The Positioning Diagnostic for AI Startups

Two Questions That Determine Your Quadrant | Know Where You Stand

The entire Startup Positioning Matrix rests on two structural forces: defensibility and incumbent attention.
You don’t need a 50-slide strategy deck to figure out where you are.
You need two brutally honest answers.

Your survival probability changes the moment your answers change.

This diagnostic gives you the fastest way to place yourself in the matrix from the full framework at businessengineer.ai/p/the-startup-positioning-matrix.


Test 1: Defensibility Assessment

“If Google or Microsoft copied your product tomorrow with unlimited resources — would your users switch?”

This is the only question that matters for defensibility because it removes excuses, narratives, and founder optimism.

If users would leave, you haven’t built moats.
If users would stay, you have the foundation for compounding advantage.

YES → Low Defensibility
NO → High Defensibility

This is not philosophical. It’s mechanical.
It’s the same lens used in the Defensibility Test embedded throughout the full matrix.


Test 2: Attention Assessment

“Is your market large enough to appear on incumbent product roadmaps? Would capturing your entire TAM move the needle for a $1T company?”

This determines whether you’re being watched.

If the market is big enough for giants to care, you’re in the danger zone.
If the market is too small or too vertical to matter to them, you’re under the radar.

YES → High Attention
NO → Low Attention

This test is the precise mechanism behind why some markets invite war and others enable compounding.


Your Diagnostic Results

Combine Test 1 + Test 2 to find your quadrant — and your survival probability.

1. SWEET SPOT

Test 1: NO (High Defense)
Test 2: NO (Low Attention)

This is the optimal position in the matrix.
Low visibility + strong moats = compounding advantage and ~70%+ survival probability.
Deep workflow integration, strong user retention, and niche markets below the giant radar.

You can stay here for years if you resist the temptation to widen your TAM prematurely.


2. BATTLEFIELD

Test 1: NO (High Defense)
Test 2: YES (High Attention)

A viable but expensive position.
You have real moats, but you’re in a market large enough that giants are deploying resources against you.

Strong companies survive here — but they spend capital like oxygen.
Survival probability ~40%.

This is a war of attrition, not a race of innovation.


3. WAITING ROOM

Test 1: YES (Low Defense)
Test 2: NO (Low Attention)

Temporary, unstable, and time-sensitive.
You’re ignored by incumbents because you’re not yet valuable enough to notice — but you have no real defensibility.

This is the race-to-build-moats zone.
You must move up before either:

  1. incumbents notice your market, or
  2. competitors build deeper moats and outpace you.

Survival probability ~15%.

Clock is ticking.


4. KILL ZONE

Test 1: YES (Low Defense)
Test 2: YES (High Attention)

This is terminal.
Large market. Zero moats. Maximum visibility.

Features get copied in weeks.
Distribution crushes you.
Only exits are acqui-hire or death.

Survival probability ~0%.

Escape immediately: either move into a niche or build moats fast enough to change your quadrant.

Scroll to Top

Discover more from FourWeekMBA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

FourWeekMBA