A fascinating divergence has emerged in tech market structure: consumer markets are becoming more winner-take-all, while enterprise markets are fragmenting. Understanding why reveals fundamental differences in how network effects operate across segments.

In consumer tech, concentration is accelerating. The top 5 apps capture an ever-larger share of screen time. The top 3 e-commerce platforms dominate an expanding pie. Social networks exhibit classic winner-take-most dynamics as network effects compound.
Enterprise Is Different
Enterprise markets show the opposite pattern. Despite predictions of consolidation, the number of SaaS vendors continues to grow. Best-of-breed solutions outcompete suites. Specialization trumps integration. Why?
The difference lies in switching costs and network effects. Consumer products benefit from direct network effects—the product is more valuable because others use it. Enterprise products rarely have this dynamic. Your CRM isn’t more useful because your competitor uses the same CRM.
Instead, enterprise products face heterogeneous needs that resist standardization. Every company’s workflow is different. The platform approach that works for consumers—one product serving all—fails when customers genuinely need different solutions.
Strategic Implications
For investors, this divergence demands different frameworks. Consumer tech investments should weight market structure heavily—betting against the leader is usually wrong. Enterprise investments should weight product differentiation—the market can support many winners.
For founders, the lesson is equally clear. Consumer startups face brutal concentration dynamics; enterprise startups can carve durable niches. The same effort yields very different probability distributions.
For more on market structure analysis, read The Business Engineer.









