paei-model

What Is The PAEI Model? The PAEI Model In A Nutshell

The PAEI model was developed by Yugoslavian-American business consultant Dr. Ichak Adizes in the 1970s. The PAEI model is a framework defining four management roles that perform key functions within an organization through four roles: the producer, the administrator, the entrepreneur, and the integrator.

Understanding the PAEI model

Adizes argued no single manager could properly meet the needs of their organization or department. In other words, it was impossible for a leader – no matter how great – to embody multiple roles at the same time.

Instead, Adizes suggested effective management required a team of leaders working in harmony and using their collective knowledge to tackle the most complex issues or challenges.

The PAEI model helps leaders benefit from their natural strengths while identifying areas for improvement.

Furthermore, it increases collaboration as leaders learn to communicate more effectively with those embodying different leadership styles.

The four roles of the PAEI model

The PAEI model is an acronym of four management roles specified by Adizes and critical to organizational success:

The Producer

Organizations exist to produce results aligned with meeting customer needs.

The Producer tends to be highly delivery-focused, working long hours in the belief that hard work is the answer to everything.

Since they consider themselves irreplaceable, they have a hard time delegating responsibility to others.

The Administrator

While the Producer focuses on what to do, the Administrator is concerned with how things get done.

They tend to focus on controlling, organizing, planning, and scheduling activities by focusing on processes, procedures, and systems.

The Entrepreneur

As the name suggests, the Entrepreneur is a visionary and innovative thinker that inspires those around them.

They are less risk-averse than other management roles because they believe in their vision and are comfortable with uncertainty. 

The Integrator

These leaders are warm, caring, trustworthy, and reliable.

They are more concerned with developing people and teams to make the organization more efficient and enhance company culture.

Advantages of the PAEI model

Management styles have been studied for over a century, producing a diverse range of management frameworks.

However, the PAEI model has some distinct advantages:

Accessibility

The model is simple, concise, easily understood, and can be applied by every member of an organization – regardless of whether they are a frontline worker or CEO.

Versatility

The model can be used to assess or analyze a leader, group, or company.

It can also be incorporated into project and product management.

Accuracy

Practitioners of the PAEI model note that it encapsulates an accurate representation of how leaders function or behave in the workplace.

Key takeaways:

  • The PAEI model is a framework defining four management roles that perform key functions within an organization. It was developed by business consultant Dr. Ichak Adizes in the 1970s.
  • The PAEI model is an acronym of four management roles: the Producer, the Administrator, the Entrepreneur, and the Integrator. Organizational success can only occur when leaders embodying one style learn to communicate with those embodying a different style.
  • The PAEI model is one of many management frameworks. However, practitioners enjoy the model because it is simple to understand, versatile, and accurate.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Read Next: Organizational Structure

Read Also: Business Model

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA