Depending on who you ask, there are two prevalent definitions of a sustainable business model.
The first definition posits that a sustainable business model is one that creates value for all stakeholders without depleting the resources that produced it.
The second interpretation is much simpler and one that many are more familiar with.
In this context, the company prioritizes sustainable, positive, long-term impact by striving to balance economic, social, and environmental pillars.
With those definitions in mind, below is a look at some sustainable business models from companies in a variety of industries.
PepsiCo

PepsiCo’s business model is built around a belief that there is an opportunity to improve how the world produces, distributes, consumes, and disposes of food and drink.
The company’s strategy permeates every aspect of its circular value chain to reduce GHG emissions, recycle packaging materials, and rejuvenate vital water supplies.
In 2021, the company announced the pep+ (PepsiCo Positive) strategy to drive positive action for people and the planet.
Among many other initiatives, Pepsi wants to improve farming communities that provide crucial raw materials and inspire customers to make sustainable choices that benefit the planet.
Nike

The “Move to Zero” sustainability campaign is part of Nike’s commitment to reduce its carbon emissions and waste production to zero.
Importantly, Nike realizes that its sustainable business model can only work if the entire industry works together.
To that end, the company plans for its factories in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia to be 100% solar-powered by 2025.
Nike is also revolutionizing its manufacturing and fabric production processes.
For one, it is reducing the size of its cardboard shoe boxes so that less tissue paper and wrapping are required.
The company also eradicated single-use plastic bags at the end of 2021 and has implemented a system where customers can identify which of its products contain more than 50% reused materials.
Ford

Ford has a broad sustainability strategy based on three key aspects:
- Hard data – Ford employs a team of climate scientists to predict its future carbon emissions. Then, the team works backward to determine the acceptable fuel efficiency that all future vehicles need to demonstrate.
- Short-term and long-term challenges – while Ford is taking advantage of the hype surrounding electric vehicles, it is also enhancing its internal combustion engine fleet with advanced technologies and innovation.
- Pragmatism – Ford acknowledges that while 9 billion will be on the planet by 2050, this is not an open invitation for it to sell more cars. Here, Ford is placing the needs of the planet and society above revenue and market saturation.
Ben & Jerry’s
Ice cream brand Ben & Jerry’s has a long history of utilizing a sustainable business model.
As early as 2002, the company was implementing carbon offset programs and investing to increase the efficiency of its supply chains and manufacturing operations.
The company’s main environmental impact stems from dairy cow emissions on farms in which it sources milk and cream.
Like Ford, Ben & Jerry’s has established science-backed GHG reduction goals which are verified by third parties.
Specific actions to reduce emissions include no-till cropping, crop rotation, and investment in manure separators and digesters that limit the amount of methane gas produced.
Key takeaways:
- Sustainable business models are those that create value for stakeholders without depleting the resources that produced them. Other definitions incorporate value creation that is sensitive to environmental, social, and economic factors.
- PepsiCo’s sustainable business model permeates every aspect of its value chain to change the way people consume and dispose of food and drink. Nike’s model relies on industry cooperation and alignment to be successful.
- Sustainability at Ford involves setting realistic, relevant, and science-based objectives. Ice cream manufacturer Ben & Jerry’s has also utilized scientific research to develop ways to reduce methane emissions.
Key highlights of sustainable business models
- PepsiCo:
- Sustainable business model focused on improving the food and drink production, distribution, consumption, and disposal processes.
- Introduced the pep+ (PepsiCo Positive) strategy to drive positive action for people and the planet.
- Initiatives include reducing GHG emissions, recycling packaging materials, and supporting farming communities that provide raw materials.
- Nike:
- Sustainable business model centered around reducing carbon emissions and waste production to zero through the “Move to Zero” campaign.
- Committed to making products more sustainably and building a positive impact in communities.
- Plans to have factories in Vietnam, China, and Indonesia running on 100% solar power by 2025.
- Ford:
- Broad sustainability strategy based on hard data, short-term and long-term challenges, and pragmatism.
- Employs climate scientists to predict future carbon emissions and sets fuel efficiency goals for all future vehicles.
- Balances advancements in electric vehicles with improvements in internal combustion engine fleet.
- Ben & Jerry’s:
- Long history of utilizing a sustainable business model, implementing carbon offset programs since 2002.
- Focuses on reducing environmental impact, particularly dairy cow emissions on farms.
- Implements science-backed GHG reduction goals, including no-till cropping, crop rotation, and methane reduction measures.
Sustainable Business Model Ideas
| Sustainable Business Model KPIs | Description | Formula to Measure | When to Use | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Emissions Reduction | Measures the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by the business. | (Previous Emissions – Current Emissions) / Previous Emissions | To track progress in reducing carbon footprint. | Demonstrates environmental commitment. | Data accuracy may be challenging. |
| Energy Efficiency | Evaluates the efficiency of energy consumption and reduction efforts. | (Energy Saved / Total Energy Consumed) x 100% | To reduce energy costs and environmental impact. | Lowers energy-related expenses. | Requires investment in energy-saving tech. |
| Waste Reduction | Tracks the reduction in waste generation and landfill contributions. | (Previous Waste – Current Waste) / Previous Waste | To minimize waste and promote recycling. | Reduces waste disposal costs. | May involve process changes and costs. |
| Water Conservation | Measures the reduction in water consumption by the business. | (Previous Water Usage – Current Water Usage) / Previous Water Usage | To minimize water usage and costs. | Supports sustainable resource management. | May require equipment upgrades. |
| Sustainable Sourcing | Assesses the percentage of materials and resources from sustainable sources. | (Sustainable Materials / Total Materials) x 100% | To promote ethical and eco-friendly sourcing. | Enhances brand reputation. | Sustainable materials can be costly. |
| Circular Economy Adoption | Tracks the extent to which the business adopts circular economy practices. | (Circular Economy Revenue / Total Revenue) x 100% | To reduce waste and maximize resource use. | Fosters resource efficiency. | Transition may require new processes. |
| Social Impact Metrics | Measures the positive social impact generated by the business model. | (Total Social Impact Value / Total Revenue) x 100% | To assess the company’s social contributions. | Enhances brand’s social responsibility. | Impact measurement can be subjective. |
| Biodiversity Conservation | Evaluates efforts to protect and enhance local biodiversity. | (Biodiversity Enhancement Activities / Total Activities) x 100% | To support ecosystem conservation. | Demonstrates ecological commitment. | Requires ongoing monitoring and investment. |
| Fair Labor Practices | Assesses adherence to fair labor practices and workers’ rights. | (Total Fair Labor Audits Passed / Total Audits Conducted) x 100% | To ensure ethical treatment of workers. | Builds a socially responsible image. | Non-compliance can damage reputation. |
| Supplier Sustainability | Measures the sustainability efforts of the company’s suppliers. | (Sustainable Suppliers / Total Suppliers) x 100% | To ensure the supply chain aligns with sustainability. | Enhances supply chain resilience. | Limited control over supplier practices. |
| Stakeholder Engagement | Evaluates the level of engagement and feedback from stakeholders. | (Total Stakeholder Engagement Activities / Total Stakeholders) x 100% | To strengthen relationships and transparency. | Improves decision-making and trust. | Requires dedicated resources for engagement. |
| Economic Impact | Measures the positive economic impact on local communities. | (Economic Contributions to Community / Total Revenue) x 100% | To assess the company’s community support. | Enhances brand’s local reputation. | Impact measurement can be subjective. |
| Green Product Development | Tracks the percentage of new products designed with sustainability in mind. | (Green Products Developed / Total Products Developed) x 100% | To promote eco-friendly product offerings. | Meets growing customer demand. | R&D investment may be required. |
| Sustainable Packaging | Measures the adoption of sustainable and eco-friendly packaging. | (Sustainable Packaging Used / Total Packaging Used) x 100% | To reduce packaging waste and environmental impact. | Aligns with consumer preferences. | May require changes in packaging suppliers. |
| Social Equality | Assesses efforts to promote social equality and inclusion. | (Equality Initiatives Implemented / Total Initiatives Implemented) x 100% | To foster diversity and inclusion. | Supports a diverse and inclusive workforce. | Impact measurement can be subjective. |
| Supply Chain Transparency | Measures the transparency of the supply chain, from sourcing to delivery. | (Transparency Efforts Implemented / Total Supply Chain Efforts) x 100% | To enhance visibility and accountability. | Builds trust with customers and partners. | May require technology investments. |
| Employee Well-being | Evaluates initiatives to improve employee well-being and work-life balance. | (Well-being Programs Implemented / Total Employee Programs) x 100% | To support employee health and satisfaction. | Enhances employee retention and morale. | Impact measurement can be subjective. |
| Sustainable Transportation | Tracks the use of eco-friendly transportation and commuting options. | (Sustainable Transportation Utilized / Total Transportation) x 100% | To reduce the carbon footprint of transportation. | Aligns with environmental goals. | May require investment in green vehicles. |
| Green Energy Adoption | Measures the adoption of renewable and green energy sources. | (Green Energy Usage / Total Energy Usage) x 100% | To reduce reliance on fossil fuels. | Lowers energy-related carbon emissions. | Initial investment in green tech. |
| Ethics Training | Assesses the training and education on ethical practices provided to employees. | (Ethics Training Hours / Total Employee Training Hours) x 100% | To promote ethical conduct within the organization. | Supports ethical decision-making. | Impact on employee behavior can vary. |
| Sustainable Reporting | Evaluates the transparency and quality of sustainability reporting. | (Sustainability Reports Published / Total Reports Published) x 100% | To communicate sustainability efforts to stakeholders. | Builds trust and credibility. | Requires dedicated reporting resources. |
| Social Impact Investment | Measures the percentage of revenue allocated to social impact initiatives. | (Social Impact Investment / Total Revenue) x 100% | To allocate resources for social responsibility. | Demonstrates commitment to social impact. | Impact measurement can be subjective. |
| Environmental Audits | Tracks the frequency and results of environmental audits. | (Successful Audits Conducted / Total Audits Conducted) x 100% | To ensure compliance with environmental regulations. | Identifies areas for improvement. | Audit process can be resource-intensive. |
| Sustainable Agriculture | Measures the adoption of sustainable and eco-friendly agricultural practices. | (Sustainable Agriculture Practices Used / Total Agriculture Practices) x 100% | To promote eco-friendly food production. | Aligns with sustainable sourcing goals. | May require education and training. |
| Community Engagement | Evaluates the level of engagement and support provided to local communities. | (Community Engagement Activities / Total Community Initiatives) x 100% | To strengthen relationships and social impact. | Enhances brand’s community reputation. | Requires dedicated resources for engagement. |
| Emissions Offset | Tracks the offsetting of carbon emissions through eco-friendly initiatives. | (Total Emissions Offset / Total Emissions) x 100% | To neutralize carbon footprint. | Demonstrates commitment to carbon neutrality. | Offset effectiveness may vary. |
| Sustainable Procurement | Measures the sustainability of procurement practices and sourcing decisions. | (Sustainable Procurement Actions / Total Procurement Actions) x 100% | To align procurement with sustainability goals. | Ensures ethical and eco-friendly sourcing. | Limited control over external suppliers. |
| Sustainable Innovations | Tracks the development and adoption of sustainable innovations and technologies. | (Sustainable Innovations Implemented / Total Innovations Implemented) x 100% | To drive eco-friendly product or process improvements. | Demonstrates industry leadership. | Innovation may require significant investment. |
Related Case Studies







Read also: Business Strategy, Examples, Case Studies, And Tools
Read Next: Lean Canvas, Agile Project Management, Scrum, MVP, VTDF.
Main Free Guides:








