
We now have four Anthropic data sources published in under 60 days, forming the most complete empirical picture of human-AI collaboration capability available anywhere.
The question they collectively answer is not whether people are using AI. It is whether they are getting better at it — in what specific ways, with what structural consequences for how work is organized, and with what implications for where this AI paradigm is actually heading.
The answer is yes and no. And the distinction between those two answers is where the strategic insight lives.
Most analyses of AI’s economic impact start from model capability and reason forward. This one starts from observed behavior — what millions of people actually do when they use AI — and reasons backward to the shape of the paradigm. The behavioral data is more constraining than the capability data. It tells us not what AI can do, but what it is actually doing, and how the humans on the other side are responding.
Join 90,000+ strategists. Business model analysis, AI maps, and earnings deep dives — free.









