
- The AI Era reverses the logic of the Internet Era — demand leads, supply lags.
- The constraint has shifted from software scalability to physical infrastructure.
- AI economics are defined by capex intensity, energy dependency, and geopolitical control.
Historical Context: Two Different Eras
The transition from the Internet to the AI era marks a structural inversion in how growth, capital, and infrastructure interact.
While the Internet scaled on abundant capital and open systems, AI scales on constrained resources and national competition.
| Dimension | Internet Era (1995–2020) | AI Era (2022–Present) |
|---|---|---|
| Geopolitics | US unipolar dominance; globalization paradigm; open internet as soft power export | US–China great power competition; AI as strategic weapon; reshoring & digital protectionism |
| Economics | Low rates (6% → 0%); capital-efficient startups; VC-led innovation | High rates (4–5.5%); capex-heavy growth; trillion-dollar infrastructure cycles |
| Technology | Distribution-based leverage (software); near-zero marginal costs | Compute-based leverage (hardware + energy); high marginal costs per inference |
| Demographics | Expanding population; new consumer markets | Western depopulation; labor scarcity driving automation |
| Dominant Paradigm | Software eats the world | Infrastructure eats the world |
Summary: The Internet democratized distribution; AI re-centralizes control around compute, capital, and energy.
Critical Inversion: Supply vs. Demand
The dot-com era overbuilt infrastructure for users who didn’t exist yet.
The AI era faces the opposite problem — explosive demand throttled by infrastructure scarcity.
Dot-Com Bubble (1999–2000)
- Supply > Demand
→ Lesson: Virtual optimism outpaced physical readiness.
AI Era (2023–Present)
- Demand > Supply
- Hundreds of millions of users, multi-billion revenue already real.
- Infrastructure (GPUs, data centers, power) lagging by years.
- Bottlenecks across the stack: compute, cooling, and energy.
→ Reality: The constraint is no longer adoption — it’s capacity.
| Era | Condition | Economic Character |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Overbuilt infrastructure | Deflationary correction |
| 2025 | Underbuilt infrastructure | Inflationary constraint |
The AI cycle is not speculative — it’s infrastructural.
The Physical AI Stack: Why Infrastructure Matters
AI is not just a software revolution; it’s a vertical integration of physical layers.
Each layer compounds dependencies — the higher layers (models, applications) are only as scalable as the lower ones (hardware, data centers, energy).
1. Applications Layer
- Generative apps, copilots, autonomous agents
- Revenue layer for end users and enterprises
- Dependent on API access and latency performance
2. AI Models Layer
- $100M–$1B per training run
- Model quality gated by compute and dataset scale
- Transition from centralized foundation models → domain-specific fine-tunes
3. Computing Hardware Layer
- GPUs, accelerators (NVIDIA, AMD, Groq, etc.)
- ASICs emerging for specialized inference tasks
- Geopolitical chokepoint: advanced chip fabrication concentrated in Taiwan
4. Data Centers Layer
- Specialized AI facilities
- Cooling, density, and proximity to renewable energy critical
- Only ~3–5% of existing cloud infrastructure optimized for AI workloads
5. Energy Infrastructure Layer
- 5–6 GW per hyperscaler facility in planning
- Nuclear and renewables now part of compute strategy
- Long permitting cycles (3–5 years) → structural delay
Each layer amplifies the bottleneck below it — creating a vertically constrained ecosystem.
Physical Constraints Driving AI Economics
| Layer | Constraint | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | Power generation and grid capacity | Multi-year permitting delays; energy as strategic moat |
| Data Centers | Cooling, location, physical materials | Only a few sites globally can host gigawatt-scale AI farms |
| Hardware | Chip lithography, rare materials, TSMC dependency | Supply risk + geopolitical exposure |
| Model | Training time and capital cost | Limits on iteration speed and innovation throughput |
Key Dynamic:
Every marginal AI improvement now depends on non-digital assets — land, power, and silicon.
This creates the first physically constrained software revolution in history.
The Economic Inversion
| Internet Economy | AI Economy |
|---|---|
| Marginal costs → 0 | Marginal costs rising (compute, energy) |
| Capital efficiency | Capital intensity |
| Infinite scalability | Physical bottlenecks |
| Globalized supply chains | Fragmented, nationalized supply chains |
| Human labor as variable | Compute as variable |
The AI economy transforms cost structure into a geopolitical variable — whoever controls energy and fabrication controls innovation velocity.
Three Distinct Adoption Curves
- Infrastructure Buildout (2024–2030)
- Capex-driven; trillions invested in energy, chips, and data centers.
- Modeled after railroads and electrification cycles.
- Winners: hyperscalers, chipmakers, energy providers.
- Model Maturity (2026–2029)
- Fewer but larger foundation models with regional fine-tuning.
- Model performance becomes predictable — commoditizing baseline intelligence.
- Differentiation shifts to trust, latency, and context.
- Application Explosion (2027–2032)
- Agentic systems as new distribution platforms.
- Value concentrates in orchestration (workflow, context memory, retrieval).
- Revenue shifts from SaaS licenses → autonomous transaction fees.
Strategic Implications
- Compute Becomes Currency
- AI power equals compute supply × energy efficiency × localization.
- The new “interest rate” of the AI economy is GPU yield.
- Energy Is the New API
- Cloud providers are now energy companies by necessity.
- Strategic advantage = ability to deploy new gigawatts at scale.
- Geopolitics = Economics
- Industrial policy replaces venture funding as growth driver.
- Compute nationalism dictates who scales, who waits, and who rents.
- Software Returns to Hardware Dependency
- The abstraction era is over; vertical integration is mandatory.
- Expect massive consolidation: only firms owning the full stack can maintain margins.
Conclusion
The Internet scaled by abstracting the physical world; AI scales by rebuilding it.
We’re entering an era where digital growth requires physical investment, geopolitical coordination, and material resilience.
The next trillion-dollar opportunity won’t come from code alone — but from the convergence of compute, energy, and intelligence infrastructure.









