Speech Act Theory

Speech Act Theory, pioneered by J.L. Austin and John Searle, delves into language’s action-performing aspect. It identifies illocutionary and perlocutionary acts. While enhancing communication analysis and pragmatics, it faces criticism for oversimplification and limited contextual consideration. Practical applications span language teaching and legal contexts.

Defining Speech Act Theory

At its core, Speech Act Theory addresses the idea that when we use language, we do more than just exchange information or convey meaning; we also perform actions. In other words, speech acts are not limited to describing the world but can actively shape it.

The theory was initially developed by J.L. Austin in his 1955 book “How to Do Things with Words” and later refined by John Searle. It distinguishes between three main types of speech acts:

  1. Locutionary Acts: These are the basic utterances or sounds that make up spoken language. For example, saying the words “I love you” constitutes a locutionary act.
  2. Illocutionary Acts: These represent the speaker’s intention or the force behind the utterance. Illocutionary acts include statements, questions, requests, promises, commands, and more. They convey the speaker’s purpose in using a particular utterance. For instance, saying “Can you pass the salt?” is an illocutionary act that functions as a request.
  3. Perlocutionary Acts: These refer to the effects or consequences of the speech act on the listener or the world. When the listener responds to an illocutionary act, the result is a perlocutionary act. For example, if the listener passes the salt after the request, the perlocutionary act is the successful fulfillment of the request.

Key Concepts of Speech Act Theory

To understand Speech Act Theory more comprehensively, let’s explore some key concepts:

1. Felicity Conditions

Felicity conditions are the conditions that must be met for a speech act to be considered successful or felicitous. They vary depending on the type of speech act being performed. For instance, for a promise to be successful, the speaker must intend to fulfill it, the promise must be relevant, and the listener must believe in the speaker’s intention.

2. Speech Act Categories

Speech acts can be categorized into various types based on their illocutionary force. Common categories include:

  • Assertives: Statements that convey beliefs, such as assertions, claims, descriptions, and denials.
  • Directives: Utterances that make requests, commands, invitations, or suggestions.
  • Commissives: Expressions of commitment, such as promises, offers, and vows.
  • Expressives: Utterances that convey feelings or emotions, including apologies, congratulations, and condolences.
  • Declarations: Speech acts that bring about a change in the external world, such as resignations, baptisms, or pronouncements of guilt in a courtroom.

3. Performatives and Constatives

J.L. Austin introduced the distinction between performatives and constatives. Performatives are sentences where the utterance itself is the action, such as “I promise” or “I apologize.” Constatives, on the other hand, are sentences that describe or state something about the world, such as “It’s raining” or “The sun is shining.”

4. Speech Act Force

The speech act force refers to the illocutionary intention behind an utterance. It can be one of several forces, including assertive, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative.

Importance of Speech Act Theory

Speech Act Theory is crucial for several reasons:

1. Understanding Communication

It provides a deeper understanding of how communication works beyond the mere exchange of information. By recognizing the illocutionary force of an utterance, we can better interpret the speaker’s intentions and respond accordingly.

2. Resolving Ambiguity

In everyday communication, sentences can be ambiguous. Speech Act Theory helps disambiguate such sentences by considering the illocutionary force. For example, the sentence “Can you pass the salt?” can be a request or a question, depending on the illocutionary intention.

3. Pragmatics

Speech Act Theory is closely related to the field of pragmatics, which studies how language is used in context. Understanding the illocutionary force of speech acts is essential for analyzing the pragmatic aspects of language.

4. Legal and Ethical Implications

In legal and ethical contexts, speech acts have significant consequences. For instance, false promises can lead to legal liabilities, and certain speech acts can have ethical implications. Understanding the illocutionary force is crucial for assessing responsibility and accountability.

Practical Examples of Speech Acts

To illustrate the application of Speech Act Theory in everyday communication, let’s consider some practical examples:

Example 1: Request

Illocutionary Act: Directive (Request)
Example: “Could you please send me the report by tomorrow?”

In this example, the illocutionary act is a request. The speaker intends for the listener to perform the action of sending the report by tomorrow. If the listener agrees and complies, the perlocutionary act is the successful execution of the request.

Example 2: Command

Illocutionary Act: Directive (Command)
Example: “Close the door.”

The illocutionary act here is a command, and the speaker expects the listener to immediately close the door. The perlocutionary act is the listener’s action of closing the door in response to the command.

Example 3: Promise

Illocutionary Act: Commissive (Promise)
Example: “I promise I will be there on time.”

In this case, the illocutionary act is a promise, indicating the speaker’s commitment to being punctual. The perlocutionary act is the listener’s expectation of the speaker’s punctuality.

Example 4: Assertion

Illocutionary Act: Assertive (Assertion)
Example: “The meeting is at 2:00 PM.”

The illocutionary act in this example is an assertion, conveying information about the time of the meeting. The perlocutionary act involves the listener processing and potentially acknowledging this information.


Speech Act Theory provides a valuable framework for understanding how language goes beyond conveying meaning to perform actions and shape interactions. It sheds light on the complexities of communication by considering the illocutionary force and felicity conditions of speech acts. Recognizing speech acts in everyday conversations enhances our ability to interpret intentions, resolve ambiguity, and navigate the social and pragmatic aspects of language. Whether in personal relationships, professional settings, or legal contexts, Speech Act Theory remains a powerful tool for analyzing the impact of language on our actions and the world around us.

Key highlights of Speech Act Theory:

  • Founders: Speech Act Theory was developed by philosophers J.L. Austin and later expanded upon by John Searle.
  • Types of Acts: The theory distinguishes between three types of acts in language: locutionary acts (producing words), illocutionary acts (performing actions through speech), and perlocutionary acts (the effects of speech on the listener).
  • Performative Nature: It highlights the performative nature of language, emphasizing that speech is not just about conveying information but also about performing actions.
  • Implications: Speech Act Theory has profound implications for the analysis of communication, as it helps us understand how language can be used to make requests, promises, assertions, questions, and commands.
  • Applications: It has applications in linguistics, philosophy of language, and communication studies, contributing to pragmatics and the understanding of language use in context.
  • Critiques: Critics argue that the theory may oversimplify the complexity of communicative acts and overlook the broader context in which language is used.
  • Practical Use: In practice, it is applied in language teaching to help learners use language effectively in real-life situations and in legal contexts to analyze legal documents and courtroom communication.

Connected Communication Models

Aristotle’s Model of Communication

The Aristotle model of communication is a linear model with a focus on public speaking. The Aristotle model of communication was developed by Greek philosopher and orator Aristotle, who proposed the linear model to demonstrate the importance of the speaker and their audience during communication

Communication Cycle

The linear model of communication is a relatively simplistic model envisaging a process in which a sender encodes and transmits a message that is received and decoded by a recipient. The linear model of communication suggests communication moves in one direction only. The sender transmits a message to the receiver, but the receiver does not transmit a response or provide feedback to the sender.

Berlo’s SMCR Model

Berlo’s SMCR model was created by American communication theorist David Berlo in 1960, who expanded the Shannon-Weaver model of communication into clear and distinct parts. Berlo’s SMCR model is a one-way or linear communication framework based on the Shannon-Weaver communication model.

Helical Model of Communication

The helical model of communication is a framework inspired by the three-dimensional spring-like curve of a helix. It argues communication is cyclical, continuous, non-repetitive, accumulative, and influenced by time and experience.

Lasswell Communication Model

The Lasswell communication model is a linear framework for explaining the communication process through segmentation. Lasswell proposed media propaganda performs three social functions: surveillance, correlation, and transmission. Lasswell believed the media could impact what viewers believed about the information presented.

Modus Tollens

Modus tollens is a deductive argument form and a rule of inference used to make conclusions of arguments and sets of arguments.  Modus tollens argues that if P is true then Q is also true. However, P is false. Therefore Q is also false. Modus tollens as an inference rule dates back to late antiquity where it was taught as part of Aristotelian logic. The first person to describe the rule in detail was Theophrastus, successor to Aristotle in the Peripatetic school.

Five Cannons of Rhetoric

The five canons of rhetoric were first organized by Roman philosopher Cicero in his treatise De Inventione in around 84 BC. Some 150 years later, Roman rhetorician Quintilian explored each of the five canons in more depth as part of his 12-volume textbook entitled Institutio Oratoria. The work helped the five canons become a major component of rhetorical education well into the medieval period. The five canons of rhetoric comprise a system for understanding powerful and effective communication.

Communication Strategy

A communication strategy framework clarifies how businesses should communicate with their employees, investors, customers, and suppliers. Some of the key elements of an effective communication strategy move around purpose, background, objectives, target audience, messaging, and approach.

Noise if Communication

Noise is any factor that interferes with or impedes effective communication between a sender and receiver. When noise disrupts the communication process or prevents the transmission of information, it is said to be communication noise.

7 Cs of Communication

The 7Cs of communication is a set of guiding principles on effective communication skills in business, moving around seven principles for effective business communication: clear, concise, concrete, correct, complete, coherent, and courteous.

Transactional Model of Communication

The transactional model of communication describes communication as a two-way, interactive process within social, relational, and cultural contexts. The transactional model of communication is best exemplified by two models. Barnlund’s model describes communication as a complex, multi-layered process where the feedback from the sender becomes the message for the receiver. Dance’s helical model is another example, which suggests communication is continuous, dynamic, evolutionary, and non-linear.

Horizontal Communication

Horizontal communication, often referred to as lateral communication, is communication that occurs between people at the same organizational level. In this context, communication describes any information that is transmitted between individuals, teams, departments, divisions, or units.

Communication Apprehension

Communication apprehension is a measure of the degree of anxiety someone feels in response to real (or anticipated) communication with another person or people.

Closed-Loop Communication

Closed-loop communication is a simple but effective technique used to avoid misunderstandings during the communication process. Here, the person receiving information repeats it back to the sender to ensure they have understood the message correctly. 

Grapevine In Communication

Grapevine communication describes informal, unstructured, workplace dialogue between employees and superiors. It was first described in the early 1800s after someone observed that the appearance of telegraph wires strung between transmission poles resembled a grapevine.

ASE Model

The ASE model posits that human behavior can be predicted if one studies the intention behind the behavior. It was created by health communication expert Hein de Vries in 1988. The ASE model believes intention and behavior are determined by cognitive variables such as attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. The model also believes that intention predicts behavior such that one’s attitude toward a behavior is influenced by the consequences of that behavior. Three cognitive variables are the primary determinants of whether the intention to perform a new behavior was sustained: attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy. Various external variables also influence these factors.

Integrated Marketing Communication

Integrated marketing communication (IMC) is an approach used by businesses to coordinate and brand their communication strategies. Integrated marketing communication takes separate marketing functions and combines them into one, interconnected approach with a core brand message that is consistent across various channels. These encompass owned, earned, and paid media. Integrated marketing communication has been used to great effect by companies such as Snapchat, Snickers, and Domino’s.

Social Penetration Theory

Social penetration theory was developed by fellow psychologists Dalmas Taylor and Irwin Altman in their 1973 article Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Social penetration theory (SPT) posits that as a relationship develops, shallow and non-intimate communication evolves and becomes deeper and more intimate.

Hypodermic Needle

The hypodermic needle theory was first proposed by communication theorist Harold Lasswell in his 1927 book Propaganda Technique in the World War. The hypodermic needle theory is a communication model suggesting media messages are inserted into the brains of passive audiences.

7-38-55 Rule

The 7-38-55 rule was created by University of California psychology professor Albert Mehrabian and mentioned in his book Silent Messages.  The 7-38-55 rule describes the multi-faceted way in which people communicate emotions, claiming that 7% of communication occurred via spoken word, 38% through tone of voice, and the remaining 55% through body language.

Active Listening

Active listening is the process of listening attentively while someone speaks and displaying understanding through verbal and non-verbal techniques. Active listening is a fundamental part of good communication, fostering a positive connection and building trust between individuals.

Main Free Guides:

About The Author

Scroll to Top