Transactional leadership is a theory of leadership first described by German sociologist Max Weber, who originally referred to it as rational-legal leadership. The style saw heavy use in the United States after World War II as the government rebuilt the country and used a high degree of structure to maintain national stability. Transactional leadership is a leadership style focusing on supervision, organization, and performance. Compliance in subordinates is attained through reward or punishment.
Understanding transactional leadership
Weber’s theory is based on a few key assumptions:
- Subordinates are motivated by rewards and punishments.
- Subordinate performance is maximized when the chain of command is definite and clear.
- Adherence to leader instruction is the primary goal of subordinates, and
- Subordinates must be monitored to ensure performance standards are met.
Ultimately, transactional leaders view the manager-employer dyad as an exchange.
Employees who perform well are duly rewarded, while those who perform poorly are punished.
This two-exchange process gives transactional leadership its name.
The three major dimensions of transactional leadership
During the 1990s, researchers including James McGregor Burns, Bernard M. Bass, Jane Howell, and Bruce Avolio advanced Weber’s original theory.
In so doing, they defined three major dimensions:
Transactional leaders link goals with rewards.
They clarify expectations, provide the necessary resources, and establish mutually agreed-upon objectives based on the SMART goal-setting framework.
Active management by exception
Transactional leaders actively monitor subordinate teams, anticipate problems, and employ corrective actions when required.
Passive management by exception
Lastly, transactional leaders prefer not to micromanage their teams.
They only feel the need to intervene when performance standards do not meet expectations.
Real-world examples of transactional leadership
Transactional leadership is successfully employed in many contexts, including:
Policing agencies and first responder organizations that regularly deal with crises.
Coaching professional sports teams
The coaching of professional sports teams, where coaches motivate players with the reward of winning a game.
Business process management
Projects requiring linear and specific processes. These are typically seen in manufacturing and other highly regulated industries.
Organizations with well-defined problems and universally understood rules and regulations.
Organizations with a preference for middle management where most activities and operations are fixed.
Sales, where employees are motivated to perform by meeting aggressive quotas.
Military and politics. U.S. Republican senator Joseph McCarthy and French army officer and later president Charles de Gaulle are two prime examples.
Traits of a transactional leadership
Below are some of the general traits or characteristics that describe transactional leadership.
While many of these traits may be seen as undesirable by the subordinate, they are effective when applied to the appropriate situation.
Transactional leaders go through proper channels and processes when discussing new strategies or initiatives.
Failure to bring these initiatives to the attention of upper management is seen as insubordination.
Transactional leadership is characterized by maintaining the status quo.
They prefer a relatively passive management style and avoid changing internal processes or systems unless they are forced.
These leaders also make pragmatic decisions based on current constraints and the information at hand.
They very rarely employ creative or innovative thinking.
When the transactional leader and their followers earn rewards for hitting quotas or meeting objectives, a collaborative team atmosphere is sacrificed or at the very least, underappreciated.
In many cases, subordinates are more concerned with beating their colleagues and being promoted to upper management.
- Transactional leadership is a leadership style focusing on supervision, organization, and performance. It was first described by German sociologist Max Weber after the Second World War.
- Transactional leadership is characterized by an exchange in the manager-subordinate dyad. Subordinates are rewarded if they perform well and punished if they perform poorly.
- Transactional leadership is present in many contexts. It is perhaps most suited to the professional sports industry, where coaches use the prospect of winning to motivate players. The style is also common in policing, emergency response, politics, sales, and manufacturing.
- Transactional Leadership Theory: Transactional Leadership is a leadership theory first outlined by Max Weber, a German sociologist. Originally known as rational-legal leadership, it gained prominence after World War II during the United States’ post-war reconstruction efforts.
- Key Assumptions of Transactional Leadership:
- Motivation by Rewards and Punishments: Subordinates are motivated by the promise of rewards for good performance and punishments for poor performance.
- Clear Chain of Command: Well-defined hierarchy and structure maximize subordinate performance.
- Adherence to Instructions: Subordinates’ primary goal is to follow the leader’s instructions.
- Performance Monitoring: Regular monitoring of subordinates is necessary to ensure performance standards are met.
- Exchange-based Approach: Transactional leaders view leadership as an exchange where employees who perform well are rewarded, and those who perform poorly face punishment. This two-way process forms the basis of transactional leadership.
- Three Dimensions of Transactional Leadership:
- Contingent Rewards: Leaders link objectives with rewards, setting clear expectations, providing resources, and defining objectives using the SMART goal-setting framework.
- Active Management by Exception: Leaders actively monitor subordinates, anticipate issues, and intervene when performance deviates from expectations.
- Passive Management by Exception: Leaders only intervene when performance falls below established standards.
- Applications of Transactional Leadership:
- Emergency Response and Policing Agencies: Transactional leadership suits organizations dealing with crises and requiring structured responses.
- Professional Sports Coaching: The reward of victory motivates players to perform at their best.
- Business Process Management: Industries like manufacturing that rely on specific processes and regulations.
- Organizational Design: Organizations with well-defined rules and a preference for middle management.
- Sales Performance: Sales teams motivated by meeting sales quotas.
- Military and Politics: Figures like U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy and French President Charles de Gaulle.
- Traits of Transactional Leadership:
- Hierarchical Approach: Leaders follow proper channels and seek approval for new strategies.
- Laissez-Faire Management Style: Preferring passive management and maintaining the status quo.
- Pragmatic Decision-Making: Practical decisions based on current constraints, rather than innovative thinking.
- Motivated Self-Interest: Subordinates’ focus on individual rewards can undermine teamwork and collaboration.
- Key Takeaways:
- Transactional leadership emphasizes supervision, organization, and performance.
- Subordinates are motivated through an exchange of rewards for good performance and punishments for poor performance.
- This leadership style is present in various industries, including professional sports, emergency response, and sales.
Connected Leadership Concepts
Main Free Guides: