The generalized other is George Herbert Mead‘s term for the organised attitudes of a whole community, which a person learns to take into account when acting. In Mead’s words, it is “the attitude of the whole community”. The idea comes from Mind, Self, and Society, published in 1934 after his death and compiled largely from students’ notes of his lectures at the University of Chicago.
How it works
Where you see it today
On social media you write for many audiences at once. Researchers who interviewed Twitter users (Marwick and boyd, 2010) found they wrote for an imagined audience, a modern version of the generalized other assembled from followers they could not fully see.
Language models do not grow up in a community, so their norms have to be written down. Constitutional AI (Bai et al., 2022) trains a model to critique and revise its answers against a list of principles, a written stand-in for the generalized other.
In October 2023 Anthropic and the Collective Intelligence Project asked about 1,000 Americans to propose and vote on rules for a chatbot, then trained a model on the resulting public constitution. The community’s attitudes were turned into an explicit document.
A new hire absorbs a team’s unwritten rules over months. An AI agent acting for that team cannot, so tone, limits and escalation rules have to be spelled out in its instructions.
The generalized other and related ideas
How to use it
- Write down your team's unwritten rules: how decisions are made, what good work looks like, what gets escalated.
- Use that document to onboard people and to instruct AI agents acting for the team.
- When you post publicly, name the audience you are writing for; assume others will read it too.
- Check new norms with the people they affect before you encode them in a tool.
- Review the written rules regularly, since the community they describe keeps changing.
Organisations used to pass on their norms by osmosis; AI agents need them written down. The Business Engineer treats that written layer, the rules, tone and limits an agent works within, as part of the operating system of the company.
Read: The Business Engineer's Agent OS →Explore the platform →Related: Looking-glass self · Symbolic interactionism · Social norms · Theory of mind · Impression management
Frequently asked questions
What is the generalized other?
It is George Herbert Mead's term for the organised attitudes of a whole community, which people take into account when they think about and judge their own actions.
Where did Mead describe the generalized other?
In Mind, Self, and Society, published in 1934 after his death and compiled largely from students' notes of his lectures.
What is the difference between the generalized other and a significant other?
A significant other is a specific person, such as a parent; the generalized other is the combined expectations of the group as a whole.
How does the generalized other relate to AI?
AI systems do not absorb norms from a community, so developers write them down as principles or rules, as in Constitutional AI.
Sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, George Herbert Mead
- Marwick & boyd (2010), I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience, New Media & Society
- Bai et al. (2022), Constitutional AI: harmlessness from AI feedback
- Anthropic (2023), Collective Constitutional AI: aligning a language model with public input
The full guide
The complete explainer, cleaned up and reformatted for mobile.
The concept of the “generalized other” is a key component of George Herbert Mead’s social theory, specifically his theory of the self. It represents a crucial aspect of how individuals come to understand and internalize the norms, values, and expectations of society.
To fully grasp the concept of the generalized other, it’s essential to first understand its place within Mead’s broader framework of social theory. George Herbert Mead was a pioneering American philosopher and sociologist whose work emphasized the social nature of the self. He argued that the self is not a fixed, innate entity but rather a product of social interaction and communication. The generalized other is one of the central ideas within Mead’s theory of the self.
Defining the Generalized Other
The generalized other can be defined as follows:
The generalized other is the collective understanding of societal norms, values, and expectations. It represents the perspective of the larger society and serves as a reference point for individuals in evaluating their own actions and behaviors.
In simpler terms, the generalized other is the internalized sense of what society as a whole expects and considers appropriate. It represents the “voice” of society within an individual’s mind.
Key Features of the Generalized Other
To better understand the concept of the generalized other, let’s examine its key features and components:
1. Collective Perspective
- The generalized other represents the collective viewpoint of society. It embodies the shared norms, values, and expectations that are widely accepted within a particular social and cultural context.
2. Reference Point
- Individuals use the generalized other as a reference point when evaluating their own actions and behaviors. They consider whether their actions align with or deviate from societal norms.
3. Internalization
- The generalized other is not a physical entity but a mental construct. It exists within the minds of individuals as an internalized sense of societal expectations. It is shaped through socialization and interaction with others.
4. Dynamic and Evolving
- The content of the generalized other can change over time as societal norms and values evolve. It is not a static or unchanging entity but is influenced by cultural shifts and social developments.
5. Role in Social Control
- The concept of the generalized other plays a crucial role in social control. It guides individuals’ behavior by encouraging conformity to societal expectations and discouraging actions that deviate from those expectations.
Development of the Generalized Other
The formation and development of the generalized other occur through a process of socialization and interaction. Here are the key factors and stages involved in this process:
1. Social Interaction
- Socialization begins in early childhood through interactions with caregivers, peers, and other significant individuals. During these interactions, children begin to grasp societal norms and values.
2. Role-Taking
- Role-taking is a critical aspect of understanding the generalized other. It involves the ability to take on the perspective and roles of others. For example, children learn to see themselves as sons or daughters and understand the expectations associated with those roles.
3. Significant Others
- Significant others are individuals who hold importance in an individual’s life and whose roles and expectations are internalized. These may include parents, teachers, family members, and peers.
4. Expanded Perspective
- As individuals grow and engage in more complex social interactions, their understanding of the generalized other expands. They begin to consider the expectations and norms of broader societal groups and institutions.
Role of the Generalized Other in Behavior
The concept of the generalized other influences various aspects of human behavior and identity:
1. Moral Development
- The generalized other plays a vital role in moral development. It guides individuals in distinguishing between right and wrong by internalizing societal moral standards.
2. Conformity and Deviance
- Individuals are motivated to conform to the expectations of the generalized other to gain social acceptance and avoid social sanctions. Deviating from societal norms may result in social disapproval.
3. Identity Formation
- The generalized other contributes to the formation of an individual’s identity. It shapes how individuals perceive themselves in relation to societal roles and expectations.
4. Social Change
- The concept of the generalized other can also influence social change. When individuals challenge existing societal norms and expectations, they may contribute to shifts in the generalized other’s perspective.
Critiques and Debates
While the concept of the generalized other is a valuable tool for understanding socialization and societal influence, it has not been without criticism and debate:
1. Cultural Variation
- Critics argue that the concept may not fully capture the cultural variations in the development of societal norms and values. Different cultures may have distinct generalized others.
2. Individual Agency
- Some scholars contend that the concept of the generalized other places too much emphasis on societal control and socialization, potentially neglecting the role of individual agency and autonomy.
3. Social Change vs. Stability
- There is ongoing debate about whether the generalized other primarily reinforces social stability by promoting conformity or whether it can also be a catalyst for social change when individuals challenge established norms.
Conclusion
The concept of the generalized other is a fundamental component of George Herbert Mead’s social theory of the self. It highlights the role of societal norms, values, and expectations in shaping human behavior and identity. By internalizing the perspective of the generalized other, individuals navigate social interactions, make moral judgments, and develop a sense of self in relation to their broader social context.
While the concept is a powerful tool for understanding socialization and societal influence, it is not without its complexities and debates. Scholars continue to explore the nuanced ways in which the generalized other operates in diverse cultural and social settings, shedding light on the intricate relationship between the individual and society.
Connected · Generalized Other
Where to go next from Generalized Other
Picked for this page by topic. Every link checked live.
The Business Engineer readThe Business Engineer's Agent OSStay tuned, this is landing soon for exec members!!Read on businessengineer.ai →















