What happened to Commodore?

Commodore was an American manufacturer of home computers and electronics. The company, which was founded by Jack Tramiel and Manfred Kapp, was a major player during the burgeoning PC market of the 70s, 80s, and early 90s. Commodore failed to keep pace with advancements in personal computing, which opened the door for IBM and Apple. This lack of innovation was no doubt caused by the appointment of a CEO who cut research and development funds to almost nothing.

Introduction of CommodoreCommodore International, often referred to as Commodore, was a prominent American home computer and electronics manufacturer. Founded in 1954 by Jack Tramiel, the company initially focused on typewriters and adding machines before venturing into calculators and eventually home computers. Commodore is perhaps best known for its line of personal computers, including the iconic Commodore 64 (C64), which became one of the best-selling and most beloved home computers in history. The Commodore brand is closely associated with the early days of personal computing.
Success with the Commodore 64The Commodore 64, released in 1982, was a groundbreaking home computer that offered impressive graphics and sound capabilities, particularly for its time. Priced competitively, it quickly gained popularity in homes, schools, and businesses, thanks to its extensive library of software and games. The C64’s affordability and versatility made it a dominant player in the home computer market, selling millions of units worldwide and solidifying Commodore’s status as a major player in the industry.
Challenges and CompetitionDespite its early success, Commodore faced several challenges as the personal computer industry evolved. Competition intensified with the emergence of IBM-compatible PCs, Apple Macintosh computers, and the Atari ST series. Commodore’s reluctance to embrace IBM-compatible technology and transition to newer computing platforms left it somewhat isolated in a changing market. Additionally, the company faced supply chain issues, internal management conflicts, and financial pressures. These challenges hindered Commodore’s ability to adapt and innovate, ultimately impacting its market position.
Decline and Financial TroublesThroughout the mid-1980s to early 1990s, Commodore experienced a gradual decline in sales and market share. The company’s inability to keep up with technological advancements, particularly in the business computing sector, contributed to its struggles. Financial difficulties, including unsustainable debt and poor management decisions, further eroded its stability. Commodore’s diversification into other products, such as portable calculators and game consoles, failed to provide the necessary revenue to sustain its computer business. By the early 1990s, the company’s financial problems became critical.
Bankruptcy and LiquidationIn April 1994, Commodore filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This marked a significant turning point in the company’s history. Amid financial turmoil, Commodore’s assets were sold off, including the rights to its intellectual property and brand name. Various entities acquired Commodore’s assets, and its remaining inventory was liquidated. The once-thriving manufacturer of home computers ceased to exist as an active entity, marking the end of an era in personal computing.
Legacy and NostalgiaDespite its downfall, Commodore left a lasting legacy in the world of personal computing. The Commodore 64, in particular, remains an iconic and beloved piece of technology, cherished by enthusiasts and collectors. Its extensive software library, dedicated fan base, and contributions to the early gaming industry continue to be celebrated. The Commodore brand name has also been licensed and revived in various forms in recent years, with new products bearing the classic logo and targeting retro gaming enthusiasts. The nostalgia associated with Commodore’s products endures as a testament to its impact on the history of computing.
ConclusionCommodore’s journey from a pioneering home computer manufacturer to bankruptcy and liquidation reflects the competitive and rapidly evolving nature of the personal computer industry. The company’s early success with the Commodore 64 left an indelible mark on computing history, and its products are remembered fondly by those who grew up with them. Commodore’s story serves as a reminder of the importance of adaptability and innovation in the tech industry, as well as the challenges faced by once-dominant players who fail to keep pace with changing technologies and consumer preferences. Despite its ultimate demise, Commodore’s impact on computing culture endures.


Commodore was an American manufacturer of home computers and electronics.

The company, which was founded by Jack Tramiel and Manfred Kapp, was a major player during the burgeoning PC market of the 70s, 80s, and early 90s.

The company is best known for the Commodore 64. With over 17 million units sold, it is regarded as the most popular single computer model of all time.

Commodore was also headed by the somewhat enigmatic Tramiel, who recognized the potential of the home computing industry before most others.

Commodore declared bankruptcy on April 29, 1994, with its trademarks sold to Escom and then Tulip Computers – both of which are now defunct.

Below is a look at the interesting story of this once-pioneering company.


Jack Tramiel, who was a Holocaust survivor, founded Commodore in 1955. He had an aggressive leadership style and approach to business that frequently landed him in trouble.

After becoming embroiled in a scandal with a Canadian finance company, Tramiel was forced to sell a large portion of Commodore to Irving Gould.

The two worked together harmoniously for a time, but Gould quickly tired of Tramiel’s one-man management style which also offended Commodore’s suppliers and resellers. 

After a series of disagreements, Gould forced Tramiel to resign from the company in 1984. Without Tramiel, Commodore became a rudderless ship akin to Apple when Steve Jobs resigned.

The company had lost Tramiel’s strategic vision while retaining his aggressive style of leadership.

Gould later embarked on a “hire and fire” campaign as the company struggled to find coherent and stable leadership.

This unsettled the company as each incoming CEO had a different vision for Commodore. What’s more, many were unqualified or inexperienced in computing and had no desire to learn. 

Commodore 64 succession

As successful as the Commodore 64 had been, the 8-bit machine was beginning to show its age in the late 1980s.

The problem for Commodore was that its successor, the 16-bit Amiga, was not ready to go on the market. When it was released, it failed to achieve the same access as the 64.

The Amiga didn’t offer enough business software to appeal to enterprise customers, but at $1,000 was too expensive to appeal to younger gamers. 

The A500 was eventually released and sold well, but subsequent updates to the Amiga range failed to keep pace with advancements in personal computing.

Commodore was also unable to shake its public image as a producer of cheap computers at a time when IBM and Apple were starting to dominate the PC market.

New CEO appointment

With deteriorating company finances, Gould paid millions to a management consulting firm to find a new CEO.

Yale graduate and former GM and Pepsi executive Mehdi Ali was appointed in 1989 – a hiring many consider to be the beginning of the end for Commodore.

Ali’s reign was characterized by costly strategic errors. He cut funds for essential research and development while increasing his own compensation.

In fact, in 1990, Ali received a $2 million salary not including bonuses, while IBM CEO John Akers received $713,000.

Ali twice sabotaged a lucrative deal with Sun Microsystems which wanted to license Commodore hardware.

He was also responsible for one of the worst Amiga products ever released – the Amiga 600. He doubled down on its manufacture instead of creating more of the A500s and A1200s people wanted.

Perhaps his greatest indiscretion as leader was the continual cutting of R&D funding to almost zero.

Early Amigas were years ahead of their time, with a color GUI, pre-emptive multitasking, and advanced sound acceleration and hardware graphics.

When the research team created an updated version of Amiga’s chipset, Commodore chose to shelve it. Instead, they opted for a much less powerful upgrade to the Amiga 500 and 2000.

Commodore did begin work on a major revamp in 1988 named the Advanced Amiga Architecture (AAA).

Due to a lack of funding, however, only one engineer was working on it by the time the company went bankrupt six years later.

A stopgap solution was rushed into production, but it was not ready for market and only highlighted how far the company had fallen.

Key takeaways:

  • Commodore was an American manufacturer of home computers and electronics. The company was a significant part of the burgeoning personal computer market but filed for bankruptcy in 1994.
  • Commodore founder Jack Tramiel employed an autocratic leadership style which ended in his forced resignation from the company. Commodore then lost its strategic direction and hired a series of underqualified and inexperienced CEOs.
  • Commodore failed to keep pace with advancements in personal computing, which opened the door for IBM and Apple. This lack of innovation was no doubt caused by the appointment of a CEO who cut research and development funds to almost nothing.

Quick Timeline

  • Commodore was a major player in the home computer market during the 70s, 80s, and early 90s, known for the popular Commodore 64.
  • Founder Jack Tramiel’s aggressive leadership style and later departure from the company left Commodore without a clear strategic vision.
  • Succession of CEOs with different visions and lack of experience contributed to a lack of direction for Commodore.
  • The successor to Commodore 64, the Amiga, faced challenges in the market and failed to keep pace with advancements in personal computing.
  • The appointment of Mehdi Ali as CEO marked the beginning of the end for Commodore, as he made costly strategic errors, cut research and development funds, and made poor product decisions.
  • Commodore’s failure to innovate and invest in research and development allowed IBM and Apple to dominate the PC market.
  • The company declared bankruptcy in 1994 and was eventually sold off, marking the end of its once-pioneering presence in the computer industry.

Other Failure Stories

What Happened to WeWork

WeWork is a commercial real estate company providing shared workspaces for tech start-ups and other enterprise services. It was founded by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey in 2010. WeWork’s business model was built on complex arrangements between the company and its landlords. There were also several conflicts of interest between Neumann and WeWork, which provided the impetus for the failed IPO and significant devaluation that would follow.

What Happened to Netscape

Netscape – or Netscape Communications Corporation – was a computer services company best known for its web browser. The company was founded in 1994 by Marc Andreessen and James H. Clark as one of the internet’s first and most important start-ups. The Netscape Navigator web browser was released in 1995 and became the browser of choice for the users of the time. By November 1998, it had been acquired by AOL, which tried unsuccessfully to revive the popularity of the web browser. Ten years later, Netscape was shut down entirely.

What Happened to Musical.ly

Musically, or Musical.ly as it is officially known, was a Chinese social media platform headquartered in Shanghai. After passing 200 million users in May 2017, the platform was shut down by tech company ByteDance in November. After its acquisition, ByteDance suggested Musical.ly would continue to operate as a standalone platform. Company representatives noted that it would be able to leverage ByteDance’s AI technology and enormous reach in the Chinese market. Musically was ultimately absorbed into TikTok in June 2018, with the app no longer available in August of the same year. Existing users were offered technical support and several new features as a sweetener.

What Happened to Vine

Vine was an American video social networking platform with a focus on looping video clips of six seconds in length, founded by Dom Hofmann, Rus Yusupov, and Colin Kroll in 2012 to help people capture casual moments in their lives and share them with their friends. Vine went on to become a massively popular platform. Yet by 2016, Twitter discontinued the mobile app, allowing users to view or download content on the Vine website. It then announced a reconfigured app allowing creators to share content to a connected Twitter account only. This marked the end of Vine.

What Happened to CNN Plus

CNN Plus was a video streaming service and offshoot of CNN’s cable TV news network that was launched on March 29, 2022. The service was ultimately shut down just one month after it was launched. Trouble began for the platform when parent company WarnerMedia merged with Discovery. The latter was unimpressed with paltry viewer data and, with $55 billion in debt to clear, was not interested in funding CNN+ moving forward. Other contributing factors to CNN Plus’s demise include a lack of compelling content and streaming service market saturation.

What Happened to Clubhouse

Clubhouse is a social app that allows thousands of people to communicate with each other in audio chat rooms. At one point, the company was worth $4 billion and boasted users such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. Clubhouse declined because it rode the wave of pandemic lockdowns and suffered when people resumed their normal routines. The decision to remove the invite-only feature also caused a rapid influx of new members and removed any exclusivity. Clubhouse management also failed to define a business model and was unaware of the components of a successful social media site.

What Happened to Facebook


What Happened To Carvana

Carvana is an American online used car retailer headquartered in Tempe, Arizona. The company – which sells cars in unique vending machines – was the fastest-growing used vehicle retailer in the United States, with revenue of $3.94 billion in 2019. Yet by 2022, on $12.8 billion in revenue, the company reported almost $2.9 billion in net losses.

What Happened To Houseparty

Houseparty was an app-based group video chat platform for mobile and desktop. Released in February 2016, the platform rapidly grew to hundreds of millions of users and was the #1 social app in 82 countries by May 2020. Less than 18 months later, however, owner Epic Games announced that it would be shutting down the app in October 2021. Let’s explain the reasons for Houseparty’s demise below.

What Happened To ChaCha

ChaCha was a human-guided search engine founded in 2006. The platform provided a valuable service at a time when traditional search engine algorithms were unreliable and less developed. When algorithms did become sufficiently developed, they provided answers to questions for free and much more rapidly than ChaCha could. The ChaCha business model was also unscalable, with employees overworked as the company tried to stay ahead of innovation. ChaCha’s demise was also compounded by the smartphone, which provided another avenue for consumers to find information. A belated attempt to restructure and cut costs followed, but the company could not service its debt past 2016.

What Happened To RadioShack

RadioShack is an American electronics retailer founded by brothers Milton and Theodore Deutschmann in 1921. The company enjoyed market dominance in the 70s and 80s but faded fast after a slew of missed opportunities. RadioShack operated over four thousand stores in the USA, but many were placed too close together which caused sales cannibalization. These stores were also often small and had a confusing inventory mix. RadioShack sold the first mass-produced personal computer with much success. However, the company saw no future in personal computers because of the high cost of hardware. It then instructed sales managers to intentionally keep PC sales under a certain threshold.

What Happened To Compaq

Compaq was an American developer and producer of computer products and services. After strong initial success, the company was acquired by HP in 2002 with the Compaq brand retired in 2013. Compaq’s short-sighted acquisition of DEC provided the catalyst for its decline. While the company was dealing with the ramifications of the acquisition, competitors such as Dell and Gateway increased their market share. Compaq also experienced a loss in revenue after the dot-com bubble burst. This was exacerbated by the standardization of chipsets and motherboards by Intel.

What Happened To Kodak

Kodak is an American photography product and service company founded in 1892 by George Eastman and Henry A. Strong. After dominating the photographic film industry for decades, the company filed for bankruptcy in 2012. Kodak was not ignorant of digital camera technology. But it did fail at various stages to commit to digital products entirely despite overwhelming evidence that the technology would prove profitable. Kodak was also the victim of the changing retail landscape and consumer sentiment toward foreign products in the United States. Blind in its devotion to printing, it also missed an opportunity to create a Facebook-style photo-sharing website three years before Facebook itself was conceived.

What Happened To Friendster

Friendster was a social networking site that then transitioned to a gaming platform. Ultimately, Friendster failed to capitalize on its early success as one of the first social media platforms to experience mass uptake. When Friendster became a gaming platform, it failed to notify its user base. This set in motion the migration of users to Facebook which would continue for some years. Friendster’s decision to raise funds via venture capital funding populated its board with investors who were not interested in technology or innovation. The company was acquired by MOL Global in 2009 who then sold its patents to Facebook soon after.

What Happened To StumbleUpon

xStumbleUpon was an early social network founded by Garrett Camp, Geoff Smith, Justin LaFrance, and Eric Boyd. At one point, the platform was responsible for half of all social media traffic in the United States. StumbleUpon suffered intense competition from the likes of Pinterest, Digg, and Reddit – both in terms of site functionality and monetization strategy. After a failed partnership with eBay, Camp bought back the company and instituted a major redesign to limited success. The StumbleUpon user experience became outdated as consumers preferred to waste time scrolling through news feeds. Upon this realization, Camp shut down the service in 2018 to focus on a more modern iteration called Mix.com

What Happened To Altavista

Altavista was a pioneering search engine developed by a group of Digital Equipment (DEC) researchers. It was originally created to showcase the power of a then-revolutionary DEC supercomputer. After an ominous partnership with Yahoo in 1996, AltaVista underwent a series of acquisitions and format charges as several companies tried to make it profitable. In the process, the search engine lost market share to up-and-comer Google. Yahoo acquired AltaVista in 2003 and absorbed the technology behind the search engine into its own platform. AltaVista was formally put to rest ten years later.

What Happened To Blockbuster

Blockbuster was an American movie and video game rental chain. The company went from industry leader to filing for bankruptcy with $1 billion in debt in less than a decade. Blockbuster relied on late fees to drive a high proportion of revenue. This strategy proved uncompetitive after Netflix offered fee-free movie rentals by mail. Blockbuster lost significant market share to Netflix in the ensuing years and experienced a decline in profit after abolishing late fees in an attempt to remain competitive. Blockbuster’s demise is mostly due to an inability to innovate. Although passing on the offer to purchase Netflix is noteworthy, the company failed because of a myopic focus on its outdated rental franchise model.

What Happened To Napster

Napster was a peer-to-peer music-sharing software application. It was the first such platform to provide free access to the full history of recorded music online. Napster quickly attracted the attention of music artists, with Metallica instigating court proceedings against the company for copyright infringement and the distribution of unreleased music. Napster was forced to shut down after the Recording Industry Association of America won a court injunction. Mounting legal fees and compensation costs led to the company filing for bankruptcy in 2002.

What Happened To BlackBerry

BlackBerry is an iconic smartphone brand owned by Canadian company BlackBerry Limited. The company enjoyed first-mover status in the smartphone industry, but ultimately squandered its advantage. BlackBerry was ignorant and in some ways disrespectful of competitors in the industry. It was more concerned with protecting its proprietary technology than innovating to stay relevant. Though profitable to some extent, BlackBerry’s focus on enterprise customers came at the expense of the far more lucrative consumer market. Government opposition to censoring information also eroded one of the core strengths of the company’s smartphone.

Why Nokia Failed

Nokia is a Finnish telecommunications, consumer technology, and information technology company founded in 1865. It enjoyed 51% of the global market share for mobile phones in 1998. Nokia’s device-based hardware system was cumbersome and outdated, but the company persisted with it while competitors developed the software-based iOS and Android operating systems. By the time Nokia phones offered Android, the company had been left behind. Corporate mismanagement within Nokia was rife and culture suffered as a result. Internally and externally, the company failed to acknowledge its diminishing relevance and market share.

What Happened To Xerox

Xerox is an American corporation selling print and digital document products and services worldwide. The company failed to capitalize on revolutionary research performed at its PARC R&D center. Xerox was visited by Steve Jobs in 1979 who gained access to PARC in exchange for Xerox receiving shares in Apple. He then purchased the rights to a Xerox GUI and used it to produce the Apple Macintosh. Xerox released the Xerox Star personal computer in 1981 in a rare example of the company selling an innovative product commercially. However, the Star was prohibitively expensive, targeted the wrong market, and was a decade ahead of its time.

What Happened To Quibi

Quibi was an American short-form streaming service for smartphones. Unfortunate timing with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic is at least partly responsible for the failure of the platform. Despite billions being invested in securing high-end talent and production studios, Quibi content was generally poor quality. In any case, there was no way for consumers to share or engage with the content they did enjoy. Quibi was not helped by its pricing strategy and the presence of established competitors offering more for less. It was also improperly and inadequately marketed.

About The Author

Scroll to Top