SpaceX’s AI data centre campus on the Memphis–Mississippi line will go from 0.4 gigawatts of IT capacity in January to 2.4 gigawatts by the end of 2026, the research firm SemiAnalysis said in an X thread on 14 November, citing its own estimates. That is six times January’s size, a 2.0-gigawatt addition in one year, by our arithmetic.
The growth runs across five sites the firm names as Macrohard, MiniHard, Macroharder, Project SPAM and Gun Range. “Stargate Abilene is impressive. Colossus 2 is adding nearly two of them in under a year”, the thread opens.
Business Pill · Switching Costs Explained
An evergreen Business Engineer explainer on switching costs: why it is hard to leave an AI supplier. It teaches the general idea only and does not discuss SpaceX’s data centres.
The key insight: As we read SemiAnalysis’s figures, speed of construction has run ahead of power supply: the campus is estimated to add 2.0 gigawatts in a year, while the firm puts the possible power shortfall at upwards of 300 megawatts.
Build Times Cut in Half, SemiAnalysis Says
SemiAnalysis wrote that “While most are fighting for 8-12 month build times, SpaceX has cut them in half”. It says MiniHard finished construction in about five months and that the new Gun Range plot, just south of the state line, will take about four.
The firm counts Colossus 1’s first retrofit at 122 days for 150 megawatts and Colossus 2 at 91 days for 210 megawatts. That is 1.23 megawatts a day against 2.31, nearly twice the pace, by our arithmetic. Project SPAM, it says, started on 5 October and targets its first tranches in December. Musk has said Colossus 2 will hold 1.2 million Blackwells by year-end.

The Power Gap
The open question is power. In its 3 November newsletter, SemiAnalysis wrote that the region’s utility, TVA, lists service requests for Macrohard (700MW) and MiniHard (450MW), or 1,150 megawatts together by our arithmetic. The firm assumes a grid connection of about 1.2 gigawatts covers both.
The Southaven turbines face a limit: the site “can legally operate 2.7GW nameplate right now, but only 1.24GW nameplate by July 2027”, the newsletter says, 54% lower by our arithmetic. That leaves about 1.3 gigawatts of compute on 1.24 gigawatts of nameplate gas, and SemiAnalysis says “the gap could be upwards of 300MW”. The site’s gas turbines are also the subject of a NAACP lawsuit a judge let proceed.
SemiAnalysis’s Battery Answer
SemiAnalysis’s answer is storage. “We count 1,377 Megapacks across Colossus 2, nearly 6GWh”, the thread says, calling it the largest battery field in the US. The firm argues gas and batteries can be run together to raise baseload while the turbines charge them, and that with a power usage effectiveness of about 1.10 to 1.15 “the site may still cover a ~300MW shortfall”.
The local money is already visible: Southaven’s mayor has put Musk’s data centres at $63 million a year for the city.
The Structural Read
As we read the thread, the build pace is the story: by SemiAnalysis’s counts, Colossus 2 went up at 2.31 megawatts a day against 1.23 for Colossus 1’s first retrofit, by our arithmetic.
As we read the newsletter, the binding date is July 2027, when the Southaven turbine limit drops from 2.7 to 1.24 gigawatts of nameplate, and the firm says batteries may cover the gap only if its IT assumptions are correct.
SemiAnalysis, X thread, 14 November 2026
“Our answer: SpaceX built the largest BESS field in the USA for a reason.”
Three Implications
FOR DATA CENTRE BUILDERS SemiAnalysis says most builders face 8 to 12 month build times while SpaceX has cut them in half.
FOR UTILITIES TVA lists service requests for Macrohard (700MW) and MiniHard (450MW), per the newsletter, 1,150 megawatts by our arithmetic.
FOR BATTERY SUPPLIERS SemiAnalysis counts 1,377 Megapacks across Colossus 2, nearly 6 gigawatt-hours.
The Business Engineer Lens
This story maps onto the Business Engineer framework The State of AI Data Centers.
The framework argues: “Companies that solve the power equation will dominate the AI era; those that don’t will watch their chips sit idle.”
As we read it, SemiAnalysis’s battery argument is SpaceX’s attempt at that equation in Memphis. The framework does not discuss SpaceX’s Memphis sites.

What Is Not Established
The capacity, build-time, battery and power-gap figures are SemiAnalysis estimates drawn from its paid Datacenter Industry Model, satellite imagery and local filings; SpaceX has not published site-level capacity, and we did not see the firm’s underlying data. The firm itself frames the battery solution as conditional on its IT assumptions being correct.
We read SemiAnalysis’s thread and the free part of its newsletter; neither SpaceX nor TVA was contacted for this piece.
The Bottom Line
SemiAnalysis says SpaceX’s Memphis–Mississippi campus will reach 2.4 gigawatts of IT capacity by year-end, six times January’s 0.4 gigawatts by our arithmetic, built at about twice the industry’s usual speed. The firm puts the possible power shortfall at upwards of 300 megawatts once the Southaven turbine limit falls to 1.24 gigawatts in July 2027.
95,000+ executives read Business Engineer for the AI strategy frameworks cited by ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity.
A note on sourcing. Capacity, build-time, power and battery figures are SemiAnalysis estimates from its 14 November thread and the free part of its 3 November newsletter, read on 14 November 2026. SpaceX does not publish site-level capacity. Multiples, rates and totals are our arithmetic.
Sources: SemiAnalysis on X, 14 Nov 2026 · SemiAnalysis newsletter, 3 Nov 2026









