The Structural Picture: Ceiling vs. Floor Profiles

The Structural Picture: Ceiling vs. Floor Profiles

What the Questions Reveal Together

The five questions are not independent. They interact and compound to reveal structural reality.

Strong Ceiling Profile (4-5 Yes Answers)

  • AI cannot easily replicate—value comes from integration and data
  • Switching cost exceeds 24 months due to services investment and integrations
  • The product is the system of record for critical business data
  • 20-40% services revenue demonstrates organizational embedding
  • Data gravity compounds—5-year customers far more locked-in than 1-year customers

Weak or Vulnerable Profile (3 Yes Answers)

  • One or two structural weaknesses exist that competitors can exploit
  • May be able to maintain Ceiling position with exceptional execution
  • Requires ongoing investment in deepening the moat
  • Remains vulnerable to well-funded competitors with stronger structural positions

Floor Profile (0-2 Yes Answers)

  • AI can replicate core functionality
  • Switching costs are low enough to be a routine decision
  • The product is a tool, not a system
  • Self-service model with minimal services
  • Data value is static, not compounding

The Compound Effects

AI replicability + low switching cost = Rapid commoditization. Even current customers can be poached.

System of record + compounding data gravity = Deepening moat. The fortress gets stronger every year.

Services layer + deep integrations = Organizational embedding. Load-bearing infrastructure through human investment.


This is part of a comprehensive analysis. Read the full analysis on The Business Engineer.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA