- AI development is now shaped primarily by geopolitical alignment, not by product cycles or model releases (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
- The US and China are not competing within the same system — the US pursues alliance-driven breadth, while China builds a vertically sovereign stack.
- The Deep Capital Stack begins here: whoever controls alliances, chokepoints, protocols, and capital flows determines the boundaries of global compute.
Context: Geopolitics Has Become the True Source Code of AI
Layer 1 of the Deep Capital Stack shifts the entire framing of AI. It rejects the belief that frontier models are independent technological artifacts, and instead shows that compute is political, chips are diplomatic, and model development is downstream of national strategy (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
AI companies don’t operate in a neutral market.
They operate in a geopolitical grid that defines:
- access to silicon
- access to energy
- export control boundaries
- supply chain risk
- alliance protocols
- sovereign capital flows
This is why geopolitics sits at Layer 1:
it shapes all layers below it, from silicon to software.
The US Model: Network Expansion and Alliance Depth
The United States is executing a “breadth over depth” strategy built on multi-country coordination.
1. The Chip 4 Alliance
The Chip 4 grouping — US, Japan, Korea, Taiwan — collectively controls nearly every critical chokepoint in the semiconductor chain.
- US: design + capital
- Japan: equipment
- Korea: memory
- Taiwan: foundry
This alignment effectively defines the global silicon supply map (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
No commercial AI system escapes these chokepoints.
2. Cross-Hyperscaler Cooperation
A new phenomenon: hyperscalers cooperating across competitive boundaries.
- Google selling TPUs to Meta
- Microsoft + Nvidia + Anthropic aligning in multi-cloud configurations
- TPU sales targeting 10 percent of Nvidia’s revenue
This would have been unthinkable in cloud computing.
In AI, scale compels cooperation, not competition.
3. Sovereign Capital Integration
Allied sovereign wealth funds now function as geopolitical accelerators:
- SoftBank (Japan)
- MGX (UAE)
- PIF (Saudi)
These deployments create a bidirectional capital flow:
resource-rich nations fuel infrastructure, and tech-rich nations provide compute, silicon, and AI expertise (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
4. Open Protocols Within the Alliance
Unlike China’s closed-stack architecture, the US system relies on:
- interoperability standards
- shared security frameworks
- open-protocol data alignment
This creates network effects across allies, enabling faster expansion through protocol cohesion rather than vertical ownership.
The China Model: Vertical Integration and Strategic Autonomy
China’s AI architecture is the mirror opposite of the US.
1. Full Domestic Stack Control
China is building a system that minimizes exposure to US leverage points:
“Breadth from global partnerships” is replaced by “depth under sovereign control” (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
2. Efficiency Innovation Under Constraints
China’s frontier labs have been forced to innovate without access to premium Nvidia chips.
This led to:
- DeepSeek R1 training at $2.9M instead of $100M+
- Kimi K2 beating GPT-5 on BrowseComp (60.2 vs 54.9 percent)
- novel training efficiencies under pressure
Constraint-driven innovation is China’s competitive advantage.
3. Huawei as the National Champion
Huawei now spans:
- hardware (Ascend chips)
- software (MindSpore)
- cloud
- infrastructure
It is the only organization operating a full-stack AI industrial system under unified national coordination (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
4. Open-Source as a Competitive Weapon
China uses open-source as an export-control workaround:
- DeepSeek: open weights
- Kimi K2: modified MIT license
- Strategic adoption of “open release” as geopolitical leverage
The logic:
If export controls restrict silicon, release the software as a counter.
The Key Insight: Two Systems, Two Logics
The US and China are not playing the same game.
US Logic:
Network expansion
Breadth > depth
Allied interoperability
Open protocols
Distributed power
Economic elasticity
China Logic:
Vertical sovereignty
Depth > breadth
Domestic stack control
Efficiency innovation
Unified national leadership
Whole-of-system coherence (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new)
This divergence is structural, not tactical.
It defines how each nation will build, scale, and defend AI capability over the next decade.
What to Watch
1. Export Control Effectiveness vs Efficiency Innovation
Can US restrictions slow China?
Or will China’s constraint-driven breakthroughs accelerate instead?
2. Alliance Cohesion Under Economic Pressure
Allies share protocols —
but do they share risk?
3. Taiwan Semiconductor Dependencies
Taiwan remains the single point of failure in global silicon.
4. Open-Source Parity vs Proprietary Moats
As open models outperform, how defensible are premium frontier labs?
Enterprise Implications
Geopolitics is no longer optional context — it is core to AI strategy.
- AI budgets must factor in alliance dependencies.
- Data sovereignty frameworks will shape deployment choices.
- Supplier diversification becomes mandatory.
- Dual-track strategies (US + China) may be required, especially for multinationals (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
If you don’t know where your compute lives,
you don’t have an AI strategy.
Key Moves to Track (November 2025)
- Google TPUs sold externally at scale
- MS/Nvidia/Anthropic $45B alliance
- Kimi K2’s benchmark leadership
- Stargate’s $500B sovereign-backed expansion (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new)
These moves represent tectonic shifts, not incremental ones.
The Bottom Line
Layer 1 determines everything.
It defines the rules of access, the flow of capital, the boundaries of innovation, and the ceiling of national AI ambition.
The US and China are building two different systems, and every company, model lab, investor, and nation must now choose how to navigate them (as per analysis by the Business Engineer on https://businessengineer.ai/p/this-week-in-business-ai-the-new).
You cannot understand AI strategy without understanding geopolitics.
This is the new foundation.
More Resources
