holistic-organizational-structure

Holistic Organizational Structure

The holistic organizational structure is a departure from conventional hierarchical models that emphasize vertical reporting lines and segmented departments. Instead, it seeks to foster an environment where the organization is viewed as an interconnected and interdependent whole. In this structure, the emphasis is on collaboration, transparency, and a shared sense of purpose.

Key elements of the holistic organizational structure include:

  1. Networked Teams: Instead of rigid hierarchies, organizations in this structure often rely on networked teams that cut across traditional departmental boundaries.
  2. Collaborative Leadership: Leadership in a holistic structure is more about facilitation and guidance rather than command and control. Leaders encourage open communication and collaboration.
  3. Shared Vision and Values: Organizations adopting this structure often have a well-defined mission, vision, and values that guide decision-making and actions at all levels.
  4. Interconnectedness: There is a recognition that actions in one part of the organization can have ripple effects throughout the whole. This interconnectedness drives a focus on cooperation and shared responsibility.
  5. Employee Empowerment: Employees are empowered to take ownership of their work and contribute to the organization’s success. Decision-making authority is often pushed down to lower levels.
  6. Flexibility and Adaptability: The holistic structure is designed to be flexible and adaptable to changing market conditions, allowing organizations to respond quickly to challenges and opportunities.

Key Principles of the Holistic Organizational Structure

To effectively implement the holistic organizational structure, organizations adhere to several key principles:

  1. Wholeness: The organization is viewed as a unified whole, not as a collection of discrete parts. This perspective fosters a sense of shared purpose and collective responsibility.
  2. Interconnectedness: Recognizing that every part of the organization is interconnected, decisions and actions are guided by an understanding of their potential impact on other areas.
  3. Collaboration: Collaboration is at the core of the structure. Teams work together across functional boundaries, sharing knowledge and resources to achieve common goals.
  4. Empowerment: Employees are empowered to make decisions and take ownership of their work. This empowerment fosters a sense of accountability and commitment.
  5. Adaptability: The structure is designed to be adaptable to changing circumstances. It allows organizations to respond quickly to market shifts and emerging opportunities.
  6. Transparency: Open communication and transparency are valued. Information is shared freely, and there is a commitment to honesty and integrity in all interactions.

Advantages of the Holistic Organizational Structure

The holistic organizational structure offers several compelling advantages to organizations:

  1. Enhanced Innovation: Collaboration and open communication foster a culture of innovation, where diverse perspectives can lead to creative solutions.
  2. Improved Employee Engagement: Empowered employees who feel a sense of ownership in their work tend to be more engaged and motivated.
  3. Better Problem-Solving: A holistic view of the organization enables better problem-solving, as issues can be addressed at their root causes rather than through isolated fixes.
  4. Flexibility and Agility: The structure’s adaptability allows organizations to respond quickly to market changes and shifting customer demands.
  5. Efficiency: By breaking down silos and promoting cooperation, the structure can lead to more efficient processes and resource allocation.
  6. Customer-Centricity: Organizations can become more customer-centric, as they focus on delivering value across the entire customer journey rather than within isolated departments.
  7. Resilience: The interconnectedness of the structure can make organizations more resilient to disruptions, as they can quickly reallocate resources and adapt to new challenges.

Implementing the Holistic Organizational Structure

Implementing the holistic organizational structure involves several steps and considerations:

  1. Leadership Commitment: Leaders must be committed to the holistic approach and model the behaviors they want to see throughout the organization.
  2. Shared Vision: Develop a clear and compelling vision for the organization that emphasizes its interconnectedness and shared purpose.
  3. Employee Training: Provide training and support to employees to help them adapt to the new structure and understand their roles in the holistic context.
  4. Communication: Establish open and transparent communication channels that encourage dialogue and knowledge sharing.
  5. Team Formation: Create cross-functional teams that work together to achieve specific goals. These teams should be given autonomy and decision-making authority.
  6. Technology and Tools: Invest in technology and collaboration tools that facilitate communication and cooperation among teams.
  7. Performance Metrics: Develop performance metrics that align with the holistic structure’s principles, focusing on outcomes rather than individual tasks.
  8. Feedback Loops: Implement feedback mechanisms that allow employees to provide input and share insights about the organization’s performance.

Examples of Holistic Organizational Structures

Several well-known organizations have embraced the holistic organizational structure in various forms:

  1. Toyota: Toyota’s production system is often cited as an example of a holistic approach to manufacturing. It emphasizes collaboration, continuous improvement, and employee involvement in problem-solving.
  2. Zappos: The online shoe and clothing retailer Zappos is known for its unique company culture, which is built around holacracy—a form of self-management that distributes decision-making authority throughout the organization.
  3. Spotify: Spotify, the music streaming service, organizes its development teams into “squads,” “tribes,” and “guilds” to encourage collaboration and innovation.
  4. Semco: Brazilian company Semco, under the leadership of Ricardo Semler, implemented a radical form of workplace democracy and self-management, which has been celebrated for its holistic approach to organizational structure.
  5. Buurtzorg: This Dutch home healthcare organization has a decentralized structure that empowers nurses to make decisions about patient care, resulting in more personalized and efficient services.

Challenges and Considerations

While the holistic organizational structure offers many advantages, it is not without its challenges:

  1. Resistance to Change: Employees and leaders accustomed to traditional hierarchical structures may resist the shift to a holistic model.
  2. Complexity: Managing interconnected teams and functions can be complex, requiring effective coordination and communication.
  3. Lack of Clarity: Without clear roles and responsibilities, there may be confusion about decision-making authority and accountability.
  4. Scaling Challenges: As organizations grow, maintaining a holistic structure can become challenging, requiring careful planning and adaptation.
  5. Cultural Shift: Achieving a true cultural shift towards holism can take time and effort.

Conclusion

The holistic organizational structure represents a paradigm shift in how organizations are designed and managed. By embracing principles of interconnectedness, collaboration, and empowerment, businesses and institutions can reap the benefits of enhanced innovation, improved employee engagement, and greater adaptability. While the transition to a holistic structure may present challenges, its potential to create more agile, resilient, and customer-centric organizations makes it a compelling model for the future.

Key Highlights:

  • Holistic Organizational Structure:
    • Departs from traditional hierarchical models.
    • Emphasizes interconnectedness, collaboration, transparency, and shared purpose.
    • Utilizes networked teams and collaborative leadership.
  • Key Elements of the Holistic Organizational Structure:
    • Networked Teams
    • Collaborative Leadership
    • Shared Vision and Values
    • Interconnectedness
    • Employee Empowerment
    • Flexibility and Adaptability
  • Key Principles of the Holistic Organizational Structure:
    • Wholeness
    • Interconnectedness
    • Collaboration
    • Empowerment
    • Adaptability
    • Transparency
  • Advantages of the Holistic Organizational Structure:
    • Enhanced Innovation
    • Improved Employee Engagement
    • Better Problem-Solving
    • Flexibility and Agility
    • Efficiency
    • Customer-Centricity
    • Resilience
  • Implementing the Model:
    • Leadership Commitment
    • Shared Vision
    • Employee Training
    • Communication
    • Team Formation
    • Technology and Tools
    • Performance Metrics
    • Feedback Loops
  • Examples of Holistic Organizational Structures:
    • Toyota
    • Zappos
    • Spotify
    • Semco
    • Buurtzorg
  • Challenges and Considerations:
    • Resistance to Change
    • Complexity
    • Lack of Clarity
    • Scaling Challenges
    • Cultural Shift
  • Conclusion: The holistic organizational structure represents a paradigm shift that can enhance innovation, employee engagement, and adaptability. While it poses challenges, its potential for creating agile and customer-centric organizations makes it a compelling model for the future.
Case StudyStrategyOutcome
PatagoniaHolistic Organization: Integrated environmental sustainability into all aspects of the business, promoting a holistic approach to decision-making.Enhanced brand loyalty, increased customer satisfaction, and achieved strong growth by aligning business practices with environmental values.
Whole Foods MarketHolistic Organization: Emphasized employee well-being, customer satisfaction, and community involvement alongside business performance.Fostered a strong community presence, high employee engagement, and customer loyalty, driving growth and profitability.
ZapposHolistic Organization: Focused on company culture, employee happiness, and customer service excellence.Achieved high levels of customer satisfaction and employee engagement, driving strong sales growth and brand reputation.
Ben & Jerry’sHolistic Organization: Integrated social mission with business operations, focusing on environmental sustainability and social justice.Enhanced brand image, increased customer loyalty, and drove growth by aligning business practices with social values.
GoogleHolistic Organization: Promoted a culture of innovation, employee well-being, and social responsibility alongside business performance.Fostered a highly innovative environment, high employee satisfaction, and strong market growth.
SalesforceHolistic Organization: Emphasized stakeholder well-being, corporate social responsibility, and environmental sustainability.Achieved strong market growth, high employee satisfaction, and a positive brand reputation by aligning business practices with holistic values.
UnileverHolistic Organization: Integrated sustainability into all aspects of business operations and product development.Increased market share, customer loyalty, and brand reputation by promoting sustainable practices and holistic business strategies.
IKEAHolistic Organization: Focused on sustainability, employee well-being, and customer satisfaction.Enhanced brand loyalty, operational efficiency, and market growth by aligning business practices with holistic values.
Southwest AirlinesHolistic Organization: Emphasized employee satisfaction, customer service, and operational efficiency.Achieved high levels of customer satisfaction, employee engagement, and profitability, maintaining strong market leadership.
The Body ShopHolistic Organization: Integrated social and environmental responsibility into business practices.Increased customer loyalty, brand reputation, and market growth by promoting ethical and sustainable business practices.
Seventh GenerationHolistic Organization: Focused on sustainability, social responsibility, and customer well-being.Achieved strong brand loyalty, market growth, and positive environmental impact by aligning business practices with holistic values.
DanoneHolistic Organization: Integrated health, sustainability, and social responsibility into business strategy.Enhanced brand reputation, customer loyalty, and market growth by promoting holistic business practices.
Natura &CoHolistic Organization: Emphasized sustainability, social responsibility, and employee well-being.Increased market share, customer loyalty, and brand reputation by promoting ethical and sustainable business practices.
StarbucksHolistic Organization: Focused on sustainability, employee well-being, and community involvement.Enhanced brand loyalty, customer satisfaction, and market growth by aligning business practices with holistic values.
Interface, Inc.Holistic Organization: Emphasized sustainability and environmental responsibility in business practices.Achieved strong market growth, brand reputation, and positive environmental impact by promoting sustainable business practices.
TimberlandHolistic Organization: Integrated corporate social responsibility and sustainability into business strategy.Enhanced brand loyalty, market growth, and positive social impact by aligning business practices with holistic values.
Herman MillerHolistic Organization: Focused on sustainability, design innovation, and employee well-being.Increased market share, customer satisfaction, and brand reputation by promoting holistic business practices.
Method ProductsHolistic Organization: Emphasized sustainability, design, and social responsibility.Achieved strong brand loyalty, market growth, and positive environmental impact by aligning business practices with holistic values.
PatagoniaHolistic Organization: Integrated environmental sustainability into all aspects of the business.Enhanced brand loyalty, increased customer satisfaction, and achieved strong growth by aligning business practices with environmental values.
Eileen FisherHolistic Organization: Emphasized sustainability, ethical production, and employee well-being.Increased customer loyalty, brand reputation, and market growth by promoting holistic business practices.

Related ConceptsDescriptionImplications
Holistic Organizational StructureA Holistic Organizational Structure integrates various dimensions of the organization, including people, processes, technology, and culture, into a unified and interconnected system. In this structure, the organization is viewed as a holistic entity where all parts are interconnected and interdependent, working together to achieve common goals and objectives. Holistic structures prioritize alignment, integration, and synergy across different organizational elements, enabling organizations to optimize performance, innovation, and resilience effectively. Holistic structures foster a culture of collaboration, learning, and adaptability, empowering employees to contribute their unique skills and perspectives to drive organizational success.Holistic Organizational Structures offer several benefits, including alignment, integration, and adaptability. By integrating various dimensions of the organization into a unified system, holistic structures enable organizations to prioritize alignment, integration, and synergy effectively. Holistic structures foster a culture of collaboration, learning, and adaptability, empowering employees to contribute their unique skills and perspectives to drive organizational success. However, holistic structures may also pose challenges related to complexity, ambiguity, and change management. To maximize the benefits of holistic structures, organizations need to establish clear vision, values, and communication channels, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different organizational elements and stakeholders.
Systems Thinking ApproachSystems Thinking is a holistic approach to understanding and managing complex systems, such as organizations, by considering the interactions and interdependencies between different components and stakeholders. Systems thinking emphasizes the interconnectedness of parts within a system and the need to consider the broader context and long-term consequences of decisions and actions. Systems thinking enables organizations to identify patterns, feedback loops, and leverage points within the system to drive systemic change and improvement effectively.Systems Thinking shares similarities with Holistic Structures in its focus on understanding and managing complex systems. By considering the interactions and interdependencies between different components and stakeholders, systems thinking enables organizations to prioritize alignment, integration, and synergy effectively. Both models foster a culture of collaboration, learning, and adaptability, empowering employees to contribute their unique skills and perspectives to drive organizational success. However, systems thinking may also require effective problem-solving, collaboration, and leadership to ensure successful implementation and alignment with organizational goals. To maximize the benefits of systems thinking, organizations need to establish clear systemic goals, communication channels, and cross-functional collaboration mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different organizational elements and stakeholders.
Organizational Development (OD)Organizational Development (OD) is a holistic approach to improving organizational effectiveness and performance by focusing on the human and social aspects of the organization. OD interventions aim to enhance employee engagement, collaboration, and well-being, leading to positive organizational change and transformation. OD techniques, such as team building, leadership development, and change management, enable organizations to build a culture of trust, openness, and continuous improvement, fostering resilience and adaptability in a rapidly changing environment.Organizational Development shares similarities with Holistic Structures in its focus on improving organizational effectiveness and performance. By focusing on the human and social aspects of the organization, OD interventions enable organizations to prioritize alignment, integration, and synergy effectively. Both models foster a culture of collaboration, learning, and adaptability, empowering employees to contribute their unique skills and perspectives to drive organizational success. However, organizational development may also require effective communication, leadership support, and cultural transformation to ensure successful implementation and alignment with organizational goals. To maximize the benefits of organizational development, organizations need to establish clear development goals, change management strategies, and employee engagement mechanisms, ensuring alignment and collaboration across different organizational elements and stakeholders.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA