
Nvidia’s B200 GPU costs approximately $6,400 to produce but sells for $30,000-$40,000 – an implied chip-level gross margin of roughly 82%. Yet this extraordinary margin obscures a more nuanced reality: Nvidia’s pricing power depends on supply chain constraints it does not control.
The Bill of Materials Surprise
The breakdown reveals an unexpected cost structure:
HBM Memory: $2,900 (45% of cost)
Advanced Packaging: $1,100 (17%)
Yield Loss: $1,000 (16%)
Logic Die (GPU silicon): $900 (14%)
Other: $500 (8%)
The counterintuitive finding: The actual GPU silicon – 208 billion transistors across two ~800mm squared dies fabricated on TSMC’s 4NP process – represents less than one-sixth of total production cost.
Where Value Really Concentrates
Nvidia’s chip design brilliance is real, but the bill of materials shows that memory and packaging dominate the economics. The silicon – Nvidia’s core intellectual property – accounts for just 14% of the total.
This inverts intuitive assumptions about semiconductor value. The chip itself isn’t the expensive part – the memory and the assembly are.
The Margin Architecture
If the B200 sells at $30,000-$40,000 with a $6,400 production cost, chip-level gross margins exceed 75-80%. But this excludes R&D amortization. Jensen Huang stated Nvidia’s Blackwell R&D budget totaled approximately $10 billion.
If Nvidia ships 2 million B200 units in 2025, R&D cost per unit is $5,000 – nearly doubling effective production cost.
Key Takeaway
As the AI Memory Chokepoint shows, Nvidia’s margins depend on memory pricing dynamics it doesn’t control. The headline margins obscure structural vulnerability.
Source: The Economics of the GPU on The Business Engineer









