17 SDGs

Business / By /

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outline 17 interconnected objectives aimed at addressing global challenges and fostering sustainable development by 2030. Achieving these goals necessitates concerted efforts from various stakeholders, including governments, businesses, civil society, and individuals.

Understanding Stakeholder Roles

Goal 1: No Poverty

  • Governments: Implement poverty reduction policies, social safety nets, and inclusive economic growth strategies.
  • Businesses: Promote fair wages, decent working conditions, and inclusive business models that empower marginalized communities.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for social protection programs, access to basic services, and poverty alleviation initiatives.
  • Individuals: Support local economies, donate to poverty alleviation programs, and advocate for policies that address income inequality.

Goal 2: Zero Hunger

  • Governments: Invest in agricultural development, food security programs, and sustainable farming practices.
  • Businesses: Support smallholder farmers, reduce food waste, and invest in research and innovation for food security.
  • Civil Society: Provide food assistance, promote nutrition education, and advocate for policies that address hunger and malnutrition.
  • Individuals: Support local food banks, practice sustainable food consumption, and raise awareness about hunger issues.

Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being

  • Governments: Strengthen healthcare systems, increase access to essential services, and promote public health education.
  • Businesses: Provide healthcare benefits, support medical research, and develop innovative healthcare solutions.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for universal healthcare coverage, combat infectious diseases, and promote mental health awareness.
  • Individuals: Practice healthy lifestyles, seek preventive care, and support health-related charities and initiatives.

Goal 4: Quality Education

  • Governments: Invest in education infrastructure, train teachers, and promote inclusive and equitable education.
  • Businesses: Support educational initiatives, provide scholarships, and invest in education technology.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for education funding, promote literacy programs, and support marginalized communities’ access to education.
  • Individuals: Value education, volunteer as mentors, and support educational institutions through donations and volunteering.

Goal 5: Gender Equality

  • Governments: Enact laws and policies that promote gender equality, eliminate discrimination, and empower women and girls.
  • Businesses: Promote gender diversity and inclusion in the workplace, close the gender pay gap, and support women-owned businesses.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for women’s rights, provide support services for survivors of gender-based violence, and promote women’s leadership.
  • Individuals: Challenge gender stereotypes, support gender equality initiatives, and advocate for women’s rights in their communities.

Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation

  • Governments: Invest in water infrastructure, protect water sources, and ensure access to clean water and sanitation for all.
  • Businesses: Adopt sustainable water management practices, invest in water-saving technologies, and support clean water initiatives.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for water conservation, provide access to clean water in underserved communities, and raise awareness about water issues.
  • Individuals: Conserve water, support water conservation efforts, and advocate for clean water access in their communities.

Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy

  • Governments: Invest in renewable energy infrastructure, promote energy efficiency, and phase out fossil fuel subsidies.
  • Businesses: Invest in renewable energy projects, adopt clean energy technologies, and promote energy conservation.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for renewable energy policies, raise awareness about energy efficiency, and support community-based renewable energy projects.
  • Individuals: Reduce energy consumption, adopt renewable energy sources, and advocate for clean energy policies.

Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth

  • Governments: Promote full and productive employment, protect workers’ rights, and support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
  • Businesses: Provide fair wages, ensure safe working conditions, and create opportunities for decent employment.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for labor rights, support job training programs, and promote inclusive economic growth.
  • Individuals: Support ethical businesses, advocate for workers’ rights, and seek decent employment opportunities.

Goal 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

  • Governments: Invest in infrastructure development, promote innovation ecosystems, and support industrial diversification.
  • Businesses: Invest in research and development, adopt innovative technologies, and support infrastructure projects.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for sustainable infrastructure, promote innovation in local communities, and support entrepreneurship.
  • Individuals: Support local businesses, embrace innovation, and advocate for sustainable infrastructure development.

Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities

  • Governments: Implement policies that reduce income inequality, address social disparities, and promote social inclusion.
  • Businesses: Foster diversity and inclusion in the workplace, address wage gaps, and support marginalized communities.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for social justice, support vulnerable populations, and promote equality and non-discrimination.
  • Individuals: Challenge prejudice and discrimination, support inclusive policies, and advocate for marginalized communities’ rights.

Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities

  • Governments: Plan sustainable urban development, invest in public transportation, and promote affordable housing.
  • Businesses: Adopt sustainable business practices, support urban renewal projects, and invest in smart city technologies.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for sustainable urban planning, promote community engagement in decision-making, and support local initiatives.
  • Individuals: Reduce carbon footprint, support local businesses, and participate in community development projects.

Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

  • Governments: Enact regulations to promote sustainable consumption and production patterns, support waste reduction initiatives, and encourage green procurement.
  • Businesses: Adopt circular economy principles, reduce waste generation, and promote sustainable supply chains.
  • Civil Society: Raise awareness about sustainable consumption, advocate for eco-friendly products, and support recycling programs.
  • Individuals: Reduce, reuse, and recycle, make environmentally conscious purchasing decisions, and support sustainable brands.

Goal 13: Climate Action

  • Governments: Implement policies to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, adapt to climate change impacts, and support renewable energy transition.
  • Businesses: Reduce carbon emissions, invest in renewable energy, and develop climate-resilient infrastructure.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for climate action policies, raise awareness about climate change impacts, and support climate adaptation initiatives.
  • Individuals: Reduce personal carbon footprint, advocate for climate-friendly policies, and support climate action organizations.

Goal 14: Life Below Water

  • Governments: Establish marine protected areas, regulate overfishing and pollution, and promote sustainable fisheries management.
  • Businesses: Adopt sustainable fishing practices, reduce plastic pollution, and support marine conservation initiatives.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for marine conservation, organize beach cleanups, and raise awareness about ocean health.
  • Individuals: Reduce plastic use, support sustainable seafood choices, and participate in ocean conservation efforts.

Goal 15: Life on Land

  • Governments: Protect biodiversity, restore degraded ecosystems, and promote sustainable land management practices.
  • Businesses: Support reforestation efforts, adopt sustainable land use practices, and invest in wildlife conservation.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for environmental conservation, participate in reforestation projects, and promote wildlife protection.
  • Individuals: Plant trees, support conservation organizations, and practice sustainable land stewardship.

Goal 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

  • Governments: Strengthen the rule of law, promote human rights, and support democratic governance institutions.
  • Businesses: Uphold ethical business practices, respect human rights, and support peace-building initiatives.
  • Civil Society: Advocate for social justice, promote human rights awareness, and support conflict resolution efforts.
  • Individuals: Respect diversity and human rights, promote peace-building initiatives, and engage in civic activism.

Goal 17: Partnerships for the Goals

  • Governments: Strengthen international cooperation, promote global partnerships, and support capacity-building initiatives in developing countries.
  • Businesses: Engage in cross-sector collaborations, support development projects, and share expertise and resources.
  • Civil Society: Foster collaboration among stakeholders, mobilize resources for development projects, and promote participatory decision-making.
  • Individuals: Support international aid organizations, volunteer for development projects, and advocate for global solidarity.

Key Strategies for Collaboration

Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships

  • Foster collaboration among governments, businesses, civil society, and other stakeholders to leverage their complementary strengths and resources.
  • Establish multi-stakeholder partnerships that facilitate knowledge-sharing, capacity-building, and collective action towards achieving specific SDG targets.

Innovation and Technology

  • Harness the power of innovation and technology to develop sustainable solutions that address pressing challenges related to each SDG.
  • Encourage collaboration between academia, research institutions, businesses, and governments to drive technological innovation and promote sustainable development.

Capacity Building and Education

  • Invest in capacity-building initiatives and educational programs that empower individuals, communities, and organizations to contribute effectively to the SDGs.
  • Promote lifelong learning, skill development, and awareness-raising campaigns that foster a culture of sustainability and responsible citizenship.

Policy Coherence and Advocacy

  • Advocate for policy coherence at the national, regional, and international levels to align government policies and regulatory frameworks with the SDGs.
  • Engage in advocacy efforts to promote transparency, accountability, and participatory decision-making processes that prioritize people, planet, and prosperity.

Impact Measurement and Reporting

  • Develop robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to track progress towards the SDGs and assess the impact of interventions and initiatives.
  • Promote transparency and accountability through regular reporting on SDG-related activities, outcomes, and challenges, enabling stakeholders to learn from successes and failures.

Importance of Collective Action

  • Achieving the SDGs requires collective action and solidarity among stakeholders at all levels of society.
  • By working together towards common goals, stakeholders can amplify their impact, drive systemic change, and create a more equitable and sustainable world for future generations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, advancing the Sustainable Development Goals necessitates collaborative efforts from governments, businesses, civil society, and individuals across the globe. By understanding their roles in advancing each SDG, embracing actionable strategies for collaboration, and fostering collective action, stakeholders can accelerate progress towards sustainable development and create a better future for all. Through innovation, education, advocacy, and partnership, we can collectively address the world’s most pressing challenges and build a more prosperous, inclusive, and sustainable world for generations to come.

Read Next: Organizational Structure.

Types of Organizational Structures

organizational-structure-types
Organizational Structures

Siloed Organizational Structures

Functional

functional-organizational-structure
In a functional organizational structure, groups and teams are organized based on function. Therefore, this organization follows a top-down structure, where most decision flows from top management to bottom. Thus, the bottom of the organization mostly follows the strategy detailed by the top of the organization.

Divisional

divisional-organizational-structure

Open Organizational Structures

Matrix

matrix-organizational-structure

Flat

flat-organizational-structure
In a flat organizational structure, there is little to no middle management between employees and executives. Therefore it reduces the space between employees and executives to enable an effective communication flow within the organization, thus being faster and leaner.

Connected Business Frameworks

Portfolio Management

project-portfolio-matrix
Project portfolio management (PPM) is a systematic approach to selecting and managing a collection of projects aligned with organizational objectives. That is a business process of managing multiple projects which can be identified, prioritized, and managed within the organization. PPM helps organizations optimize their investments by allocating resources efficiently across all initiatives.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model

kotters-8-step-change-model
Harvard Business School professor Dr. John Kotter has been a thought-leader on organizational change, and he developed Kotter’s 8-step change model, which helps business managers deal with organizational change. Kotter created the 8-step model to drive organizational transformation.

Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model

nadler-tushman-congruence-model
The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model was created by David Nadler and Michael Tushman at Columbia University. The Nadler-Tushman Congruence Model is a diagnostic tool that identifies problem areas within a company. In the context of business, congruence occurs when the goals of different people or interest groups coincide.

McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom

mckinseys-seven-degrees
McKinsey’s Seven Degrees of Freedom for Growth is a strategy tool. Developed by partners at McKinsey and Company, the tool helps businesses understand which opportunities will contribute to expansion, and therefore it helps to prioritize those initiatives.

Mintzberg’s 5Ps

5ps-of-strategy
Mintzberg’s 5Ps of Strategy is a strategy development model that examines five different perspectives (plan, ploy, pattern, position, perspective) to develop a successful business strategy. A sixth perspective has been developed over the years, called Practice, which was created to help businesses execute their strategies.

COSO Framework

coso-framework
The COSO framework is a means of designing, implementing, and evaluating control within an organization. The COSO framework’s five components are control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring activities. As a fraud risk management tool, businesses can design, implement, and evaluate internal control procedures.

TOWS Matrix

tows-matrix
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.

Lewin’s Change Management

lewins-change-management-model
Lewin’s change management model helps businesses manage the uncertainty and resistance associated with change. Kurt Lewin, one of the first academics to focus his research on group dynamics, developed a three-stage model. He proposed that the behavior of individuals happened as a function of group behavior.

Organizational Structure Case Studies

OpenAI Organizational Structure

openai-organizational-structure
OpenAI is an artificial intelligence research laboratory that transitioned into a for-profit organization in 2019. The corporate structure is organized around two entities: OpenAI, Inc., which is a single-member Delaware LLC controlled by OpenAI non-profit, And OpenAI LP, which is a capped, for-profit organization. The OpenAI LP is governed by the board of OpenAI, Inc (the foundation), which acts as a General Partner. At the same time, Limited Partners comprise employees of the LP, some of the board members, and other investors like Reid Hoffman’s charitable foundation, Khosla Ventures, and Microsoft, the leading investor in the LP.

Airbnb Organizational Structure

airbnb-organizational-structure
Airbnb follows a holacracy model, or a sort of flat organizational structure, where teams are organized for projects, to move quickly and iterate fast, thus keeping a lean and flexible approach. Airbnb also moved to a hybrid model where employees can work from anywhere and meet on a quarterly basis to plan ahead, and connect to each other.

Amazon Organizational Structure

amazon-organizational-structure
The Amazon organizational structure is predominantly hierarchical with elements of function-based structure and geographic divisions. While Amazon started as a lean, flat organization in its early years, it transitioned into a hierarchical organization with its jobs and functions clearly defined as it scaled.

Apple Organizational Structure

apple-organizational-structure
Apple has a traditional hierarchical structure with product-based grouping and some collaboration between divisions.

Coca-Cola Organizational Structure

coca-cola-organizational-structure
The Coca-Cola Company has a somewhat complex matrix organizational structure with geographic divisions, product divisions, business-type units, and functional groups.

Costco Organizational Structure

costco-organizational-structure
Costco has a matrix organizational structure, which can simply be defined as any structure that combines two or more different types. In this case, a predominant functional structure exists with a more secondary divisional structure. Costco’s geographic divisions reflect its strong presence in the United States combined with its expanding global presence. There are six divisions in the country alone to reflect its standing as the source of most company revenue. Compared to competitor Walmart, for example, Costco takes more a decentralized approach to management, decision-making, and autonomy. This allows the company’s stores and divisions to more flexibly respond to local market conditions.

Dell Organizational Structure

dell-organizational-structure
Dell has a functional organizational structure with some degree of decentralization. This means functional departments share information, contribute ideas to the success of the organization and have some degree of decision-making power.

eBay Organizational Structure

ebay-organizational-structure
eBay was until recently a multi-divisional (M-form) organization with semi-autonomous units grouped according to the services they provided. Today, eBay has a single division called Marketplace, which includes eBay and its international iterations.

Facebook Organizational Structure

facebook-organizational-structure
Facebook is characterized by a multi-faceted matrix organizational structure. The company utilizes a flat organizational structure in combination with corporate function-based teams and product-based or geographic divisions. The flat organization structure is organized around the leadership of Mark Zuckerberg, and the key executives around him. On the other hand, the function-based teams are based on the main corporate functions (like HR, product management, investor relations, and so on).

Goldman Sachs’ Organizational Structure

goldman-sacks-organizational-structures
Goldman Sachs has a hierarchical structure with a clear chain of command and defined career advancement process. The structure is also underpinned by business-type divisions and function-based groups.

Google Organizational Structure

google-organizational-structure
Google (Alphabet) has a cross-functional (team-based) organizational structure known as a matrix structure with some degree of flatness. Over the years, as the company scaled and it became a tech giant, its organizational structure is morphing more into a centralized organization.

IBM Organizational Structure

ibm-organizational-structure
IBM has an organizational structure characterized by product-based divisions, enabling its strategy to develop innovative and competitive products in multiple markets. IBM is also characterized by function-based segments that support product development and innovation for each product-based division, which include Global Markets, Integrated Supply Chain, Research, Development, and Intellectual Property.

McDonald’s Organizational Structure

mcdonald-organizational-structure
McDonald’s has a divisional organizational structure where each division – based on geographical location – is assigned operational responsibilities and strategic objectives. The main geographical divisions are the US, internationally operated markets, and international developmental licensed markets. And on the other hand, the hierarchical leadership structure is organized around regional and functional divisions.

McKinsey Organizational Structure

mckinsey-organizational-structure
McKinsey & Company has a decentralized organizational structure with mostly self-managing offices, committees, and employees. There are also functional groups and geographic divisions with proprietary names.

Microsoft Organizational Structure

microsoft-organizational-structure
Microsoft has a product-type divisional organizational structure based on functions and engineering groups. As the company scaled over time it also became more hierarchical, however still keeping its hybrid approach between functions, engineering groups, and management.

Nestlé Organizational Structure

nestle-organizational-structure
Nestlé has a geographical divisional structure with operations segmented into five key regions. For many years, Swiss multinational food and drink company Nestlé had a complex and decentralized matrix organizational structure where its numerous brands and subsidiaries were free to operate autonomously.

Nike Organizational Structure

nike-organizational-structure
Nike has a matrix organizational structure incorporating geographic divisions. Nike’s matrix structure is also present at the regional and sub-regional levels. Managerial responsibility is segmented according to business unit (apparel, footwear, and equipment) and function (human resources, finance, marketing, sales, and operations).

Patagonia Organizational Structure

patagonia-organizational-structure
Patagonia has a particular organizational structure, where its founder, Chouinard, disposed of the company’s ownership in the hands of two non-profits. The Patagonia Purpose Trust, holding 100% of the voting stocks, is in charge of defining the company’s strategic direction. And the Holdfast Collective, a non-profit, holds 100% of non-voting stocks, aiming to re-invest the brand’s dividends into environmental causes.

Samsung Organizational Structure

samsung-organizational-structure (1)
Samsung has a product-type divisional organizational structure where products determine how resources and business operations are categorized. The main resources around which Samsung’s corporate structure is organized are consumer electronics, IT, and device solutions. In addition, Samsung leadership functions are organized around a few career levels grades, based on experience (assistant, professional, senior professional, and principal professional).

Sony Organizational Structure

sony-organizational-structure
Sony has a matrix organizational structure primarily based on function-based groups and product/business divisions. The structure also incorporates geographical divisions. In 2021, Sony announced the overhauling of its organizational structure, changing its name from Sony Corporation to Sony Group Corporation to better identify itself as the headquarters of the Sony group of companies skewing the company toward product divisions.

Starbucks Organizational Structure

starbucks-organizational-structure
Starbucks follows a matrix organizational structure with a combination of vertical and horizontal structures. It is characterized by multiple, overlapping chains of command and divisions.

Tesla Organizational Structure

tesla-organizational-structure
Tesla is characterized by a functional organizational structure with aspects of a hierarchical structure. Tesla does employ functional centers that cover all business activities, including finance, sales, marketing, technology, engineering, design, and the offices of the CEO and chairperson. Tesla’s headquarters in Austin, Texas, decide the strategic direction of the company, with international operations given little autonomy.

Toyota Organizational Structure

toyota-organizational-structure
Toyota has a divisional organizational structure where business operations are centered around the market, product, and geographic groups. Therefore, Toyota organizes its corporate structure around global hierarchies (most strategic decisions come from Japan’s headquarter), product-based divisions (where the organization is broken down, based on each product line), and geographical divisions (according to the geographical areas under management).

Walmart Organizational Structure

walmart-organizational-structure
Walmart has a hybrid hierarchical-functional organizational structure, otherwise referred to as a matrix structure that combines multiple approaches. On the one hand, Walmart follows a hierarchical structure, where the current CEO Doug McMillon is the only employee without a direct superior, and directives are sent from top-level management. On the other hand, the function-based structure of Walmart is used to categorize employees according to their particular skills and experience.

Main Free Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA