The Five Defensible Moats in AI


The Real Test of Defensibility

The central question introduced in the full essay is simple and brutal:

If incumbents copied your product tomorrow—with unlimited resources—would your users stay?

Only moats that compound with usage, deepen with time, or embed into workflow and organizations can survive the awakened giants.

The five moats below are the only structural advantages that scale as fast as AI improves.


MOAT 1 — Data Network Effects

The strongest and most nonlinear moat.

Mechanism
Every user interaction generates proprietary data signals that strengthen the model, which improves the product, which attracts more users, which generates more data.

A compounding loop that Big Tech cannot replicate retroactively.

This aligns with the article’s framing:

“Usage creates the moat. Time strengthens it. Incumbents cannot buy history.”

Why it survives giants

  • Historical data is time-locked.
  • Behavioral patterns, writing signatures, and task-specific corrections become proprietary.
  • Reinforcement from usage compounds daily.

The Flywheel
Usage → Data → Better Model → More Usage → Wider Moat

Examples
Cursor (coding patterns), Grammarly (writing), GitHub Copilot.


MOAT 2 — Workflow Lock-in

The operating-system moat, not the feature moat.

Mechanism
Deep integration into day-to-day workflows creates massive switching costs.
Users must retrain teams, rebuild processes, migrate data, and re-automate everything.

In the article, this is summarized as:

“Incumbents can clone features. They can’t clone your place in the workflow.”

Why it survives giants

  • Retraining costs are high.
  • Automation chains break when switching tools.
  • Integration rebuilding becomes prohibitive.

The Flywheel
Deeper Integration → More Automation → Higher Switching Cost → Stickier Users

Examples
Notion AI, Figma AI, Linear, Slack automations, Zapier AI.


MOAT 3 — Community Moat

The network becomes the product.

Mechanism
A passionate user community produces templates, prompts, tutorials, workflows, best practices, culture, and identity.
This creates value the company itself could never manufacture.

As noted in the original essay:

“Community output compounds faster than product output.”

Why it survives giants

  • Culture can’t be copied.
  • Shared learning and identity create emotional lock-in.
  • Community-generated assets scale faster than enterprise R&D.

The Flywheel
More Members → More Content → More Value → Stronger Identity → More Members

Examples
Midjourney (Discord), Hugging Face, Replit, Stable Diffusion.


MOAT 4 — Specialization Depth

Go deep where giants can only go wide.

Mechanism
Domain expertise + specialized workflows + niche language + industry-specific edge cases create a moat giants avoid.
Generalist models fail in the “last mile” of implementation.

From the full essay:

“Depth beats breadth. The deeper you go, the more irreplaceable you become.”

Why it survives giants

  • Niche markets are too small for hyperscalers.
  • Expertise compounds with every solved edge case.
  • Trust is domain-specific.

The Flywheel
Domain Use → Better Domain Model → Industry Trust → More Domain Use

Examples
Harvey (legal), Abridge (medical), Runway (video), Jasper (marketing).


MOAT 5 — Enterprise Relationships

The trust moat that takes years to build and seconds to lose.

Mechanism
Multi-year contracts, procurement hurdles, compliance reviews, and deep organizational integrations create enormous inertia.
Ripping out an incumbent AI vendor is a multi-quarter project.

The underlying insight, as stated in the essay:

“Once you’re inside a Fortune 500, the cost of replacing you becomes politically and operationally catastrophic.”

Why it survives giants

  • Champions have personal stakes.
  • Procurement teams avoid redoing 18 months of evaluation.
  • Legal and security approvals become reusable vendor passports.

The Flywheel
Longer Tenure → Deeper Integration → More Custom Work → Higher Switching Cost → Renewal

Examples
Cohere (enterprise), Anthropic Enterprise, Writer, Glean.


The Strategic Insight

Together, these five moats answer the defensibility question in the age of AI acceleration.
As argued in The Five Defensible Moats in AI:

“Feature moats die. Structural moats scale. The only sustainable moats are those that deepen every day your users engage.”

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA