The ADL matrix was developed and named after the consulting firm Arthur D. Little, Inc. (ADL) in the late 1970s. It is one of several portfolio planning matrices representing the various businesses of a company in two-dimensional form. The ADL matrix is a portfolio management technique used to strengthen a product portfolio or strategic business unit.
The ADL matrix is most often associated with strategic planning at the business unit level. However, it is also effective when applied to product lines or at the individual product level.
Fundamentally, the matrix plots five competitive positions of a business against four maturity levels of the industry in which it operates.
Insights from the matrix are then used by managers to guide general product strategy to attain a dominant market position.
In the following section, we will discuss each parameter in the matrix in more depth.
Plotting the ADL matrix
Competitive position
The competitive position of a company is determined by assessing the following categories and criteria:
Dominant
A rare position where a company has a monopoly or protected leadership within its market.
Profits are consistently strong and market share is maintained.
Strong
Describing a company with a strong market position with a few competitors.
The market is typically divided, allowing each player to make money.
Favorable
Or a company operating in a fragmented market with no dominant player.
However, one player may still enjoy a competitive advantage in one segment of the market.
Tenable
Most commonly describing a company occupying a niche market or in a limited geographical area.
Weak
Companies in a weak competitive position are small players in an aggressive market.
Their small size makes it difficult to maintain profitability.
Industry life cycle
In the ADL matrix, there are four stages of the industry life cycle:
Embryonic
A new or emerging industry characterized by rapid growth, little competition, new technology, and high investment and prices.
Growth
A slightly stronger market with few competitors and strong sales.
First movers enjoy significant benefits for bringing products to market.
Mature
Or stable markets with a stable customer base and market share.
High competitive pressure means businesses focus more effort on differentiation.
Aging
In aging industries, product demand decreases, and the cost of differentiation becomes prohibitively expensive.
This causes some companies to abandon the market.
Interpreting the ADL matrix
With each combination of competitive position and industry life cycle stage, the matrix guides future strategy in twenty different scenarios.
Some of the more pertinent combination scenarios are provided below:
Dominant position/embryonic industry
Maintain position by preventing the establishment of new businesses. Efforts should be focused on securing as much market share as possible.
Find a niche within the market that facilitates growth while protecting the current position.
Weak position/embryonic industry
Get out of the market if profitability cannot be assured.
Weak position/aging industry
Abandon the market.
Key takeaways
The ADL matrix is a portfolio management technique and may be used to strengthen a strategic business unit (SBU), product portfolio, or individual product.
The ADL matrix plots the competitive position of a business against the maturity of the industry it operates in, with the latter based on a four-stage life cycle.
Each combination of competitive position and industry maturity on the ADL matrix yields twenty different scenarios that influence future strategy decisions.
Key Highlights
Introduction to the ADL Matrix:
The ADL Matrix was developed by the consulting firm Arthur D. Little, Inc. in the late 1970s.
It’s a portfolio management technique used to analyze and strengthen a company’s product portfolio or strategic business unit.
Scope of Application:
The ADL Matrix is commonly used for strategic planning at the business unit level, but it can also be applied to product lines or individual products.
Matrix Parameters: Competitive Position and Industry Life Cycle:
The matrix plots a company’s competitive position against the maturity levels of the industry it operates in.
Competitive Position is categorized into: Dominant, Strong, Favorable, Tenable, and Weak.
Industry Life Cycle is categorized into: Embryonic, Growth, Mature, and Aging.
Interpreting the Matrix: Strategy Scenarios:
The matrix helps guide strategy decisions based on the combination of competitive position and industry life cycle stage.
Dominant Position/Aging Industry: Maintain position and maximize profit.
Favorable Position/Growth Industry: Invest to increase market share.
Favorable Position/Mature Industry: Find a niche for growth.
Weak Position/Embryonic Industry: Exit if profitability is uncertain.
Weak Position/Aging Industry: Exit the market.
Key Takeaways:
The ADL Matrix is a valuable tool for strengthening SBUs, product portfolios, or individual products.
It aligns competitive position and industry life cycle to provide insights into future strategy.
Case Study
Steps
Description
Examples
1. Identify Products
Begin by identifying and listing the products or business units within your company’s portfolio that you want to assess using the ADL Matrix.
– Products in a consumer electronics company: smartphones, tablets, smartwatches. – Business units in a conglomerate: automotive, energy, healthcare.
2. Define Market Growth Rate
Determine the market growth rate for each product or business unit. This rate represents the current or projected growth of the market in which each product operates.
Calculate the market share percentage for each product or business unit, which represents its share of the total market. Market share is typically calculated based on revenue or sales.
Plot each product or business unit on the ADL Matrix based on their market growth rate and market share. The matrix typically consists of four quadrants.
– Smartphone: Market growth rate (10%) vs. Market share (25%) positions it in Quadrant I (High Market Share, High Growth). – Energy sector: Market growth rate (4%) vs. Market share (15%) positions it in Quadrant II (Low Market Share, High Growth).
5. Analyze Quadrant Position
Analyze the position of each product or business unit within the ADL Matrix quadrants to determine their strategic implications. Different strategies are recommended for each quadrant.
– Quadrant I (Stars): Invest in growth and market leadership. – Quadrant II (Question Marks): Consider investing to gain market share or divest if not strategically viable.
6. Develop Strategies
Develop strategic actions or recommendations for each product or business unit based on their ADL Matrix quadrant positions. Strategies may involve investing, growing, holding, or divesting.
– For smartphones in Quadrant I, invest in innovation and marketing to maintain market leadership. – For the energy sector in Quadrant II, explore strategies to increase market share or consider divestment.
Related Frameworks
Description
When to Apply
SWOT Analysis
– A strategic planning tool used to identify Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats related to a business or project. SWOT Analysis helps organizations assess internal capabilities and external factors to inform strategic decision-making and goal setting.
– When analyzing internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats to inform strategic decision-making and goal setting effectively. – Utilizing SWOT Analysis to identify key factors influencing business opportunities and market competitiveness.
BCG Matrix
– A portfolio analysis tool used to evaluate strategic business units (SBUs) based on their market growth rate and relative market share. BCG Matrix categorizes SBUs into four quadrants: Stars, Question Marks, Cash Cows, and Dogs, guiding resource allocation and strategic priorities.
– When evaluating the strategic position and potential of different business units or product lines based on their market growth rate and relative market share. – Applying BCG Matrix to guide resource allocation and strategic priorities effectively among SBUs.
Porter’s Five Forces
– A framework for analyzing the competitive forces shaping an industry’s attractiveness and profitability. Porter’s Five Forces assesses the bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, the threat of new entrants, the threat of substitutes, and the intensity of competitive rivalry to inform strategic positioning and decision-making.
– When assessing the competitive dynamics and attractiveness of an industry to inform strategic positioning and decision-making effectively. – Applying Porter’s Five Forces to identify key factors influencing industry competitiveness and profitability.
Ansoff Matrix
– A strategic planning tool used to explore growth opportunities by analyzing combinations of market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification strategies. Ansoff Matrix helps organizations assess risk and select appropriate growth strategies aligned with their objectives and capabilities.
– When exploring growth opportunities and considering different strategic options, including market penetration, market development, product development, and diversification. – Utilizing Ansoff Matrix to assess risk and align growth strategies with organizational objectives effectively.
GE McKinsey Matrix
– A portfolio analysis tool used to evaluate strategic business units (SBUs) based on their industry attractiveness and competitive strength. GE McKinsey Matrix categorizes SBUs into nine cells and provides guidance on resource allocation, investment decisions, and strategic priorities.
– When evaluating the strategic position and performance of different SBUs based on industry attractiveness and competitive strength. – Applying GE McKinsey Matrix to guide resource allocation, investment decisions, and strategic priorities effectively among SBUs.
Value Chain Analysis
– A strategic analysis tool used to identify and analyze the primary and support activities that create value within a company’s operations. Value Chain Analysis helps organizations understand their competitive advantage, optimize processes, and identify opportunities for cost reduction or differentiation.
– When analyzing and optimizing internal processes to enhance competitiveness and create value within the organization’s operations effectively. – Utilizing Value Chain Analysis to identify opportunities for cost reduction, process optimization, or differentiation.
Pestle Analysis
– A strategic framework used to analyze the external macro-environmental factors that may impact a business or industry. PESTLE Analysis considers Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors to identify opportunities and threats and inform strategic planning and decision-making.
– When assessing the external factors and trends affecting a business or industry to identify opportunities and threats and inform strategic planning effectively. – Applying PESTLE Analysis to consider political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors influencing strategic decisions.
Scenario Planning
– A strategic planning technique that involves creating and analyzing multiple plausible scenarios or futures to anticipate and prepare for potential challenges and opportunities. Scenario Planning helps organizations explore uncertainties, test assumptions, and develop adaptive strategies to navigate future complexities and disruptions.
– When facing uncertainties or disruptions in the external environment and seeking to develop flexible and adaptive strategies to navigate future challenges and opportunities. – Engaging in Scenario Planning to anticipate and prepare for potential futures effectively.
Balanced Scorecard
– A strategic performance management tool used to translate an organization’s mission and strategy into measurable objectives, key performance indicators (KPIs), and targets across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. Balanced Scorecard helps organizations align strategic priorities, monitor performance, and drive continuous improvement.
– When translating organizational strategy into measurable objectives and KPIs across different perspectives to monitor performance and drive continuous improvement effectively. – Implementing Balanced Scorecard to align strategic priorities and measure performance across financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth perspectives.
Critical Success Factors (CSFs)
– Key areas or activities within an organization that must perform effectively to achieve strategic objectives and mission. Critical Success Factors (CSFs) are identified through strategic analysis and help organizations focus resources and efforts on priorities that significantly impact success.
– When identifying and prioritizing key areas or activities critical to achieving strategic objectives and mission effectively. – Utilizing Critical Success Factors (CSFs) to focus resources and efforts on priorities that significantly impact organizational success.
The SFA matrix is a framework that helps businesses evaluate strategic options. Gerry Johnson and Kevan Scholes created the SFA matrix to help businesses evaluate their strategic options before committing. Evaluation of strategic opportunities is performed by considering three criteria that make up the SFA acronym: suitability, feasibility, and acceptability.
The Hoshin Kanri X-Matrix is a strategy deployment tool that helps businesses achieve goals over the short and long term. Hoshin Kanri is a method that seeks to bridge the gap between strategy and execution. Strategic objectives are clearly defined and the goals of every level of the organization are aligned. With everyone moving in the same direction, process coordination and decision-making ability are strengthened.
The Kepner-Tregoe matrix was created by management consultants Charles H. Kepner and Benjamin B. Tregoe in the 1960s, developed to help businesses navigate the decisions they make daily, the Kepner-Tregoe matrix is a root cause analysis used in organizational decision making.
The Eisenhower Matrix is a tool that helps businesses prioritize tasks based on their urgency and importance, named after Dwight D. Eisenhower, President of the United States from 1953 to 1961, the matrix helps businesses and individuals differentiate between the urgent and important to prevent urgent things (seemingly useful in the short-term) cannibalize important things (critical for long-term success).
An action priority matrix is a productivity tool that helps businesses prioritize certain tasks and objectives over others. The matrix itself is represented by four quadrants on a typical cartesian graph. These quadrants are plotted against the effort required to complete a task (x-axis) and the impact (benefit) that each task brings once completed (y-axis). This matrix helps assess what projects need to be undertaken and the potential impact for each.
The TOWS Matrix is an acronym for Threats, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strengths. The matrix is a variation on the SWOT Analysis, and it seeks to address criticisms of the SWOT Analysis regarding its inability to show relationships between the various categories.
The GE McKinsey Matrix was developed in the 1970s after General Electric asked its consultant McKinsey to develop a portfolio management model. This matrix is a strategy tool that provides guidance on how a corporation should prioritize its investments among its business units, leading to three possible scenarios: invest, protect, harvest, and divest.
In the 1970s, Bruce D. Henderson, founder of the Boston Consulting Group, came up with The Product Portfolio (aka BCG Matrix, or Growth-share Matrix), which would look at a successful business product portfolio based on potential growth and market shares. It divided products into four main categories: cash cows, pets (dogs), question marks, and stars.
In the FourWeekMBA growth matrix, you can apply growth for existing customers by tackling the same problems (gain mode). Or by tackling existing problems, for new customers (expand mode). Or by tackling new problems for existing customers (extend mode). Or perhaps by tackling whole new problems for new customers (reinvent mode).
You can use the Ansoff Matrix as a strategic framework to understand what growthstrategy is more suited based on the market context. Developed by mathematician and business manager Igor Ansoff, it assumes a growthstrategy can be derived by whether the market is new or existing, and the product is new or existing.
The Kraljic matrix is a framework that analyzes and classifies a company’s supplier base.
Kraljic’s matrix is used by purchasers to maximize supply security/minimize supply risk and reduce costs. In so doing, it encourages them to see procurement as a strategic activity and not one that is simply transactional.
The Kraljic matrix is divided into four quadrants based on varying degrees of supply risk and profit impact. Each quadrant defines a type of supply item and a strategy that reduces risk and cost. The quadrants encompass leverage items, bottleneck items, non-critical items, and strategic items.
The product-process matrix was introduced in two articles published in the Harvard Business Review in 1979. Developed by Robert H. Hayes and Steven C. Wheelwright, the matrix assesses the relationship between The stages of the product life cycle (from ideation to growth or decline) and The stages of the process (technological) life cycle.
The Mendelow stakeholder matrix is a framework used to analyze stakeholder attitudes and expectations and their potential impact on business decisions.
A requirements traceability matrix (RTM) is a vital part of the lifecycle of any embedded system, helping organizations ensure their products are safe and meet intended standards. While the matrix has long been associated with medicine, technology, and engineering, the approach works well for any project regardless of industry. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool used to identify and maintain the status of project requirements and deliverables.
The value/effort matrix is a feature prioritization model used to build effective product roadmaps. The value/effort matrix allows product managers to prioritize their product backlog using a confident, structured approach. The product team learns how to plan an effective roadmap, identify boundaries of work, and differentiate between needs and wants.
A decision matrix is a decision-making tool that evaluates and prioritizes a list of options. Decision matrices are useful when: A list of options must be trimmed to a single choice. A decision must be made based on several criteria. A list of criteria has been made manageable through the process of elimination.
The grand strategy matrix was created by American business theorist Paul Joseph DiMaggio in 1980. The matrix, which first appeared in the Strategic Management Journal, was initially used as a strategic option tool for managers. The grand strategy matrix helps organizations develop feasible alternative strategies based on their competitive position and the growth of their industry.
Gennaro is the creator of FourWeekMBA, which reached about four million business people, comprising C-level executives, investors, analysts, product managers, and aspiring digital entrepreneurs in 2022 alone | He is also Director of Sales for a high-tech scaleup in the AI Industry | In 2012, Gennaro earned an International MBA with emphasis on Corporate Finance and Business Strategy.
