skills-matrix

Skills Matrix Vs. Competency Matrix

A skills matrix is a framework that companies use to visualize the skills employees possess and the level at which they possess them. This framework is commonly used to determine what is required in a team to complete a project or task successfully.

AspectSkills MatrixCompetency Matrix
DefinitionA Skills Matrix is a tool used by organizations to assess and track the skills possessed by their employees. It helps in identifying skills gaps, training needs, and optimizing resource allocation.A Competency Matrix is a broader tool that evaluates not only skills but also the knowledge, behaviors, and attributes required for effective job performance. It assesses employees’ overall competencies.
FocusSkills Matrix primarily focuses on the specific skills and abilities possessed by individuals. It categorizes skills into different levels, such as beginner, intermediate, advanced, or by proficiency.Competency Matrix has a broader focus, encompassing skills, knowledge, behaviors, and attributes that contribute to job performance and organizational success. It evaluates employees’ overall competencies.
ComponentsA Skills Matrix typically includes a list of skills or competencies required for a job or project and assesses individuals’ proficiency levels in each skill. It may use a simple matrix format with skill names and ratings.A Competency Matrix includes a more comprehensive set of competencies, often categorized into knowledge, skills, behaviors, and attributes. It assesses individuals’ proficiency or competence in each category.
MeasurementSkills in a Skills Matrix are usually measured on a proficiency scale, such as levels (e.g., basic, intermediate, advanced), numerical ratings (e.g., 1 to 5), or binary (e.g., yes/no).Competencies in a Competency Matrix may be measured using various rating scales, including qualitative descriptions, numerical ratings, or behavioral indicators.
PurposeSkills Matrices are primarily used for assessing technical or job-specific skills. They help organizations ensure that employees possess the required skills for their roles.Competency Matrices are used for a more holistic assessment of employees. They consider not only technical skills but also soft skills, behaviors, and knowledge critical for job success.
Employee DevelopmentSkills Matrices are often used to identify skill gaps and tailor training and development programs to improve specific skills.Competency Matrices support broader employee development by identifying gaps in competencies and guiding comprehensive training and development plans.
Job MatchingSkills Matrices are valuable for matching individuals to specific roles based on their technical skills, ensuring a good fit for job requirements.Competency Matrices consider a broader range of attributes and behaviors, aiding in matching individuals to roles where a holistic set of competencies is crucial.
Recruitment and SelectionSkills Matrices may be used in the recruitment process to assess candidates’ technical skills and determine if they meet job requirements.Competency Matrices can assist in selecting candidates based on their overall suitability and alignment with the organization’s core competencies and values.
Performance EvaluationSkills Matrices can be used for evaluating individual performance, primarily focusing on technical skill development and achievement.Competency Matrices support a more comprehensive performance evaluation, including assessing employees’ behaviors, attributes, and overall contribution.
Succession PlanningSkills Matrices are essential for identifying potential successors based on their technical skills and readiness to take on specific roles.Competency Matrices play a significant role in succession planning by considering the broader competencies required for leadership and key positions.
Organizational AlignmentSkills Matrices are aligned with specific job roles and their skill requirements, ensuring that employees can perform their tasks effectively.Competency Matrices contribute to organizational alignment by evaluating employees against a set of core competencies aligned with the company’s values and goals.
AdaptabilitySkills Matrices may require frequent updates to reflect changes in job requirements or technology advancements, making them adaptable to evolving skill needs.Competency Matrices are more stable over time as they encompass a broader set of competencies. However, they may still require periodic review and adjustment to remain relevant.
ComplexitySkills Matrices are simpler and more straightforward in structure, making them easier to create and maintain.Competency Matrices are more complex due to the diverse range of competencies they assess, requiring more effort to develop and manage.
CustomizationSkills Matrices are often customized for specific job roles or projects, tailoring the list of skills and proficiency levels accordingly.Competency Matrices can be highly customized to align with the organization’s unique competencies and values, allowing for a more personalized approach.
Data CollectionSkills Matrices rely on data collection related to specific skills and proficiency levels, often through self-assessment, manager assessments, or training records.Competency Matrices require a more extensive data collection process, including behavioral observations, 360-degree feedback, and assessments of knowledge and attributes.
Implementation EffortSkills Matrices are relatively easier to implement due to their simplicity, making them suitable for organizations looking for a quick skills assessment solution.Competency Matrices require more extensive planning, data gathering, and alignment with organizational goals, making their implementation effort higher.
Integration with HR SystemsSkills Matrices can be integrated into HR systems and software for skills tracking and reporting.Competency Matrices, due to their complexity, may require more sophisticated HR software solutions to effectively manage and report on competencies.

What is a competency matrix?

A competency matrix is simply another name for a skills matrix.

While each matrix serves the same purpose irrespective of the name it is given, there do exist some differences between the way employee skills and competencies are defined.

Furthermore, for a skills matrix to be complete, both skills and competencies must be included.

In the next sections, we’ll define each term and how they contribute to organizational performance.

How are skills defined?

In the context of skills management, a skill is a learned ability that allows a person to proficiently perform or execute a particular task.

Another way to think of skills is that they clarify what a potential recruit can and cannot do.

Skills are said to be granular because they describe specific competencies such as:

  • C++. 
  • Data entry.
  • HTML. 
  • Programming, and
  • Quality assurance.

How are competencies defined?

While skills are specific and granular, competencies tend to be broader and are used to describe the capabilities of an organization’s workforce.

It is also important to note that multiple skills comprise a single competence.

Within competencies themselves exist three elements:

Ability

A measure of how well an employee can perform a particular skill.

In other words, can the employee apply the skill in a reasonable amount of time with a reasonable amount of energy?

Multiple abilities can form capabilities that, like competencies, are used to describe skills more broadly.

Knowledge

Information that is obtained and understood via study and experience.

Employees with knowledge can describe a subject in the absence of physical exposure to it via comprehension and memorization of facts.

Desire

A measure of an employee’s interest to perform, develop, and maintain competency in a skill.

Those with the ability and knowledge but without sufficient desire will find that their competency diminishes.

How can organizations benefit from competencies?

Tracking systems are used to monitor employee ability, knowledge, and desire to ensure the organization benefits from a certain level of competence.

To realize these benefits, the employee must be able to perform a skill (or group of skills) in a valid way. 

For example, the group of skills a HR manager must be competent in include:

  • Effective communication.
  • Proficiency in recruitment, onboarding, and payroll platforms.
  • Critical thinking.
  • Skills matrix creation and integration.
  • Conflict management, and
  • Soft interpersonal skills such as active listening, social awareness, and accountability.

How can organizations benefit from skills or competency matrices?

Organizations can also use these matrices to:

Determine if specific skills or competencies are missing

This will necessitate corrective action such as training of existing employees or recruitment of new employees.

Set clear job expectations

Skill and competency matrices set clear expectations around the attributes required for a specific role. This has implications for performance reviews and KPIs.

Improve employee engagement and motivation

Lastly, these matrices can be used to match employees with roles that suit their unique skill set. This results in motivated employees and happy customers.

Key takeaways:

  • There is no difference between a skills matrix and a competency matrix. Both serve as frameworks to analyze employee skill sets, identify skill gaps, improve employee engagement, and set clear job expectations.
  • The skills matrix does differentiate between skills and competencies, however. In short, skills are specific and granular abilities with multiple skills forming a single competency.
  • Competencies also tend to be broader than skills and are used to describe the capabilities of an organization’s workforce. To benefit from these competencies, organizations use tracking systems to monitor employee ability, knowledge, and desire.

Key Highlights:

  • Skills Matrix & Competency Matrix:
    • Both serve as frameworks to help companies visualize employee skill sets.
    • They are often used interchangeably but have nuances in their definitions.
  • Definition of Skills:
    • A learned ability that allows a person to proficiently perform a specific task.
    • Examples include C++, Data entry, HTML, Programming, and Quality assurance.
  • Definition of Competencies:
    • Broader than skills, they describe the capabilities of an organization’s workforce.
    • A single competence can be made up of multiple skills.
    • Three elements within competencies are:
      • Ability: How well an employee can perform a skill.
      • Knowledge: Information obtained and understood through study and experience.
      • Desire: Employee’s interest to perform, develop, and maintain competency in a skill.
  • Benefits from Competencies:
    • Organizations use tracking systems to monitor the three elements of competencies: Ability, Knowledge, and Desire.
    • To benefit from competencies, the employee must be competent in a group of skills like those needed for an HR manager.
  • Benefits from Skills or Competency Matrices:
    • Identify missing skills or competencies.
    • Set clear job expectations and performance review benchmarks.
    • Improve employee engagement by matching roles to unique skill sets.
  • Key Takeaways:
    • No inherent difference between a skills matrix and a competency matrix.
    • Skills are specific and granular, while competencies are broader.
    • Multiple skills form a single competency.
    • Organizations use tracking systems to ensure the benefits from competencies are realized.

Related Frameworks, Models, ConceptsDescriptionWhen to Apply
Skills Matrix– A grid that displays individuals’ abilities across various skills, showing what skills are covered and identifying any gaps. It helps in planning for training, development, and team assignments.– Ideal for teams to visualize skill levels and plan development activities, suitable for both small teams and large departments.
Competency Matrix– Similar to the Skills Matrix, but includes behavioral and technical competencies. It’s used to assess and display levels of proficiency across a range of competencies.– Useful for HR to manage career paths, succession planning, and comprehensive employee development programs.
Performance Management System– A systematic process by which an organization involves its employees in improving organizational effectiveness in the accomplishment of its mission and goals.– Critical for ongoing assessment and development of employee performance, aligning individual achievements with business objectives.
Training Needs Analysis (TNA)– A process that helps organizations identify the skills and knowledge gaps within their workforce, so that they can deliver the most appropriate training.– Applied prior to designing training programs to ensure that training meets the actual needs of the workforce and the business.
Job Evaluation– A systematic way to determine the value/worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organization. It helps in designing a fair and equitable pay framework.– Necessary for establishing a fair compensation structure that reflects the relative value of each job in an organization.
360-Degree Feedback– A feedback process where employees receive confidential, anonymous feedback from the people who work around them, including peers, managers, and direct reports.– Utilized for comprehensive performance reviews that include insights from various perspectives within the organization.
Succession Planning– A strategy for passing on leadership roles, and ensuring that businesses continue to run smoothly after key people move on to new opportunities, retire, or pass away.– Essential for maintaining continuity and preparing for the future leadership needs of an organization.
Employee Onboarding– The process of integrating a new employee into the organization and its culture, equipping them with the necessary knowledge and skills to become effective members of the team.– Important for ensuring that new hires are successfully acclimated to their roles and the company, boosting long-term retention and effectiveness.
Talent Acquisition Strategy– A long-term approach to identifying, attracting, and hiring talented individuals to meet organizational needs.– Applied in strategic HR planning to ensure a steady pipeline of skilled personnel ready to fill key roles.
Organizational Development (OD)– A field of research, theory, and practice dedicated to expanding the knowledge and effectiveness of people to accomplish more successful organizational change and performance.– Necessary for improving organizational results through strategic interventions in change management and employee development.

Read Next: OKRSMART Goals.

Connected Leadership Concepts And Frameworks

Leadership Styles

leadership-styles
Leadership styles encompass the behavioral qualities of a leader. These qualities are commonly used to direct, motivate, or manage groups of people. Some of the most recognized leadership styles include Autocratic, Democratic, or Laissez-Faire leadership styles.

Agile Leadership

agile-leadership
Agile leadership is the embodiment of agile manifesto principles by a manager or management team. Agile leadership impacts two important levels of a business. The structural level defines the roles, responsibilities, and key performance indicators. The behavioral level describes the actions leaders exhibit to others based on agile principles. 

Adaptive Leadership

adaptive-leadership
Adaptive leadership is a model used by leaders to help individuals adapt to complex or rapidly changing environments. Adaptive leadership is defined by three core components (precious or expendable, experimentation and smart risks, disciplined assessment). Growth occurs when an organization discards ineffective ways of operating. Then, active leaders implement new initiatives and monitor their impact.

Blue Ocean Leadership

blue-ocean-leadership
Authors and strategy experts Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne developed the idea of blue ocean leadership. In the same way that Kim and Mauborgne’s blue ocean strategy enables companies to create uncontested market space, blue ocean leadership allows companies to benefit from unrealized employee talent and potential.

Delegative Leadership

delegative-leadership
Developed by business consultants Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey in the 1960s, delegative leadership is a leadership style where authority figures empower subordinates to exercise autonomy. For this reason, it is also called laissez-faire leadership. In some cases, this type of leadership can lead to increases in work quality and decision-making. In a few other cases, this type of leadership needs to be balanced out to prevent a lack of direction and cohesiveness of the team.

Distributed Leadership

distributed-leadership
Distributed leadership is based on the premise that leadership responsibilities and accountability are shared by those with the relevant skills or expertise so that the shared responsibility and accountability of multiple individuals within a workplace, bulds up as a fluid and emergent property (not controlled or held by one individual). Distributed leadership is based on eight hallmarks, or principles: shared responsibility, shared power, synergy, leadership capacity, organizational learning, equitable and ethical climate, democratic and investigative culture, and macro-community engagement.

Ethical Leadership

ethical-leadership
Ethical leaders adhere to certain values and beliefs irrespective of whether they are in the home or office. In essence, ethical leaders are motivated and guided by the inherent dignity and rights of other people.

Transformational Leadership

transformational-leadership
Transformational leadership is a style of leadership that motivates, encourages, and inspires employees to contribute to company growth. Leadership expert James McGregor Burns first described the concept of transformational leadership in a 1978 book entitled Leadership. Although Burns’ research was focused on political leaders, the term is also applicable for businesses and organizational psychology.

Leading by Example

leading-by-example
Those who lead by example let their actions (and not their words) exemplify acceptable forms of behavior or conduct. In a manager-subordinate context, the intention of leading by example is for employees to emulate this behavior or conduct themselves.

Leader vs. Boss

leader-vs-boss
A leader is someone within an organization who possesses the ability to influence and lead others by example. Leaders inspire, support, and encourage those beneath them and work continuously to achieve objectives. A boss is someone within an organization who gives direct orders to subordinates, tends to be autocratic, and prefers to be in control at all times.

Situational Leadership

situational-leadership
Situational leadership is based on situational leadership theory. Developed by authors Paul Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard in the late 1960s, the theory’s fundamental belief is that there is no single leadership style that is best for every situation. Situational leadership is based on the belief that no single leadership style is best. In other words, the best style depends on the situation at hand.

Succession Planning

succession-planning
Succession planning is a process that involves the identification and development of future leaders across all levels within a company. In essence, succession planning is a way for businesses to prepare for the future. The process ensures that when a key employee decides to leave, the company has someone else in the pipeline to fill their position.

Fiedler’s Contingency Model

fiedlers-contingency-model
Fielder’s contingency model argues no style of leadership is superior to the rest evaluated against three measures of situational control, including leader-member relations, task structure, and leader power level. In Fiedler’s contingency model, task-oriented leaders perform best in highly favorable and unfavorable circumstances. Relationship-oriented leaders perform best in situations that are moderately favorable but can improve their position by using superior interpersonal skills.

Management vs. Leadership

management-vs-leadership

Cultural Models

cultural-models
In the context of an organization, cultural models are frameworks that define, shape, and influence corporate culture. Cultural models also provide some structure to a corporate culture that tends to be fluid and vulnerable to change. Once upon a time, most businesses utilized a hierarchical culture where various levels of management oversaw subordinates below them. Today, however, there exists a greater diversity in models as leaders realize the top-down approach is outdated in many industries and that success can be found elsewhere.

Action-Centered Leadership

action-centered-leadership
Action-centered leadership defines leadership in the context of three interlocking areas of responsibility and concern. This framework is used by leaders in the management of teams, groups, and organizations. Developed in the 1960s and first published in 1973, action-centered leadership was revolutionary for its time because it believed leaders could learn the skills they needed to manage others effectively. Adair believed that effective leadership was exemplified by three overlapping circles (responsibilities): achieve the task, build and maintain the team, and develop the individual.

High-Performance Coaching

high-performance-coaching
High-performance coaches work with individuals in personal and professional contexts to enable them to reach their full potential. While these sorts of coaches are commonly associated with sports, it should be noted that the act of coaching is a specific type of behavior that is also useful in business and leadership

Forms of Power

forms-of-power
When most people are asked to define power, they think about the power a leader possesses as a function of their responsibility for subordinates. Others may think that power comes from the title or position this individual holds. 

Tipping Point Leadership

tipping-point-leadership
Tipping Point Leadership is a low-cost means of achieving a strategic shift in an organization by focusing on extremes. Here, the extremes may refer to small groups of people, acts, and activities that exert a disproportionate influence over business performance.

Vroom-Yetton Decision Model

vroom-yetton-decision-model-explained
The Vroom-Yetton decision model is a decision-making process based on situational leadership. According to this model, there are five decision-making styles guides group-based decision-making according to the situation at hand and the level of involvement of subordinates: Autocratic Type 1 (AI), Autocratic Type 2 (AII), Consultative Type 1 (CI), Consultative Type 2 (CII), Group-based Type 2 (GII).

Likert’s Management Systems

likerts-management-systems
Likert’s management systems were developed by American social psychologist Rensis Likert. Likert’s management systems are a series of leadership theories based on the study of various organizational dynamics and characteristics. Likert proposed four systems of management, which can also be thought of as leadership styles: Exploitative authoritative, Benevolent authoritative, Consultative, Participative.

Main Guides:

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA