cooperative-organizational-structure

Cooperative Organizational Structure

A cooperative is an organization owned and operated by its members, who share in the benefits and responsibilities of the enterprise. Cooperative structures are designed to serve the needs and interests of their members rather than external shareholders or investors. Key components of cooperative organizational structures include:

  1. Membership: Individuals or businesses join a cooperative as members, often with equal voting rights, to collectively make decisions about the organization’s operation.
  2. Shared Ownership: Members typically invest in the cooperative and share ownership, which may include receiving dividends or profits based on their level of participation.
  3. Democratic Control: Cooperative structures operate on a democratic basis, with members participating in decision-making processes, such as electing leaders and setting organizational goals.
  4. Mutual Benefit: Co-ops are established to meet the common needs and objectives of their members, whether they are consumers, producers, or workers.
  5. Voluntary and Open Membership: Cooperatives are typically open to anyone who shares the organization’s mission and is willing to accept the responsibilities of membership.

History of Cooperative Structures

Cooperative structures have a rich history dating back to the 18th century, with notable developments in various sectors:

  1. Agriculture: Agricultural cooperatives emerged in the 19th century, enabling farmers to collectively purchase supplies, market their products, and share resources.
  2. Consumer Cooperatives: Consumer co-ops, such as grocery stores, were established to provide members with access to affordable, high-quality goods and services.
  3. Worker Cooperatives: Worker-owned cooperatives empower employees to collectively own and manage their workplaces, fostering a sense of ownership and shared decision-making.
  4. Housing Cooperatives: Housing co-ops allow residents to collectively own and manage their housing, providing an alternative to traditional homeownership or renting.
  5. Credit Unions: Credit unions are financial cooperatives that provide members with banking services and access to loans while prioritizing their financial well-being.

Types of Cooperative Organizational Structures

Cooperative structures vary based on their primary purpose and member base. Common types of cooperatives include:

  1. Consumer Cooperatives: These co-ops are owned and operated by consumers who seek to purchase products or services collectively. Examples include food co-ops and retail cooperatives.
  2. Producer Cooperatives: Producer co-ops are formed by individuals or businesses involved in the production or distribution of goods. Farmers’ cooperatives and artisan cooperatives fall into this category.
  3. Worker Cooperatives: Worker-owned cooperatives are managed and operated by their employees, who share ownership and decision-making responsibilities. They are common in industries such as manufacturing, technology, and services.
  4. Credit Unions: Credit unions are financial cooperatives that offer banking services, savings accounts, and loans to their members. They prioritize providing affordable financial services.
  5. Housing Cooperatives: Housing co-ops enable residents to collectively own and manage their housing units. They can be found in urban and suburban areas, providing an alternative to traditional homeownership or renting.

Benefits of Cooperative Organizational Structures

Cooperative structures offer numerous advantages for their members and the broader community:

  1. Shared Ownership: Members have a stake in the cooperative, leading to a strong sense of ownership, commitment, and loyalty.
  2. Democratic Control: Cooperatives operate democratically, giving members a say in decision-making and ensuring that the organization aligns with their needs and values.
  3. Economic Empowerment: Cooperative structures can empower individuals and businesses by providing access to resources, markets, and financial services.
  4. Risk Sharing: Members share both the benefits and risks of the cooperative, reducing the individual burden of unforeseen challenges.
  5. Local Impact: Cooperatives often prioritize local economies and community development, reinvesting profits within their regions.
  6. Environmental Sustainability: Some cooperatives focus on sustainability and responsible practices, contributing to environmental conservation and ethical production.

Challenges of Cooperative Organizational Structures

While cooperative structures offer significant advantages, they also come with challenges:

  1. Decision-Making Complexity: Achieving consensus in a democratic cooperative can be time-consuming and challenging.
  2. Capitalization: Raising capital for cooperatives can be difficult, limiting their ability to invest in growth or compete with larger corporations.
  3. Member Participation: The success of cooperatives relies on active member engagement, which can wane over time.
  4. Management and Leadership: Finding individuals with the skills and commitment to effectively manage and lead cooperatives can be a challenge.
  5. Exit and Transition: Addressing member exits and transitioning ownership can be complex, potentially affecting the stability of the cooperative.

Implementing a Cooperative Organizational Structure

Creating and operating a cooperative requires careful planning and adherence to legal requirements. Here are key steps to implement a cooperative structure:

  1. Identify the Need: Determine the specific needs and objectives that the cooperative will address within its target community or industry.
  2. Market Research: Conduct market research to assess demand, competition, and potential members’ willingness to participate.
  3. Legal Structure: Choose the legal structure that best suits your cooperative, considering factors such as liability protection and tax treatment.
  4. Membership Recruitment: Attract members who share the cooperative’s vision and goals. Effective outreach and communication are essential.
  5. Business Plan: Develop a detailed business plan outlining the cooperative’s mission, objectives, financial projections, and governance structure.
  6. Legal Compliance: Comply with legal requirements, including registering the cooperative, drafting bylaws, and meeting reporting and regulatory obligations.
  7. Financial Management: Establish sound financial management practices, including accounting systems, budgeting, and revenue-sharing mechanisms.
  8. Governance Structure: Define the cooperative’s governance structure, including the roles and responsibilities of members, boards, and committees.
  9. Member Training: Provide training and education to members to ensure they understand their rights and responsibilities.
  10. Operations and Management: Implement operational processes and management systems to run the cooperative efficiently.

Examples of Successful Cooperative Organizations

  1. The Mondragon Corporation: Located in Spain, Mondragon is one of the world’s largest worker-owned cooperatives, comprising various businesses in industries such as manufacturing, finance, and retail.
  2. REI (Recreational Equipment, Inc.): REI is a consumer cooperative that specializes in outdoor gear and sporting goods. Members enjoy benefits such as dividends and voting rights.
  3. Land O’Lakes: This agricultural cooperative is owned by thousands of farmers and operates in the dairy industry, offering products ranging from butter to animal feed.
  4. Suma Wholefoods: Suma is a worker cooperative based in the United Kingdom that distributes organic and ethically sourced food products.
  5. The Greenbelt Cooperative: This housing cooperative in Maryland provides affordable and sustainable housing options to its members while promoting community engagement.

Conclusion

Cooperative organizational structures offer a powerful model for individuals and businesses to collaborate, share ownership, and collectively address their needs and goals. Whether in agriculture, consumer goods, worker empowerment, or housing, cooperatives continue to play a vital role in fostering economic empowerment and community development. By understanding the principles and benefits of cooperative structures, individuals and organizations can explore opportunities for shared ownership and collaborative success.

Key Highlights

  • Understanding Cooperative Organizational Structures:
    • Cooperatives are owned and operated by their members, serving their needs and interests.
    • Key components include membership, shared ownership, democratic control, mutual benefit, and voluntary membership.
  • History of Cooperative Structures:
    • Cooperatives have a rich history dating back to the 18th century, with developments in agriculture, consumer goods, worker empowerment, and housing.
  • Types of Cooperative Organizational Structures:
    • Consumer cooperatives, producer cooperatives, worker cooperatives, credit unions, and housing cooperatives are common types.
  • Benefits of Cooperative Organizational Structures:
    • Shared ownership, democratic control, economic empowerment, risk sharing, local impact, and environmental sustainability are key benefits.
  • Challenges of Cooperative Organizational Structures:
    • Decision-making complexity, capitalization difficulties, member participation, management and leadership challenges, and exit and transition complexities are common challenges.
  • Implementing a Cooperative Organizational Structure:
    • Steps include identifying the need, conducting market research, choosing a legal structure, recruiting members, developing a business plan, ensuring legal compliance, establishing financial management practices, defining governance structure, providing member training, and implementing operational processes.
  • Examples of Successful Cooperative Organizations:
    • Mondragon Corporation, REI (Recreational Equipment, Inc.), Land O’Lakes, Suma Wholefoods, and The Greenbelt Cooperative are notable examples.
  • Conclusion:
    • Cooperative structures offer a collaborative model for individuals and businesses to address their needs collectively, fostering economic empowerment and community development.
Case StudyContextStrategyOutcome
Mondragon CorporationWorker-owned cooperative conglomerate in Spain.Cooperative Organization: Structured as a federation of worker cooperatives across various sectors.Achieved strong economic performance, job stability, and social benefits, becoming a model for worker-owned enterprises.
REI (Recreational Equipment Inc.)American consumer cooperative retailing outdoor gear.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure where profits are returned to members through dividends and discounts.Enhanced customer loyalty, increased sales, and strong community engagement, driving growth and market leadership in outdoor retail.
The Co-operative GroupBritish consumer cooperative with diverse businesses including food retail, insurance, and legal services.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits shared among members and reinvested in the community.Improved customer loyalty, community impact, and business growth, maintaining a strong presence in multiple sectors.
Land O’LakesAmerican agricultural cooperative specializing in dairy products.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure where profits are distributed among member-owners.Enhanced member engagement, innovation in product development, and market competitiveness, driving growth in the agricultural sector.
Ocean SprayAmerican agricultural cooperative specializing in cranberries and grapefruit.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure with profits shared among grower-owners.Achieved strong market presence, product innovation, and financial returns for members, driving growth in the beverage industry.
Ace HardwareAmerican hardware retail cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Retailer-owned structure with profits returned to member stores.Increased operational efficiency, competitive pricing, and member satisfaction, driving growth and market leadership in hardware retail.
Sunkist GrowersAmerican citrus-grower cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Grower-owned structure where profits are shared among members.Enhanced product quality, market reach, and financial returns for growers, driving growth in the citrus industry.
Blue Diamond GrowersAmerican almond-grower cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure with profits distributed to members.Achieved strong market presence, product innovation, and financial returns for members, driving growth in the almond industry.
Arla FoodsEuropean dairy cooperative based in Denmark.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure where profits are reinvested in the business and distributed to members.Enhanced product quality, market reach, and financial stability, driving growth and competitiveness in the dairy industry.
Organic ValleyAmerican organic food cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure with profits returned to members and reinvested in sustainable practices.Increased member engagement, product quality, and market presence, driving growth and leadership in organic foods.
RabobankDutch multinational banking and financial services company.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits reinvested in member services and community projects.Achieved strong financial performance, customer loyalty, and community impact, maintaining a leading position in cooperative banking.
CoBankAmerican cooperative bank serving rural America.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits returned to member-owners.Enhanced financial stability, member services, and community impact, driving growth and leadership in rural banking.
Group Health CooperativeAmerican healthcare provider and insurance company.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure where profits are reinvested in healthcare services and member benefits.Improved healthcare quality, member satisfaction, and operational efficiency, driving growth and leadership in cooperative healthcare.
Agricultural Cooperative Federation (Zen-Noh)Japanese agricultural cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure with profits reinvested in member services and agricultural innovation.Enhanced agricultural productivity, member engagement, and market competitiveness, driving growth and sustainability in Japanese agriculture.
FonterraNew Zealand-based dairy cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure where profits are distributed to members and reinvested in the business.Achieved strong market presence, product innovation, and financial returns for members, driving growth and competitiveness in the global dairy industry.
Rochdale PioneersBritish consumer cooperative and the world’s first successful cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits shared among members and reinvested in the community.Established a sustainable business model, improved member benefits, and inspired the global cooperative movement.
Desjardins GroupCanadian financial cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits reinvested in member services and community development.Achieved strong financial performance, customer loyalty, and community impact, maintaining a leading position in cooperative banking.
Credit AgricoleFrench cooperative banking group.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits reinvested in member services and local economies.Enhanced financial stability, customer loyalty, and community impact, driving growth and leadership in cooperative banking.
WelkoopDutch agricultural and pet supply cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Member-owned structure with profits returned to members.Increased member engagement, operational efficiency, and market presence, driving growth and competitiveness in agricultural and pet supplies.
PlunkettsIrish agricultural cooperative.Cooperative Organization: Farmer-owned structure with profits reinvested in member services and agricultural innovation.Enhanced agricultural productivity, member engagement, and market competitiveness, driving growth and sustainability in Irish agriculture.

Related Organizational StructuresDescriptionImplications
Cooperative Organizational StructureA Cooperative Organizational Structure is characterized by a democratic and participative approach to decision-making and governance. It emphasizes collaboration, shared ownership, and equal participation among members or stakeholders. Cooperative structures prioritize employee empowerment, transparency, and accountability, fostering a culture of trust, collaboration, and mutual respect.Cooperative Organizational Structures offer several benefits, including increased employee engagement, motivation, and commitment. By involving employees in decision-making and sharing ownership, cooperative structures can enhance organizational performance, innovation, and resilience. However, cooperative structures may also pose challenges related to consensus-building, coordination, and conflict resolution, as decision-making processes may require more time and effort to ensure alignment and inclusivity.
Employee-Owned BusinessAn Employee-Owned Business is a company in which employees have a significant ownership stake in the organization. Employee ownership can take various forms, such as employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs), cooperatives, or employee stock options. Employee-owned businesses prioritize employee involvement, participation, and financial stake in the company’s success, fostering a sense of ownership, commitment, and alignment with organizational goals.Employee-Owned Businesses share similarities with Cooperative Structures in their emphasis on employee ownership and participation. By giving employees a stake in the company’s success, employee-owned businesses can enhance employee motivation, engagement, and performance. Both models prioritize transparency, accountability, and shared responsibility, enabling organizations to leverage the collective expertise and commitment of employees to achieve common goals. However, employee ownership may also pose challenges related to governance, valuation, and succession planning, as employees may require training and support to understand their roles and responsibilities as owners.
Worker CooperativeA Worker Cooperative is a type of cooperative where employees own and democratically manage the business. Worker cooperatives operate based on the principles of democratic governance, equal participation, and profit-sharing among members. Each worker-owner has an equal vote in decision-making processes, regardless of their role or tenure in the organization. Worker cooperatives prioritize employee empowerment, job satisfaction, and community engagement, fostering a culture of cooperation, fairness, and solidarity.Worker Cooperatives share similarities with Cooperative Structures in their focus on democratic governance and shared ownership. By giving employees equal voting rights and financial stake in the business, worker cooperatives can promote employee engagement, innovation, and resilience. Both models prioritize transparency, accountability, and inclusivity, enabling organizations to leverage the collective wisdom and commitment of employees to achieve common objectives. However, worker cooperatives may also face challenges related to governance, leadership, and financing, as members may require training and support to participate effectively in decision-making and manage the business collectively.
Participatory ManagementParticipatory Management is an approach to organizational leadership that involves employees in decision-making, goal-setting, and problem-solving processes. It emphasizes collaboration, transparency, and shared responsibility, enabling employees to contribute their ideas, insights, and expertise to organizational decision-making. Participatory management fosters a culture of empowerment, ownership, and accountability, enhancing employee motivation, engagement, and satisfaction.Participatory Management aligns closely with the principles of Cooperative Organizational Structures in its emphasis on employee involvement and empowerment. By involving employees in decision-making and goal-setting processes, participatory management can enhance organizational performance, innovation, and resilience. Both approaches prioritize transparency, collaboration, and shared responsibility, enabling organizations to leverage the diverse perspectives and expertise of employees to achieve common goals. However, participatory management may require leadership commitment, cultural change, and investment in training and development to ensure effective implementation and sustainability.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Scroll to Top
FourWeekMBA