Business Pill 32 · Why the lifetime of a chip matters
Capital spending is spread over the years an asset is expected to last. For AI chips, a small change in assumed lifetime moves billions between years.
A short explainer video. The numbers in it are round numbers for illustration.
Two Kinds of Spending
Companies spend money in two ways. Some spending is used up at once: salaries, electricity, rent. That is operating expense.
Other spending buys something that lasts for years: a building, a machine, a chip. That is capital expenditure, capex.
Depreciation
Capex is not counted as a cost all at once. It is spread over the years the asset is expected to last. That yearly slice is called depreciation.
A Worked Example
The video uses round numbers. A company buys chips for $6 billion. If it assumes they last six years, the cost is $1 billion a year. If it assumes three years, the cost is $2 billion a year. Same chips, same cash, very different profit.
And the lifetime is a judgment. Nobody knows for certain how long an AI chip stays useful. It may keep working for 10 years. But if a newer chip does the same job for a third of the power, the old one may stop earning much sooner.

Why It Matters
This is why depreciation is watched so closely in AI. The spending is enormous, and a small change in the assumed lifetime moves billions between years.
The cash leaves on day one. The cost appears slowly, over years. So for a while, profit can look healthy while the cash is already gone.
Three Questions to Ask
- How much is being spent on assets?
- Over how many years is it spread?
- What happens if those assets age faster than planned?
See It in the News
Lambda’s $1B GPU Loan Is Underwritten by Contracts, Not Chips. A news piece on financing GPUs against contracts rather than the chips themselves.
More Business Pills
- The Memory Wall: Why a Faster AI Chip Is Not Faster AI
- Tokens per Watt: What an AI Data Centre Actually Produces
- Why AI Can’t Be Both Instant and Cheap: Latency vs Throughput
- The Model and the Harness: Why Same-Model Products Differ
- Context, Not Capability: Why a Smart AI Model Gives Poor Answers
- Discardable Software: When Code Is Cheap Enough to Throw Away
- Human in the Loop vs Human on the Loop: Supervising AI Agents
- The AI Audit Problem: When Making Work Is Cheaper Than Checking It
- AI Evaluation as Acceptance Test: How to Know It’s Good Enough
- Extensibility Is Control: Who Holds the Power in an AI Product
- RLHF Explained: How an AI Model Learns What People Prefer
- Pretraining Explained: How an AI Model Learns Before Anyone Teaches It
- Fine-Tuning Explained: How to Adapt a General AI Model to One Job
- Tokens Explained: The Unit AI Reads, Writes and Bills In
- Embeddings Explained: How a Machine Compares Meaning
- RAG Explained: How a Model Answers From Your Documents
- AI Hallucination Explained: Why Models State False Things
- Distillation Explained: How a Small Model Learns From a Large One
- Reasoning Models Explained: What Changes When AI Thinks First
- Tool Use Explained: How an AI Model Goes From Text to Action
- Run-Rate Revenue Explained: What an AI Company’s Number Means
- Backlog Explained: Revenue That Is Signed but Not Yet Earned
- Switching Costs Explained: Why It Is Hard to Leave an AI Supplier
- Temperature Explained: The Dial That Sets How Predictable an AI Model Is
- Guardrails Explained: Rules Enforced Around an AI Model, Not Inside It
- Benchmarks Explained: Why a Test Score Is Not Your Own Result
- Agent Memory Explained: How an AI Assistant Remembers You Between Chats
- MCP Explained: The Shared Plug That Connects AI Models to Tools
- Quantization Explained: How a Large AI Model Is Shrunk to Fit
- Parameters Explained: Where an AI Model’s Knowledge Lives
- Scaling Laws Explained: Why AI Labs Keep Building Bigger
- Synthetic Data Explained: When a Model Writes Its Own Training Examples
- Transformers and Attention Explained: How AI Reads Every Word at Once







