Decentralized authority, also known as distributed leadership or decentralized decision-making, is a management philosophy that distributes decision-making responsibilities to various levels and teams within an organization.
It empowers individuals or groups to make decisions based on their expertise and understanding of the organization’s goals and values.
Key Principles of Decentralized Authority
Autonomy: Individuals or teams have the freedom to make decisions within defined boundaries.
Transparency: Information, goals, and objectives are shared openly within the organization.
Accountability: Those who make decisions are responsible for the outcomes of those decisions.
Collaboration: Decentralized authority encourages collaboration and cross-functional communication.
Continuous Improvement: It promotes learning and adaptation based on feedback and results.
Decentralized authority empowers individuals or teams to take ownership of their work and decisions.
This sense of ownership fosters commitment and dedication to achieving organizational goals.
2. Faster Decision-Making
Decisions are made at the level where the expertise and information reside, resulting in quicker responses to challenges and opportunities.
Reduced bureaucracy leads to increased efficiency.
3. Innovation and Creativity
Autonomous teams are more likely to experiment and innovate, leading to creative solutions and product improvements.
Diversity of thought is encouraged, which can drive innovation.
4. Employee Engagement
Decentralized authority enhances employee engagement by involving individuals in decision-making processes.
Employees feel valued and empowered to contribute their ideas and expertise.
5. Flexibility and Adaptability
Organizations practicing decentralized authority are better equipped to adapt to changing market conditions and customer needs.
Decentralized decision-making allows for rapid adjustments.
6. Improved Learning
Individuals and teams in decentralized authority environments continuously learn from their experiences, both successes and failures.
This learning contributes to ongoing improvement.
7. Reduced Hierarchical Constraints
Decentralized authority reduces hierarchical constraints and promotes a flatter organizational structure.
This can lead to more open communication and collaboration.
Challenges in Decentralized Authority
1. Clear Boundaries
Defining the boundaries within which individuals or teams can make decisions is essential.
Overlapping responsibilities or unclear authority can lead to confusion.
2. Alignment with Organizational Goals
Ensuring that decisions made autonomously align with the organization’s overarching goals and values can be challenging.
Effective communication of these goals is crucial.
3. Resistance to Change
Transitioning to a decentralized authority model may face resistance from employees accustomed to traditional hierarchical structures.
Change management strategies are needed.
4. Decision Quality
The quality of decisions made autonomously varies based on individual or team expertise.
Ensuring that adequate support and resources are available is important.
5. Accountability and Responsibility
Holding individuals or teams accountable for their decisions and outcomes can be challenging.
Establishing clear mechanisms for accountability is necessary.
Strategies for Implementing Decentralized Authority
1. Define Clear Boundaries
Clearly define the areas where individuals or teams have decision-making authority.
Establish boundaries to avoid conflicts and ensure alignment with organizational goals.
2. Communicate Organizational Values and Goals
Ensure that all members of the organization understand the company’s values, goals, and mission.
This alignment is crucial for decision-making that supports the organization’s direction.
3. Provide Training and Support
Offer training and resources to individuals or teams to enhance their decision-making skills.
Encourage continuous learning and development.
4. Establish Feedback Mechanisms
Create feedback mechanisms that allow individuals or teams to receive input on their decisions.
Use feedback to drive continuous improvement.
5. Foster a Culture of Trust
Build a culture of trust and mutual respect within the organization.
Trust in individuals’ abilities and intentions is fundamental to decentralized authority.
6. Develop a Framework for Accountability
Implement mechanisms for tracking and evaluating decisions and their outcomes.
Hold individuals or teams accountable for their actions and results.
7. Monitor Progress and Adapt
Continuously monitor the effectiveness of decentralized authority practices.
Be prepared to adapt and refine the approach based on feedback and results.
Real-Life Decentralized Authority Success Stories
1. Semco
Semco, a Brazilian industrial conglomerate, is renowned for its decentralized authority practices.
Employees have a high degree of autonomy, and decisions such as salaries and work hours are made collectively.
Semco’s approach has led to increased employee satisfaction and profitability.
2. Buurtzorg
Buurtzorg, a Dutch healthcare organization, operates with a decentralized authority model.
Nurses work in autonomous teams, making decisions about patient care and administrative matters.
This approach has resulted in improved patient outcomes and cost savings.
3. Valve Corporation
Valve Corporation, a video game developer, operates without traditional managers or hierarchies.
Employees choose their projects and teams, and decisions are made collaboratively.
Valve’s approach has fostered innovation and the creation of popular video games.
4. W.L. Gore & Associates
W.L. Gore & Associates, known for products like Gore-Tex, practices decentralized authority.
The organization has a lattice structure where employees have sponsors, not bosses.
This approach has contributed to a culture of innovation and collaboration.
Measuring and Sustaining Decentralized Authority Success
Measuring Decentralized Authority Success
Measure the effectiveness of decentralized authority through employee engagement surveys, performance metrics, and feedback from stakeholders.
Track the impact of autonomous decision-making on organizational goals and outcomes.
Sustaining Decentralized Authority Success
Continuously communicate the benefits and progress of decentralized authority to all members of the organization.
Encourage a culture of adaptability and continuous improvement.
Support and mentor individuals or teams as they take on more autonomy and responsibility.
Conclusion
Decentralized authority represents a transformative approach to organizational management, emphasizing autonomy, responsibility, and decentralized decision-making. This philosophy empowers individuals and teams to take ownership of their work, leading to increased engagement, innovation, and adaptability. While challenges exist, such as defining clear boundaries and aligning decisions with organizational goals, the benefits of decentralized authority, including empowerment and improved decision quality, make it a compelling model for organizations seeking to thrive in the modern business landscape. In an era where agility and autonomy are highly valued, decentralized authority stands as a beacon of empowerment and accountability in organizational governance.
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure.
Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue.
Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
