying issues in one dimension affect other dimensions. – It helps diagnose the root causes of conflicts, assess their complexity, and design appropriate interventions to address multiple dimensions of conflict effectively. – The model promotes a holistic approach to conflict resolution that considers diverse factors and perspectives.Conflict analysis, conflict resolution training, mediation, organizational development
The Integrative Model of Organizational Conflict– A model that conceptualizes conflict as a dynamic process influenced by individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors. – The Integrative Model of Organizational Conflict identifies four stages in the conflict process: potential opposition or incompatibility, cognition and personalization, intentions, and behavior. – It examines how conflict escalates or de-escalates over time and explores factors that influence individuals’ perceptions, reactions, and responses to conflict situations. – The model provides insights into effective conflict management strategies and interventions to prevent or resolve conflicts in organizations.Organizational conflict analysis, conflict resolution training, leadership development, organizational change management
The Conflict Transformation Model– A framework that views conflict as an opportunity for positive change and growth rather than simply a problem to be resolved. – The Conflict Transformation Model emphasizes constructive engagement, dialogue, and collaboration to address underlying causes of conflict and transform destructive dynamics into opportunities for learning and innovation. – It recognizes the importance of addressing power imbalances, social injustices, and systemic issues to achieve sustainable peace and social change. – The model aligns with principles of restorative justice, reconciliation, and social justice activism.Conflict resolution in community development, peacebuilding, social change initiatives, humanitarian work

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

More Resources

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA